Parkview Village Condo
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Parkview Village Condo
Building Overview
Parkview Village Condo in Waipahu — built 1981 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Parkview Village Condo
Parkview Village Condo is located in the Waipahu neighborhood and was built in 1981. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count information are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features listed in MLS data include building construction type (concrete) and policy restrictions: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The MLS record does not list a management company for the association.
Additional details commonly requested by buyers — such as parking arrangements, HOA fees, specific amenities, maintenance policies, and lease or rental rules beyond short-term rental prohibition — are not included in the provided MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings reach floor 2, and both the county parcel record and state registration report 2 floors. No penthouse or unit-number evidence contradicts this.
The county record reports 120 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 120 units. The 123-unit dwell sum is set aside because it includes units beyond the reconciled residential count.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1312. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." None were found, and no current elevator count is provided, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Twelve of 15 listings list OTCOEX, strongly indicating that common-area expenses are included in the maintenance fee. Remarks do not explicitly quote 'common area electricity,' but one confirms coverage of 'common area maintenance'; the repeated checkbox evidence appears consistent across listings rather than being an isolated entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of 15 listings indicate hot water is included, and 10 list WTRHTR. Multiple listings mention individual water heaters, including water heaters installed in 2020, 2024, and newer replacements, providing strong evidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 14 listings mark sewer as included, and one explicitly says the maintenance fee "covers water & sewer." Evidence is somewhat inconsistent because another listing says sewer and water are sub-metered and paid according to usage, but the explicit inclusion statement supports the feature.
Four of 14 listings mark water as included, with one clear remark stating the fee "covers water & sewer." Another listing says water is sub-metered and usage-based, so the evidence is mixed, but the repeated MLS data and explicit coverage language support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by MLS data across multiple listings, including 4/15 building amenity records and 6/15 unit-feature records. Two remarks explicitly mention a "large storage area" and "Additional storage space," so this appears to be a legitimate feature available to some units rather than a single unsupported checkbox.
Some remarks mention unit storage areas or additional storage space, but none identify dedicated surfboard or board storage. The feature is therefore unsupported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No swimming pool is identified in the building context or public remarks. Therefore, there is no evidence of a saltwater pool.
At least 8 of the provided remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including "full size washer/dryer in the unit," "washer and dryer," "new washer and dryer-10/24," and "all new appliances including the washer/dryer." Combined with 15/15 MLS listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions and prior high confidence, the evidence is strong across multiple listings rather than relying solely on a checkbox.
No analysis available
Several listings mention full-size or newer washers and dryers inside the units. The remarks do not identify any shared laundry facility or payment requirement.
The remarks consistently describe in-unit washers and dryers rather than community laundry facilities. No evidence supports laundry availability on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: at least 8 of 15 remarks explicitly mention assigned stalls, parking stalls, or street parking. Key phrases include 'one assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' and 'TWO parking stalls,' with confirmations from multiple listings rather than relying only on copied MLS checkboxes.
Assigned parking is confirmed by multiple current listings, with at least 4 explicit mentions of assigned or designated stalls. Key phrases include 'one assigned parking stall,' 'two assigned parking stalls,' and a correction explaining that stall #177 does not transfer but can be rented, indicating the feature exists even though individual stall rights vary.
No analysis available
Parking is repeatedly described as assigned rather than deeded or owned with the unit. The explicit statement that a stall does not transfer strongly indicates the parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly identify a monthly parking charge of $60 for a second stall. This is direct evidence of the building's parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention assigned stalls, abundant street parking, and a paid second stall, but do not describe a parking waitlist system. In the absence of explicit waitlist language, this is treated as false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks mention individual security screen or security doors, but these do not establish a building-wide card or fob access system. No qualifying security-card feature is described.
No analysis available
The listings do not describe any security patrol service. References to unit security doors are not evidence of building patrol coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 13 public remarks explicitly mentions "2 split AC units," while 2 of 13 listings show ACSPL in the current MLS inclusions. Evidence is limited in breadth but includes a clear, specific statement confirming the feature is available in at least one unit.
1 of 14 listings explicitly mentions “window A/C units.” The remaining remarks generally omit window AC, while one describes “2 split AC units,” so evidence for window units is limited but the direct statement confirms availability in at least one unit.
No analysis available
Fourteen of 15 current listings identify DOUWAL construction, and historical data showed the same pattern in 13 of 14 records. No remarks explicitly quote 'double wall,' but the strong, repeated MLS coding across listings supports including the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided listings reference a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. SLAB appears in only 3 of 15 current MLS records, matching the prior low-confidence pattern and providing insufficient evidence to confirm this construction feature.
No analysis available
None of the provided listings mention wood-frame construction or wood framing. WOOFRA appears in only 2 of 15 current MLS records, consistent with the prior low-confidence evidence and insufficient to validate this building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings characterize the properties as residential homes and investment opportunities but do not state that short-term rentals are allowed. No explicit STR prohibition was found either, so this is treated as false based on the lack of authorization evidence.
The remarks contain no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool or hotel operations. Because STR permission is not supported, the hotel-pool feature must also be false.
The remarks provide no evidence that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since STR authorization is not supported, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terminology and specific four-digit lease-expiry or renewal years. No applicable year was found, so the lease-expiry year remains unknown.
The public remarks provide repeated, direct evidence that VA-eligible buyers can assume existing financing. This strongly supports VA financing availability for the building.
One listing explicitly states that the building is "100% hurricane insured," strongly supporting comprehensive building insurance. Although the remark does not specifically use the term walls-in coverage, it corroborates the existing high-confidence verification of full insurance.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for FLSE passage, fire/life safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found; with no current verified value, this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence under the absence rule.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly mention ocean views, including 'unobstructed gorgeous view of mountains, Diamond Head, Pearl Harbor and ocean' and 'enjoy the sunset and oceanviews.' This confirms the building offers ocean-view units and is consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment and current MLS data showing OCEAN in 6 of 14 listings.
At least 3 listings explicitly mention mountain views or views of mountains. The repeated descriptions across separate listings, together with MOUNTA appearing in 8 of 14 current MLS view descriptions, strongly support that the building offers mountain-view units.
2 of 13 remarks explicitly mention Diamond Head views. The phrases "view of ... Diamond Head" and "Enjoy Diamond Head ... views" are clear, specific confirmations from separate listings.
At least 2 listings explicitly identify city views. The phrases 'views of the city and mountains' and 'Diamond Head, city and garden views' provide direct support, consistent with CITY appearing in 8 of 14 current MLS view descriptions.
No analysis available
Garden or landscaped views are supported by 5 of 15 current MLS listings, including an explicit remark describing "Diamond Head, city and garden views." Additional listings mention "lush green scenery," green spaces, preservation areas, and park-like surroundings, indicating this is not solely an isolated or unsupported checkbox entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly describe viewing Waikiki fireworks from a unit's covered lanai. This directly satisfies the requirement for a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by 8 of 14 current MLS listings with the RESMAN amenity, consistent with the prior evidence of 7 of 13 listings. One current remark explicitly references "Resident Manager Jason," providing direct confirmation beyond checkbox data; the feature appears to be a building amenity rather than a unit-specific claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.