Pensacola Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pensacola Gardens
Building Overview
Pensacola Gardens in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1966) with pool and resident manager.
About Pensacola Gardens
Pensacola Gardens is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building does not permit short-term rentals.
Assigned parking is available and pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and current management, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
MLS floor fields consistently reach 3, with a penthouse listed as unit 318 on floor 3, establishing the top residential floor. The county and state records list 4, which is set aside as a non-residential or differently counted level.
The county assessor reconciles 68 residential units, and the state registration independently reports 68 units. The stored value is supported.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 489. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator references, including counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." None were found, and no current elevator count is provided, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity inclusion is strongly supported by MLS consistency across 9 of 11 listings. Two public remarks specifically mention photovoltaic panels helping with common area electricity, providing independent confirmation beyond likely checkbox copying.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is included according to 10 of 11 current MLS listings, with no WTRHTR entries indicating unit-level water heaters. Public remarks are silent on hot water, but the broad, consistent MLS pattern and high historical confidence strongly support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by 10 of 11 current listings and prior high-confidence evidence. None of the public remarks discuss separate sewer charges or otherwise contradict the MLS data.
Water inclusion has unanimous current MLS support, appearing in all 11 listings. Although no public remark explicitly says “water included,” the consistency across the entire listing set and absence of contradictory evidence make this highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 8 of the 11 current listing remarks mention a patio, lanai, balcony, courtyard, or comparable outdoor space. Key phrases include "spacious private lanai," "large patio," "large courtyard indoor/outdoor living," and "large lanai," indicating this is a recurring building offering rather than a single isolated or copy-pasted claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 10 listings explicitly mention a recreation area or related amenity. The sole RECARE checkbox entry is not corroborated by multiple agents or descriptive remarks, while the remarks instead mention a pool, laundry, storage, and courtyard; therefore the feature is omitted as likely checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 9 of 11 current listings or remark sections mention storage, including unit-specific phrases such as 'large storage unit,' 'large, individual storage space,' and 'spacious storage closets for each owner.' The repeated, detailed descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly confirm that Pensacola Gardens offers storage units or lockers to owners, rather than this being merely copied MLS checkbox data.
Multiple listings clearly describe various types of storage (exterior, large individual, extra storage) but never mention surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no matches, so surfboard-specific storage is likely not a dedicated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly validated across the building: at least 4 of the 11 listings explicitly mention a "community pool," "on-site resident manager and swimming pool," or cooling off "by the pool." The repeated references across multiple listings and consistency with the 11/11 MLS amenity records indicate a genuine shared building amenity rather than isolated copy-paste data.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but never describe it as a salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool. I specifically searched for those terms and found no matches. Based on this absence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
Shared laundry is strongly confirmed across the building: 5 of 11 current remarks explicitly mention community laundry or a laundry area, including references to laundry on the 1st floor and laundry near the community pool. The evidence appears across multiple listings and is consistent with the 11/11 current MLS COMLAU designation, so this is a building-wide shared amenity.
The remarks note 'community laundry' but do not specify payment methods or fees. Terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' do not appear. With no explicit evidence of paid operation, this is set to false by default.
The listings confirm there is community laundry but never describe it as being on each or every floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording and found none. Given this absence, it's likely laundry is not provided on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: at least 5 of the 11 listings explicitly mention a parking stall, parking home, or 1pkg. The remarks come from multiple listings and align with the MLS data showing parking on all 11 listings.
Assigned parking is explicitly mentioned in at least 2 listings, including "assigned parking" and "one assigned parking stall," with another listing describing a 1pkg unit. The strong MLS evidence—ASSIGN on 10 of 11 listings—supports the feature despite not every remark repeating it.
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention one parking stall, assigned parking, or one assigned parking stall. None states that the stall is deeded, included in the deed, or separately owned.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for monthly parking fees, parking charges, and additional parking costs. Parking is mentioned, but no fee amount or rental charge is provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention assigned and included parking stalls but do not mention a parking waitlist or waiting list. A building parking waitlist cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks describe location, upgrades, pool, storage, pet-friendliness, and a resident manager but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no results. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have card/fob access security.
No analysis available
The listings highlight amenities such as a pool, photovoltaic panels, extra storage, and an on-site resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol or roving security. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found none. In the absence of any evidence, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 11 current listings include ACWIUN, supporting that window or wall AC may be present in some units. None of the provided remarks mention window AC, window units, or wall AC, so this appears to rely primarily on MLS checkbox data rather than consistent remarks across multiple agents.
Concrete construction is supported by strong, consistent MLS data: all 11 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials. The public remarks focus on amenities and completed building projects, without disputing the construction type; the repeated MLS designation across multiple listings is strong evidence rather than a single isolated entry.
No analysis available
Three out of eight current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to HOLTIL, but none of the public remarks reference 'hollow tile' explicitly. The presence in multiple listings suggests some portions or units may be hollow-tile, but evidence is limited to agent-checked boxes and not corroborated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is not supported by the remarks, and the current MLS data shows only 1 of 9 listings with WOOFRA checked. Given the overwhelming concrete signal and the absence of any agent/site-visit confirmation for wood framing, this is most likely a mistaken MLS entry rather than a real building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rentals, vacation rentals, NUCs, TVUs, and rental restrictions such as 30-day minimums. No authorization or prohibition was stated, so STR approval is not supported.
Several listings refer to the building's residential community pool. No hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, or managed hotel operation was mentioned, and the STR prerequisite is not met.
The remarks contain no references to mandatory hotel-pool participation, required rental programs, or an inability to opt out. Because STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold expiration, ground lease terms, and lease renewal dates. No specific four-digit lease-expiry year was mentioned.
The remarks were searched for explicit references to VA approval, VA financing, or VA loans. None were found, so VA eligibility is not supported.
Several listings directly report that the building is fully insured or has 100% insurance coverage. The repeated explicit statements provide strong evidence that the HOA maintains full building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found, so there is no evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
None of the 10 public remarks explicitly describes an ocean or water view. The single MLS OCEAN entry is not corroborated by agent remarks, while five listings specify NONE, so there is insufficient building-level evidence to include this feature.
None of the 10 public remarks mention a mountain or mauka view. With only one MLS MOUNTA entry and no supporting remarks across multiple listings, the evidence is too weak to treat mountain views as a building feature.
No analysis available
City views are supported by 6 of 11 current MLS view descriptions marked CITY, with one listing explicitly stating “Corner unit with a Honolulu city view.” Although most remarks do not discuss views, the direct remark and historical high confidence support including this building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that Pensacola Gardens offers sunset views. Across the provided listings, 0 of 9 mention SUNSET and several explicitly show NONE, while the remarks only describe city, lanai, pool, storage, and building upgrades. This looks like a consistent absence rather than a copy-paste feature being added.
No analysis available
The listings reference a 'Honolulu city view' and convenience to various Honolulu locations, but do not mention seeing fireworks from the property. I specifically looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. This suggests the building is not being promoted for fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the 11 current listing remarks explicitly confirms an "on-site resident manager." Combined with historical MLS data showing RESMAN in 6 of 10 listings and prior high-confidence validation, the feature is strongly supported, though the explicit wording appears in only one remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.