Poha Kea Point 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Poha Kea Point 3
Building Overview
Poha Kea Point 3 in Kaneohe — concrete building (1986); pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Poha Kea Point 3
Poha Kea Point 3 is located in the Kaneohe neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1986 and is of concrete construction. Specific information about building size, number of units, or floor count is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features recorded in MLS data include building construction type and policy restrictions: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as Unknown in MLS records. No additional amenity details (such as pool, gym, or common areas) are provided in the data supplied.
Additional practical details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, or association rules are not included in the provided MLS information. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify current policies, management contact, and any other specifics with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Some listings reference VA buyers and investment/rental potential but provide no statistics or qualitative statements about how many units are owner-occupied. The owner-occupancy percentage is therefore unknown from the available remarks.
Remarks describe multi-level townhomes/condos with references to stairs, ground-floor, and top-level access but never mention elevators. Without explicit evidence, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No public remarks mention cable being included and only 2/20 current MLS listings check CABTV. Evidence appears weak and likely agent checkbox usage; therefore cable-in-fees is not supported by the remarks.
Common area electricity is strongly confirmed at the building level. The current MLS data shows 20 out of 20 listings including OTCOEX, which is overwhelming evidence and far stronger than anything in the remarks. No remarks suggest this changed, so this appears to be a stable copy-paste-consistent building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be a building-wide maintenance-fee inclusion. Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOTWAT, and multiple remarks mention a tankless water heater or on-demand water heater, which is a strong sign the building is not providing hot water as an HOA-paid utility. The evidence supports false with high confidence.
Internet inclusion is not supported by the remarks and appears on only 2 of 20 current MLS listings, which is too weak for a building-level feature. The absence of any explicit internet mention suggests this may be copy-paste MLS noise rather than a verified HOA benefit.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strongly confirmed. All 20 current MLS listings include SEWER, and at least one remark explicitly says the HOA includes 'water, sewer, and more.' This looks like a stable building-level feature rather than an agent-specific checkbox error.
Water inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. All 20 current MLS listings include WATER, and the remarks are consistent with that pattern, including explicit language that the HOA includes water. This is high-confidence and appears consistent across listings.
BBQ is consistently confirmed across the building. Multiple listings mention “BBQ areas,” “BBQ grill,” “BBQ facilities,” and “barbecue pavilions,” showing clear cross-agent agreement rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is only moderately supported by MLS checkbox data, and the remarks do not provide direct confirmation. Because the current MLS records still show the amenity in many listings, it likely exists or is being carried inconsistently, but the public text does not validate it.
Clubhouse access is strongly confirmed. The remarks repeatedly use direct language like “clubhouse,” “two clubhouses,” and “club houses,” which aligns well with the MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
There is no public-remark support for a dog park or dog run anywhere in the listing set. Because the MLS checkbox appears only rarely and the remarks are otherwise silent, this is best treated as not present for buyer searches.
No analysis available
There is weak support for an exercise room: 2 of 20 listings have the MLS EXEROO amenity, but none of the remarks clearly describe a fitness center, gym, or workout room. This looks more like limited MLS checkbox usage than strong remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
Meeting-room evidence is limited but real. Only a small subset of listings mention a "meeting room" or similar community room language, so this appears to exist but is not widely advertised in the remarks.
Strong evidence that Poha Kea Point offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least 20+ listings mention a lanai, covered lanai, or covered patio, with phrases like "covered lanai," "spacious lanai," "private lanai," and "extra-large covered patio." The consistency across multiple listings and agents makes this a reliable building-level feature.
Jogging and walking paths are strongly confirmed. Multiple listings describe “walking paths,” “walking/jogging paths,” “walking trails,” and “jogging path,” making this one of the most consistent amenities in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area amenities are well supported across the building. Listings mention “recreation areas,” “rec center facilities,” and similar shared amenity zones, making this a strong building-level feature.
Support for a recreation-room style amenity is moderate. Several listings reference “rec center facilities” or a “meeting room,” but explicit “recreation room” language is uncommon, so this appears more implied than directly stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is clearly supported by the remarks and MLS history. Several listings directly mention “sauna,” including a specific “infrared sauna,” so this is a reliable building amenity.
Storage is strongly supported across the listing set and appears in multiple independent remarks, not just MLS checkboxes. At least several listings explicitly mention storage details such as "extra lanai storage," "bonus storage closet," "storage in the garage," and "ample storage space," indicating this is a real building/unit feature rather than copy-paste noise.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, and related amenity language and found nothing. The remarks mention general storage, lanai storage, and closets, but not a dedicated surfboard storage facility.
Tennis courts are clearly present and repeatedly confirmed. The remarks consistently describe “tennis courts” and “tennis/pickleball courts,” matching the MLS data across nearly every listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool-style amenities are well supported. The remarks repeatedly reference “hot tubs,” “jacuzzis,” and “whirlpools,” confirming the feature across multiple listings.
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building/community. Across the provided remarks, pool access is mentioned in many listings, often in shared-amenity language such as "three pools," "multiple swimming pools," "resort-style pool," and "pool and rec center facilities." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' or 'saline pool' language and found none. The listings mention multiple pools, hot tubs, jacuzzis, and resort-style amenities, but not the pool water type.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building. At least several listings explicitly mention it in remarks, including phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer," "full size washer/dryer," "washer/dryer in-unit," and "stacked washer and dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and matches the MLS inclusions, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or similar paid-laundry language and found no evidence. Multiple listings reference in-unit washer/dryer, which further reduces the likelihood of paid community laundry being a noted amenity.
I searched for wording like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or similar building-wide laundry descriptions and found nothing. The remarks instead mention in-unit washer/dryer in several listings, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present building-wide. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention “two parking stalls,” “2 parking spaces,” “one enclosed garage space and one open stall,” and similar phrasing, confirming this is not just a checkbox artifact.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS history and remarks. Several listings explicitly describe assigned stalls/spots, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than occasional copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly documented across the listings. Remarks include multiple direct references to covered stalls, an enclosed garage, and covered parking, matching the MLS data very closely.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded stall, owned parking, or parking included in the deed and found none. The listings describe assigned and included stalls, but that is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking fees, additional parking charges, or parking rental terms, but found no references. The remarks discuss parking availability and stall types, not a separate parking cost.
Guest parking is very well documented across the listings. Multiple agents independently mention guest parking availability, which is consistent with the near-universal MLS indication.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is explicitly mentioned in a smaller subset of listings, but the remarks are clear: phrases like "one enclosed garage space and one open stall, tandem" and "a second stall tandem in the driveway" confirm the layout. This suggests tandem parking is available in some units rather than building-wide for all units.
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as waitlist, waiting list, or joining a queue for parking and found nothing. The listings instead describe assigned stalls and guest parking, which suggests no public evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card, fob, keycard, or electronic access wording. While the remarks do not clearly say 'card access,' the explicit mention of keyless entry provides moderate evidence for an electronic access security system.
Security guard/service is strongly supported at Poha Kea Point. Roughly 14+ listings mention it directly in remarks with phrases like "24-hour security," "24/7 security," and "security patrols," across multiple agents and unit types. The MLS amenity checkbox and the remarks are aligned, so this appears to be a genuine building-wide feature.
There is repeated direct evidence for patrol-style security service across multiple listings. This is strong, explicit support for security patrol being present at the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported across the listings: well over 10 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases such as 'new Split A/C servicing downstairs main living area and both upstairs bedrooms,' 'split A/C units in every room,' '3 split AC units installed 2025,' and 'Fujitsu split AC.' The evidence comes from multiple listings and agents, not just a copied checkbox, so confidence is very high that some units in this building offer split/ductless AC.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a real building-level feature for Poha Kea Point. Current MLS data supports it in 16 of 20 listings, while the public remarks are silent on construction type and read like standard copy-paste marketing rather than material verification.
The building has some MLS support for double-wall construction, with 9 of 20 current listings marked DOUWAL. However, none of the public remarks mention 'double wall,' so this remains only moderately supported rather than strongly confirmed by narrative remarks.
Evidence for hollow tile is limited: 5 of 20 current listings include HOLTIL, and none of the public remarks explicitly describe hollow tile or hollow-tile construction. This looks like weak MLS-driven evidence without independent confirmation from agents or site-site remarks.
Masonry/stucco construction has moderate-to-strong MLS support for Poha Kea Point, with 14 of 20 current listings marked MASSTU. The public remarks do not explicitly mention masonry or stucco, so this is supported primarily by the MLS pattern rather than narrative confirmation. The repeated marking across listings suggests it is likely a real building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction has moderate MLS support for Poha Kea Point, with 14 of 20 listings checked ABOGRO. The public remarks do not explicitly mention above-ground materials or construction, so this appears to be MLS-driven evidence rather than confirmed by agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental permissions, but found none. Based only on the public remarks, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style programs or any managed hotel rental structure and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR allowance in the remarks, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, required rental program enrollment, or inability to opt out, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool program, mandatory pooling is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as lease expiry year, ground lease, leasehold expiring, renewed through, or lease extended, but found nothing. With no specific year mentioned, the lease expiry remains unknown from these remarks.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA financing eligibility for this building. Several listings mention VA approval, and others advertise assumable VA loans, which strongly supports the feature.
Remarks discuss amenities, pet-friendliness, VA loans, and investment potential but never describe the scope of HOA/building insurance. With no explicit reference to full or walls-in coverage, full insurance cannot be confirmed and is treated as not indicated.
There is no public-remarks evidence for fire sprinklers across the listings provided. The only signal is sparse MLS checkbox data (3/20), which is weak and looks inconsistent with the otherwise detailed amenity descriptions; this suggests the checkbox may be copy-paste or unverified.
Listings highlight views, amenities, and security patrols but do not reference any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. In the absence of explicit statements, the building is assumed not to have a documented FLSE pass in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly supported for this building. I found explicit mentions in well over half of the remarks, including phrases like 'ocean views,' 'Pacific ocean,' 'views of Kaneohe Bay,' and 'panoramic ocean views.' The historical MLS data is perfect on this feature, so confidence is very high.
Mountain views are very well supported. Numerous listings mention 'Ko'olau Mountains,' 'Koolau mountain range,' and views framed by the mountains, showing consistent building-level appeal rather than an isolated unit feature. Historical MLS data is also nearly unanimous, so confidence is extremely high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are supported, though the wording is often indirect. Multiple listings reference the sandbar, Kaneohe Bay frontage, panoramic bay/ocean views, and scenery that clearly aligns with coastline/shoreline exposure. The evidence is broad across remarks and consistent with the MLS history.
Garden-style views are supported by both the remarks and the MLS history. Several listings describe 'garden and lawn' areas, 'lush landscaping,' and 'beautifully landscaped grounds,' which fits the definition even when the word 'garden' is not always used. The evidence is widespread enough to treat this as a true feature of the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are not validated by the remarks. While some listings mention 'morning coffee' or bright natural light, that is not the same as an explicit sunrise/eastern exposure view, and no listing clearly describes sunrise-facing scenery. Given the weaker historical signal, this should not be treated as confirmed.
Sunset views are clearly supported, though not universal to every unit. Several remarks specifically mention "sunset dining" and "sunset dinners" on the lanai, alongside evening views over Kaneohe Bay. This is consistent enough across multiple listings to include as a building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements about viewing Friday night fireworks from the building or from individual units. The remarks focus on Kaneohe Bay, mountain, and ocean views, but do not mention fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is well supported for this building. At least 2 listings include direct on-site management language, with one explicitly saying 'resident manager,' and the majority of current MLS records also carry the RESMAN amenity, making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.