Nuuanu Park Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nuuanu Park Place
Building Overview
Nuuanu Park Place in Liliha-Alewa — concrete building (1981) with pool and on-site resident manager.
About Nuuanu Park Place
Nuuanu Park Place is a residential building located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1981 and is concrete construction.
The property includes on-site amenities such as a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units use split air conditioning systems.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide a direct numeric owner-occupancy figure of 77%, matching the current building context. This explicit listing statement strongly supports retaining 77.0% with very high confidence.
The remarks were searched for elevator references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but none were found. There is no current elevator count to retain, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported. At least several listings explicitly mention "cable/internet" or "cable TV," and the MLS data is nearly unanimous (17/19). This looks like a consistent building-level fee item rather than a one-off agent entry.
Evidence for common-area electricity is weaker than the other fee items. MLS coding suggests it may be included in some listings, but the remarks do not clearly say "common electric" or "common area electricity," so this appears to be based mostly on inconsistent checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is directly supported by at least one public remark that says fees include "hot water." Although only 4/19 MLS entries show HOTWAT, the explicit wording is enough to support the feature at the building level.
Internet inclusion is directly supported by the remarks, including the phrase "internet service" in the maintenance fee. While only 3/18 listings currently carry the MLS internet code, the repeated wording across multiple remarks suggests this is a legitimate building-level benefit rather than a one-off entry.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. Multiple remarks name sewer directly, and the MLS data is unanimous (19/19), which strongly suggests a consistent building-level fee item.
Water inclusion is very strongly supported. Public remarks explicitly mention water being covered, and the MLS data is unanimous (19/19), making this one of the clearest building-level inclusions.
At least 11 of the 20 remarks explicitly mention a shared BBQ or grilling amenity. Key phrases include 'BBQ grilling area,' 'BBQ area,' and 'a lovely outdoor area to grill,' appearing across multiple listings and agents, strongly confirming the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence of a jogging or walking path in the remarks. While several listings mention botanical gardens, streams, and strolling, none describe a shared jogging path, walking path, or fitness trail, so the current MLS checkbox appears unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a shared recreation area at the building level. One listing explicitly states, "Building amenities include a swimming pool, garden and BBQ and recreation area," while the current MLS data also has RECARE checked in 2/19 listings. The repeated amenity wording across remarks suggests a real shared feature rather than a unit-specific claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple listing remarks, including phrases like "storage closet" and "private lanai with a storage room." Historical MLS data also shows storage in both amenities and unit features across several listings, which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Some listings mention private lanai storage closets or storage rooms, but none identify dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. The available storage references do not establish this feature.
No analysis available
No current public remark mentions a trash chute or equivalent terminology. However, 8 of 20 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, providing some support, though the partial checkbox coverage and lack of descriptive remarks suggest the data may be copied or inconsistently verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly confirmed by both historical and current evidence. At least 11 of the provided listings explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, including multiple distinct descriptions of a "community pool," "swimming pool and BBQ grilling area," and a pool that "invites relaxation," making this highly unlikely to be copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having a swimming pool, but no public remark identifies the pool as saltwater. Therefore, there is no evidence for the saltwater attribute.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across multiple current listings, with at least 9 remarks explicitly mentioning it. Repeated phrases include "WASHER/DRYER IN THE UNIT," "in-unit washer/dryer," and "washer and dryer in unit," and the evidence is consistent with the historically high-confidence finding rather than relying only on copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to in-unit laundry only. They do not mention coin laundry, payment by quarters or card, laundry fees, or any other paid community laundry arrangement.
The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryers, including "WASHER/DRYER IN THE UNIT," but do not describe shared community laundry facilities. No evidence supports laundry rooms on every floor.
Parking is consistently confirmed across the building, with at least 12 of the supplied remarks explicitly mentioning parking, including covered, open, deeded, and multiple stalls. The evidence comes from varied descriptions and is reinforced by all 20 current MLS records containing a parking feature, so parking is strongly supported.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported for this building. Across the current remarks, several listings explicitly mention “2 PARKING STALLS,” “deeded parking space,” and other specific stall counts, which aligns with the MLS pattern showing assignment in most listings. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
Covered parking is clearly present in the building for at least some units. Several current remarks explicitly say “1 covered parking stall” or “covered parking stall near the elevator,” which matches the MLS history showing covered parking in a subset of listings. The evidence is strong and repeated across listings, indicating this is a real building feature rather than a checkbox error.
The remarks directly confirm deeded parking. Other listings consistently mention included, covered, open, or multiple parking stalls, supporting the presence of assigned parking.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss covered, open, deeded, and multiple parking stalls but provide no parking-fee amount. The monthly parking fee is therefore unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe parking availability and stall types, including deeded, covered, open, and multiple stalls. No parking waitlist system is referenced, so this feature is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
The remarks mention overnight security and evening security patrol, but do not describe a card- or fob-based access system. The available security references do not support this feature.
Several listings mention building security, with key phrases like "overnight security" and "security patrol in the evenings." The MLS checkbox is present in only 4 of 19 listings, so the evidence is not universal, but the remarks provide direct confirmation that the building offers security coverage. This looks more like inconsistent agent reporting than a copy-paste-only amenity, but the feature is still supported.
Public remarks directly confirm evening security patrol service, with additional references to overnight security. This is consistent with the building context indicating security personnel.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by the MLS history and confirmed in current public remarks. One listing explicitly mentions a "brand new window AC unit," which aligns with the prior pattern of ACWIUN appearing in multiple current listings. This looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by MLS data across listing periods: 17 of 20 current listings and 16 of 19 historical listings identify the construction material as CONCRE. The public remarks do not explicitly use phrases such as 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete,' but the consistent checkbox data across many listings and agents indicates this is a building-level feature rather than a recent copy-paste change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 70%: 2 of 14 MLS listings specify MASSTU in construction_materials, and no listings or remarks suggest a different primary construction type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 16 current MLS listings show construction_materials='ABOGRO' and the provided public remarks (many listings) contain no mention of 'above ground' or related phrasing. This pattern suggests the few ABOGRO checks may be agent checkbox errors or inconsistently applied; evidence is weak and not corroborated by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention investor or owner-occupant opportunities and potential renting but contain no explicit short-term-rental authorization. There is also no explicit prohibition, so the absence of STR evidence supports a low-confidence false value.
The remarks contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STR permission is not established, this feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
The listings do not mention any hotel rental program, much less mandatory participation. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The fee-simple descriptions indicate that the property is not leasehold, so a land-lease expiration year is not applicable. No specific lease-expiry year was found in the remarks.
The remarks directly confirm that VA-assumable financing is available. This is strong public-remark evidence that the building supports VA financing.
Multiple direct remarks confirm comprehensive building insurance, including an explicit statement that the building is fully insured and another stating it is 100% hurricane insured. This is strong, repeated evidence supporting a true value with very high confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks contain no statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, is FLSE passed, fire-safety certified, or life-safety compliant. Because there is no current verified value and no supporting evidence, this remains false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain-related views are supported by 4 of 20 current MLS listings. Public remarks specifically mention views of Diamond Head in the distance, including a 'tree-lined view of Diamond Head' and Diamond Head visible from the lanai, though the evidence is less direct than for garden views.
Diamond Head views are mentioned in several listings, not just one agent remark. Phrases like 'Diamond Head in the distance' and 'views ... and Diamond Head' appear across multiple remarks, while the MLS view field also has 2/18 DIAHEA entries. This looks like a genuine feature available in some units rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
City views are supported by 8 of 20 current MLS listings. Remarks emphasize the urban setting and proximity to Downtown Honolulu, Chinatown, and other city amenities, but few explicitly describe a cityscape or downtown view; this may partly reflect copied MLS descriptions.
No analysis available
Garden views are very strongly supported by 13 of 20 current MLS listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'lush garden views,' 'looks over the Liliuokalani Botanical Garden,' 'beautiful garden view,' and describe the lanai overlooking lush botanical-garden greenery and the Nuuanu Stream.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited support for sunrise views from the MLS view field alone: 3/18 listings currently show SUNRIS. No public remarks explicitly confirm sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, so this appears more like weak MLS-level evidence than well-documented confirmation across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe garden, stream, greenery, and distant Diamond Head views from units and lanais. They do not state that fireworks can be viewed from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 listings explicitly mention a resident manager or onsite manager, including “Amenities include Resident Manager” and “This pet-friendly community ... [has] an onsite manager.” This aligns with the historically high-confidence data and the RESMAN checkbox appearing in 13/20 listings, indicating the feature is well-supported across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.