Poha Kea Point 4-4
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Poha Kea Point 4-4
Building Overview
Poha Kea Point 4-4 in Kaneohe; built 1990 with concrete construction. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Poha Kea Point 4-4
Poha Kea Point 4-4 is a condominium building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, built in 1990 with concrete construction. Size and unit-level square footage are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company for the property is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional information such as parking, maintenance fees, on-site amenities, and other building policies are not specified in the MLS records provided. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, current policies, and fee information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is directly confirmed in the remarks, including the phrase 'Also included with the common expenses is your sewer, water, cable TV.' This is repeated across multiple listings and appears to be reliable building-level information rather than a one-off unit feature.
The listings mention broad HOA coverage and amenities, but none specifically identify common area electricity, common electric, or building power as included. Because this feature is not explicitly supported in the public remarks, it should not be treated as verified from the text alone.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not explicitly mentioned in any of the remarks, while the current MLS data shows WTRHTR in 5/6 listings and HOTWAT in only 1/6. That combination suggests hot water is likely not a building-paid fee item here.
Internet is not supported by the public remarks. The listings are explicit about other included utilities, but none mention internet service or wifi as part of the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Sewer is directly verified by the remarks and appears to apply at the building level. The phrase is explicit and repeated in the context of HOA/common expenses, making this strong evidence.
Water is directly confirmed in the public remarks as part of the common expenses. This is strong, repeated building-level evidence rather than a speculative MLS checkbox.
BBQ is strongly supported by both MLS and remarks. Multiple listings mention shared BBQ amenities, including one that lists "BBQ" alongside other community features. This looks consistent across agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse is strongly confirmed. The remarks repeatedly list "clubhouse" among resort-style amenities, matching the MLS data across all listings. This is high-confidence and consistent.
No analysis available
Dog park is not supported by the remarks and appears in only one MLS listing. The public comments only say the building is pet-friendly, which does not establish a shared dog park or pet area. This looks like an unreliable MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence for a meeting room. Although the MLS checkbox appears in 3/6 listings, the public remarks do not describe any meeting or conference space, suggesting this may be agent copy/paste noise rather than a verified amenity.
5 of 6 current listings show PATDEC/COVPAT in MLS amenities, and multiple public remarks explicitly mention a "covered lanai" or "open lanai." Phrases like "perfect for dining al fresco" and "the open lanai is the perfect spot" strongly support building-level patio/deck-style outdoor space. The evidence is consistent across several listings and aligns with the current MLS checkbox data.
Walking/jogging paths are very well supported. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "walking & jogging paths" or "walk jog paths," matching the MLS across all listings. This is a strong shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is supported by both the MLS and the remarks. One listing explicitly says "rec area," and another notes "recreation area" among the community amenities. This appears to be a real shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is strongly confirmed. Several listings explicitly mention "Saunas" or "dry sauna," aligning perfectly with the MLS data across all listings. This is a high-confidence shared amenity.
Storage is only weakly supported here: 1 of 6 MLS listings checked a storage-related box in amenities and 1 of 6 in unit features, but 0 of the public remarks mention a storage locker, extra storage, or additional storage space. Because the remarks are silent and the MLS data appears inconsistent, confidence is low.
No analysis available
Tennis courts are clearly supported. Remarks in multiple listings mention "tennis courts," matching the MLS pattern across most listings. The evidence is consistent and high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool is supported primarily by the MLS, which lists it in all 6/6 entries. One public remark mentions "whirl, dry sauna," suggesting the spa/whirlpool amenity is real, though the wording is abbreviated. Overall confidence is high but slightly below the most explicit features.
Pool access is strongly confirmed for this building. All 6 listings have pool-related MLS amenities, and every set of public remarks mentions it directly, often with specifics like "multiple pools" or "3 swimming pools." This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building amenity, not a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry. One remark explicitly states "in-unit washer/dryer," and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 5 of 6 listings. The repeated inclusion across multiple listings suggests this is a real and commonly offered feature in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available in the building, with all 6/6 MLS listings showing parking features and multiple public remarks calling out "2 parking" or "2 dedicated parking spaces." The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, not just a single remark.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "assigned," "dedicated," or describe reserved-type stalls, indicating this is a building-level feature available to buyers.
Covered parking is supported by explicit remark evidence and by MLS parking feature data in all 6/6 listings. One listing says "1 covered 1 open," which confirms at least some units have covered stalls.
I found clear evidence of assigned/dedicated parking, which confirms parking exists, but not that it is deeded with the unit. I specifically looked for terms like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed," and none appeared.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as a monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge. The remarks only describe assigned and dedicated spaces, so no parking fee can be confirmed.
Guest parking is evidenced by the phrase "ample guest stalls for visitors," and the MLS data shows guest parking in 4/6 listings. That suggests guest parking is available in the building, though not every listing mentions it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list for parking, or limited parking that requires waiting. The remarks instead describe assigned and dedicated parking, with no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security guard service is strongly supported. 2 of the provided remarks explicitly mention '24 Hour Security' or '24 hour security,' and the current MLS amenities checkbox is set in 5/6 listings, suggesting the feature is present and consistently advertised rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers split AC in some or many units. At least 4 listings explicitly mention it, including detailed phrasing like 'smart split AC throughout,' 'installed split AC with permits,' and 'split A/Cs in every room,' which suggests this is not a copy-paste checkbox issue. Current MLS data also supports it with ACSPL checked in 5 of 6 listings.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 of 5 listings mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or any equivalent construction detail. The descriptions repeatedly emphasize views, split-level layout, and interior upgrades, which suggests the construction material checkbox is not supported by the public remarks.
0 of 5 listings mention double wall construction. The public remarks instead discuss unit condition, views, AC, and community amenities, which is not enough to validate this structural feature.
No analysis available
None of the 5 remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. The language appears generic and amenity-focused, so this looks like an unchecked-in-reality MLS material field rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks identify the building as above-ground construction. The evidence is absent across all 5 listings, so the checkbox is not validated by the public listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR permission language such as "short-term rental allowed," "STR permitted," "NUC," or "TVU," but found nothing. With no supportive language in the remarks, STR allowance is not established.
I looked for hotel rental pool references like "hotel program," "managed by hotel," or branded pool participation, but found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must also be false.
I searched for language indicating a mandatory rental pool, required participation, or inability to opt out. The remarks contain no rental program references at all, so there is no basis to mark this true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording like "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension year, but the remarks do not mention land tenure at all. Without a specific year, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found nothing. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence this building is VA-approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for ocean views. All 6 MLS listings show OCEAN in the view field, and the remarks repeatedly describe 'ocean views,' 'incredible ocean views,' and views from the lanai, living room, and primary bedroom. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just copy-paste noise.
Mountain views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. Four of six listings include mountain-related view descriptions, and several remarks explicitly reference 'Koolau Mountain' and 'Ko'olau Mountains' alongside ocean or bay views. This indicates the feature is available in some units at the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are supported by the current MLS view data, with 4 of 6 listings showing COASTL. The public remarks emphasize ocean, bay, and mountain vistas, so the coastline aspect is inferred primarily from MLS rather than explicit agent language. This is enough to include the feature for buyers searching for it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be a real building-level feature based on MLS view data. Five of six listings include SUNSET in the view field, but the remarks here focus on ocean, bay, and mountain views rather than sunset specifically. The evidence is strong from MLS, though less directly confirmed in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is very strong that the building has a resident manager on-site. The current MLS data shows 6/6 listings including RESMAN, and several remarks independently mention "Resident Mgr." in the amenity list. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.