Olino at Mehana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Olino at Mehana
Building Overview
Olino at Mehana in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 2015; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Olino at Mehana
Olino at Mehana is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2015. Size, unit mix, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Olino at Mehana include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking arrangements, homeowner association fees, maintenance responsibilities, and other building amenities are not detailed in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking, fee, and amenity information with the listing agent or management and confirm all policies and records independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages or qualitative descriptions such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied" and found none. The remarks include one reference to a unit being tenant occupied, but that is not enough to infer the overall owner-occupancy rate for the building.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording and found none. The listings consistently describe Olino at Mehana as townhomes with stairs, garages, yards, and parking stalls, which does not provide evidence of an elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the HOA/maintenance fee based on 15 of 20 current listings showing OTCOEX. Public remarks do not spell out "common electric," but the MLS data is consistent enough across multiple listings to treat this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee: 0 of 20 listings have HOTWAT checked. Multiple remarks instead reference individual water heaters or a solar water heater, which is consistent with hot water not being provided by the HOA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is explicitly confirmed in the remarks with the phrase "Water & sewer baseline costs in HOA." MLS data also shows SEWER in 9 of 20 listings, so this looks like a legitimate building feature rather than a one-off agent note.
Water inclusion is directly stated in the remarks: "Water & sewer baseline costs in HOA." Even though only 8 of 20 current listings have WATER checked, the explicit wording across the listing remarks makes this a reliable building feature.
BBQ facilities are very well supported. Roughly 8+ listings mention "BBQ areas" or "BBQ area with event space," and several also pair it with the MAC/community amenities. The repetition across different remarks suggests this is a real shared building/community feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park amenities are exceptionally well supported. Many listings mention "dog park" directly, including detailed phrases like "Pawsome Dog Park," "fenced dog park," and separate areas for small and large dogs. This is one of the strongest features in the dataset.
No analysis available
Strong support across many listings for an exercise room/fitness center. Remarks reference "gym," "fitness center," "fitness room," and the "Mehana Activity Center (MAC) with a gym" in roughly 8+ listings. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is reinforced by the historical MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports patio/deck features in Olino at Mehana. Public remarks mention "cozy lanai," "2 private patios," "private balcony," "front porch," and "open lanai," and the language appears in multiple agents' remarks rather than a single copied description. This aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS amenity data.
Walking/jogging paths are consistently described across the remarks. Multiple listings mention "walking/jogging paths," "private jogging path," "scenic walking paths," and even "walking and biking paths." This is strong, repeated evidence from several different listings.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported by the remarks, with numerous listings explicitly stating "private yard," "private backyard," "enclosed yard," and "fenced backyard." The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, making this feature very reliable for the building. This is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
Recreation-area support is strong and recurring. Listings mention a "recreation center," "recreation area," "party room," and the MAC, which functions as the community recreation hub. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not isolated to one description.
Remarks reference a recreation/clubhouse/party room or rec center across multiple listings (phrases like "Clubhouse", "party room", "rec center"). Evidence is moderate and indicates shared recreation/meeting room amenities are available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage appears to be a real, recurring building feature rather than a one-off agent checkbox. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention storage directly, including phrases like 'extra storage,' 'generous storage,' and 'smart storage,' while the MLS data shows it in both amenities and unit features. This consistency across many listings suggests the feature is genuinely available in some units and/or as a building amenity.
No analysis available
Tennis courts are mentioned, though less often than the other amenities. At least 2-3 remarks explicitly reference "tennis court(s)," including one listing that names the amenity directly alongside the MAC and another that mentions "basketball or tennis courts." This is moderate-to-strong evidence, not just a checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building/community clearly has a pool. Pool access is mentioned in many current remarks across numerous listings, including phrases like "community pool," "resort-style pool," "swimming pool," and "large pool," often alongside other shared amenities. The repeated references from multiple agents strongly support that this is a real shared building/community feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. The current remarks explicitly mention the feature in multiple listings, including phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer, dryer," and "full-size washer/dryer in the unit." Combined with the prior MLS pattern of 19/20 listings including washer/dryer, this is high-confidence and consistent across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings indicate parking in parking_features (no listings show 'NONE'), and the public remarks repeatedly reference garage and open parking (e.g., 'one-car garage', 'two parking spaces', 'open tandem stall', 'plenty of guest and street parking'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so building-level parking is strongly supported.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings, with 12/20 MLS records showing ASSIGN and numerous remarks using explicit phrases like 'two assigned parking stalls,' 'two assigned parking stalls nearby,' and 'an assigned parking stall.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error, so this building should be marked as offering assigned/reserved parking.
Multiple listings explicitly describe covered parking via a garage or carport-like covered stall, with phrases such as 'one-car garage,' 'private garage,' and 'attached garage.' The evidence is strong across many remarks, not just the MLS checkbox data, so covered parking should be treated as a real building feature.
I looked for deeded, owned, or parking-included language tied to ownership, but the remarks only describe assigned stalls and garages. That supports parking access, not deeded parking ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for any public remark about a separate parking fee or monthly parking cost and found none. The listings discuss stalls, garages, and assigned parking, but never mention a charge.
Guest parking is directly mentioned in multiple remarks, with wording like 'guest parking right out front,' 'plenty of guest and street parking,' and 'Guest parking is also conveniently nearby.' Because this appears in several listings from different agents, the evidence supports guest parking as an available building/community feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as waitlist, waiting list, or join the list for parking and found nothing. The remarks instead describe assigned or nearby parking without any queue system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that units have split/ductless AC. Across many listings, agents explicitly mention 'split AC,' 'split A/C units,' 'split AC in every room,' and 'mini-split style' cooling, which aligns with the historical MLS data showing ACSPL in 19 of 20 listings. The repeated wording across multiple remarks suggests this is a real, widely available feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No listings reviewed explicitly mention window AC; instead, many say "split AC in every room," "split A/C units," or "new upstairs AC unit." With only 1 of 20 MLS listings showing ACWIUN and no confirming remarks, the evidence points away from window air conditioning being an actual building feature.
Concrete construction appears in 2 of 20 current MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "concrete construction," "reinforced concrete," or similar. Because the evidence is only from the MLS checkbox and not reinforced by agent remarks, confidence is low.
Double wall construction is marked in 13 of 20 current MLS listings. No public remarks explicitly mention "double wall" or similar wording, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox based, but the frequency across listings makes this moderately strong.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in 3 of 20 current MLS listings, but the public remarks are silent on construction type. With only a small number of checkbox hits and no descriptive confirmation, this feature is weakly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame is marked in 9 of 20 current MLS listings. Public remarks do not explicitly use the phrase "wood frame," so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence without direct remark confirmation, but the volume of listings gives moderate support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators like short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or similar language and found none. Because there is no explicit permission in the remarks, this is treated as not allowed based on the available public text.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, and found nothing. Since STR is not supported by the remarks, this feature must also be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program and found none. With no evidence of a hotel pool or STR program, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, land lease, leasehold, and renewal terms. Nothing in the provided text gives a specific expiration year, so this remains unknown.
The listings clearly reference VA financing multiple times, including assumable VA loans at specific rates. That is strong public evidence the building’s units are VA-financeable/VA-related. I found no counterevidence in the remarks.
I searched for terms like "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," "full insurance," or other HOA insurance language and found no evidence. The remarks discuss HOA amenities and fees, but they do not state that the building is fully insured.
Moderate evidence the building has fire sprinklers: 9/20 recent MLS listings include the FIRSPR amenity and one listing remark explicitly says 'With fire sprinklers and a move-in ready status.' However, the majority of remarks do not mention sprinklers and only about half of listings have the checkbox checked, so confidence is moderate rather than definitive.
I looked for explicit FLSE or fire/life-safety language such as "passed fire inspection," "fire life safety evaluation passed," or "fire safety certified" and found nothing. Some remarks mention fire sprinklers, but that is not the same as a passed fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in some units, but the evidence is limited. MLS view data shows SUNSET in 2 of 20 listings, while most others are marked NONE; the public remarks mostly mention park, natural light, or general island living rather than explicit sunset exposure. This suggests sunset views may exist in select units, but the remarks do not show strong cross-agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The only evidence for a resident manager is the MLS amenity flag appearing in 6 of 20 listings. Public remarks across the available listings do not mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager, so this does not rise above low confidence. It may be a real building feature, but the current remarks look more like copy-paste amenity descriptions than firsthand verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.