Ocean Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ocean Vista
Building Overview
Ocean Vista in Aliamanu-Salt Lake, built 1981; no pets and no short-term rentals per MLS data.
About Ocean Vista
Ocean Vista is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and is recorded as built in 1981. MLS records provided do not specify building size (number of units or square footage) or construction type; those details should be confirmed with listing documents or the seller.
Key policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS data. No specific common-area amenities or services are listed in the provided records.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building rules are not included in the MLS information supplied. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and financials with the listing agent, HOA, or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County records and the state registration both report 19 floors. Listings reach only floor 15 and have no penthouse listings, so they do not establish a higher residential top floor.
The county parcel record and the single-building state registration both report 37 residential units; the county's 38-unit dwell sum is set aside as a broader count.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1382. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator-related terms, including a specific number, 'multiple elevators,' and 'elevators.' No such information was found, so the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention common area electricity or building power included in maintenance fees. The only fee inclusions described are water, sewer, and trash, so there is no public-remarks evidence for common electric despite the partial MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 5 listings include HOTWAT in the MLS association-fee data, and no public remarks state that hot water is included. Two listings show WTRHTR, while the repeated fee language specifies water, sewer, and trash only, so hot water inclusion is unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water inclusion is directly confirmed in the public remarks and reinforced by the current MLS data showing 4/4 listings with WATER in association_fee_includes. This looks well-supported and consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
BBQ is supported by the current MLS data on all 5 listings and is explicitly mentioned in 1 of the 5 public remarks. The phrase "fire up the BBQ" refers to the community amenity, while the other remarks are largely repeated descriptions that do not discuss it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is supported by both the current remarks and historical MLS data. One listing says, 'Unwind at the community pool,' and the building has had pool-related amenities checked in most recent MLS entries. The evidence looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported across all 5 listings through MLS inclusions showing washer/dryer, and 1 of 5 public remarks explicitly mentions "in-unit laundry." The consistent MLS data, combined with the direct remark and previously high confidence, provides strong evidence that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for this building. One listing explicitly says the unit has '2 assigned parking stalls,' and the current MLS parking_features data shows all 4/4 listings with parking rather than NONE. This is strong, consistent evidence across the listings and does not appear to be a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is mentioned repeatedly, but there is no explicit statement that the stalls are deeded or owned. The available wording does not establish deeded parking.
No analysis available
The listings mention 2 assigned parking stalls but provide no cost information. A parking fee cannot be determined from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of five current listings identify TANDEM in the MLS parking features. Public remarks mention assigned parking stalls but do not clarify whether they are tandem, so the feature is plausible but not strongly confirmed across multiple agents.
No analysis available
The remarks do not describe a waitlist system. The repeated reference to assigned stalls provides some indication that parking is already allocated, but does not explicitly address a building-wide waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Partial evidence suggests masonry/stucco construction: 2 of 4 current listings include MASSTU in construction materials. No listing remarks explicitly describe the exterior construction, so this appears to be MLS-derived rather than copy-paste verified by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Brick appears in the construction materials for 2 of 5 current listings, but no public remarks mention brick, brick exterior, or brick-and-mortar construction. The evidence is therefore partial and not confirmed across multiple agents.
No analysis available
The listings do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. Because no STR authorization is mentioned, this is recorded as false with low-to-medium confidence.
There is no evidence of a hotel rental pool or similar program. Since short-term-rental permission is not established, the prerequisite for a hotel pool is not met.
The remarks contain no mandatory-pool language and no evidence of any hotel rental program. Because STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no specific lease expiry or renewal year. Because no applicable lease information is provided, the expiration year is unknown.
The remarks mention nearby military installations but do not state that the building is VA loan approved. Military proximity is not evidence of VA financing eligibility, so this remains false with low-to-medium confidence.
The remarks were searched for terms such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'comprehensive building insurance,' and 'walls-in coverage.' No relevant insurance statement was found.
2 of 5 listings explicitly mention fire sprinklers, using the phrases "sprinkler system" and "in-unit sprinkler." Although the remarks do not describe installation timing, the repeated explicit references and 3 of 5 MLS amenity entries provide strong evidence that the building offers this feature.
The remarks mention in-unit sprinklers and a sprinkler system, but do not state that the building passed an FLSE, fire inspection, or life-safety evaluation. Because there is no explicit confirmation, this feature is not established.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views appear to be available in some units of this building, based on 2 of 4 current MLS listings showing CITY in the view descriptions. The remarks themselves do not explicitly say 'city view' or 'downtown view,' so this is supported more by the MLS view field than by agent narrative. Evidence suggests it is a building-level option for some units, not all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the five listings mention sunset views or related terms. Three listings explicitly report no view, and the remaining listings provide no supporting evidence, so the building should not be represented as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 5 listings mention an "on-site resident manager," and both use nearly identical wording, suggesting some copy-paste but still providing direct evidence of the feature. Combined with RESMAN appearing in 3 of 5 current MLS records, the building should be treated as having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.