Ocean Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ocean Vista
Building Overview
Ocean Vista in Aliamanu-Salt Lake, built 1981; no pets and no short-term rentals per MLS data.
About Ocean Vista
Ocean Vista is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and is recorded as built in 1981. MLS records provided do not specify building size (number of units or square footage) or construction type; those details should be confirmed with listing documents or the seller.
Key policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS data. No specific common-area amenities or services are listed in the provided records.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building rules are not included in the MLS information supplied. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and financials with the listing agent, HOA, or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any owner-occupancy clues, including exact percentages, terms like "majority owner occupied," or other statements about owner-occupied units. The remarks do not provide any occupancy percentage or descriptive ownership mix, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for references to the number of elevators, including phrases like "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a specific count such as "4 elevators," but found nothing. Because this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence, it remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention common area electricity or building power included in maintenance fees. The only fee inclusions described are water, sewer, and trash, so there is no public-remarks evidence for common electric despite the partial MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water inclusion is directly confirmed in the public remarks and reinforced by the current MLS data showing 4/4 listings with WATER in association_fee_includes. This looks well-supported and consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
BBQ/grilling facilities appear to be a shared building amenity. The current MLS data shows BBQ in amenities on 4 out of 4 listings, and one remark explicitly invites residents to 'fire up the BBQ.' The consistent MLS matches across all listings suggest this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is supported by both the current remarks and historical MLS data. One listing says, 'Unwind at the community pool,' and the building has had pool-related amenities checked in most recent MLS entries. The evidence looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by the MLS inclusions in all 4 listings (washer/dryer included) and reinforced by a public remark stating "in-unit laundry." This appears to be consistent building-level/unit-level availability rather than a one-off agent copy. Confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for this building. One listing explicitly says the unit has '2 assigned parking stalls,' and the current MLS parking_features data shows all 4/4 listings with parking rather than NONE. This is strong, consistent evidence across the listings and does not appear to be a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only mention assigned parking, which indicates parking exists but does not confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental and found none. The remarks mention assigned stalls but do not state any separate parking price.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language and found nothing. The remarks instead state the unit has assigned parking stalls, which suggests parking is allocated rather than waitlisted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Partial evidence suggests masonry/stucco construction: 2 of 4 current listings include MASSTU in construction materials. No listing remarks explicitly describe the exterior construction, so this appears to be MLS-derived rather than copy-paste verified by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules and found none. With no public remark evidence supporting STR use, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not allowed for now.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel rental program references and found none. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, a hotel pool arrangement is not supported.
I searched for wording such as mandatory pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Without any sign of an STR or hotel rental pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any statement about leasehold status or a lease expiration year and found nothing. Since the remarks do not mention land tenure at all, the expiry year cannot be extracted.
I searched the remarks for any explicit VA financing language and found none. The references to nearby military bases do not indicate VA approval, so there is no evidence to mark this building as VA-approved.
I searched for language indicating full HOA insurance or walls-in coverage, such as "fully insured," "full insurance," or "comprehensive building insurance." None of the remarks mention insurance coverage details, so this feature cannot be confirmed from the provided text.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety indicators such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection." The remarks mention a sprinkler system, but that is not the same as a stated FLSE pass, so there is no direct evidence for this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views appear to be available in some units of this building, based on 2 of 4 current MLS listings showing CITY in the view descriptions. The remarks themselves do not explicitly say 'city view' or 'downtown view,' so this is supported more by the MLS view field than by agent narrative. Evidence suggests it is a building-level option for some units, not all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.