Palehua Nani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Nani
Building Overview
Palehua Nani in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 1987; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed.
About Palehua Nani
Palehua Nani is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood, originally built in 1987. Based on MLS data, specific details such as unit count, square footage ranges, and construction type are not available in the provided records.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this building. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional information commonly sought by buyers — including parking arrangements, homeowner association fees, utilities, and any guest or leasing restrictions beyond short-term rental and pet policies — is not detailed in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent, management, or association. This summary is based on MLS data and available records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports common-area electricity being included in the maintenance fee. MLS data shows OTCOEX in 12 of 15 listings, which is a consistent pattern across listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste error. Public remarks do not explicitly mention common electricity, but nothing contradicts the MLS inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points away from hot water being included in the maintenance fee. No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and many listings instead note WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator the unit has its own water heater rather than building-supplied hot water. The public remarks are silent on hot water inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a consistent building feature. MLS data shows SEWER in 12 of 15 listings, which is strong repeated evidence across multiple listings/agents. The public remarks do not explicitly mention sewer, but they do not conflict with the MLS data.
Water is very likely included in the HOA/maintenance fee for this building. MLS data shows WATER in 12 of 15 listings, indicating a repeated pattern rather than a sporadic checkbox. Public remarks do not explicitly call it out, but there is no evidence against it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports patio/deck amenities in Palehua Nani, with MLS checkboxes present on 5 of 15 listings and at least one remark explicitly mentioning a 'private patio.' The remarks are mostly about private outdoor areas rather than a shared deck, but buyers searching for patio/deck space would still find this building relevant.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported and appears repeatedly across multiple listings, with at least 8 distinct remarks referencing 'fenced private yard,' 'private usable yard,' 'private grassy yard,' 'private garden/yard,' 'private yard,' and 'enclosed front yard space.' The consistency across multiple remarks and the ongoing PRIYAR checkbox makes this a very high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported across multiple listings and agents: several remarks explicitly cite "two outdoor storage closets," "ample storage," and additional closet/pantry space. The MLS data also shows storage appearing in both building amenities and unit features for 3/15 current listings, so this appears to be a real building-level feature available in some units rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Palehua Nani offers in-unit laundry in at least some units. I found 4+ listings explicitly saying "washer and dryer within the unit," "stackable washer/dryer combo," "upgraded full-size washer & dryer," and "washer and dryer in the unit." The remarks are consistent across multiple listings and appear to confirm the MLS inclusion rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly offered for this building. Across the public remarks, multiple listings mention parking in concrete terms, including "2 parking stalls," "two open parking stalls," and "one assigned parking spot included," which aligns with the current MLS parking_features being populated in all listings. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is supported by both the MLS and the listing remarks. Several remarks explicitly say "assigned parking spot" or "assigned parking stall," while the current MLS data shows ASSIGN in most listings. The evidence is strong and repeated across multiple listings, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
I found repeated references to assigned, open, and dedicated stalls, which confirm parking availability. However, there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded or owned with the unit, so this cannot be confirmed as deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for language about parking fees, rental charges, or any extra monthly parking cost and found none. The remarks only discuss parking stalls and convenience, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking queue, or needing to join a list for parking and found nothing. The listings instead mention included/assigned stalls, with no indication of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have split (ductless/mini-split) AC: 2 of 14 current MLS listings include ACSPL and one listing remark explicitly says 'comes with an enclosed front yard space and split AC unit'. The explicit mention in the remarks combined with MLS checkbox occurrences across listings suggests the building offers split AC in at least some units; evidence is from multiple agent entries but includes a clear, explicit agent remark.
No listing remarks mention window or wall air-conditioning despite 6 of 14 MLS listings having ACWIUN checked. With no corroborating public-remarks evidence and no prior history, the checked boxes appear unverified (likely copy/paste), so the building is omitted for window AC availability.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks include terms like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Despite 9 of 14 current MLS listings showing DOUWAL, there is no supporting descriptive text across listings to confirm this structural detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks reference 'concrete slab,' 'slab,' or 'solid concrete foundation' in any listing text. With only 4 of 14 current MLS listings showing SLAB and no corroborating remarks, there is insufficient evidence to assert the building is slab‑on‑grade.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks mention wood frame or 'wood frame construction.' Although 7 of 14 current MLS listings have WOOFRA checked, there is no corroborating language in any agent remarks, suggesting the checkbox may be copy/paste rather than verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-stay rules, but found none. With no evidence in the remarks supporting STR use, this is treated as not allowed based on available public remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation and found nothing. Since there is no STR allowance evidence either, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental program membership, or inability to opt out, but found nothing. With no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool program, mandatory pooling is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "lease to [year]," and renewal wording, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
The remarks directly state that the building is VA-approved, which supports VA financing acceptance. This is repeated in multiple listings, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly supported across multiple listings, with at least 2 remarks explicitly saying 'ocean view' or 'ocean views.' The MLS data also shows 5/15 listings marked OCEAN, so this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks in the provided set explicitly mention city, downtown, urban, or cityscape views. Given the sparse MLS signal and repeated absence in remarks, city views do not appear reliably supported for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 14 listings list SUNSET in view_descriptions and none of the 14 public remarks explicitly mention 'sunset' or 'western exposure'. Several remarks reference 'ocean view' or 'gorgeous views' and 'cool breezes', but there is no language about evening/western sunset views. Given the MLS checkbox is not set and no remarks support sunset views, we mark view_sunset as false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 14 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. Two public remarks explicitly state a resident/on-site manager (e.g., "On-site resident manager readily available to assist with any concerns." and "Rest easy knowing that a resident manager is on-site to assist with any concerns or needs that may arise."). The checkbox presence across many listings plus multiple agent remarks provides moderate confidence that the building has a resident manager, though some listings omit the note, so some agent copy/paste or inconsistency is possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.