Piikoi Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Piikoi Terrace
Building Overview
Piikoi Terrace in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1971) with mountain views and covered parking.
About Piikoi Terrace
Piikoi Terrace is a condominium located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1971 and is of concrete construction.
Key features noted in MLS-derived data include mountain views and window air conditioning. The building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals, per the available listing information. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Parking is reported as available and covered. Additional details such as maintenance fees, unit sizes, exact amenity list, and management contact are not provided in the MLS summary. Based on MLS data — buyers should verify all information, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of owner occupancy levels, including percentages and qualitative descriptions like majority owner occupied, but none were present. Since no number or descriptive estimate is given, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or spelled-out counts, but found none. The only relevant reference is to a singular elevator, which confirms elevator access exists but does not establish the number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 5 listings, there is no evidence that maintenance fees include hot water. The MLS pattern is the opposite: 3/5 listings show WTRHTR in inclusions, and no remarks describe hot water as an included building amenity. This looks like a consistent building-level absence rather than an agent copy/paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage or related storage amenities such as board storage or surf storage. Nothing in the remarks indicates that the building offers this feature.
No analysis available
The current MLS data is consistent across all 5 listings, with TRACHU marked in amenities every time. No agent remarks mention a trash chute or refuse chute, so this appears to come from repeated MLS checkbox data rather than listing descriptions. Given the 5/5 consistency, it is likely a building-level amenity, though not independently confirmed in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 5 listing remarks mention a swimming pool, lap pool, plunge pool, or similar shared amenity. The only evidence is one outlier MLS amenity checkbox, which looks like a likely data-entry or copy/paste mistake rather than a building feature buyers can rely on.
No analysis available
I looked for mentions of a pool and specifically saltwater/saline pool language. The current building context also says there is no pool, and the public remarks do not contradict that.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like coin laundry, quarters, card-operated laundry, and laundry fees. Nothing in the public remarks indicates a paid community laundry system, only private in-unit laundry.
I looked for references to laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or shared community laundry facilities. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe any laundry facilities distributed throughout the building.
Parking is clearly present in the building. Across the current MLS set, 5/5 listings have parking features, and remarks mention both 'available street parking' and 'Parking is covered,' confirming that the building offers parking options.
Assigned parking appears to be available for at least some units in the building. The current MLS data shows 3/5 listings with ASSIGN in parking features, but the public remarks do not explicitly describe assigned or reserved stalls, so this is supported by MLS more than by listing text.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or included stall. The remarks only describe parking as covered and available, which is not enough to conclude it is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rental, or added parking cost. No such information appears in the remarks, so the fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist references, including waitlist or waiting list wording. None were found, so there is no evidence that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access language. The mention of a key fobbed elevator is strong evidence that the building has card/fob-based security access.
No analysis available
I looked for any references to patrol service or roving security. The remarks describe the building as secure, but they do not mention an actual security patrol program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 listings in the current MLS data mark the building as concrete construction (5/5). The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, but there is no contrary evidence, and the MLS data is consistent across every listing. This appears to be a stable building-level attribute rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Only 2 of 5 current listings include HOLTIL, and the public remarks across the listings do not reference hollow tile at all. Because the feature is inconsistently checked and unsupported by remarks, confidence is high that it should not be treated as a verified building feature. This looks more like agent data inconsistency or copy-paste than confirmed construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, as well as disqualifiers like 30-day minimum or owner-occupant only. The remarks do not address rental legality, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is treated as not evidenced here.
I looked for hotel pool terms like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded rental program participation. Nothing in the remarks suggests such a program, and there is no evidence supporting STR eligibility either.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent. The remarks do not mention any such arrangement, so there is no evidence that participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expiration, renewal, or a 4-digit expiry year. Nothing was mentioned, so the lease expiry cannot be determined from these listings.
The public remarks directly identify the building as VA-approved, which supports VA financing availability. No contradictory statements were found.
I searched for HOA insurance coverage wording such as fully insured or walls-in coverage and found nothing. The remarks do not provide any insurance details, so there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured from this data.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or is otherwise fire-safety certified, but there were no such references. Because there is no explicit mention and no prior value, this is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS view field is consistent across all recent listings: 5/5 list CITY, with none marked NONE. Public remarks do not explicitly repeat 'city view,' but one listing mentions 'great views' from the lanai and another emphasizes 'urban living' and nearby downtown Honolulu, which fits the MLS data. Overall, this appears to be a building-level view feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to being able to see Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks mention "great views" and a large private lanai, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.