Pleasanton
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pleasanton
Building Overview
Pleasanton in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1971). Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted, per MLS data.
About Pleasanton
Pleasanton is a concrete residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, built in 1971. Based on MLS data, specific information about unit counts or building height/size is not provided in available records.
According to available records, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data provided; no other amenity or common-area information is included in the source data.
MLS-derived data for this entry is limited — details such as parking, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and management contact information are not available in the provided records. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or homeowner association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy references such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any occupancy percentage or comparable indication, so this cannot be determined from the listings.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or "two elevators," but the remarks only reference a single elevator in a general way. Because no number is given, I cannot determine the elevator count from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 listings include OTCOEX, which is a strong MLS signal for common area electricity being covered. Public remarks do not mention this directly, so this looks like MLS checkbox data rather than agent commentary. Still, the consistency across most listings suggests the building likely includes common-area electric in the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 5 listings include HOTWAT, and 3 of 5 note WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not bundled into maintenance fees. None of the public remarks mention hot water service being included. This appears to be a consistent building-level absence rather than a copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 listings include SEWER in the association fee breakdown. There are no conflicting remarks, and the consistency across multiple listings makes this a high-confidence building feature. This looks like stable MLS data rather than a one-off checkbox error.
All 5 listings include WATER, with no conflicting public remarks. The unanimity across listings strongly supports that water is included in the maintenance fee. This is likely a reliable building-level amenity and not a copy/paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 1 listing explicitly mentions a "Shared floor storage room," and current MLS checkbox data shows storage/additional storage in most listings (3/5 amenities, 1/5 unit features). This looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The only storage noted is a shared floor storage room, which does not specifically indicate surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building amenity based on current MLS data, with 5/5 listings marking TRACHU. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, which suggests the amenity is coming from the MLS building record rather than copy-paste unit comments, but it is still consistently present across all current listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any mention of a saltwater, salt, or saline pool. There is no pool referenced in the remarks, and the provided building context also indicates the building does not have a pool.
In-unit laundry is well supported for this building. Four listings explicitly mention 'full size washer & dryer' or 'washer & dryer inside the property,' and the current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 5/5 listings. The first remark doesn’t mention it, but the overall evidence is consistent and strong.
No analysis available
I searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fee, quarters, and card-operated laundry. The listings only describe full-size washer and dryer inside the unit, so there is no evidence of a paid community laundry system.
I looked for wording such as laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry, but found nothing. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not indicate community laundry facilities.
No analysis available
Assigned parking appears to be a building-level feature based on current MLS data: 5/5 listings show ASSIGN. The public remarks do not explicitly repeat the assignment language, but nothing suggests otherwise, so this looks like consistent MLS coding rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking is supported by at least one explicit remark: 'secure building with covered parking.' Current MLS data also flags covered/garage parking in 1/5 listings, which suggests the feature is present but not uniformly checked across all listings.
I searched for deeded parking, owned stalls, or parking included in the deed, but the remarks do not say that. The only parking detail is that the building has covered parking, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking cost information such as fees, rentals, or monthly charges, and found none. The remarks only reference covered parking, so no fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language, but nothing in the remarks indicates one exists. Since there is no explicit mention, this is treated as not evidenced.
No analysis available
The remarks clearly indicate card/fob-based access control. FOB access is strong evidence of an electronic security entry system, so this feature is supported.
No analysis available
I searched for references to patrol service or roving security, but none were found. The listings mention secure access and cameras, which are not the same as a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is direct evidence that this building offers split AC in at least some units. Two of five remarks explicitly mention it, including the phrases "Split AC in every room" and "split AC system," while another listing notes conduit pre-installed for split A/C wiring. The evidence looks real rather than copy-paste noise because the remarks are specific and consistent with the MLS ACSPL inclusions.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a consistent building-level characteristic: 4 of 5 listings report CONCRE in the MLS construction materials field. The public remarks do not mention any alternate construction and focus instead on unit renovations and building updates, so there is no sign this is a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, including NUC or TVU references, and found none. With no evidence of STR permission, this is marked false by default from the remarks.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed-by-hotel, or branded pool participation, and found nothing. Because STR allowance is not established and no pool program is mentioned, this is false.
I looked for any wording that rental pool participation is mandatory or required, but there were no such references. With no STR pool program mentioned at all, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end date, or renewal terms, but nothing was stated. Without a specific year in the remarks, the lease expiry remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any reference to VA approval or VA financing and found none. Because there is no explicit evidence, this is marked false with low-to-moderate confidence based on absence of mention.
I looked for any insurance-related statements indicating HOA full coverage or walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance status at all, so there is no public evidence supporting a fully insured designation.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. Nothing in the public remarks indicates this building has passed that evaluation, so there is no evidence to mark it true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 1 listing explicitly says "beautiful mountain and tree top views," and the MLS view descriptions show MOUNTA in 2 of 5 listings. This appears to be a real building-level feature available in some units rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from units, lanais, or the building. The remarks mention mountain, tree-top, and city-adjacent location details, but nothing about fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.