Pensacola Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pensacola Gardens
Building Overview
Pensacola Gardens in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1966) with pool and resident manager.
About Pensacola Gardens
Pensacola Gardens is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building does not permit short-term rentals.
Assigned parking is available and pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and current management, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative indicators such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." No owner-occupancy information was provided, so the percentage is unknown.
The remarks were searched for elevator references, including explicit counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No elevator information was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity inclusion is strongly supported by MLS consistency and public remarks. Two listings mention photovoltaic panels that help with "common area electricity" or provide "significant electric savings for owners," confirming the building-level benefit across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by repeated MLS checkbox data across 9 of 10 listings. Public remarks are silent on the feature, but there are no indications of individual water heaters and no WTRHTR inclusions to contradict the MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by broad, consistent MLS data across 9 of 10 listings. No public remarks discuss sewer charges or provide evidence against inclusion, so the repeated checkbox pattern remains reliable.
Water inclusion has unanimous current MLS support, appearing in all 10 listings. Although no public remark explicitly says "water included," the consistency across listings and lack of contrary statements make this evidence very strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6/10 listings explicitly mention outdoor space, including "large lanai," "spacious private lanai," "large patio," "large courtyard indoor/outdoor living," and "unique lanai space." The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and the previously high-confidence history strongly support that Pensacola Gardens offers patio/deck-style amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 10 listings explicitly mention a recreation area or related amenity. The sole RECARE checkbox entry is not corroborated by multiple agents or descriptive remarks, while the remarks instead mention a pool, laundry, storage, and courtyard; therefore the feature is omitted as likely checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly confirmed across multiple listings and agents, with 8 of 10 current remarks explicitly describing unit-specific or owner storage. The repeated language indicates a building-wide offering rather than isolated copy-paste, including storage units, closets, and exterior storage assigned to units.
Multiple listings clearly describe various types of storage (exterior, large individual, extra storage) but never mention surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no matches, so surfboard-specific storage is likely not a dedicated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly validated across the building: at least 3 of 10 current remarks explicitly mention a community or on-site swimming pool. Key phrases include “community pool,” “on-site resident manager and swimming pool,” and “cool off and unwind by the pool,” supported by the pool amenity appearing in all 10 listings.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but never describe it as a salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool. I specifically searched for those terms and found no matches. Based on this absence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
Shared laundry is strongly confirmed across the building: at least 4 current remarks explicitly mention community laundry or a laundry area, including laundry on the first floor. The evidence aligns with COMLAU appearing in all 10/10 current listings and the previously high-confidence building-level finding.
The remarks note 'community laundry' but do not specify payment methods or fees. Terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' do not appear. With no explicit evidence of paid operation, this is set to false by default.
The listings confirm there is community laundry but never describe it as being on each or every floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording and found none. Given this absence, it's likely laundry is not provided on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the current listings and remarks. Multiple agents mention it directly with phrases like "1-parking home," "one assigned parking stall," and "1pkg," which aligns with the MLS parking feature flags. There is no conflicting evidence, so this appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS and multiple listing remarks. At least two listings explicitly use the phrases "assigned parking" and "one assigned parking stall," while others describe units as including one parking space, confirming this is a consistent building feature rather than an isolated or copied claim.
No analysis available
Several listings reference assigned parking or one parking stall. Because none explicitly describes the stall as deeded or owned, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned parking but provide no cost information. The monthly parking fee is unknown from the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned parking but do not mention a parking waitlist system. No waitlist evidence was found in the public remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks describe location, upgrades, pool, storage, pet-friendliness, and a resident manager but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no results. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have card/fob access security.
No analysis available
The listings highlight amenities such as a pool, photovoltaic panels, extra storage, and an on-site resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol or roving security. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found none. In the absence of any evidence, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention window AC, window units, or wall AC. However, ACWIUN appears in 3 of 10 current listings and previously appeared in 2 of 9, suggesting some units may have window air conditioning, though the evidence is modest and could reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
Concrete construction is supported by strong, consistent MLS data: 10 of 10 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials, matching the prior high-confidence assessment. None of the 10 public remarks explicitly mentions concrete construction, so the conclusion relies primarily on repeated building-level MLS data rather than remark language.
No analysis available
Three out of eight current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to HOLTIL, but none of the public remarks reference 'hollow tile' explicitly. The presence in multiple listings suggests some portions or units may be hollow-tile, but evidence is limited to agent-checked boxes and not corroborated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is not supported by the remarks, and the current MLS data shows only 1 of 9 listings with WOOFRA checked. Given the overwhelming concrete signal and the absence of any agent/site-visit confirmation for wood framing, this is most likely a mistaken MLS entry rather than a real building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no explicit statement allowing short-term rentals. They also do not mention a prohibition, so STR permission is not supported by the available remarks.
The listings mention a community swimming pool, but not a hotel rental pool or rental-management program. Because STR permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false.
The remarks contain no indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. The prerequisite STR permission is also not established, so mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no specific lease-expiry year or renewal information. A lease expiration date is therefore unknown from the public remarks.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA-approval or VA-financing language, but none appears. VA eligibility cannot be confirmed from these listings.
Several listings directly report complete building insurance coverage. The repeated references to "100% insured" provide strong evidence that the building is fully insured, despite one listing including a verification disclaimer.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. None of these were mentioned; without a current positive value or explicit confirmation, this remains false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
None of the 10 public remarks explicitly describes an ocean or water view. The single MLS OCEAN entry is not corroborated by agent remarks, while five listings specify NONE, so there is insufficient building-level evidence to include this feature.
None of the 10 public remarks mention a mountain or mauka view. With only one MLS MOUNTA entry and no supporting remarks across multiple listings, the evidence is too weak to treat mountain views as a building feature.
No analysis available
One of the 10 remarks explicitly confirms a "Honolulu city view," providing direct evidence for the feature. The matching CITY designation in 5 of 10 MLS listings suggests city views are offered by multiple units, although the remarks do not consistently describe them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that Pensacola Gardens offers sunset views. Across the provided listings, 0 of 9 mention SUNSET and several explicitly show NONE, while the remarks only describe city, lanai, pool, storage, and building upgrades. This looks like a consistent absence rather than a copy-paste feature being added.
No analysis available
The listings reference a 'Honolulu city view' and convenience to various Honolulu locations, but do not mention seeing fireworks from the property. I specifically looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. This suggests the building is not being promoted for fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of 10 current public remarks explicitly confirms an "on-site resident manager," while 6 of 10 listings include RESMAN in the MLS amenities. The explicit building-level statement and historically high confidence provide strong support, although the feature is not mentioned across most current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.