Palehua Hale 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Palehua Hale 3
Building Overview
Palehua Hale 3 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 1979; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Palehua Hale 3
Palehua Hale 3 is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1979. Specific details on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit occupancy policy information: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The property’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, utilities, or condominium association details are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers and agents should verify all facts, policies, and any fees with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
While at least one listing notes a specific unit is owner-occupied, there is no data in the public remarks about the overall percentage of owner-occupied units in the complex. Without an explicit numeric value in remarks, owner_occupancy remains unknown (null) with low confidence.
Across all compiled listings the units are described as 2-story townhome-style with exterior access, yards, and nearby parking; there are no remarks referencing elevators. Because no numeric value is provided in remarks, we cannot assign a number and retain an unknown (null) value with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates 19 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX (common area electric) in the association fee. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', so the evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes and could be agent copy/paste; confidence is moderate (implied by consistent MLS entries).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence hot water is not included in the HOA fee: MLS data lists HOTWAT=0/20 while 12/20 show WTRHTR (water heater) and several remarks explicitly reference 'Newer Water Heater' or 'solar water heater', implying in-unit/owned hot water systems. This is consistent across multiple listings, so hot water included = false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show 19 of 20 listings include SEWER in association fees, and a public remark explicitly says 'water and sewer bills are covered in your maintenance fee.' Because of both consistent MLS data and at least one explicit remark across agents, sewer included = true with high confidence.
All 20 current MLS listings have WATER in association_fee_includes and at least one public remark explicitly confirms 'water ... covered in your maintenance fee.' The combination of unanimous MLS checkboxes and explicit remark yields high confidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings that units have private yard space: 15 of 20 MLS listings have the PRIYAR amenity checked and public remarks repeatedly state 'wrap-around yard', 'private enclosed backyard', 'fully fenced front and back yards', and 'private lanai & lush yard'. These phrases appear in multiple seller/agent remarks (not isolated to a single posting), supporting inclusion of private_yard for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings that units provide additional storage: 16/20 listings checked STORAG in unit_features and 10/20 checked building-level storage. Remarks repeatedly note "attic storage," "outdoor storage closet/shed," "4 storage/closet areas," and "bonus outdoor storage area," indicating storage is commonly available with units rather than being a single private, unit-exclusive amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current listings have pool amenities checked in the MLS and numerous public remarks mention access to a community or association pool. Key phrases include "access to the Community Association pool," "resort-style pool," "community pool," and "KRC Pool," appearing across multiple agent remarks rather than a single duplicate sentence, providing strong, consistent evidence that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 MLS listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions and numerous public remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry (quotes: "High efficiency Washer and Dryer", "in-unit washer/dryer", "indoor laundry room", "full washer/dryer"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All MLS records (20/20) show parking features present and none show 'NONE'. Public remarks across listings repeatedly note parking stalls or spaces—common phrases include 'two side-by-side parking stalls', '2 reserved parking stalls', and 'assigned open parking'—indicating strong, consistent evidence from multiple agents that the building offers parking.
MLS checkboxes show 'ASSIGN' on the majority of listings (18/20), and many public remarks explicitly call out 'reserved' or 'assigned' stalls (quotes: '2 reserved parking stalls', 'two assigned parking spots', 'two dedicated parking spaces'), providing strong corroborating evidence that parking stalls are assigned or reserved for units.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'deeded', 'owned', or 'parking included in deed'. Listings consistently describe assigned/reserved stalls but do not indicate they are deeded, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar language. Listings indicate assigned or reserved stalls are included but provide no information about a monthly parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist'. None of the public remarks refer to a waitlist system, so there is no evidence of one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
While 13 of 20 current MLS records have the DOUWAL checkbox, none of the public remarks in these listings mention 'double wall', 'double-wall construction', or 'two walls'. Because there is no agent narrative or owner/site-visit verification describing double-wall construction or a recent conversion, evidence is weak and likely reflects checkbox use/copy-paste rather than an explicit documented feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 7 of 20 MLS records indicate SLAB, the compiled public remarks do not reference 'concrete slab' or foundation type, nor do they describe recent foundation changes. With no firsthand verification or explicit textual support in agent remarks, the slab checkbox appears unsupported by the listing narratives and cannot be reliably confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', or minimum-night rules. There is no evidence in the remarks that STRs are permitted, so STR allowed is not supported by these public remarks.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel management references. None found; because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is also unsupported.
Searched remarks for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. No evidence found; there is no indication of mandatory rental-pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or a 4-digit expiry year. Nothing was found, so the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
Several listings explicitly state VA approval and assumable VA loans. This provides strong, corroborating evidence that the building/project accepts VA financing.
None of the listings discuss the HOA having full 'walls-in' or comprehensive building insurance. Because there is no explicit statement that the building is fully insured by the HOA, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No listings indicate the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of any explicit statement that the FLSE was passed, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it likely hasn't been stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many public remarks explicitly reference private or landscaped yards and garden-like surroundings—phrases include “wrap-around yard,” “private outdoor retreat,” “tropical garden oasis,” and “beautifully landscaped backyard.” Numerous listings also note units look out onto park-like or green common areas, indicating the building offers garden views for some units. Evidence is widespread across agents’ remarks (appears in many listings) though MLS view_descriptions currently show GARDEN rarely, suggesting agents emphasize yard/garden features in remarks even if the MLS view checkbox is seldom used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 20 current MLS listings have the RESMAN checkbox selected, but across the combined public remarks there are zero mentions of a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'). Given the lack of any explicit remarks and no historical confirmation, the RESMAN entries appear to be inconsistent or copy/paste errors and the building should not be represented as having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.