Palehua Hale 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Hale 3
Building Overview
Palehua Hale 3 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 1979; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Palehua Hale 3
Palehua Hale 3 is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1979. Specific details on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit occupancy policy information: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The property’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, utilities, or condominium association details are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers and agents should verify all facts, policies, and any fees with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Listings include at least one mention of a specific unit being owner-occupied, but none provide an overall owner-occupancy percentage for the building. Because there is no explicit numeric percentage in the remarks and no current verified value, the building-level owner-occupancy is unknown.
No public remarks refer to elevators. Listings describe split-level/townhome units with exterior entrances, reserved parking stalls, and community pool but do not state any elevator count. Because there is no explicit numeric mention, elevator count is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 current MLS listings include OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'common area electricity' and many listings focus on in-unit solar or low electric bills, so evidence is primarily from multiple agents' MLS checkbox entries rather than repeated remark text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings (0/20) mark HOTWAT as included while 12/20 list WTRHTR (water heater) and numerous remarks mention 'newer water heater', 'solar water heater', or 'new water heater', supporting that hot water is provided by individual units and not covered in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes and public remarks explicitly state 'water and sewer bills are covered in your maintenance fee' (quoted), so evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings.
19 of 20 MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes and at least one remark explicitly states 'water and sewer bills are covered in your maintenance fee.' Combined MLS checkbox prevalence and remark confirmation provide strong evidence that water is included in the HOA fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous listing remarks explicitly mention outdoor living spaces: phrases include "spacious lanai", "private lanai & lush yard", "covered lanai", "oversized lanai/deck", and "extended roof over the open back patio." While checkbox amenities currently show PATDEC/COVPAT on 8 of 20 MLS entries, roughly 15–18 separate remarks reference lanais/patios/decks or covered outdoor spaces across different agent listings, providing strong corroborating evidence that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
0 of 20 public remarks explicitly mention a jogging or walking path (search terms like 'jogging path', 'walking path', 'running trail' not found). Several listings reference 'parks', 'playgrounds', 'hiking trails', or 'park-like area' nearby or within the community, but no listing describes a dedicated jogging/walking path. The MLS amenity checkbox appears in 2/20 listings, suggesting inconsistent agent entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings that units have private yard space: 15 of 20 MLS listings have the PRIYAR amenity checked and public remarks repeatedly state 'wrap-around yard', 'private enclosed backyard', 'fully fenced front and back yards', and 'private lanai & lush yard'. These phrases appear in multiple seller/agent remarks (not isolated to a single posting), supporting inclusion of private_yard for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building/offering includes additional storage: current MLS shows 15/20 listings with STORAG in unit_features and 10/20 with building-level storage checked. Public remarks repeatedly mention storage: "attic storage", "extra storage shed out back", "outdoor storage closet", "bonus outdoor storage area", and "ample storage throughout the home" — language appearing across many agent listings rather than a single isolated remark, supporting inclusion of storage units/lockers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current listings have pool amenities checked in the MLS and numerous public remarks mention access to a community or association pool. Key phrases include "access to the Community Association pool," "resort-style pool," "community pool," and "KRC Pool," appearing across multiple agent remarks rather than a single duplicate sentence, providing strong, consistent evidence that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 MLS listings historically include washer/dryer in the inclusions and current public remarks across the building explicitly reference in‑unit laundry in multiple ads (quotes: "High efficiency Washer and Dryer", "in-unit washer/dryer", "full washer/dryer"). Evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, so the building offers units with in‑unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building offers parking: historical MLS data indicates parking features in 19/20 records and none marked NONE, and many current public-remark variations explicitly state two reserved/assigned or side-by-side parking stalls (quotes include “two designated parking stalls,” “two side-by-side parking stalls,” and “assigned open parking is available for two vehicles”). The consistency across multiple agents/listings suggests the parking information is reliable rather than isolated copy-paste.
MLS checkboxes show 'ASSIGN' on the majority of listings (18/20), and many public remarks explicitly call out 'reserved' or 'assigned' stalls (quotes: '2 reserved parking stalls', 'two assigned parking spots', 'two dedicated parking spaces'), providing strong corroborating evidence that parking stalls are assigned or reserved for units.
No analysis available
Searched for 'deeded', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed'. Remarks consistently mention assigned/reserved stalls but never indicate parking is deeded/owned, so no evidence supports parking being deeded.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', and similar phrases. Only references to assigned/reserved stalls and street parking were found; no parking fee amount or ongoing charge was mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrasing. None of the public remarks refer to a waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox ACWIUN is set in 13 of 20 current listings for the building, and at least three separate public remarks explicitly state window units (quotes include "window AC units in every bedroom", "(4) brand new window units", and "(5) brand new window units!"). The consistency across many listings plus specific counts in remarks indicates multiple units in the building have window air conditioners, so include window_ac=true with high confidence.
Only 2 of 20 MLS records list concrete (CONCRE) but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete', 'concrete building' or similar. Evidence for concrete construction is weak and appears to be MLS checkbox entries without corroborating agent remarks, so do not include as a confirmed building feature.
Although 13 of 20 MLS records include the double-wall checkbox, the public remarks (0 of ~30 compiled blocks) do not mention 'double wall' or similar. Historical confidence was Low and the remarks do not corroborate the MLS checkbox—evidence is insufficient to treat double-wall as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of 20 MLS records indicate SLAB, but the compiled public remarks contain no references to 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'. With prior Low confidence and no corroborating remarks, slab foundation is not reliably supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
While 14 of 20 MLS records mark wood frame (WOOFRA), none of the public remarks mention 'wood frame' or describe framing. Given lack of corroborating remarks and no user/site-visit verification, wood-frame construction is not reliably supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', and minimum-night rules. There is no evidence in the remarks that STRs are permitted, so STR allowed is assumed false based on absence of any supporting language.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', or other hotel/pool rental program language. None found. Because STRs are not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation cannot be true.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or language indicating compulsory participation in a rental pool. No evidence was found; given STRs are not indicated as allowed, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', and four-digit years indicating lease expiry. No leasehold or lease-expiry information was found in the provided remarks.
Numerous listings explicitly reference VA assumable loans and VA financing approval across multiple remarks, providing strong corroborating evidence that VA financing is accepted for units in this community.
Public remarks do not state that the HOA provides full 'walls-in' or comprehensive building insurance. Without explicit language in the listings or a user verification, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of any explicit statement, and with no current verification provided, this field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention is treated as likely not present).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are described across several unit listings (at least 7 listings reference ocean or Pacific views — phrases include 'expansive ocean views', 'partial ocean views', and 'Ocean and Diamond Head views'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with MLS view_descriptions indicating OCEAN in several listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Numerous listings (around 10–12) emphasize landscaped front/back yards, wrap-around yards, and private garden spaces — key phrases include 'wrap-around yard', 'landscaped backyard', and 'garden oasis'. Multiple agents describe garden-like surroundings consistently, so building-level garden views/landscaped outlooks are offered by some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0) reference sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure in the public remarks. With MLS view_descriptions also showing 0 entries for SUNRIS and no agent remarks supporting it, there is strong evidence to mark sunrise views as not offered at the building level.
Sunset views are repeatedly called out across many unit remarks (at least 8 listings reference sunsets — phrases include 'stunning sunset skies' and 'perfect for enjoying sunsets from your lanai'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks, indicating some units offer sunset-facing views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 20 current MLS listings have the RESMAN checkbox selected, but across the combined public remarks there are zero mentions of a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). Given the lack of any explicit remarks and no historical confirmation, the RESMAN entries appear to be inconsistent or copy/paste errors and the building should not be represented as having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.