Plumeria Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Plumeria Hale
Building Overview
Plumeria Hale in McCully-Moiliili (built 1975) — concrete construction with ocean and mountain views, window air conditioning.
About Plumeria Hale
Plumeria Hale is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit count and floorplate size are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features noted in MLS-derived information include ocean and mountain views and window air conditioning in units. Short-term rentals and pet ownership are not allowed according to the available MLS records. The listed management company is unknown in the provided data.
Parking is described in the MLS data as available, covered, and assigned. Buyers should verify parking details, association fees, rules, and management information with the listing agent or condo association, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for numeric ownership percentages and qualitative phrases like "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied," but found none. The remarks focus on unit condition, security, parking, and location rather than resident composition.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none were provided. The only elevator-related language refers to an updated elevator and secured elevator fob access, which confirms the presence of an elevator but not the number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate from MLS checkbox data: 9 of 12 current listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity). The public remarks mostly mention broad 'common expenses' and building maintenance, but do not explicitly spell out common area electric, so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than remark-confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is supported by the current MLS inclusions in 8 of 12 listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly mention hot water. There is also no WTRHTR indicator, so there is no strong evidence that the building’s maintenance fees exclude hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the dataset: all 12 current MLS listings include SEWER in association fee inclusions. Public remarks also confirm it directly, with one listing stating that 'Maintenance fees cover water, sewer, trash, and common expenses,' indicating this is not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Water is very well supported: all 12 current MLS listings include WATER in association fee inclusions. A public remark explicitly confirms that maintenance fees cover 'water, sewer, trash, and common expenses,' which strongly reinforces the MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage references. The only storage/parking details relate to bikes and mopeds, so surfboard storage is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any pool references, especially "salt water pool" or similar wording. There is no evidence of any pool in the remarks, so there is no support for a salt-water pool.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported across the current listings: many remarks explicitly mention 'community laundry,' 'on-site community laundry,' or 'community laundry located in the lobby.' The evidence is consistent across multiple entries and aligns with the historical MLS checkbox, so this feature should be included with very high confidence.
I searched the remarks for signs of paid laundry such as "coin laundry," "coin-op," "card operated," or "laundry fee." None were found, so payment is not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for language such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or floor-by-floor laundry access. The remarks only support a shared laundry area in the lobby/on site, so there is no evidence for every-floor laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'one covered parking space' or 'covered parking stall,' including phrases like 'near the entrance' and 'conveniently situated near the lobby entrance.' This appears consistent across several agents and is reinforced by the current MLS parking features.
I looked for explicit references to deeded, owned, or parking included in the deed and found none. The listings describe assigned or covered parking stalls, which suggests parking access but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or additional parking cost language and found nothing. The remarks only note that parking is included/assigned, not that it carries a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as "join the waitlist" or "parking waiting list" and found none. The remarks instead refer to assigned/covered stalls, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, or electronic entry. The remarks repeatedly confirm key fob-secured access, so this feature is supported with high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark indicating patrol service or roving security. The listings mention secured entry and video surveillance, but not security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is explicitly mentioned in multiple listings, including remarks that say '2 new window ac units for the living room and primary bedroom.' Current MLS data also shows ACWIUN in 5/12 listings, which aligns with the remarks and suggests this is a real feature rather than a copy-paste error. Because buyers searching for window AC would find relevant units here, it should be included.
0 of the provided remarks explicitly mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or concrete construction. Multiple listings repeat the same amenity-style copy about renovations, views, parking, and laundry, which suggests the construction-material fields are not being independently verified in remarks.
0 of the listings mention double wall construction or any equivalent wording like 'two walls.' With no corroborating remark evidence and only mixed MLS material checkboxes, this feature is not validated.
No analysis available
0 of the sampled remarks mention masonry or stucco. The repeated generic listing language across agents points to copy/paste behavior, so the MLS material checkbox is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of the remarks refer to above-ground construction. Across the listings, agents repeatedly describe interior renovations, breezes, views, and secure entry, but not the building's construction method.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU and found no evidence. Nothing in the listings suggests short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool language and found none. Since STR allowance is not established, there is also no evidence of a hotel pool program.
I searched for wording indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence of a mandatory hotel or rental pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state the building/unit is fee simple, which means the land is owned rather than leased. Because this is not a leasehold property, there is no lease expiration year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Without a direct mention, I cannot पुष्टि VA financing eligibility from the listing text.
The remarks directly state that the building "is fully insured," which matches the requested walls-in/full insurance wording. This is strong direct evidence, so the feature is set to true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection certification, but found none in the public remarks. The listings discuss security, parking, and updates, but do not mention FLSE or fire/life safety compliance.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Diamond Head views are repeatedly confirmed across multiple listings and agents. Current remarks explicitly mention 'stunning views of Diamond Head,' 'Beautiful Diamond Head and Peek-a-boo Ocean Views,' and 'beautiful panoramic views of Diamond Head,' so this is not just a copied checkbox.
City views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 2 current remarks explicitly reference 'city living,' 'city views,' and 'city lights,' with additional mention of views toward Downtown/Waikiki, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements like "watch fireworks from the lanai" or "fireworks view." The listings only describe general views and proximity to Waikiki, which is not enough to establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks reference a resident manager or any equivalent on-site/live-in management role, despite multiple listings describing the same building. The only evidence is the inconsistent MLS amenity checkbox (4/12), which appears uncorroborated by remarks and likely reflects agent copy-paste rather than an actual on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.