Ode Rancho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ode Rancho
Building Overview
Ode Rancho in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1972 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ode Rancho
Ode Rancho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1972 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features noted in the MLS-derived data include the building's concrete construction and the stated policies that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No additional amenity or common-area information is available in the provided records.
Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify details such as unit sizes, parking, monthly maintenance/association fees, rules, and current management directly with the listing agent or condominium association. This description is based on MLS data and does not substitute for independent verification.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements or numeric percentages and found none. Remarks reference 'high occupancy rates' and rental/investor interest but do not state owner-occupancy. Per rules, numeric owner_occupancy cannot be guessed without explicit evidence, so the value is left unknown.
Several public remarks explicitly reference elevators, including a line stating "the condo’s two recently updated elevators" and other listings noting elevator access. This directly supports the current value of 2 elevators with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data indicates 11 of 15 current listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrases, so the evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes and appears implied across multiple listings; this could be due to consistent agent entry/copy-paste rather than explicit remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows 14 of 15 listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. Although none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees', the high prevalence of the MLS checkbox across multiple listings provides moderately strong implied evidence; however, absence of explicit remarks suggests possible agent copy/paste and warrants moderate confidence.
MLS data indicates 14 of 15 listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. There are no explicit mentions in public remarks like 'water included' or 'water in HOA fees', so the feature is inferred from widespread MLS checkbox selection across listings; evidence is strong but not corroborated by agent remarks, so confidence is moderate-high.
Multiple agent remarks for units in this building explicitly mention a BBQ or 'BBQ area' (appearing in at least 3 of the provided remarks), and prior MLS-derived confidence was High. The repeated, explicit phrasing across different listings suggests the building offers shared BBQ/grilling facilities rather than a single listing copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention outdoor spaces: at least three remarks say 'large covered lanai', 'penthouse level lanai', and 'two large recreation decks', and the MLS amenities checkbox is set in 7 of 15 listings. Evidence comes from several different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting inclusion of patio/deck as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One or more public-remarks explicitly advertise 'two large recreation decks' and other amenity-focused copy references common outdoor/amenity decks. Although only a few remarks mention recreation decks, the statements are explicit and buyers would expect a shared recreation area; confidence is moderate given limited number of explicit mentions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
While multiple listings note storage lockers or additional storage, none explicitly describe facilities for surfboard or board storage. I searched for 'surfboard', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no mentions.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of the provided listings) mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute, while MLS checkbox counts indicate some listings have TRACHU checked (agent-entered). Given the historical Low confidence and complete absence of explicit mention in remarks, evidence does not support including a building trash chute, and the checkbox entries appear to be inconsistent agent input rather than confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 15 current MLS listings include the pool amenity and numerous remarks explicitly mention the pool, with phrases like 'community pool', 'sparkling pool', and 'refreshing swimming pool'. The repeated, consistent mentions across multiple agent postings indicate the building offers a shared swimming pool and the evidence is strong.
No analysis available
Public remarks confirm a pool exists in the building but never indicate it is saltwater. I specifically looked for 'salt water', 'saltwater', 'salt', and related terms and found no references.
At least one public remark explicitly states 'in-unit washer/dryer' and the CURRENT MLS shows 1/15 listings include WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, supporting that some units have in-unit laundry. This appears in a single listing (1/15), while most other listings reference shared facilities, so the building offers in-unit laundry for at least some units.
Community/shared laundry is strongly supported: numerous listings (multiple separate public remarks across the corpus, roughly 10+ mentions) describe 'community laundry', 'laundry on every floor', 'on-site laundry', or 'laundry facilities on each floor'. The MLS checkbox also shows 13/15 listings with COMLAU, indicating the building provides shared laundry facilities.
Listings consistently reference community/on-site laundry and laundry on each floor, indicating shared laundry exists. None of the public remarks specify payment method or coin/card operation; I searched for terms like 'coin', 'quarters', 'coin-op', 'card operated' and found no matches.
Multiple remarks explicitly state laundry is available on every floor (e.g., 'laundry facilities on each floor', 'community laundry on every floor'). This is consistently mentioned across listings, supporting high confidence.
Strong evidence that the building has parking: MLS checkbox shows parking on all 15 listings and public remarks repeatedly mention 'one gated parking stall', 'covered parking right in front of the unit', and 'very large, partially covered parking spot.' Multiple agents independently reference parking rather than a single outlier, so confidence is high.
Evidence that parking is assigned: 12 of 15 MLS listings have ASSIGN checked and many remarks specify 'one parking stall', 'dedicated' or 'right in front of the unit', indicating stalls are reserved/assigned to units. Multiple listings/authors make this claim, supporting high confidence.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention secured, gated, covered, or dedicated parking stalls and an assigned stall directly adjacent to units, but none explicitly say parking is deeded or included in the deed. Because there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded, I do not mark it as deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any reference to monthly parking fees, rental charges, or supplemental parking costs and found none. Without explicit fee information, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
Secured parking/entry is supported by both MLS checkbox data (8/15 SECENT) and numerous remarks stating 'gated, secure entry', 'secured gated parking', and 'updated fob/remote entry.' The repeated references across listings indicate building-level secured parking access, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a parking waitlist system (e.g., 'waitlist', 'join waitlist') but found none. Remarks instead describe available/assigned secured or covered stalls without mentioning any waiting list.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention fob/remote/keycard entry and secured entry, strongly indicating electronic card/fob access is present.
No analysis available
The building appears secured with gated entry, surveillance, and an on-site resident manager, yet there is no evidence in the remarks of a security patrol or roving patrol service. I searched for 'security patrol', 'patrol', and 'roving security' with no matches.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 out of 15 current MLS listings for this building list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials, indicating the building is likely concrete. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or 'concrete construction', so the support comes from repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents (possible copy/paste), not explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental allowance language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', '30-day minimum') and found none. References to investor appeal and rental income do not confirm STR permission, so STR is not indicated.
I looked for language such as 'hotel rental pool', 'part of hotel operations', or hotel management of rentals and found none. Because STR allowance is not indicated in the remarks, hotel pool participation is not indicated and set to false.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'must participate', or 'required to participate' and found none. With no STR/hotel program mentioned and no language indicating mandatory participation, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold indicators and a four-digit lease expiry year or renewal language (e.g., 'leasehold', 'ground lease', 'lease expires 20xx') and found none. Without any explicit year, the lease expiry is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, VA approval is not indicated.
Multiple listings explicitly state comprehensive building insurance (phrases such as '100% Hurricane Coverage' and 'fully-insured'). This indicates the HOA provides full/walls-in style coverage, so marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified', and 'life safety compliant' and found no references. Because there is no explicit mention and no current value supplied, I return false with medium confidence (absence of mention makes it more likely not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention mountain views—phrases include 'large covered lanai with mountain views' and 'Wake up to stunning mountain vistas.' These explicit mentions appear across multiple listing remarks (at least 3 separate remarks) and align with MLS view_descriptions that include MOUNTA for some units, so there is strong evidence the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference city/skyline views—examples include 'nice city views' and 'unobstructed skyline and ocean views.' These explicit remarks appear in at least 2 separate listings and match MLS view_descriptions that include CITY for some units, indicating the building does offer units with city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe mountain, city, and ocean views and lanai enjoyment, but there is no statement that fireworks can be viewed from the building or units. I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', and 'see fireworks from unit' with no hits.
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS amenities indicate RESMAN on 13 of 15 listings and at least six separate public remarks explicitly reference an on-site/resident manager (phrases include 'on-site resident manager', 'onsite Resident Manager', and 'on-site resident manager, community laundry'). The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so the building is very likely to have a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.