Palehua Nani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Nani
Building Overview
Palehua Nani in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 1987; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed.
About Palehua Nani
Palehua Nani is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood, originally built in 1987. Based on MLS data, specific details such as unit count, square footage ranges, and construction type are not available in the provided records.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this building. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional information commonly sought by buyers — including parking arrangements, homeowner association fees, utilities, and any guest or leasing restrictions beyond short-term rental and pet policies — is not detailed in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent, management, or association. This summary is based on MLS data and available records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows OTCOEX in 11 of 14 listings indicating 'common area electricity' is included. Public remarks do not explicitly mention common electric (remarks only note "low maintenance fees"), but the consistent MLS inclusion across multiple listings suggests building-level inclusion of common area electricity rather than isolated copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, while 10 of 14 listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions — a strong indicator hot water is provided by individual unit heaters and not included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not claim hot water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows SEWER included in 11 of 14 listings' association_fee_includes. Public remarks don't explicitly state 'sewer included' (they generally reference "low maintenance fees"), but the repeated MLS checkbox across multiple listings supports that sewer is included in HOA fees.
Water is listed in association_fee_includes for 11 of 14 MLS listings, implying water is included in HOA fees. While public remarks don't explicitly state 'water included', the consistent MLS entries across many listings indicate building-level inclusion of water in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows PATDEC/COVPAT on 4 of 14 listings and at least one remark explicitly states 'private patio'; many other remarks reference usable outdoor space, patios/decks or covered outdoor areas. Evidence is spread across multiple agent listings but explicit patio/deck wording in remarks is less common than private-yard language, so confidence is moderate (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple independent listings (at least 9 separate public-remarks entries) explicitly mention private yard features—phrases include 'fenced private yard', 'private grassy yard', 'private garden/yard', 'private patio', 'large semi-private fenced yard', and 'enclosed front yard space'. The consistency across many agent remarks indicates strong evidence the building/units offer private yard space, so confidence is high (0.90).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of 14 current listings include the MLS storage amenity (and two list storage in unit features). Remarks frequently note 'ample storage', 'generous storage', and 'two outdoor closets', but none explicitly say 'storage locker' or 'building storage units'. The evidence suggests some form of extra storage is available in the property but is weak and possibly due to agent copy/paste rather than a clear, building-level locker program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry: current MLS checkbox shows 13/14 listings include washer/dryer, and at least five individual public remarks explicitly mention phrases like 'washer and dryer within the unit', 'stackable washer/dryer combo', and 'upgraded full-size washer & dryer'. The mentions appear across multiple listings/agents (some likely copy-paste), but the consistency and variety of wording support including laundry_in_unit as true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: the MLS checkbox is set to ASSIGN in 11 of 14 listings and at least 9 of the provided public remarks explicitly reference assigned/dedicated stalls or specific stall numbers (examples: 'one assigned parking spot included', 'two assigned parking stall unit', 'two open parking stalls (54C and 56)'). Some listings use 'open stalls' language, but multiple agents state 'assigned' or give stall numbers, indicating assigned/reserved parking is offered.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention assigned/assigned stalls and dedicated parking in front of units, but there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded/owned. Without the explicit 'deeded' language, we cannot conclude parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', or 'parking rental' but found none. Because there is no information about parking fees in the remarks, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for references to a waitlist or parking queue but found nothing. Absence of mention suggests there is not a waitlist, but this is unconfirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have split (ductless/mini-split) AC: 2 of 14 current MLS listings include ACSPL and one listing remark explicitly says 'comes with an enclosed front yard space and split AC unit'. The explicit mention in the remarks combined with MLS checkbox occurrences across listings suggests the building offers split AC in at least some units; evidence is from multiple agent entries but includes a clear, explicit agent remark.
No listing remarks mention window or wall air-conditioning despite 6 of 14 MLS listings having ACWIUN checked. With no corroborating public-remarks evidence and no prior history, the checked boxes appear unverified (likely copy/paste), so the building is omitted for window AC availability.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks include terms like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Despite 9 of 14 current MLS listings showing DOUWAL, there is no supporting descriptive text across listings to confirm this structural detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks reference 'concrete slab,' 'slab,' or 'solid concrete foundation' in any listing text. With only 4 of 14 current MLS listings showing SLAB and no corroborating remarks, there is insufficient evidence to assert the building is slab‑on‑grade.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks mention wood frame or 'wood frame construction.' Although 7 of 14 current MLS listings have WOOFRA checked, there is no corroborating language in any agent remarks, suggesting the checkbox may be copy/paste rather than verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language about short-term rentals, TVU/NUC, or minimum-stay policies, but the remarks only discuss typical residential features (parking, pet policy, VA approval). In the absence of any STR-related statements, STR allowance is assumed not indicated.
I looked for terms like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or 'managed by [hotel name]' and found none. Since there is no indication STRs are allowed, hotel-pool participation cannot apply.
I searched for language such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' but found nothing. With no STR allowance and no rental pool mentions, mandatory participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease', and specific years (e.g., 2050). There is no indication the property is leasehold or any lease expiry year in the provided public remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly mention the building is VA-approved. This direct statement in the public remarks supports that VA financing is accepted for units in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 14 listings list SUNSET in view_descriptions and none of the 14 public remarks explicitly mention 'sunset' or 'western exposure'. Several remarks reference 'ocean view' or 'gorgeous views' and 'cool breezes', but there is no language about evening/western sunset views. Given the MLS checkbox is not set and no remarks support sunset views, we mark view_sunset as false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 14 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. Two public remarks explicitly state a resident/on-site manager (e.g., "On-site resident manager readily available to assist with any concerns." and "Rest easy knowing that a resident manager is on-site to assist with any concerns or needs that may arise."). The checkbox presence across many listings plus multiple agent remarks provides moderate confidence that the building has a resident manager, though some listings omit the note, so some agent copy/paste or inconsistency is possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.