Pearl Horizons 3A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Pearl Horizons 3A
Building Overview
Pearl Horizons 3A in Aiea — built 1988; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per MLS data.
About Pearl Horizons 3A
Pearl Horizons 3A is a condominium building located in Aiea, originally built in 1988. According to available MLS records, specific details on unit sizes, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the listing data.
Based on MLS data, pet ownership and short-term rentals are not permitted at Pearl Horizons 3A. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or common-area information is specified in the MLS information provided.
Buyers should note that parking, maintenance fees, specific unit features, and other policies are not detailed in the MLS summary. Prospective purchasers are advised to verify all building particulars, rules, and fees with the seller, association, or management prior to making any decisions, as this summary is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy clues like a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none appeared in the remarks. Since no occupancy rate is stated, the value remains unknown from the provided text.
I looked for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or any building elevator count, but none were mentioned in the public remarks. Based on the remarks alone, the number of elevators cannot be verified.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is partial MLS checkbox support for common-area electricity, with 5 of 9 listings marked OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. However, none of the public remarks explicitly say 'common area electricity' or similar, so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than remark-verified evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is consistently shown in the current MLS data, with 9 of 9 listings marked SEWER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not explicitly repeat it, but there is no sign of a correction or contradiction, so this is strong building-level evidence.
Water inclusion is consistently shown in the current MLS data, with 9 of 9 listings marked WATER in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'water included,' but there is no contrary evidence, making this strong building-level evidence.
BBQ is strongly supported by the current listing set: 7 of 9 listings include it in MLS amenities, and multiple remarks independently describe a "BBQ area" or "barbecue area." The wording is consistent across different listings, so this appears to be a real shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage references and found none in the remarks. There is no public listing evidence indicating the building offers surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool is supported by direct remarks in multiple listings, including "jacuzzi" and amenity lists that pair it with the pool and BBQ area. Although only 2 of 9 MLS entries currently mark it, the repeated explicit mentions are strong enough to confirm a building spa/whirlpool amenity.
Pool is strongly supported across the listings: 9/9 current MLS amenities include pool-related codes, and multiple remarks say "pool," "swimming pool," or "relax by the pool and BBQ area." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than a single copy-paste remark, so this is a high-confidence building amenity.
No analysis available
The remarks confirm the building has a pool, but they do not describe it as salt water. I searched for salt pool terminology and found no evidence for this feature.
Strong, repeated evidence across the listings confirms in-unit laundry. Several remarks explicitly state "new stacked washer and dryer," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "washer/dryer inside the unit," matching the MLS inclusions data (9/9). This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for evidence that community laundry is paid or coin-operated, but the remarks do not mention any shared laundry room at all. The only laundry references are to in-unit washer/dryer setups, so there is no support for paid community laundry.
I searched for references to laundry rooms on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or community laundry locations and found none. The public remarks only describe in-unit laundry, which does not support this feature.
Parking is clearly present across the building. Every current MLS listing includes a parking feature, and the remarks repeatedly mention assigned stalls, including several references to 'one assigned parking stall' and 'two assigned parking stalls.'
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported by both the MLS data and the public remarks. Most listings checked ASSIGN, and the descriptions consistently use explicit language like 'assigned parking' and 'two assigned stalls,' which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings consistently describe assigned stalls, which does not indicate deeded parking. Based on the remarks, deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, rental stall cost, or similar language. The remarks mention assigned stalls but do not state any separate parking cost. There is not enough evidence to determine a monthly parking fee.
Guest parking appears in about half of the current MLS records, but none of the public remarks explicitly call it out. The evidence is moderate and relies on checkbox data rather than descriptive confirmation, so confidence is lower than for general or assigned parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join a list for stalls. None of the remarks mention any waitlist process. With no evidence suggesting one, this is marked false.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry or electronic access and found none. The remarks mention security patrol, but not card-based building access.
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed in the public remarks. The listing explicitly includes security patrol as one of the community amenities, so this is a strong match.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for A/C is present across multiple listings, but the remarks are not consistently specific about window units. The strongest current support is the MLS inclusion code ACWIUN appearing in 6/9 listings, with only some remarks mentioning air conditioning at all and one specifically saying "2 split AC units." This looks more like mixed MLS data than a clearly documented building-wide upgrade.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for above-ground construction: 2 of 9 current MLS listings include ABOGRO in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly mention above-ground construction, so this appears to be an inconsistent MLS checkbox rather than a clearly documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related phrases such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, and TVU. The remarks contain none of these indicators. Since there is also no sign the building permits STRs, this is marked false.
I looked for hotel pool language like hotel rental pool, hotel program, or branded rental management. None appeared in the remarks. Because STR is not evidenced here, hotel pool participation is also false.
I searched for terms indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as must rent, required program, or cannot opt out. There is no such language in the remarks. With no evidence of any hotel pool arrangement, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, leasehold, or renewal dates, but found nothing. There is no evidence in the provided remarks to identify a lease expiration year. This remains unknown from the available text.
I found a direct reference to VA financing via the phrase "VA assumable" in one listing. While this is not the exact wording "VA approved," it is strong evidence that VA-related financing is being marketed for these units. I did not find any explicit contradiction in the remarks.
I checked the remarks for insurance/coverage language such as fully insured, walls-in, or full HOA coverage, but there were no references. The listing remarks do not provide enough information to confirm that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, fire safety certification, and passed inspection references, but found nothing. With no explicit mention and no prior value provided, this is treated as not evidenced in the listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the provided set explicitly mention sunset views, and the MLS view data has 0/9 marked SUNSET while 5/9 are NONE. The remarks instead describe privacy, trade winds, mauka-facing orientation, and a Pearl Harbor view, which suggests the earlier sunset implication was likely a copy/paste or MLS-data mismatch rather than a real building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like fireworks view, see fireworks from the unit, or watch fireworks from the lanai and found nothing. The listings mention views of Pearl Harbor and breezes, but not fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.