Pensacola Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pensacola Gardens
Building Overview
Pensacola Gardens in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1966) with pool and resident manager.
About Pensacola Gardens
Pensacola Gardens is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1966. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building does not permit short-term rentals.
Assigned parking is available and pets are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, rules, and current management, with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupied', 'X% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied' and similar phrases but found no quantitative or qualitative statements about owner-occupancy in the remarks. No reliable numeric estimate can be made from the provided text.
I searched the remarks for 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators' and related terms but found no references. No current numeric value was provided, so I cannot determine the number of elevators from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (5/6 MLS checkboxes) indicate common area electric is included and public remarks explicitly note '100 photovoltaic panels to help with common area electricity' and 'electric savings for owners.' Evidence is consistent across listings and directly referenced by agent remarks, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six MLS listings check HOTWAT indicating hot water is included in fees, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included' and there is no onsite verification; MLS data supports inclusion but lack of remarks lowers confidence to a moderate level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of eight current MLS listings check SEWER as included in association fees, and historical confidence was Medium. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'sewer included' (remarks reference plumbing retrofit/completion but not fee inclusion), so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and may reflect agent copy/paste rather than explicit confirmation.
All eight current MLS listings indicate WATER is included in association fees, giving uniform checkbox evidence. Public remarks do not explicitly confirm 'water included' (they note plumbing upgrades), so the conclusion relies on consistent MLS entries across multiple listings though it may reflect checkbox copy/paste rather than explicit agent remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for Pensacola Gardens reference outdoor living: at least four remark sections mention "large patio", "large lanai", "unique lanai space" and "large courtyard indoor/outdoor living." CURRENT MLS amenity checkboxes also list PATDEC/COVPAT on 3 of 6 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks, so the building is marked as having patio/deck amenities with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across listings that the building provides storage units/lockers: 7 of 8 public remarks explicitly mention storage (phrases include "Additional large storage closet", "spacious storage closets for each owner", "Spacious exterior storage comes with the unit", "Extra-Large storage unit", and "large, individual storage space"). This is consistent with MLS amenities (7/8) and unit features (5/8), suggesting the building reliably offers storage for owners.
Multiple listings clearly describe various types of storage (exterior, large individual, extra storage) but never mention surfboard or board storage. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no matches, so surfboard-specific storage is likely not a dedicated feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All eight current MLS listings show the pool amenity and multiple agent remarks reference a shared pool — examples include "community pool", "swimming pool", and "cool off and unwind by the pool, conveniently located just steps away from your unit." Evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building has a communal swimming pool.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a pool but never describe it as a salt water, saltwater, saline, or salt pool. I specifically searched for those terms and found no matches. Based on this absence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention shared laundry: e.g., 'Community laundry located on 1st floor,' 'just one other unit separates you from the community pool and laundry area,' and repeated 'community laundry' notes across at least 5 separate remarks. Evidence is consistent across different listings/agents and matches the MLS COMLAU amenity checkbox, so high confidence that the building has community laundry facilities.
The remarks note 'community laundry' but do not specify payment methods or fees. Terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' do not appear. With no explicit evidence of paid operation, this is set to false by default.
The listings confirm there is community laundry but never describe it as being on each or every floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording and found none. Given this absence, it's likely laundry is not provided on every floor.
All 8 current MLS listings include parking features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/covered/etc.), and public remarks repeatedly reference parking — e.g., "1-parking home at Pensacola Gardens" and "1pkg" — suggesting building-level parking is available. The consistency across multiple listings and MLS checkbox data provides strong evidence this building offers parking.
Seven of eight current MLS records list ASSIGN in parking_features and remarks explicitly mention assigned parking — e.g., "one assigned parking stall" and "1pkg" — indicating that assigned/reserved parking is offered for units in this building. The repeated, specific language across listings supports a high-confidence conclusion.
No analysis available
Listings consistently mention an assigned parking stall/1 parking for units, but there is no explicit language that parking is deeded or included in the deed. Based on the remarks alone, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', and similar terms; none were found. There is no evidence in the remarks to determine whether a monthly parking fee applies.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar and found no references. No evidence of a formal parking waitlist system in the listings.
No analysis available
The remarks describe location, upgrades, pool, storage, pet-friendliness, and a resident manager but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no results. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have card/fob access security.
No analysis available
The listings highlight amenities such as a pool, photovoltaic panels, extra storage, and an on-site resident manager, but do not mention any security patrol or roving security. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found none. In the absence of any evidence, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 of 8 current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to CONCRE, though none of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'. The consistency across multiple agents/listings provides moderate implied evidence that the building is concrete construction rather than isolated checkbox error.
No analysis available
Three out of eight current MLS listings have the construction_materials checkbox set to HOLTIL, but none of the public remarks reference 'hollow tile' explicitly. The presence in multiple listings suggests some portions or units may be hollow-tile, but evidence is limited to agent-checked boxes and not corroborated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', 'nightly', and related terms and found none. In absence of explicit allowance language, STR is assumed not allowed based on available public remarks.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or named-hotel management references and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated in the remarks, participation in a hotel rental pool is not supported.
Looked for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. Given no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool, there is no indication of mandatory rental-pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease ends', or a four-digit expiry year and found no references. Without any explicit leasehold language or year, the lease expiry is unknown.
Searched the listing remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted', or 'VA financing' and found none. No evidence in the public remarks to indicate VA loan approval.
Multiple remark entries explicitly state the building is 100% insured (e.g., 'Building is 100% INSURED', 'Building Insurance coverage is at 100%'). This directly indicates comprehensive HOA/building (walls-in) insurance; set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection' and similar wording but found nothing in the remarks. With no explicit statement, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention makes it likely not reported).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the eight current public remarks explicitly states "Corner unit with a Honolulu city view." Historical data also noted a city view mention (Medium confidence). However, the MLS view checkbox appears unset across listings, so evidence is limited to a single remark and may reflect agent copy/paste; nonetheless there is at least one unit advertised with city views, so the building is marked as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings reference a 'Honolulu city view' and convenience to various Honolulu locations, but do not mention seeing fireworks from the property. I specifically looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found none. This suggests the building is not being promoted for fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the public remarks explicitly states, "this quiet, well-maintained building has an on-site resident manager," and MLS checkbox data currently shows RESMAN in 4 of 6 listings. While prior confidence is absent, the explicit remark plus multiple listings checking the amenity support including the feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.