Pensacola Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pensacola Gardens
Building Overview
Pensacola Gardens in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1966) with pool and resident manager.
About Pensacola Gardens
Pensacola Gardens is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building does not permit short-term rentals.
Assigned parking is available and pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and current management, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative statements about the resident mix, but found none. Since there is no explicit number or descriptive evidence, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these remarks.
I searched the public remarks for any elevator references, including explicit counts and generic mentions, and found none. With no current value provided and no supporting evidence in the listings, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (5/6 MLS checkboxes) indicate common area electric is included and public remarks explicitly note '100 photovoltaic panels to help with common area electricity' and 'electric savings for owners.' Evidence is consistent across listings and directly referenced by agent remarks, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six MLS listings check HOTWAT indicating hot water is included in fees, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included' and there is no onsite verification; MLS data supports inclusion but lack of remarks lowers confidence to a moderate level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of eight current MLS listings check SEWER as included in association fees, and historical confidence was Medium. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'sewer included' (remarks reference plumbing retrofit/completion but not fee inclusion), so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and may reflect agent copy/paste rather than explicit confirmation.
All eight current MLS listings indicate WATER is included in association fees, giving uniform checkbox evidence. Public remarks do not explicitly confirm 'water included' (they note plumbing upgrades), so the conclusion relies on consistent MLS entries across multiple listings though it may reflect checkbox copy/paste rather than explicit agent remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for Pensacola Gardens reference outdoor living: at least four remark sections mention "large patio", "large lanai", "unique lanai space" and "large courtyard indoor/outdoor living." CURRENT MLS amenity checkboxes also list PATDEC/COVPAT on 3 of 6 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks, so the building is marked as having patio/deck amenities with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across listings that the building provides storage units/lockers: 7 of 8 public remarks explicitly mention storage (phrases include "Additional large storage closet", "spacious storage closets for each owner", "Spacious exterior storage comes with the unit", "Extra-Large storage unit", and "large, individual storage space"). This is consistent with MLS amenities (7/8) and unit features (5/8), suggesting the building reliably offers storage for owners.
Multiple listings clearly describe various types of storage (exterior, large individual, extra storage) but never mention surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no matches, so surfboard-specific storage is likely not a dedicated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All eight current MLS listings show the pool amenity and multiple agent remarks reference a shared pool — examples include "community pool", "swimming pool", and "cool off and unwind by the pool, conveniently located just steps away from your unit." Evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building has a communal swimming pool.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but never describe it as a salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool. I specifically searched for those terms and found no matches. Based on this absence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention shared laundry: e.g., 'Community laundry located on 1st floor,' 'just one other unit separates you from the community pool and laundry area,' and repeated 'community laundry' notes across at least 5 separate remarks. Evidence is consistent across different listings/agents and matches the MLS COMLAU amenity checkbox, so high confidence that the building has community laundry facilities.
The remarks note 'community laundry' but do not specify payment methods or fees. Terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' do not appear. With no explicit evidence of paid operation, this is set to false by default.
The listings confirm there is community laundry but never describe it as being on each or every floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording and found none. Given this absence, it's likely laundry is not provided on every floor.
All 8 current MLS listings include parking features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/covered/etc.), and public remarks repeatedly reference parking — e.g., "1-parking home at Pensacola Gardens" and "1pkg" — suggesting building-level parking is available. The consistency across multiple listings and MLS checkbox data provides strong evidence this building offers parking.
Seven of eight current MLS records list ASSIGN in parking_features and remarks explicitly mention assigned parking — e.g., "one assigned parking stall" and "1pkg" — indicating that assigned/reserved parking is offered for units in this building. The repeated, specific language across listings supports a high-confidence conclusion.
No analysis available
The listings confirm parking is assigned/included with the unit, but I did not find explicit wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. Because deeded status requires direct confirmation, I cannot mark it true.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any monthly parking cost or rental fee language and found none. The listings only indicate assigned parking, not whether there is an additional fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or needing to join a list for parking and found nothing. In the absence of any mention, this is best treated as not evidenced.
No analysis available
The remarks describe location, upgrades, pool, storage, pet-friendliness, and a resident manager but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no results. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have card/fob access security.
No analysis available
The listings highlight amenities such as a pool, photovoltaic panels, extra storage, and an on-site resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol or roving security. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found none. In the absence of any evidence, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 of 8 current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to CONCRE, though none of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'. The consistency across multiple agents/listings provides moderate implied evidence that the building is concrete construction rather than isolated checkbox error.
No analysis available
Three out of eight current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to HOLTIL, but none of the public remarks reference 'hollow tile' explicitly. The presence in multiple listings suggests some portions or units may be hollow-tile, but evidence is limited to agent-checked boxes and not corroborated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, including NUC, TVU, or legal vacation-rental language, and found none. There is also no contrary evidence suggesting STR is permitted here.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel program, or managed-by-hotel references and found none. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, this feature must also be false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool wording such as required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out and found nothing. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed at all, mandatory pool participation cannot be true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, land lease to YYYY, and renewal/extension language. Nothing in the remarks indicates this is a leasehold property or gives an expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Since VA approval must be stated publicly to confirm it, this is best treated as not evidenced in the listings.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly state that the building is fully insured, including clear '100% INSURED' wording. This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple listings, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety compliance language in the public remarks and found nothing indicating the building passed such an evaluation. In the absence of any current positive value, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the eight current public remarks explicitly states "Corner unit with a Honolulu city view." Historical data also noted a city view mention (Medium confidence). However, the MLS view checkbox appears unset across listings, so evidence is limited to a single remark and may reflect agent copy/paste; nonetheless there is at least one unit advertised with city views, so the building is marked as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings reference a 'Honolulu city view' and convenience to various Honolulu locations, but do not mention seeing fireworks from the property. I specifically looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. This suggests the building is not being promoted for fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the public remarks explicitly states, "this quiet, well-maintained building has an on-site resident manager," and MLS checkbox data currently shows RESMAN in 4 of 6 listings. While prior confidence is absent, the explicit remark plus multiple listings checking the amenity support including the feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.