
Nuuanu Streamside 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nuuanu Streamside 2
Building Overview
Nuuanu Streamside 2 in Liliha-Alewa — concrete building (1992); pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.

About Nuuanu Streamside 2
Nuuanu Streamside 2 is located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood and was built in 1992. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size or unit count information is not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. No specific common-area amenities, unit features, or HOA inclusions are listed in the available MLS summary.
Additional details such as parking, management company, maintenance fees, and other building services are not specified in the MLS data provided (management company listed as unknown). Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and fees with the listing agent or managing entity before making a decision.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for percentages such as '80% owner occupied,' or qualitative building-wide statements like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found none. The remarks only mention individual units as original owner occupied or tenant occupied, which is not enough to determine overall owner occupancy.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators or multiple elevator banks and found none. The listings describe townhouse units in a gated community and mention stairs/split-level layouts, which does not indicate elevator service.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six listings currently mark OTCOEX, which is a strong building-level signal even though the remarks do not spell out 'common area electricity.' The listing comments are otherwise consistent across agents and read like copy/paste, so the MLS checkbox pattern is the main evidence here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 listings, there is no evidence that maintenance fees include hot water. In fact, all 6 listings list WTRHTR in inclusions, a strong signal the building does not provide hot water as an HOA-covered utility. The remarks are consistent and do not describe hot water as included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six listings currently include SEWER in the HOA/association fee breakdown. The public remarks are silent on this item, so the evidence comes primarily from the MLS data rather than agent narrative, but the majority pattern is still strong.
Five of six listings currently include WATER in association fees. No listing remarks directly confirm it, but the majority MLS pattern is consistent enough to treat this as included for the building.
No public remarks mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling facilities in any of the listings provided. With only 1 out of 6 MLS entries showing BBQ in amenities and no corroborating description from agents or site-visit style remarks, the evidence is weak and inconsistent. I would treat BBQ as not established for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is clearly supported by the current remarks and MLS data. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "new washer/dryer," "stacked washer/dryer," and "washer/dryer in unit," while MLS inclusions show 6/6 listings include washer/dryer. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and does not look like a one-off copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention 2 parking stalls/spaces, including one covered and one open, which strongly supports that parking is an available building feature rather than a one-off unit detail.
Assigned parking is supported by both the MLS checkbox pattern and the public remarks. At least one listing explicitly says "2 assigned parking," and others describe fixed stall allocations, indicating this is a building feature buyers can expect.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. Several listings explicitly note covered stalls or a covered parking space, and the MLS data is consistent across all listings, making this a reliable building feature.
The listings confirm parking is included and assigned, but they never describe the stalls as deeded or owned with the unit. I therefore cannot mark the parking as deeded from these remarks alone.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly charges or rental fees, and found nothing. The remarks only indicate that the unit has assigned parking stalls.
No analysis available
Secured entry is well supported by the remarks and MLS data. The building/community is described multiple times as "gated" and even "fully gated and secured," indicating secured access for parking and/or the community overall.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that parking requires a waitlist, but the remarks do not mention one. The listings simply note two assigned stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly present in this building based on multiple current listings. At least 3 remarks explicitly mention it, including details like "recently replaced a/c split systems" and "split a/c in every room," which strongly supports the feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0/6 public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction. The only signal is the MLS material checkbox (2/6), which is weak and may reflect copy/paste rather than verified building details. Based on the lack of supporting remarks, I do not treat concrete construction as confirmed for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for signs that short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR permitted, NUC, or TVU, and found none. With no positive evidence in the remarks, this is treated as not established.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, Hilton pool, or similar branding, but there were none. Since STR itself is not evidenced, this also remains false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, but nothing in the remarks suggested that. There is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, or a renewal year, but nothing was stated in the public remarks. Based on the available text, the lease expiry cannot be determined.
I searched the listings for any reference to VA approval or VA financing and found none. The remarks focus on unit features, parking, and the gated community, but do not mention lender eligibility.
I searched the remarks for any HOA insurance or walls-in coverage language and found nothing. The HOA is said to cover exterior maintenance and repairs, but that does not confirm the building is fully insured.
Fire sprinkler coverage is strongly supported for this building. At least 4 of 6 current MLS listings show FIRSPR in amenities, and multiple remarks explicitly say 'fire sprinkler system' or 'sprinkler system.' The evidence is consistent across several listings, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than an agent checkbox error.
I looked for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, passed fire inspection, and similar compliance statements, but none were present. The remarks do mention fire sprinkler systems, which is not the same as a passed FLSE or life-safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-view evidence is fairly strong across the listings: 4 of 6 current MLS entries mark GARDEN, and several remarks describe the building or units as facing or overlooking the botanical gardens. Phrases like 'views of the lush and green Lili'uokalani Botanical Gardens' and 'adjacent to the lush tropical surroundings' support that garden views are available in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.