Nuuanu Park Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nuuanu Park Place
Building Overview
Nuuanu Park Place in Liliha-Alewa — concrete building (1981) with pool and on-site resident manager.
About Nuuanu Park Place
Nuuanu Park Place is a residential building located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1981 and is concrete construction.
The property includes on-site amenities such as a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units use split air conditioning systems.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state that the building has 77% owner occupancy. This matches the current building context and is direct numeric evidence, so it should be retained.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevators,' '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Since no elevator count is stated in the remarks provided, the number cannot be confirmed from this data.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported. At least several listings explicitly mention "cable/internet" or "cable TV," and the MLS data is nearly unanimous (17/19). This looks like a consistent building-level fee item rather than a one-off agent entry.
Evidence for common-area electricity is weaker than the other fee items. MLS coding suggests it may be included in some listings, but the remarks do not clearly say "common electric" or "common area electricity," so this appears to be based mostly on inconsistent checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is directly supported by at least one public remark that says fees include "hot water." Although only 4/19 MLS entries show HOTWAT, the explicit wording is enough to support the feature at the building level.
Internet inclusion is directly supported by the remarks, including the phrase "internet service" in the maintenance fee. While only 3/18 listings currently carry the MLS internet code, the repeated wording across multiple remarks suggests this is a legitimate building-level benefit rather than a one-off entry.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. Multiple remarks name sewer directly, and the MLS data is unanimous (19/19), which strongly suggests a consistent building-level fee item.
Water inclusion is very strongly supported. Public remarks explicitly mention water being covered, and the MLS data is unanimous (19/19), making this one of the clearest building-level inclusions.
BBQ is strongly supported. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly say "BBQ area," "BBQ grilling area," "barbecue," and "grilling area," often alongside the pool as a building amenity. The MLS data is also consistent at 19/19 listings, suggesting this is a stable shared building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence of a jogging or walking path in the remarks. While several listings mention botanical gardens, streams, and strolling, none describe a shared jogging path, walking path, or fitness trail, so the current MLS checkbox appears unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a shared recreation area at the building level. One listing explicitly states, "Building amenities include a swimming pool, garden and BBQ and recreation area," while the current MLS data also has RECARE checked in 2/19 listings. The repeated amenity wording across remarks suggests a real shared feature rather than a unit-specific claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple listing remarks, including phrases like "storage closet" and "private lanai with a storage room." Historical MLS data also shows storage in both amenities and unit features across several listings, which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and related amenity wording. The remarks mention storage closets and lanai storage in some units, but nothing about dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is only weakly supported by the available evidence. No public remark explicitly mentions a trash, garbage, or refuse chute, but 7/19 current MLS amenity entries include TRACHU. That makes this plausible as a building feature, though the lack of remark confirmation means the MLS checkbox data may be inconsistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building’s pool is strongly confirmed. Multiple recent remarks from different listings explicitly mention a “pool,” “swimming pool,” or “community pool,” often alongside the BBQ area and resident manager, indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a one-off mention. Historical MLS data also shows pool amenities across all 19/19 listings, so there is no sign of a change.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and "saline pool." The listings confirm that the building has a pool, but they do not identify it as a saltwater pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "washer/dryer in the unit" or "washer and dryer in unit," and the current MLS data shows 16/19 listings include washer/dryer. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, quarters, and card-operated language. The remarks do not describe any paid community laundry system, and the only laundry detail is in-unit washer/dryer.
I looked for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor community laundry wording. The public remarks repeatedly reference washer/dryer in the unit instead, with no evidence of shared laundry facilities on each floor.
Parking is strongly supported across all current listings: 18/18 MLS entries include a parking feature and none show NONE. Public remarks repeatedly mention parking in multiple forms, including '2 parking stalls,' '1 open parking stall,' 'deeded parking space,' and 'covered parking stall,' so this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported for this building. Across the current remarks, several listings explicitly mention “2 PARKING STALLS,” “deeded parking space,” and other specific stall counts, which aligns with the MLS pattern showing assignment in most listings. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
Covered parking is clearly present in the building for at least some units. Several current remarks explicitly say “1 covered parking stall” or “covered parking stall near the elevator,” which matches the MLS history showing covered parking in a subset of listings. The evidence is strong and repeated across listings, indicating this is a real building feature rather than a checkbox error.
Multiple remarks reference parking stalls, and one explicitly states the unit comes with a deeded parking space. That is clear evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rent, additional parking cost, or parking rental. The listings mention parking stalls, covered stalls, and deeded parking, but none state a fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. The remarks describe available stalls and deeded/covered parking, but do not indicate any waitlist process.
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob access, card reader, and similar controlled-entry language. The remarks mention overnight security, security patrol, resident manager, and security guard, but not card/fob building access.
Several listings mention building security, with key phrases like "overnight security" and "security patrol in the evenings." The MLS checkbox is present in only 4 of 19 listings, so the evidence is not universal, but the remarks provide direct confirmation that the building offers security coverage. This looks more like inconsistent agent reporting than a copy-paste-only amenity, but the feature is still supported.
The listings directly confirm security patrol service. One remark says there is 'security patrol in the evenings,' and another references 'overnight security,' which strongly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by the MLS history and confirmed in current public remarks. One listing explicitly mentions a "brand new window AC unit," which aligns with the prior pattern of ACWIUN appearing in multiple current listings. This looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The building is very likely concrete. Historical MLS data is strongly consistent (16 of 19 listings) showing construction_materials='CONCRE', which is a high-confidence signal. None of the public remarks suggest a change in construction type, so this appears to be stable, repeated MLS information rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 70%: 2 of 14 MLS listings specify MASSTU in construction_materials, and no listings or remarks suggest a different primary construction type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 16 current MLS listings show construction_materials='ABOGRO' and the provided public remarks (many listings) contain no mention of 'above ground' or related phrasing. This pattern suggests the few ABOGRO checks may be agent checkbox errors or inconsistently applied; evidence is weak and not corroborated by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental cues such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules. Nothing in the public remarks indicates short-term rentals are allowed, so this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not allowed based on absence of evidence.
I looked for hotel rental pool, branded hotel management, or pool-program language and found none. Since there is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out, but found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel pool or STR allowance, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings identify the building/property as fee-simple, which indicates it is not leasehold. I looked for lease-end language such as ground lease, lease expires, or renewal dates and found none.
A public remark explicitly states VA assumable financing is available, which is strong evidence the building/listing supports VA financing. This is direct enough to mark the feature true.
The remarks explicitly state that the building is fully insured, which is direct evidence for this feature. The additional phrase '100% Hurricane Insured' reinforces that the association carries comprehensive building coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'life safety compliant,' 'passed fire inspection,' or similar wording, but found nothing in the remarks. There is no public remark evidence here to confirm whether the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data supports mountain views in some units of Nuuanu Park Place, with 3 of 17 listings showing MOUNTA in the view field. Public remarks emphasize garden, stream, and urban convenience more than mountains, so this appears to be an MLS-based building feature rather than repeatedly described by agents.
Diamond Head views are mentioned in several listings, not just one agent remark. Phrases like 'Diamond Head in the distance' and 'views ... and Diamond Head' appear across multiple remarks, while the MLS view field also has 2/18 DIAHEA entries. This looks like a genuine feature available in some units rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
City views are supported by the current MLS data (7 of 19 listings marked CITY). Public remarks are less direct, but multiple descriptions reference Downtown Honolulu/urban Honolulu and a distance view toward Diamond Head, consistent with some units having city-oriented outlooks. Evidence is moderate and appears to come from multiple listings rather than a single copy-paste source.
No analysis available
Garden views are extremely well supported: 12 of 19 current MLS records include GARDEN, and many remarks explicitly say 'lush garden views,' 'looks over Liliuokalani Botanical Garden,' and 'garden greenery.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, with repeated references to the botanical garden and stream setting rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited support for sunrise views from the MLS view field alone: 3/18 listings currently show SUNRIS. No public remarks explicitly confirm sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, so this appears more like weak MLS-level evidence than well-documented confirmation across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements such as "fireworks view," "see fireworks from the lanai," or "view of Friday night fireworks." The remarks focus on garden, stream, and Diamond Head views, with nothing indicating a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is confirmed across multiple recent listings and appears consistent with the building’s amenity set. At least 3-4 remarks explicitly mention an "onsite manager" or "resident manager," which aligns with the current MLS RESMAN flag and suggests this is not just copy-paste noise. This is strong building-level evidence that buyers can rely on.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.