Ode Rancho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ode Rancho
Building Overview
Ode Rancho in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1972 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ode Rancho
Ode Rancho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1972 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features noted in the MLS-derived data include the building's concrete construction and the stated policies that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No additional amenity or common-area information is available in the provided records.
Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify details such as unit sizes, parking, monthly maintenance/association fees, rules, and current management directly with the listing agent or condominium association. This description is based on MLS data and does not substitute for independent verification.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
MLS floor fields and unit-number floors agree through floor 9, supported by the county max_floors and state registration. No penthouse listings are present, but the independent records also report 9 floors.
County reconciled_units and the state registration both report 65 residential units, matching the currently stored value. The county dwell_sum of 66 is set aside because reconciled_units is the preferred residential count.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 231. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks explicitly confirm that the building has two elevators. This matches the current value of 2 and provides strong direct evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided listings explicitly mention common area electricity, common electric, or building power being included in the fees. However, 15 of 19 current MLS listings check OTCOEX, suggesting the feature is likely included, although the consistency may partly reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided listings explicitly say 'sewer included' or describe sewer as part of the HOA fees. Nevertheless, 18 of 19 current MLS listings check SEWER, consistent with the previously High-confidence determination and strong enough to retain the feature.
None of the provided listings explicitly state that water is included in the HOA fees or that water fees are covered. However, 18 of 19 current MLS listings check WATER, matching the previously High-confidence evidence and supporting the feature.
At least three provided listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area," including repeated wording across separate listing remarks. This confirms the building-level amenity and is consistent with the high historical confidence and current MLS checkbox presence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings from different remarks identify outdoor spaces, including an "enclosed lanai," "large covered lanai with mountain views," and a "penthouse level lanai." One listing also explicitly mentions "two large recreation decks," providing strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck or lanai amenities beyond isolated checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One current listing clearly describes "two large recreation decks," directly confirming a building recreation amenity. The explicit remark supports the high historical confidence and current MLS data, even though most listings do not repeat the detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 listings explicitly mention storage, using phrases such as "additional storage," "private storage," "large dedicated storage unit," and "individual storage locker." The repeated, specific descriptions across multiple listings and the strong historical MLS evidence indicate that storage units or lockers are a legitimate building feature rather than a checkbox or copy-paste error.
Storage is repeatedly referenced, but its purpose is not identified as surfboard storage. No qualifying surfboard-storage wording was found.
No analysis available
Zero provided listings mention a trash chute or equivalent wording. The only support is the MLS checkbox appearing in 7 of 19 listings, which may reflect copied or unverified agent data; therefore this feature has low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is exceptionally strong: 19 of 19 listings have pool-related MLS amenity codes, and at least 14 current remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool. The feature is confirmed across many distinct listing descriptions and is clearly presented as a building/community amenity, not a private unit feature.
No analysis available
The building context and remarks confirm that a pool exists. No qualifying saltwater-pool wording was found.
At least one public remark explicitly states 'in-unit washer/dryer' and the CURRENT MLS shows 1/15 listings include WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, supporting that some units have in-unit laundry. This appears in a single listing (1/15), while most other listings reference shared facilities, so the building offers in-unit laundry for at least some units.
At least 12 current listings explicitly mention community laundry or shared laundry facilities, including laundry on every floor and on-site laundry. The repeated confirmation across multiple listings and agents, together with 17/19 MLS amenity entries marked COMLAU and previously high confidence, strongly validates this building feature.
The listings confirm community laundry, including on every floor, but do not indicate that it requires payment. No qualifying paid-laundry wording was found.
The remarks repeatedly confirm floor-by-floor community laundry. This is strong, consistent evidence that laundry facilities are available on every floor.
At least 16 of the 19 remarks explicitly mention parking, stalls, garages, or covered parking, including "one gated parking stall," "oversized parking stall," and "covered secured parking." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, and it agrees with the current MLS data showing parking on 19/19 listings.
At least 11 listings explicitly describe assigned, dedicated, oversized, or unit-specific parking stalls. Phrases such as "large dedicated parking spot," "one parking stall," and "the only studio ... with a covered parking stall" provide strong confirmation beyond checkbox data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe parking stalls associated with the units, including covered and dedicated stalls. However, the required explicit deeded or owned-parking language is absent, so deeded status is not supported.
No analysis available
The remarks describe secure, covered, gated, and oversized parking but do not provide a separate monthly parking cost. The parking fee is therefore unknown from the public remarks.
No analysis available
At least 13 listings explicitly mention gated, secured, remote-access, or fob-controlled parking/building entry. The repeated references across multiple remarks, including "gated parking," "remote-access parking," and "updated fob/remote entry," strongly confirm secured parking access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly describe parking availability and security. None mention joining a waitlist or waiting list for a parking stall.
No analysis available
The explicit fob-entry reference strongly supports a card or fob access security system. Other remarks consistently describe secured building and residential access.
No analysis available
The listings support access controls and surveillance but not staffed or roving patrol service. No qualifying security-patrol wording was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current public remarks explicitly mention “concrete construction,” “concrete building,” or “reinforced concrete.” However, 18 of 19 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials, consistent with the previously high-confidence determination and strong evidence across multiple listings rather than a single isolated entry.
3/16 current MLS listings check 'double wall' but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar. With no corroborating remarks and only a few checkbox entries (likely agent error/copy-paste), the building is assessed as not having double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of 18 current listings check ABOGRO, but no public remarks use phrases such as "above ground construction" or describe above-ground materials. This is weak-to-moderate checkbox evidence that may reflect inconsistent agent data, so confidence remains limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention short-term rentals, vacation rentals, NUC, TVU, or other STR authorization. References to tenants, investors, rental potential, and long-term living do not establish that short-term rentals are permitted.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or similar operation. Because short-term rental permission is not supported, hotel-pool participation must be false.
The listings do not mention a mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or an inability to opt out. Since short-term rental permission is not supported, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the building as leasehold and do not mention a lease expiration or extension. No specific four-digit lease-expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks were searched for explicit references to VA approval, VA financing, or VA loans. None were found, so VA loan approval is not supported by the public remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly indicate comprehensive building insurance, including the term "fully-insured." The repeated statements about 100% hurricane coverage strongly support that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. None were found, so there is no evidence confirming this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by 7 of 19 current listings and explicit remarks from multiple listings describing "mountain views" and "stunning mountain vistas." The evidence is consistent with the previously high-confidence assessment and appears to reflect a legitimate building-level offering for some units.
Diamond Head views appear in only 3 of 19 current MLS records, with no supporting public-remark language across the listings. Because the evidence is limited to a small number of checkbox entries and may reflect agent copying or unit-specific claims, the feature is omitted.
City views are strongly supported by 13 of 19 current listings and multiple explicit remarks, including "nice city views" and "unobstructed skyline and ocean views." The broad current MLS support and prior high confidence indicate that the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The search found various unit views but no explicit fireworks-view claim. Nearby Honolulu attractions or location references do not establish a view of fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 current listing remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, including repeated phrases such as "on-site resident manager" and "onsite Resident Manager." This aligns with the historical high-confidence evidence and the MLS amenity being marked in 15 of 19 listings, indicating a genuine building-wide feature rather than an isolated or unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.