Poha Kea Point 4
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Poha Kea Point 4
Building Overview
Poha Kea Point 4 in Kaneohe, built 1990; no pets and no short-term rentals per MLS records.
About Poha Kea Point 4
Poha Kea Point 4 is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, originally constructed in 1990. Based on available MLS data, specific details on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the listing records.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list building amenities or common-area features; the management company is recorded as unknown in the provided information.
Additional details commonly important to buyers—such as parking allocation, maintenance/association fees, utility arrangements, and any special assessments—are not included in the MLS data supplied. This summary is based on MLS data only; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive wording such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found none. One remark mentions 'pristinely maintained by owner residents,' which suggests some owner occupancy, but it does not provide a measurable percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators'), 'multiple elevators,' or similar wording, but found none. Because this feature is only determined from remarks and no current value was provided, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is not supported by the public remarks. The MLS checkbox appears in a meaningful minority of current listings (13/20), but there are no explicit phrases like "cable included" or "cable in HOA" across the remarks, so this looks like inconsistent MLS input rather than a confirmed building-wide fee item.
Common-area electricity is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 17/20 current listings checking OTCOEX. While the remarks do not spell out "common area electricity," the building’s extensive shared amenities, security patrols, pools, and common facilities align with this fee item, and there is no contrary evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very unlikely to be included in the maintenance fee. Only 3/20 current MLS listings check HOTWAT, while 18/20 list WTRHTR in inclusions, and one public remark specifically notes a "newer appliances and water heater," which fits unit-supplied hot water rather than a building-paid hot water service.
Internet service is not confirmed by the remarks. The current MLS data shows only a minority of listings with INTSER (10/20), and none of the public remarks reference internet, WiFi, or a building-provided service, so this should not be treated as established.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is confirmed across the building. All current MLS listings include SEWER, and the public remarks provide no conflicting evidence, making this a very reliable building-level fee item.
Water inclusion is confirmed across the building. All 20/20 current MLS listings include WATER, and the public remarks do not contradict that pattern, so confidence is very high.
BBQ/grilling facilities are consistently confirmed across the building. Multiple listings mention phrases like "BBQs," "BBQ areas," "picnic & BBQ areas," and "hosting a BBQ," so this appears to be a shared amenity rather than agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remark provides evidence of a car wash station or auto-wash area. The listings focus on parking and garages, which does not support this feature.
Clubhouse access is strongly confirmed for this community. The remarks directly say the "clubhouse" is used for meetings or hosting gatherings, which is consistent with a shared amenity.
No analysis available
There is no direct evidence of a dedicated dog park in the remarks. The listings consistently say "pet-friendly" and mention places for pets to roam, but that is not the same as a dog park, so this appears to be an incorrect MLS amenity if checked.
No analysis available
No public remarks across the 15 listings mention an exercise room, fitness center, gym, or workout room, while only 1/15 MLS records list EXEROO—an isolated checkbox likely from copy/paste. Given lack of corroborating remarks or multiple agents mentioning it, there is low evidence the building offers a shared exercise room.
No analysis available
There is some evidence for a meeting room / community room function, but it is not consistently or explicitly described as a dedicated room. The strongest phrase is that the clubhouse is "enjoyed for meetings or hosting a gathering," which suggests this feature may exist but with less certainty than the clubhouse itself.
Strong evidence supports patio/deck amenities at Poha Kea Point. At least 15 listings and many current remarks mention lanais or covered lanais, suggesting this is a common building feature rather than a one-off agent checkbox. The language appears across multiple listings and agents, so this looks consistently supported rather than copy-paste error.
Walking/jogging path access is clearly supported by the listings. Multiple remarks use direct wording like "walking/jogging paths," "designated walking/jogging paths," and "acres of landscaped paths," showing this is a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
There is no meaningful remark support for private yard space across the listings. One description mentions a 'private garden in the common area,' but that reads as shared grounds, not a private yard, and the rest of the remarks focus on lanais, landscaping, and views. Overall this appears to be an isolated MLS checkbox entry rather than a real building feature.
No analysis available
Recreation-area language appears multiple times across the listings. Remarks reference "recreation spaces" and "recreational areas," supporting this as a real shared community feature.
No clear evidence of a dedicated recreation room appears in the remarks. The language used is broader—such as recreation areas, clubhouse, and places for gathering—so this does not support a true rec-room feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna access is strongly supported by the MLS history and the remarks. Multiple listings reference "sauna," including variants like "red light sauna" and "infrared sauna," which makes this feature highly reliable.
Storage is strongly supported for Poha Kea Point. Multiple current listings mention it in different contexts — garage storage, closet/storage space, additional storage room, and lanai storage — suggesting this is not a one-off copy/paste error. Combined with the prior MLS pattern, this is a high-confidence building feature.
I searched for surfboard storage references, including board storage and bike-and-surf storage. The remarks mention garage storage and closet/storage space, but nothing specifically indicates surfboard storage.
Tennis access is clearly supported by both MLS history and the remarks. The amenity appears repeatedly across listings, including direct references to "tennis courts" and "tennis/pickleball courts," making it highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub access is well supported by both the history and the remarks. Listings mention "three hot tubs," "whirlpool," "jacuzzi," and "spa," indicating this amenity is genuinely available in the community.
Pool access is strongly confirmed for Poha Kea Point. Current remarks mention it in many listings across different agents, with phrases like "multiple pools," "three pools," "a sparkling pool," and "swimming pool," which aligns with the high-confidence historical MLS data. The evidence appears consistent and building-wide rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I searched for any wording that would identify the pool as salt water. The listings mention multiple pools, spas, and hot tubs, but none describe the water type.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, including exact phrases such as "Whirlpool in-unit washer and dryer (2023)," "full-size stackable washer and dryer are included," "Washer & Dryer in Unit," and "stacked laundry." The evidence appears consistent across many listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks only reference in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "every floor," and "floor laundry." The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not confirm community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present throughout the building. Across the remarks, many listings mention "2 parking," "two stalls," "shared garage," "garage space," "tandem open stall," and "covered and open parking," which strongly confirms building-wide parking availability.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS history and the public remarks. Several listings explicitly say "two assigned parking spaces" or "2 assigned parking stalls," while others describe reserved-style tandem arrangements, indicating this is a recurring building feature.
Covered parking is very well supported. Numerous remarks reference garages, enclosed garage parking, and covered stalls, including phrases like "shared garage," "one car enclosed garage," and "one-covered and 1-open parking stall."
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed, but the listings only describe assigned/shared/tandem stalls. That supports parking access, but not deeded ownership of the stalls.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charges, rented stalls, or added parking costs. The remarks mention the number and type of parking stalls, but nothing about a separate fee.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed across multiple listings. The remarks consistently use phrases such as "tons of guest parking," "lots of guest parking," and "ample guest parking," suggesting this is a real, recurring amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is explicitly mentioned in multiple current listings, even though it is not universal across the building. The remarks are specific and consistent—phrases like 'tandem open stall' and 'tandem parking spot behind the garage' strongly confirm the feature.
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or instructions to join a parking list, but found none. The listings instead describe available assigned, guest, and tandem parking.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry or electronic access. The remarks mention 24-hour security and security patrols, but not a card-based access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported for Poha Kea Point. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "24-hour security" and "security patrols" on the grounds, which aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing SECGUA in 15/20 listings. The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single copied note.
This is directly confirmed in the public remarks. Multiple listings mention 24-hour security, and one explicitly says security patrols the grounds in carts during nighttime and weekends.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported for Poha Kea Point. At least 10+ current remarks explicitly mention it with phrases such as "split A/C system," "split ACs," and "split AC units," and one listing even notes a 2025 system upgrade. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and reads as genuine, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building feature for Poha Kea Point. Current MLS data supports it in 17 of 20 listings, which is strong building-level evidence even though the remarks do not explicitly say “concrete.”
Double wall construction is supported by 14 of 20 current listings, so buyers searching for that feature would reasonably consider this building. The remarks do not explicitly state “double wall,” but the MLS pattern is strong enough to treat it as present.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco shows up in 13 of 20 current listings, which suggests it is a real building feature for at least some units. The public remarks do not directly confirm the material, so this looks more like MLS-coded building data than agent-described detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is only weakly supported, appearing in 9 of 20 current listings. Because the remarks never describe the building as above ground and the code frequency is under half, this is low-confidence and may be a copy-paste MLS artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC/TVU, or hotel-style rental references, and found none. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental pool, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or hotel-managed operations, but found none. Since there is also no evidence of STR allowance, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental program, such as required pool membership or cannot opt out, but found nothing. With no evidence of STR or hotel-pool participation, mandatory pooling is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold," and any renewal/extension dates, but found nothing. No specific lease expiry year can be extracted from the public remarks.
The remarks repeatedly reference VA assumable loans and state the building is VA approved, which is direct public evidence that VA financing is accepted. This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings.
The remarks provide direct, repeated evidence that the building is fully insured, including explicit phrases like '100% hurricane insured' and 'Condo is fully insured.' This is strong enough to keep the feature true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE compliance, fire inspection pass, or similar certification, but the remarks do not mention any of these. With no explicit evidence in the listings, this should not be marked true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly established for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'ocean views,' 'stunning ocean and mountain views,' 'expansive ocean views,' and 'Premier Ocean Views,' showing consistent support across many agents rather than a one-off remark.
Mountain views are strongly supported across the building. Numerous listings independently describe 'Koolau Mountain,' 'Ko'olau Mountains,' 'mountain views from both floors,' and 'lush mountain views,' making this a highly consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline-style views are strongly supported across the building. While the remarks more often say 'bay,' 'ocean,' or 'waterfront' rather than the exact word 'coastline,' the repeated references to Kaneohe Bay, sandbar, and expansive coastal scenery make this feature very likely present.
A smaller subset of listings (2 of 15 in current MLS view_descriptions) explicitly include garden views, and many remarks mention 'lush landscaping', 'private garden in the common area', or 'landscaped grounds'. This indicates some units offer garden/courtyard views, though the evidence is less pervasive than mountain/ocean mentions.
No analysis available
Marina-style views appear to exist for at least some units, but the evidence is much thinner than for ocean or mountain views. The only MLS signal is 1/18 listings, and current remarks mostly reference bay, harbor, or nearby He'eia Harbor rather than clearly saying a marina view. This suggests the feature may be present in a limited number of units, but it is not strongly supported.
Sunrise views appear to be available in some units rather than universally. The evidence is limited: only 3 of 17 MLS entries reference sunrise, and the clearest public remark is a single mention of 'sunrise coffee time.'
Sunset views are well supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. Several listings explicitly advertise sunset-oriented lanais or sunset views, so this appears to be a real and marketable feature for the building.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to fireworks views from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks discuss bay, ocean, and mountain views, but nothing says fireworks can be viewed from the property.
No analysis available
Resident manager appears to be a real building-level amenity at Poha Kea Point based on MLS data: 16 of 20 listings include RESMAN. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, so this is supported primarily by the repeated MLS amenity flag rather than agent descriptions, but the consistency across listings is strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.