Nuuanu Park Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nuuanu Park Place
Building Overview
Nuuanu Park Place in Liliha-Alewa — concrete building (1981) with pool and on-site resident manager.
About Nuuanu Park Place
Nuuanu Park Place is a residential building located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1981 and is concrete construction.
The property includes on-site amenities such as a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units use split air conditioning systems.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly say the building has '77% owner occupancy,' which matches the current building context. This is direct, high-confidence numeric evidence, so the value is kept at 77%.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator information such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found nothing. Since there is no current value provided and no remark-based evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported by the public remarks and the MLS data. At least 2 listings explicitly mention "cable TV" or "cable/internet" in the maintenance fee description, which is consistent with the high current MLS rate (16/18). This looks like a building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent note.
There is no explicit support in the remarks for common-area electricity being included in fees. The MLS data is mixed (6/18 listings coded OTCOEX), and the public text instead uses broader language like "common expenses" and "common area maintenance," which does not validate this feature. Overall this looks weak and possibly copy-paste driven in the MLS.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no remarks saying hot water is included in maintenance fees. The presence of WTRHTR in some listings is a strong hint against building-provided hot water, so this feature appears absent despite a few MLS checkboxes.
Internet inclusion is directly supported by the remarks, including the phrase "internet service" in the maintenance fee. While only 3/18 listings currently carry the MLS internet code, the repeated wording across multiple remarks suggests this is a legitimate building-level benefit rather than a one-off entry.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. Multiple remarks explicitly name sewer, and the current MLS data is unanimous at 18/18 listings. This is a very strong building-level feature with no sign of it being a temporary or copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is extremely well supported by both the remarks and the MLS data. At least two listings explicitly say water is included, and the current MLS is unanimous at 18/18. This appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
BBQ is strongly supported across many current listings and appears consistent across multiple agents. Roughly 10+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention BBQ or grilling facilities, including "BBQ area," "BBQ grilling area," and "lovely outdoor area to grill," so this looks like a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence of a jogging or walking path in the remarks. While several listings mention botanical gardens, streams, and strolling, none describe a shared jogging path, walking path, or fitness trail, so the current MLS checkbox appears unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings' public remarks explicitly note on-unit storage: 'storage closet' and 'private lanai with a storage room' appear across multiple agent remarks. MLS checkbox data also shows storage checked in 2 of 15 listings, and the consistent remarks across different listings provides strong evidence the building offers storage/lockers.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and related amenity wording. The remarks mention general storage closets and lanai storage, but nothing about surfboard-specific storage facilities.
No analysis available
No current remark explicitly mentions a trash chute system, and I found zero references to trash, garbage, or refuse chutes across the provided listings. Given the lack of textual support, this feature should not be treated as confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks from different agents explicitly mention a "pool," "community pool," or "swimming pool," and one also references a "pool and BBQ area" plus recreation area. This appears consistent across the building rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," or similar wording. The remarks confirm a swimming pool, but they do not identify it as saltwater.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: at least 8+ remarks explicitly say 'Washer/Dryer in the unit' or 'washer and dryer in unit,' and one mentions a 'newer washer/dryer.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing versions, so this feature should be treated as available in the building.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, card-operated, quarter-fed, or fee-based laundry language. The remarks only reference washer/dryer in the unit and do not indicate any paid community laundry facilities.
I searched the remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor community laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public-remarks evidence that community laundry exists on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across all current listings: 18/18 MLS entries include a parking feature and none show NONE. Public remarks repeatedly mention parking in multiple forms, including '2 parking stalls,' '1 open parking stall,' 'deeded parking space,' and 'covered parking stall,' so this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Assigned parking is well supported by the MLS pattern and remarks. At least one listing describes a 'deeded parking space,' and several listings reference specific stalls tied to the unit, consistent with assigned or reserved parking being available in the building.
Covered parking is supported for some units in the building rather than all units. Several remarks explicitly mention '1 covered parking stall' and 'covered parking stall near the elevator,' matching the MLS covered/garage codes and indicating this is a real available feature for buyers to consider.
Several remarks explicitly indicate deeded parking, including a direct statement that the condo comes with a deeded parking space. This is clear evidence that the parking is owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking fee, monthly parking charge, rental parking cost, or language saying parking is not included. The remarks only mention parking stalls or a deeded space, but do not state any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found nothing. The remarks discuss parking availability and deeded stalls, but do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob/keycard access language such as key card entry, fob access, or electronic access. The remarks mention overnight security and security patrol, but nothing about card-based entry systems.
No analysis available
The listings directly confirm security patrol service. One remark states "overnight security," and another says "There is also security patrol in the evenings," which is clear evidence of patrol coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (9 of 16 current MLS entries) include the ACWIUN inclusion, and at least one public remark explicitly notes a "brand new window AC unit." While agents sometimes copy/paste checklist items, the combination of frequent checkbox inclusion and an explicit remark across listings provides strong evidence that some units in the building have window AC units.
The building is very likely concrete. MLS data is highly consistent at 15 of 18 listings showing construction_materials='CONCRE', while the public remarks do not specifically mention construction type but also do not raise any contradiction. This appears to be stable MLS information rather than a copy-paste feature claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 70%: 2 of 14 MLS listings specify MASSTU in construction_materials, and no listings or remarks suggest a different primary construction type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 16 current MLS listings show construction_materials='ABOGRO' and the provided public remarks (many listings) contain no mention of 'above ground' or related phrasing. This pattern suggests the few ABOGRO checks may be agent checkbox errors or inconsistently applied; evidence is weak and not corroborated by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental permissions and found none. Because there is no remark showing STR permission, this is treated as not evidenced in the public remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel pool, hotel rental program, branded pool participation, or managed-by-hotel language and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program and found nothing. There is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings identify the property as fee-simple, which indicates it is not leasehold. I searched for lease expiry language such as lease ends, ground lease, leasehold, or a renewal year and found none.
Public remarks explicitly mention a VA assumable loan, which is strong evidence that VA financing is supported for this building/listing. I did not rely on inference; the remark is direct evidence.
The remarks explicitly state the building is fully insured, which is direct evidence for this feature. The additional phrase '100% Hurricane Insured' strongly reinforces that the building has comprehensive insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'life safety compliant,' or 'passed fire inspection,' but found no such references. With no current positive value and no supporting remarks, this is treated as not evidenced in the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data supports mountain views in some units of Nuuanu Park Place, with 3 of 17 listings showing MOUNTA in the view field. Public remarks emphasize garden, stream, and urban convenience more than mountains, so this appears to be an MLS-based building feature rather than repeatedly described by agents.
Diamond Head views are mentioned in several listings, not just one agent remark. Phrases like 'Diamond Head in the distance' and 'views ... and Diamond Head' appear across multiple remarks, while the MLS view field also has 2/18 DIAHEA entries. This looks like a genuine feature available in some units rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
City views are supported by the MLS data, with 6 of 17 listings including CITY in the view field. While many remarks focus on garden or stream outlooks, the building’s Honolulu location and repeated downtown/urban references make city-view units plausible and consistent with the listings.
No analysis available
Garden views are very strongly supported across many listings and agents. At least 11 of 17 current MLS records show GARDEN, and multiple public remarks explicitly mention 'garden view,' 'looks over Liliuokalani Botanical Garden,' and 'overlooking the serene Liliuokalani Botanical Gardens,' making this a clear building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited support for sunrise views from the MLS view field alone: 3/18 listings currently show SUNRIS. No public remarks explicitly confirm sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, so this appears more like weak MLS-level evidence than well-documented confirmation across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements about viewing Friday night fireworks from the building or unit, such as from a lanai or bedroom. The remarks discuss stream, garden, Diamond Head, and city views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by both MLS data and agent remarks. At least two current listing remarks explicitly say the building has a 'resident manager,' alongside 11/17 current MLS listings showing RESMAN checked. This looks like a consistently reported shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.