Pearl Kai Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl Kai Terrace
Building Overview
Pearl Kai Terrace in Pearl City — built 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to MLS data.
About Pearl Kai Terrace
Pearl Kai Terrace is a residential building located in Pearl City, built in 1974. According to available records, specific information on building size, number of units, and construction type is not listed in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The management company is not identified in the available MLS information. Amenities and common-area features are not specified in the provided records.
Parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, and other operational details are not included in the MLS data supplied. Buyers should verify parking, fee schedules, rules, and any additional amenities or restrictions with the listing agent or management before making decisions. This summary is based on MLS data and should be independently confirmed.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrases about the resident mix, but the remarks do not mention it. Without explicit evidence, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I looked for references like 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a stated count, but found none. The '2nd-floor walk-up' wording points away from an elevator in that unit’s building, but there is not enough evidence to assign a numeric elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three listings currently mark OTCOEX/common area electricity as included in the HOA/association fee. None of the public remarks explicitly discuss common-area power, so the evidence looks like MLS checkbox data rather than remark confirmation, but it still suggests the building likely includes this cost.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listings include sewer in the association fees, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, but the consistent 3/3 MLS data makes this very likely to be correct.
Water is listed as included in the association fee in all three listings. Even though the public remarks do not call it out, the repeated 3/3 MLS confirmation is strong evidence that this building includes water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is indicated by the MLS amenities on all 3 listings (3/3 show COMLAU). None of the public remarks explicitly mention a laundry room, coin laundry, or shared laundry, so the evidence comes from consistent MLS data rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present in the building. Across the remarks, 3 listings reference parking in different ways, including '7 parking stalls,' 'one covered parking spot,' and '1-parking condo,' which strongly confirms that buyers have parking available here.
Assigned parking appears to be available in the building. The MLS data is consistent across all 3 listings, and the remarks support that with language suggesting a specific parking spot rather than general open parking.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks instead describe parking as available/rented/included by unit, which does not confirm deeded ownership, so this is marked false.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit parking charge, monthly fee, or rental cost associated with parking. The remarks mention rented stalls, but they do not provide a fee amount, so the parking fee cannot be determined.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as "join the waitlist" or "parking waiting list." Nothing in the remarks suggests a waitlist system, so this is set to false from lack of evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports window AC for this building. The current MLS data has ACWIUN checked in all 3/3 listings, and one remark explicitly states the unit has 'three window AC units to keep you cool during the summer months.' This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent error.
This feature is supported by the current MLS data: 3 of 3 listings identify the building material as concrete (CONCRE). None of the public remarks contradict this, and the repeated MLS material entry suggests a building-level characteristic rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, including NUC/TVU references or "vacation rental" wording. None was found, so STR allowance is unconfirmed and treated as false from absence of support.
I searched for hotel pool terms such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool programs. There is no such language in the remarks, and without STR support this cannot be true.
I looked for language indicating a mandatory rental pool, such as required participation or cannot opt out. The remarks contain nothing about a rental pool, so this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease expiry language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or a renewal year, but nothing was stated. Because no leasehold details appear in the public remarks, the expiration year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for any explicit VA loan approval language and found none. With no public remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false based on absence of support in the listings.
I looked for wording about full building insurance or walls-in coverage and found no references. Since the remarks do not address insurance status, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance language and found nothing. Because there is no explicit mention and no prior value, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.