Peninsula at Hawaii Kai IV
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Peninsula at Hawaii Kai IV
Building Overview
Peninsula at Hawaii Kai IV in Hawaii Kai — built 2003; no pets and no short-term rentals (per MLS data).
About Peninsula at Hawaii Kai IV
Peninsula at Hawaii Kai IV is located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood and was built in 2003. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building's documented policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. No specific common-area amenities or unit features are listed in the MLS data provided.
Management company, parking arrangements, maintenance fees and other homeowner association details are not indicated in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The state registration reports 5 floors for this single-building registration, supporting the stored value. The two listings reach only floors 1-2, and the unit-number floor signal disagrees, so they do not establish the top floor; the county's 4-floor figure applies to a shared parcel.
The state registration reports 111 units for this single-building registration, supporting the stored value. The county's 537 units cover four buildings sharing the parcel and therefore provide only an upper bound, while the two listings are not a complete count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 2 listings contain the MLS inclusion code OTCOEX, which supports that common-area expenses are included. However, neither listing specifically mentions common-area electricity, so the evidence is based primarily on consistent MLS data rather than explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 2 listings indicate HOTWAT, and 2 of 2 list WTRHTR. The consistent presence of water heaters across both listings strongly supports that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee; public remarks do not contradict this.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water is marked as included in 1 of 2 current MLS listings, with no confirming or contradicting public-remarks language. This suggests water may be included, but the evidence is weaker than for the other fee features because the MLS data is not unanimous.
Both listings include BBQ in the current MLS amenities. The feature is supported consistently across listings, but the absence of a remark makes it less certain than amenities explicitly described in the marketing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two current listings reports a car wash amenity. Because the feature is not consistently reported and is absent from both remarks, evidence is limited and should be treated cautiously.
A clubhouse is checked in both current MLS records. No public remark independently confirms it, so the evidence is consistent but may reflect copied MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The exercise room is supported by 2/2 current MLS listings and an explicit remark describing an "exercise room." This is strong, corroborated evidence rather than checkbox-only data.
No analysis available
Both current listings identify a meeting room amenity. Since neither agent describes it in the remarks, confidence is moderate and based primarily on consistent MLS coding.
Both listings mention qualifying outdoor spaces, including a "large lanai" and "recreation deck." The evidence is explicit across multiple listings and is supported by the current MLS amenity data, although the checkbox appears in only 1 of 2 listings.
A walking/jogging path is present in both current MLS amenity records. The remarks provide only indirect support through references to landscaped open space, so this may rely partly on copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A trash chute is reported in one of the two current MLS records. Neither remark confirms it, so evidence is weak and may reflect an isolated or copied amenity entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The whirlpool feature is supported by 2/2 MLS listings and an explicit reference to a "hot tub." The direct wording and consistent amenity coding provide strong evidence that the building offers this feature.
The pool is explicitly mentioned in 1 of 2 current listing remarks, with the key phrase "Enjoy all the amenities, including a pool." Both current listings include pool-related MLS amenity data, providing strong building-level support despite the pool not being named in the other remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings indicate washer/dryer availability through MLS inclusions. One remark explicitly confirms the washer and dryer are located in the unit's garage, providing strong evidence that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is indicated in 2 of 2 current listings through the ASSIGN parking feature. The remarks do not independently describe assigned or reserved stalls, but the consistent checkbox data across both listings is strong evidence.
Covered parking is indicated in 2 of 2 current listings through covered/garage-related MLS features. One listing explicitly confirms a garage, providing direct support that the building offers covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking appears in 1 of 2 current listings via the GUEST parking feature. Neither listing provides supporting remarks, so this may reflect building availability but is less strongly corroborated than the other parking features.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is indicated in 2 of 2 current listings. The explicit description of a second stall being tandem to the garage strongly confirms that the building offers tandem parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 2 listings mention security guard service or related phrases. The feature appears in only 1 of 2 MLS amenity fields, with no supporting details across multiple agents, so it is omitted as likely unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention central AC, HVAC, or forced air. However, both listings include ACCEN in inclusions, and one also lists ACCEN/CENAC in unit features, providing consistent evidence that the building offers central air conditioning, though the checkbox data may be copied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two listings identifies concrete construction in the MLS data, but neither listing includes supporting remarks such as “concrete building” or “reinforced concrete.” This is limited, checkbox-based evidence rather than confirmation across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings report steel-frame construction in the MLS data. No remarks quote “steel frame” or provide construction details, so the evidence is consistent but appears to rely on MLS checkbox data rather than independent narrative confirmation.
Both listings identify a slab foundation in the MLS data. Neither public-remarks section independently confirms the foundation type, so this is consistent building-level MLS evidence without explicit narrative support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system. FIRSPR appears in only 1 of 2 listings, with no corroborating remarks across agents, so the checkbox appears likely to be unverified rather than reliable building-level evidence.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two listings has GARDEN in the view description, while the other has NONE. Remarks for the first listing mention "beautiful landscaping" and "lots of open space," supporting garden or landscaped views, though the evidence reflects unit-level variation rather than a feature present from every unit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.