Pensacola Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pensacola Gardens
Building Overview
Pensacola Gardens in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1966) with pool and resident manager.
About Pensacola Gardens
Pensacola Gardens is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building does not permit short-term rentals.
Assigned parking is available and pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and current management, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupied', '80% owner occupied', and 'majority owner occupied' but found no quantitative information. Because no numeric owner-occupancy percent is stated and no prior numeric value exists, the percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', and 'multiple elevators' but found no references. Because there is no explicit numeric statement in the remarks and no prior numeric value to retain, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (5/6 MLS checkboxes) indicate common area electric is included and public remarks explicitly note '100 photovoltaic panels to help with common area electricity' and 'electric savings for owners.' Evidence is consistent across listings and directly referenced by agent remarks, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six MLS listings check HOTWAT indicating hot water is included in fees, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included' and there is no onsite verification; MLS data supports inclusion but lack of remarks lowers confidence to a moderate level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six MLS listings list SEWER as included in association fees, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'sewer included' and there's no direct verification; the MLS checkbox prevalence supports inclusion but evidence is primarily from agent-entered MLS fields.
Six of six MLS listings check WATER as included in association fees, though public remarks do not explicitly confirm 'water included.' The uniform MLS data suggests water is included, but absence of remark-level confirmation keeps confidence moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for Pensacola Gardens reference outdoor living: at least four remark sections mention "large patio", "large lanai", "unique lanai space" and "large courtyard indoor/outdoor living." CURRENT MLS amenity checkboxes also list PATDEC/COVPAT on 3 of 6 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks, so the building is marked as having patio/deck amenities with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building offers storage units/lockers: MLS amenities checked in 5 of 6 listings and unit_features in 4 of 6. Public remarks across multiple listings explicitly state storage for units/owners (quotes: "spacious storage closets for each owner", "Extra-Large storage unit", "SPACIOUS EXTERIOR STORAGE"). This appears to be a genuine building-level amenity rather than an isolated or copy-paste error.
Multiple listings clearly describe various types of storage (exterior, large individual, extra storage) but never mention surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no matches, so surfboard-specific storage is likely not a dedicated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS listings check the pool amenity and multiple agent remarks explicitly reference a community/swimming pool—phrases include 'community pool and laundry area', 'swimming pool', and 'cool off and unwind by the pool'. The consistency across listings and explicit language indicates the building offers a shared pool (evidence strong despite possible agent copy-paste).
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but never describe it as a salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool. I specifically searched for those terms and found no matches. Based on this absence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 6/6 listings checked COMLAU, and the public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' and 'community pool and laundry area' in multiple listings. Evidence is consistent across agents and confirms the building has shared laundry facilities.
The remarks note 'community laundry' but do not specify payment methods or fees. Terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' do not appear. With no explicit evidence of paid operation, this is set to false by default.
The listings confirm there is community laundry but never describe it as being on each or every floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording and found none. Given this absence, it's likely laundry is not provided on every floor.
All 6 current MLS listings include parking features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/etc.). Multiple remarks mention parking: e.g., "1-parking home at Pensacola Gardens!", "1 pkg" and "one assigned parking stall." Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, so parking is very likely present building-wide.
5 of 6 MLS records include ASSIGN in parking_features and remarks include explicit language such as "one assigned parking stall" and multiple references to "1-parking"/"1 pkg." The combined MLS checkbox frequency and direct agent remarks provide strong evidence that assigned parking is offered.
No analysis available
The listings state the unit 'comes with one assigned parking stall' and '1-parking', indicating parking is assigned, but there is no explicit language that the parking is deeded/owned. Without the explicit term 'deeded' or equivalent, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found none. There is no evidence to determine a monthly parking fee amount.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. The remarks do not indicate a formal waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
The remarks describe location, upgrades, pool, storage, pet-friendliness, and a resident manager but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no results. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have card/fob access security.
No analysis available
The listings highlight amenities such as a pool, photovoltaic panels, extra storage, and an on-site resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol or roving security. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found none. In the absence of any evidence, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to CONCRE (6/6). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete', 'concrete construction', or 'reinforced concrete', so the evidence relies on MLS checkboxes across multiple listings and appears possibly copy/pasted; confidence is therefore moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', 'nightly', and related terms and found no references. In absence of any explicit allowance for STRs in the public remarks, STRs are treated as not confirmed/false.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and named-hotel management references and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed, hotel-rental-pool participation is not applicable.
I looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. Since STRs are not indicated as allowed and there is no mention of a mandatory pool, mandatory participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'ground lease', or a four-digit expiry year and found no references. Because the remarks do not mention leasehold or a lease expiry, the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no explicit statement in the remarks, VA approval cannot be confirmed.
The public remarks explicitly state 'Building is 100% INSURED,' which directly indicates comprehensive HOA/building (walls-in) insurance. This explicit marketing claim yields high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no mentions. With no explicit statement and no prior value, absence of mention leads to a medium-confidence false.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 6 listing remarks explicitly mentions a "Honolulu city view" ("Corner unit with a Honolulu city view"). However, current MLS view_descriptions list 0/6 with CITY and 2/6 as NONE, so the evidence is limited and may reflect agent copy/paste or unit-specific views. Given the single explicit remark, include view_city as likely available to some units but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings reference a 'Honolulu city view' and convenience to various Honolulu locations, but do not mention seeing fireworks from the property. I specifically looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. This suggests the building is not being promoted for fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the public remarks explicitly states, "this quiet, well-maintained building has an on-site resident manager," and MLS checkbox data currently shows RESMAN in 4 of 6 listings. While prior confidence is absent, the explicit remark plus multiple listings checking the amenity support including the feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.