Pensacola Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pensacola Gardens
Building Overview
Pensacola Gardens in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1966) with pool and resident manager.
About Pensacola Gardens
Pensacola Gardens is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building does not permit short-term rentals.
Assigned parking is available and pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and current management, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative indicators like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. Without explicit remark evidence, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any elevator references, including explicit counts like "4 elevators" or generic wording such as "multiple elevators," and found none. With no evidence in the listings, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that common-area electricity is included. Multiple listings explicitly mention photovoltaic panels offsetting common electric costs, which aligns with the MLS OTCOEX checkbox evidence. This appears consistent across several agents, not just copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS checkbox evidence is very strong: 8 of 9 listings include HOTWAT. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'hot water included,' but there is also no indication of unit water heaters that would suggest the opposite.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by broad MLS consistency across current listings. No public remarks contradict this, and the repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is a building-level feature rather than an agent error.
Water inclusion is supported by unanimous current MLS data: 9 of 9 listings include WATER. The public remarks are silent on this point, but the checkbox evidence is highly consistent and reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for Pensacola Gardens reference outdoor living: at least four remark sections mention "large patio", "large lanai", "unique lanai space" and "large courtyard indoor/outdoor living." CURRENT MLS amenity checkboxes also list PATDEC/COVPAT on 3 of 6 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks, so the building is marked as having patio/deck amenities with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across listings that the building provides storage units/lockers: 7 of 8 public remarks explicitly mention storage (phrases include "Additional large storage closet", "spacious storage closets for each owner", "Spacious exterior storage comes with the unit", "Extra-Large storage unit", and "large, individual storage space"). This is consistent with MLS amenities (7/8) and unit features (5/8), suggesting the building reliably offers storage for owners.
Multiple listings clearly describe various types of storage (exterior, large individual, extra storage) but never mention surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no matches, so surfboard-specific storage is likely not a dedicated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported across the current listings: several remarks explicitly reference a shared or community pool, including phrases like "community pool," "swimming pool," and "pool, conveniently located just steps away." This matches the MLS amenity data showing pool on all current listings, so it appears to be a consistent building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but never describe it as a salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool. I specifically searched for those terms and found no matches. Based on this absence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for shared laundry: 9/9 current listings include COMLAU, and several remarks explicitly mention a 'community laundry' or 'community laundry located on 1st floor.' This appears consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error, so the building clearly offers shared laundry facilities.
The remarks note 'community laundry' but do not specify payment methods or fees. Terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' do not appear. With no explicit evidence of paid operation, this is set to false by default.
The listings confirm there is community laundry but never describe it as being on each or every floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording and found none. Given this absence, it's likely laundry is not provided on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the current listings and remarks. Multiple agents mention it directly with phrases like "1-parking home," "one assigned parking stall," and "1pkg," which aligns with the MLS parking feature flags. There is no conflicting evidence, so this appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is well supported by the MLS and by the remarks. At least one listing explicitly says "one assigned parking stall," and the current MLS records show ASSIGN in 8 of 9 listings. This is strong building-level evidence that assigned parking is available.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking wording such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only indicate assigned parking, not deeded ownership, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I looked for parking cost language such as a monthly parking fee, parking rental, or extra charge for a stall. The remarks mention parking assignment but give no fee information, so this cannot be determined.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for wording like "parking waitlist," "join the waiting list," or similar language. Nothing in the remarks suggests a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks describe location, upgrades, pool, storage, pet-friendliness, and a resident manager but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no results. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have card/fob access security.
No analysis available
The listings highlight amenities such as a pool, photovoltaic panels, extra storage, and an on-site resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol or roving security. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found none. In the absence of any evidence, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is weakly supported by the MLS inclusions data: 2 of 9 listings include ACWIUN. However, across the supplied public remarks, there are no explicit mentions of window AC, wall AC, or window units, so this appears to be sparse and not well corroborated by listing descriptions.
Strong building-level evidence indicates concrete construction: 9 of 9 current MLS listings have CONCRE checked. The public remarks are silent on construction type, but nothing suggests a different structure, so this appears to be a consistent MLS-level building characteristic rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Three out of eight current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to HOLTIL, but none of the public remarks reference 'hollow tile' explicitly. The presence in multiple listings suggests some portions or units may be hollow-tile, but evidence is limited to agent-checked boxes and not corroborated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is not supported by the remarks, and the current MLS data shows only 1 of 9 listings with WOOFRA checked. Given the overwhelming concrete signal and the absence of any agent/site-visit confirmation for wood framing, this is most likely a mistaken MLS entry rather than a real building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental permission, including terms like NUC, TVU, "STR allowed," or similar vacation-rental language. The remarks do not indicate that short-term rentals are permitted, so this is treated as not supported.
I searched for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or brand-specific pool participation. No such language appears, and without STR evidence this feature must be false.
I looked for mandatory pool wording such as "must rent," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain none of that language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any leasehold references such as "lease expires YYYY," "ground lease ends," or renewal language like "extended to YYYY." The remarks do not mention land tenure or a lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-approval language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. Because VA eligibility must be stated publicly to confirm, there is no evidence to mark this building as VA approved.
The remarks repeatedly and directly state that the building is fully insured, including explicit "100% insured" wording. This is strong, repeated evidence and supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. Since the remarks do not mention a successful evaluation, there is no basis to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the eight current public remarks explicitly states "Corner unit with a Honolulu city view." Historical data also noted a city view mention (Medium confidence). However, the MLS view checkbox appears unset across listings, so evidence is limited to a single remark and may reflect agent copy/paste; nonetheless there is at least one unit advertised with city views, so the building is marked as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that Pensacola Gardens offers sunset views. Across the provided listings, 0 of 9 mention SUNSET and several explicitly show NONE, while the remarks only describe city, lanai, pool, storage, and building upgrades. This looks like a consistent absence rather than a copy-paste feature being added.
No analysis available
The listings reference a 'Honolulu city view' and convenience to various Honolulu locations, but do not mention seeing fireworks from the property. I specifically looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. This suggests the building is not being promoted for fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the public remarks explicitly states, "this quiet, well-maintained building has an on-site resident manager," and MLS checkbox data currently shows RESMAN in 4 of 6 listings. While prior confidence is absent, the explicit remark plus multiple listings checking the amenity support including the feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.