Palehua Hale 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Hale 3
Building Overview
Palehua Hale 3 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 1979; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Palehua Hale 3
Palehua Hale 3 is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1979. Specific details on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit occupancy policy information: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The property’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, utilities, or condominium association details are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers and agents should verify all facts, policies, and any fees with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or any comparable building-wide occupancy estimate. The remarks only include unit-level wording such as "owner occupied" in one listing, which does not establish a building percentage, so the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or any mention of elevator access, and found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no direct evidence, I am leaving it unknown rather than guessing.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included at the building level. Current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with OTCOEX, which is very strong consistency and likely reflects a standard association fee item rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. Across the current MLS set, 0 of 20 listings mark HOTWAT, and many explicitly list WTRHTR instead; remarks mentioning a newer water heater or solar water heater are consistent with that exclusion.
Internet service appears to be included for at least some or all units in the building. The MLS currently has 7 of 20 listings with INTSER, and remarks explicitly mention 'high-speed fiber optic internet included in maintenance fee' and 'an internet service package,' suggesting a real amenity rather than a stray checkbox.
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 18 of 20 listings, and one remark explicitly says 'water and sewer bills are covered in your maintenance fee,' which strongly confirms the building-level feature.
Water is included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows WATER in 19 of 20 listings, and remarks repeatedly reinforce that water costs are covered, making this one of the most reliable building-level inclusions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 listings explicitly describe a dog park or pet area. Most remarks instead reference community pools, parks, playgrounds, and private yards for pets, which does not establish a shared dog-park amenity. With only 1/20 MLS records showing DGPRK and no supporting remarks, the evidence points to this being an erroneous or unverified MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. Across the remarks, well over 20 listings mention features like “spacious lanai,” “front patio,” “covered lanai,” “oversized lanai/deck,” and “back lanai,” suggesting this is a common building-level amenity or unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. Multiple agents independently describe outdoor living areas, which confirms the MLS pattern.
0 of 20 public remarks explicitly mention a jogging or walking path (search terms like 'jogging path', 'walking path', 'running trail' not found). Several listings reference 'parks', 'playgrounds', 'hiking trails', or 'park-like area' nearby or within the community, but no listing describes a dedicated jogging/walking path. The MLS amenity checkbox appears in 2/20 listings, suggesting inconsistent agent entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
There is very strong support for private yard space in this building. The remarks repeatedly reference “private yard,” “private enclosed backyard,” “fully fenced front and back yards,” “wrap-around yard,” and “large yard,” appearing across many listings from different agents. This is consistent with the historical MLS data and does not look like a stray checkbox issue.
No analysis available
At least six listings have RECARE checked and multiple public remarks explicitly reference Kanehoa Recreation Center/KRC Pool, community pool, playgrounds, and association parks (phrases: 'Kanehoa Recreation Center', 'KRC Pool', 'community pool', 'parks, playgrounds'). Evidence is strong across several agent remarks and aligns with the MLS RECARE flags, indicating the building offers community recreation areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage/locker-style space appears to be a real and recurring feature in this building. Across many listings, agents mention "storage/closet areas," attic storage, built-in storage, and even an exterior storage shed/closet, suggesting the feature is consistently available rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and aligns with the historical MLS checkboxes.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings includes TENCOU, but none of the public remarks mention tennis courts, tennis facilities, or related language. Multiple listings reference community pool/parks but not tennis, suggesting the lone TENCOU checkbox is a data entry error rather than a true building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building/community offers a swimming pool. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings mention it directly, including phrases like "community pool," "resort-style pool," and "KRC Pool." This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste error, and it aligns with the historical MLS amenities data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported: the MLS history shows 20/20 listings including washer/dryer, and several current remarks explicitly describe in-unit laundry. Phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'full washer/dryer,' and 'Indoor laundry room' appear across multiple listings, indicating this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks mention "2 reserved parking stalls," "two side-by-side parking stalls," "two assigned parking spots," and "two dedicated parking spaces," showing this is not a one-off copy-paste claim. The evidence is consistent across many agents and aligns with the high-confidence MLS history.
Assigned/reserved parking is consistently documented in the remarks and MLS history. Listings repeatedly say "2 reserved parking stalls," "two assigned parking spots right in front of the home," and "2 assigned parking stalls," which supports that the building offers designated parking. This appears to be a stable building feature rather than an MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded stall, owned parking, or parking included in deed, but found none. The remarks only describe reserved or assigned stalls, which does not confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking fee, parking rental, additional parking charge, or similar language and found nothing. The listings mention parking stalls, but no separate parking cost is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist wording such as joining a waitlist or parking waiting list, but found no evidence. The remarks consistently refer to assigned or reserved parking, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox ACWIUN is set in 13 of 20 current listings. At least five separate public remarks explicitly reference window units—examples include 'window AC units in every bedroom', 'unit has (4) brand new window units!', and another listing noting '(5) brand new window units!'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and includes explicit mentions of newly installed window units, supporting a high-confidence true for window_ac.
Only 2 of 20 MLS records list concrete (CONCRE) but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete', 'concrete building' or similar. Evidence for concrete construction is weak and appears to be MLS checkbox entries without corroborating agent remarks, so do not include as a confirmed building feature.
The double-wall construction checkbox appears in 14 of 20 current MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe double wall construction. This looks more like consistent MLS checkbox data than copy-paste remarks, so the feature is likely present at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of 20 MLS records indicate SLAB, but the compiled public remarks contain no references to 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'. With prior Low confidence and no corroborating remarks, slab foundation is not reliably supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
15 of 20 current MLS listings mark wood frame construction (WOOFRA), but none of the compiled public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or describe framing. Given the strong representation in MLS checkboxes but absence of corroborating remarks, inclusion is based on MLS data with moderate confidence and may reflect checkbox copy/paste by agents.
Above-ground construction appears in only 5 of 20 current MLS listings and is not supported by any of the public remarks. With no explicit mention of 'above ground construction' or related wording, this looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms, including short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, and TVU, but found no evidence. Based on the public remarks, there is nothing indicating short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool, rental program, managed by hotel, or similar language and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool or required participation language and found nothing. There is no public remark evidence of any rental pool program, mandatory or otherwise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, renewed through, and any 4-digit lease end year, but found nothing. There is no public remark evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
Public remarks strongly support VA financing approval for this building. The listings repeatedly reference VA assumable loans and VA financing approval, which is strong evidence that VA loans are accepted here.
I searched the listing remarks for HOA insurance language that would indicate full building coverage or walls-in coverage, but found no such references. Since the remarks do not address insurance coverage, this feature cannot be confirmed from the provided text.
No analysis available
I looked through the remarks for any language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance wording, but nothing was stated. With no explicit confirmation in the remarks, this remains unverified and is treated as not evidenced here.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are repeatedly confirmed across the listing set, with roughly 9/20 MLS view descriptions referencing OCEAN and multiple remarks calling out 'ocean views,' 'Pacific Ocean views,' and 'partial ocean views.' The consistency across different listings and agents suggests this is a real building-level feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Mountain views appear in many listings, with about 8/20 MLS view descriptions referencing MOUNTA and several remarks explicitly stating 'mountain views' or 'mountain and ocean views.' The repeated mentions across multiple listings indicate this is a genuine feature available from some units in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline-specific views are not clearly supported by the remarks, which consistently mention ocean, mountain, and sunset views instead. With only about 4/20 MLS view descriptions referencing COASTL and no strong current remarks confirming coastline/shoreline/coastal views, this appears to be absent or at least not reliably marketed for the building.
Multiple listings explicitly describe landscaped front and back yards, private garden/yard spaces, and wrap-around yards—key phrases include 'front and back yards have been landscaped', 'private outdoor retreat', and 'wrap-around yard'. MLS view_descriptions historically included GARDEN in 9 of 20 listings and current remarks across many units (numerous agent remarks) consistently reference garden/landscaped views, indicating strong, building-level availability of garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0) reference sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure in the public remarks. With MLS view_descriptions also showing 0 entries for SUNRIS and no agent remarks supporting it, there is strong evidence to mark sunrise views as not offered at the building level.
Sunset views are strongly supported, with about 6/20 MLS view descriptions referencing SUNSET and many remarks directly highlighting 'stunning sunset skies' and 'picture-perfect sunsets.' The feature is repeated across multiple listings and agents, making it highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 20 current MLS listings have the RESMAN checkbox selected, but across the combined public remarks there are zero mentions of a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). Given the lack of any explicit remarks and no historical confirmation, the RESMAN entries appear to be inconsistent or copy/paste errors and the building should not be represented as having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.