Poha Kea Point 4
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Poha Kea Point 4
Building Overview
Poha Kea Point 4 in Kaneohe, built 1990; no pets and no short-term rentals per MLS records.
About Poha Kea Point 4
Poha Kea Point 4 is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, originally constructed in 1990. Based on available MLS data, specific details on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the listing records.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list building amenities or common-area features; the management company is recorded as unknown in the provided information.
Additional details commonly important to buyers—such as parking allocation, maintenance/association fees, utility arrangements, and any special assessments—are not included in the MLS data supplied. This summary is based on MLS data only; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for a specific owner-occupancy percentage or clear majority-owner-occupied language such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied,' but none was provided. Remarks like 'owner residents' and 'original owner' suggest some owner occupancy, but they do not establish a percentage.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators'), generic wording ('multiple elevators'), or any indication that the building has elevators, and found none. Because there is no explicit evidence in the public remarks, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in the maintenance fee for a meaningful share of listings: 12 of 19 current MLS records check CABTV. The public remarks are silent on cable, so this is driven primarily by MLS data and may reflect agent copy/paste, but the repetition across listings is still suggestive.
Common-area electricity is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 16 of 19 current listings including OTCOEX. There are no contrary remarks, and the consistency across many listings suggests this is a genuine building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is unlikely to be included in the maintenance fee. Only 2 of 19 current listings check HOTWAT, while 17 of 19 list WTRHTR, a strong pattern that points away from centralized hot water service.
Internet/service appears in a substantial minority of current MLS listings, with 9 of 19 checking INTSER. Because the remarks do not mention internet, this is best treated as a moderate-confidence inclusion rather than a fully confirmed one.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is confirmed across the building: all 19 current MLS listings include SEWER. With complete consistency and no contrary remarks, this is a very strong building-level fee inclusion.
Water inclusion is confirmed across the building: all 19 current MLS listings include WATER. This is highly reliable and consistent, with no contradictory evidence in the public remarks.
BBQ/grilling facilities are consistently confirmed across the building. Multiple listings mention 'picnic & BBQ areas,' 'BBQ areas,' and 'hosting a BBQ,' which strongly suggests this is a shared amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remark provides evidence of a car wash station or auto-wash area. The listings focus on parking and garages, which does not support this feature.
Clubhouse access is strongly confirmed for this community. The remarks directly say the clubhouse is 'enjoyed for meetings or hosting a gathering,' which is consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
There is no direct evidence of a dedicated dog park in the remarks. The listings consistently say 'pet-friendly,' but that is not the same as a dog park, so this appears to be an MLS overcheck rather than a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No public remarks across the 15 listings mention an exercise room, fitness center, gym, or workout room, while only 1/15 MLS records list EXEROO—an isolated checkbox likely from copy/paste. Given lack of corroborating remarks or multiple agents mentioning it, there is low evidence the building offers a shared exercise room.
No analysis available
A distinct meeting room is not heavily documented, but there is explicit wording tying the clubhouse to meetings and gatherings. This reads more like a shared community/clubhouse space than a formal conference room, so confidence is solid but not high.
Strong building-level evidence supports patio/deck amenities at Poha Kea Point. Multiple listings mention lanais or covered lanais, including "expansive tiled lanai," "double open lanais," "covered lanai," and "large private lanai," showing consistent outdoor living space across units. This appears to be corroborated by many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
Walking/jogging path access is clearly supported by the listings. Multiple remarks use direct wording like 'walking and jogging paths' and 'designated walking/jogging paths,' which makes this a strong shared feature.
No analysis available
There is no meaningful remark support for private yard space across the listings. One description mentions a 'private garden in the common area,' but that reads as shared grounds, not a private yard, and the rest of the remarks focus on lanais, landscaping, and views. Overall this appears to be an isolated MLS checkbox entry rather than a real building feature.
No analysis available
Recreation-area language appears multiple times across the listings. The remarks reference 'recreation spaces' and 'recreational areas,' supporting this as a shared amenity even if not every agent uses the same wording.
No clear evidence of a dedicated recreation room appears in the remarks. The language used is broader—such as recreation areas, clubhouse, and places for gathering—so this does not support a true rec-room feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna access is strongly supported by the remarks and MLS history. Listings reference multiple sauna variants, including 'red light sauna' and 'infrared sauna,' confirming this as a shared amenity.
Storage is strongly supported for Poha Kea Point across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention storage or extra storage space, including "garage with storage," "built in closet/storage space in the garage," "generous lanai with storage," and "Additional Room for Storage." The evidence appears consistent across several listings and agents rather than a one-off copy-paste artifact.
I searched for surfboard-specific storage references in the public remarks. The listings mention garage storage and general storage, but nothing indicates dedicated surfboard storage.
Tennis access is clearly supported by both MLS history and the remarks. The amenity appears repeatedly across listings, making this a reliable shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub access is well supported by the remarks and MLS history. Several listings mention hot tubs, spa, or whirlpool directly, indicating this is a legitimate community amenity.
Pool access is strongly confirmed for Poha Kea Point. The current public remarks mention it in many listings, often in consistent shared-amenity language such as "sparkling pool," "three pools," and "swimming pool," indicating a building/community amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. This is reinforced across multiple agents and appears highly reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit salt-water pool wording. The building is repeatedly described as having pools and spas, but none of the remarks identify the pool as saltwater.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings and current remarks. At least 5 listings explicitly mention it, including exact wording such as "in-unit washer/dryer," "stacked washer and dryer," and "Washer & Dryer in Unit." This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for any public-remark language indicating coin laundry, paid laundry, or card/quarters-operated facilities. The remarks discuss in-unit laundry in some listings, but there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to community laundry facilities on each floor, such as 'laundry on every floor' or similar wording. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer in several units, but nothing indicates a shared laundry room on every floor.
Parking is clearly present throughout the building and is confirmed in the MLS history. Multiple current remarks mention parking in several forms, including shared garage, assigned stalls, and open stalls, which looks consistent across many agents rather than a one-off checkbox error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly reference assigned stalls/spaces, suggesting this is not a one-off agent error but a recurring building-level feature.
Covered parking is very well supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Listings repeatedly reference garages, enclosed garage parking, and covered stalls, indicating this is a standard building amenity available to buyers.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording such as deeded stall, owned parking, or parking included in the deed. The listings consistently describe assigned/shared/tandem stalls instead, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee references like monthly parking charge, parking rental, or added cost for parking. The remarks discuss parking configurations but do not mention any fee, so this is unknown.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed across multiple listings and agents. The recurring phrases 'tons of guest parking,' 'lots of guest parking,' and 'ample guest parking' align with the MLS history and support this as a true building amenity.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is explicitly mentioned in multiple current listings, even though it is not universal across the building. The remarks are specific and consistent—phrases like 'tandem open stall' and 'tandem parking spot behind the garage' strongly confirm the feature.
No analysis available
I looked for a parking waitlist or any language about joining a waiting list for stalls. The remarks do not mention one, and they describe available assigned/shared parking instead, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for public-remark evidence of card/fob-based building access. The remarks mention security patrol and 24-hour security, but do not reference any card-access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported for Poha Kea Point. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "24-hour security" and "security patrols the grounds," which aligns with the historical high-confidence MLS amenity data. This appears to be consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
There is strong public-remark evidence that the building has security patrol service. Multiple listings reference patrols on the grounds, including nighttime and weekend cart patrols, which directly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported for Poha Kea Point. At least 10+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention it using phrases like "split AC," "split A/C," "split ACs," and "ductless"-style individual comfort systems. The repeated mentions across different units and layouts indicate this is a real and marketable building feature, not just an MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building feature for Poha Kea Point, supported by 16 of 19 current listings. The remarks across multiple agents focus on views, layouts, and upgrades rather than construction type, so the MLS pattern is doing the heavy lifting here. This looks like repeated building-level data rather than a one-off checkbox.
Double wall construction is supported by a majority of current listings, though not explicitly described in the remarks. Because multiple agents show the same code, this looks more like a shared building attribute than an isolated entry. Confidence is solid but not as strong as the concrete signal.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is present in a meaningful share of the listings, but not overwhelmingly so. No public remarks explicitly use those terms, which suggests this is likely inherited MLS data rather than a frequently described feature. Still, the frequency is enough to treat it as a plausible building construction attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is weakly supported at best: fewer than half of the listings carry the code, and none of the remarks describe the building as above-ground. The evidence looks inconsistent and could reflect copy/paste MLS data rather than a confirmed property trait. I would not rely on this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed operations or branded rental programs. Nothing in the remarks supports a hotel pool, and because STR is not evidenced as allowed, this must be false.
I searched for wording that would indicate mandatory participation in a hotel or rental pool program. There are no such remarks, and with no evidence that STR is allowed, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, land lease to a year, or renewed/extended lease terms. Nothing in the remarks indicates a leasehold expiration year, so this remains unknown.
The building appears VA loan approved based on direct public remarks. Multiple listings reference VA assumable financing and one states the building is "VA approved," which is strong confirmation.
The remarks provide direct, repeated evidence that the building is fully insured, including explicit statements that it is "100% hurricane insured" and "fully insured." This is strong public-remarks support for walls-in/full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, FLSE compliance, or similar certification, and found nothing in the remarks. With no public-remarks evidence supporting this feature, it cannot be confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly established for this building. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention 'ocean views,' 'uninterrupted ocean views,' and 'Pacific Ocean,' showing consistent multi-agent support rather than a one-off claim.
Mountain views are strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings independently mention the Ko'olau/Koolau Mountains, 'lush mountains,' and 'panoramic' mountain views, indicating a consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline-style views are strongly supported across the building. Although the remarks usually say 'bay' or 'ocean' instead of 'coastline' verbatim, the repeated panoramic water-and-shoreline framing matches the high-confidence historical MLS pattern.
A smaller subset of listings (2 of 15 in current MLS view_descriptions) explicitly include garden views, and many remarks mention 'lush landscaping', 'private garden in the common area', or 'landscaped grounds'. This indicates some units offer garden/courtyard views, though the evidence is less pervasive than mountain/ocean mentions.
No analysis available
Marina-style views appear to exist for at least some units, but the evidence is much thinner than for ocean or mountain views. The only MLS signal is 1/18 listings, and current remarks mostly reference bay, harbor, or nearby He'eia Harbor rather than clearly saying a marina view. This suggests the feature may be present in a limited number of units, but it is not strongly supported.
Sunrise views appear to be available in some units rather than universally. The evidence is limited: only 3 of 17 MLS entries reference sunrise, and the clearest public remark is a single mention of 'sunrise coffee time.'
Sunset views are well supported by both MLS history and listing remarks. Several units explicitly advertise sunset-oriented lanais or sunset views, so this appears to be a real building-level offering rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements like 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from the lanai,' or similar from-unit viewing language. The remarks focus on bay, ocean, and mountain views, but do not mention fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
Resident manager appears to be a true building-level amenity at Poha Kea Point based on current MLS data: 15 of 19 listings include RESMAN. The public remarks provided here do not explicitly say "resident manager" or "on-site manager," but the consistent MLS checkbox evidence across many listings makes this a strong feature to keep enabled.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.