Olino at Mehana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Olino at Mehana
Building Overview
Olino at Mehana in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 2015; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Olino at Mehana
Olino at Mehana is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2015. Size, unit mix, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Olino at Mehana include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking arrangements, homeowner association fees, maintenance responsibilities, and other building amenities are not detailed in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking, fee, and amenity information with the listing agent or management and confirm all policies and records independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative description like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied' and found none. Since no numeric or descriptive evidence is present, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references and found none. Because this is a townhouse community and the remarks focus on unit layouts and amenities rather than building vertical access, there is no evidence to confirm an elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
17 of 20 current listings have OTCOEX (common electric) checked in the MLS. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar language, so evidence is primarily MLS checkbox recurrence (likely multiple agents copying). Given the strong MLS signal but absence of confirming remarks, inclusion is made with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current evidence that the HOA/maintenance fee includes hot water. Across the listings, 0/20 show HOTWAT, while multiple remarks instead reference individual water heaters, including a 'solar water heater' and a 'brand new... water heater,' which points away from building-provided hot water. The remarks are consistent with unit-owned heaters and do not suggest a shared hot-water system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 20 current listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or similar, so the signal comes solely from MLS checkboxes across some listings; evidence is present but not strong, so included with low-to-moderate confidence.
7 of 20 listings show WATER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'water included' and instead reference water heaters and a water softener, so the only evidence for water being included is the MLS checkbox on some listings; included with low-to-moderate confidence.
BBQ is strongly supported by the public remarks and the current MLS history. Multiple listings explicitly say "BBQ areas," "BBQ area with event space," "BBQ area, Clubhouse," and "perfect for a relaxing BBQ," showing this is a shared community amenity rather than a one-off mention. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park amenities are very well supported. Listings use phrases like "dog park," "Pawsome Dog Park," "fenced dog park," and "dog parks for small and large dogs," making this one of the clearest shared amenities in the building/community. The repeated, detailed references across many remarks indicate high confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (roughly a dozen passages) reference a fitness center/fitness room/gym or the Mehana Activity Center (MAC) with a gym (e.g., "fitness center", "fitness room", "MAC center with a gym"). Mentions appear across different agent remarks rather than a single one-off, giving strong evidence the building/community offers an exercise room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports patio/deck features in Olino at Mehana. Public remarks mention "cozy lanai," "2 private patios," "private balcony," "front porch," and "open lanai," and the language appears in multiple agents' remarks rather than a single copied description. This aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS amenity data.
Walking/jogging paths are consistently described across the listings, with phrases such as "scenic walking paths," "private jogging path," "walking/jogging paths," and "walking/jogging trails." The feature appears to be a standard community amenity and is confirmed by multiple independent remarks. Confidence is very high.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported by the remarks, with numerous listings explicitly stating "private yard," "private backyard," "enclosed yard," and "fenced backyard." The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, making this feature very reliable for the building. This is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
The building/community is repeatedly described as having recreation spaces, including a "recreation center," the "Mehana Activity Center (MAC)," and amenity areas with pool/gym/party room. While the wording varies, the remarks clearly point to a shared recreation area rather than a private unit feature. This aligns with the existing MLS data and is mentioned by multiple listings.
Remarks reference a recreation/clubhouse/party room or rec center across multiple listings (phrases like "Clubhouse", "party room", "rec center"). Evidence is moderate and indicates shared recreation/meeting room amenities are available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently referenced across multiple current listings, with about 6 of 20 listings showing storage in unit features and/or amenities. Remarks include explicit mentions such as "smart storage," "storage," "extra storage," and "plenty of extra storage," which supports that storage/locker availability is part of the building offering rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Tennis courts are mentioned in multiple remarks (several listings reference "tennis court(s)" alongside other amenities). The evidence is moderate — present in some agent remarks but not as pervasive as pool, dog park, or jogging path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building/community has a pool. The pool is mentioned across many listings and multiple agents, with phrases like "resort-style pool," "swimming pool," and "community pool" appearing repeatedly. This is consistent with the high current MLS checkbox rate (19 of 20) and does not appear to be an isolated or mistaken amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports in-unit laundry for this building. At least 4 current remark blocks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer" and "full-size washer/dryer in the unit," which aligns with the high-confidence MLS inclusions data. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings indicate parking in parking_features (no listings show 'NONE'), and the public remarks repeatedly reference garage and open parking (e.g., 'one-car garage', 'two parking spaces', 'open tandem stall', 'plenty of guest and street parking'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so building-level parking is strongly supported.
Majority MLS checkbox data (13/20) lists ASSIGN and at least a dozen public remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking stalls' or 'assigned parking stall' (examples: '2 assigned parking stalls just steps away', 'includes two assigned uncovered parking stalls', 'one assigned parking stall'). This consistent, multi-listing evidence indicates assigned parking is a building feature.
Multiple listings explicitly describe covered parking via a garage or carport-like covered stall, with phrases such as 'one-car garage,' 'private garage,' and 'attached garage.' The evidence is strong across many remarks, not just the MLS checkbox data, so covered parking should be treated as a real building feature.
The listings consistently describe assigned stalls and garages, which confirms parking access but not ownership. I did not find language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark about a parking fee or monthly parking cost and found none. The listings mention assigned stalls and garages, but never a separate parking charge.
Guest parking is directly mentioned in multiple remarks, with wording like 'guest parking right out front,' 'plenty of guest and street parking,' and 'Guest parking is also conveniently nearby.' Because this appears in several listings from different agents, the evidence supports guest parking as an available building/community feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and join-waitlist phrasing, but found no references. The public remarks only discuss assigned parking and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that units have split/ductless AC. Across many listings, agents explicitly mention 'split AC,' 'split A/C units,' 'split AC in every room,' and 'mini-split style' cooling, which aligns with the historical MLS data showing ACSPL in 19 of 20 listings. The repeated wording across multiple remarks suggests this is a real, widely available feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears in 2 of 20 current MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "concrete construction," "reinforced concrete," or similar. Because the evidence is only from the MLS checkbox and not reinforced by agent remarks, confidence is low.
Double wall construction is marked in 13 of 20 current MLS listings. No public remarks explicitly mention "double wall" or similar wording, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox based, but the frequency across listings makes this moderately strong.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in 3 of 20 current MLS listings, but the public remarks are silent on construction type. With only a small number of checkbox hits and no descriptive confirmation, this feature is weakly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame is marked in 9 of 20 current MLS listings. Public remarks do not explicitly use the phrase "wood frame," so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence without direct remark confirmation, but the volume of listings gives moderate support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR permission terms like short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or legal vacation rental and found none. Because there is no affirmative STR language in the remarks, I cannot mark STR as allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel program, managed by hotel, and brand-pool references, but found nothing. Since STR is not indicated in the remarks, hotel-pool participation must be false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool language such as required to participate, must be in rental program, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of any STR or hotel pool program, mandatory participation is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like lease expires, land lease, leasehold, ground lease, and renewal language, but found nothing. Without any explicit lease expiry year in the public remarks, this remains unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly mention VA assumable loans and VA loan assumptions at specific rates, which is strong evidence the building/units are VA finance eligible. This is explicit and repeated across multiple listings.
I searched for wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found nothing. Without an explicit statement in the remarks, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured.
Moderate evidence the building has fire sprinklers: 9/20 recent MLS listings include the FIRSPR amenity and one listing remark explicitly says 'With fire sprinklers and a move-in ready status.' However, the majority of remarks do not mention sprinklers and only about half of listings have the checkbox checked, so confidence is moderate rather than definitive.
I looked for explicit phrases like FLSE passed, fire life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, and found none. The only related note is a reference to fire sprinklers, which is not enough to confirm a passed evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in some units, but evidence is limited: 2 of 20 listings explicitly show SUNSET in the view field and most others show NONE. None of the public remarks clearly mention sunset, western exposure, or evening sun, so this looks like a partial building feature rather than a broadly advertised amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The only evidence for a resident manager is the MLS amenity flag appearing in 6 of 20 listings. Public remarks across the available listings do not mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager, so this does not rise above low confidence. It may be a real building feature, but the current remarks look more like copy-paste amenity descriptions than firsthand verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.