Nohona II at Kapolei
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nohona II at Kapolei
Building Overview
Nohona II at Kapolei in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 2008; no pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Nohona II at Kapolei
Based on MLS data, Nohona II at Kapolei is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 2008. Available MLS records provided do not include unit size, number of units, or construction type, so those details are not stated here.
According to available records, building policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The MLS-derived information did not list specific amenities, common area features, or an identified management company; the management company is shown as unknown in the provided data.
Buyers should verify specifics such as unit sizes, construction details, parking arrangements, association fees, rules, and any additional amenities with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found none. One remark notes a unit is tenant-occupied, but that does not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a count like "4 elevators," and found none. The listings describe garages, parking, pools, and recreation-center amenities, but nothing about building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included at this building. The current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings with OTCOEX checked, which is a very strong building-level signal, and the remarks consistently describe shared amenities and common areas without any contradiction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. No listings currently check HOTWAT, while many include WTRHTR, and remarks reference individual water heaters / solar hot water instead of HOA-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is well supported for this building. Current MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings with SEWER included, and the public remarks reinforce it with an explicit "WATER/SEWER INCLUDED" note. This is strong multi-listing evidence rather than a one-off agent copy.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is strong at 15 of 20 listings with WATER checked, and the remarks include a direct "WATER/SEWER INCLUDED" statement, supporting a building-level amenity rather than a unit-specific note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building/community is repeatedly described as having a rec center/community center, with party-rental hall space, party rooms, and meeting rooms. That is strong evidence of a clubhouse or community center amenity even though the exact word "clubhouse" is not used often. The remarks appear across multiple listings rather than a single copied phrase, and current MLS data also includes CLUHOU in 2/20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is supported by multiple public remarks across the building, not just MLS amenities. Listings mention "meeting rooms," "air-conditioned party rooms," and "Villages of Kapolei Hall Rentals for parties," indicating a real shared community space. The evidence is strong and consistent across several agents, so the feature should be included.
Current listings strongly support patio/deck amenities: at least 4-6 remarks describe a "covered patio," "partially covered patio," "private lanai," or "private patio." The repeated outdoor-space language across multiple agents suggests this is a real building feature available in some units, not just MLS checkbox noise.
This feature is strongly supported by both historical and current evidence. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "walking and bicycle paths" and "scenic walking paths," which directly match the jogging/walking path definition. Because the current MLS data still shows this amenity in a substantial share of listings, it remains a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Private yard access is confirmed across many current listings, with several explicit phrases such as "private yard space," "well-maintained private yard," "fenced yard," "enclosed yard area," and "attached side yard." The consistency across multiple listings and agents strongly supports that some units in this building/community offer private yard space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe the community rec center as having "party rooms" and "meeting rooms," and one mentions "Villages of Kapolei Hall for party rentals." That is consistent with a recreation room / multipurpose room amenity, though the exact phrase "recreation room" is not used often. Current MLS amenities also show RECROO in 6/20 listings, supporting that this feature is likely real but not uniformly remarked upon.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by many current listings, not just one agent, with repeated phrases like "extra storage space," "tons of storage," "ample storage," and "built in storage cabinets." Several remarks tie storage to the garage or unit features, suggesting this is a real and searchable amenity available in the building rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I looked for surfboard storage terms such as surf storage, board storage, or bike-and-surf storage. The remarks do mention garage storage and built-in storage, but nothing about surfboard-specific storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported. The current remarks mention it in many listings—phrases like "large swimming pool," "community pool," "rec center with pool," "lounge poolside," and "2 swimming pools" appear across multiple agents and unit types. Combined with the historical MLS amenities showing pool in 16/20 listings, this is very strong evidence that the building/community offers pool access.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit salt-water pool wording like "saltwater pool" or "salt pool." The pool is mentioned many times, but only as a community or recreation-center pool with no indication it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the listing set. At least a dozen remarks explicitly mention it with phrases like 'in-unit laundry,' 'washer and dryer in unit,' 'front-loading washer and dryer,' and 'full-size washer and dryer.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and matches the historical MLS pattern, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for clues like coin laundry, coin-op, card payment, quarters, or laundry fees in the public remarks. The listings reference in-unit washer/dryer or full-size washer and dryer, but nothing suggests a paid shared laundry facility.
I searched for language such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar public-remark references to shared floor-by-floor laundry facilities. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer and do not indicate any community laundry areas.
Parking is clearly a consistent building-level feature. Across the remarks, nearly every listing references a garage, driveway stall, tandem parking, or an extra parking space, and multiple units mention 2-car or 4-parking configurations. The evidence is strong across many listings and appears consistent rather than copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is not supported by the public remarks. The evidence focuses on garage and driveway parking plus tandem setups, not on assigned or deeded stalls. The small number of MLS ASSIGN checkboxes appears inconsistent with the remarks and may reflect copy/paste data entry.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed for this building. Listings explicitly mention 'garage,' 'enclosed garage,' '2-car enclosed garage,' and 'one-car garage,' often paired with driveway stalls. This is consistent across many agents and aligns with the MLS history.
I looked for explicit wording that the parking stall is deeded, owned, or included in the deed. The listings only describe garage, tandem, driveway, and guest parking, so there is no public remark evidence that the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, monthly charges, or parking rental references. The remarks discuss the number and type of parking spaces available, but do not mention any separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building, though not every listing mentions it. Several remarks explicitly call out 'guest parking' or 'ample guest parking,' which is stronger than a lone MLS checkbox. The evidence suggests it is a real building feature, likely shared/common rather than unit-specific.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is supported by both the MLS data and several explicit remarks. At least multiple listings directly state "tandem parking" or describe a tandem stall/garage-and-driveway configuration, indicating this is an actual building feature available in some units. The evidence is consistent and clear.
No analysis available
I looked for evidence of a parking waitlist or waitlist process. The listings consistently describe parking as available, with no public mention of a waiting list, so this is set to false based on absence of evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for public-remark evidence of card/fob access security systems such as keycard entry or electronic access. The remarks mention alarm sensors, garages, parking, and covered mail areas, but not card-based building security.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to security patrol service or roving/patrolled security. The public remarks do not describe any patrol service, and the current building context also lists no guard or manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly say "window AC units," "AC in every room," and several others describe AC present in bedrooms and living areas. Combined with current MLS inclusions showing ACWIUN in 14 of 20 listings, the evidence is strong and appears to be consistent across different agents rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be the prevailing building classification for this property, with 16 of 20 current listings marked DOUWAL. None of the public remarks explicitly contradict this or indicate a recent change, so the MLS pattern is the strongest available evidence. This looks like a stable building attribute rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in a minority of current MLS records for this building (7/20 listings). The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, so there is no independent confirmation from agents' descriptions. This looks like a partially populated MLS checkbox rather than strong remark-based evidence, but it is present in enough current records to keep as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, or a 30-day minimum. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that STR is allowed here.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style programs or hotel-managed operations. None appear in the remarks, and because STR is not evidenced, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool or hotel program, such as "must rent," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out." There is no such evidence in the remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground-lease language such as lease expiry dates, leasehold references, and renewal wording, but found nothing in the provided remarks. Without a specific year mentioned, this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly and repeatedly mention VA assumable financing, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted in this building/community context. This is explicit enough to set the feature to true with very high confidence.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, full insurance, or comprehensive building insurance and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence here to indicate the building is fully insured by the HOA.
Fire sprinklers are explicitly mentioned in 1 listing with the phrase 'Unit has ceiling fire sprinklers for safety.' The rest of the remarks are silent on sprinklers, so this appears to be a genuine building/unit feature rather than copy-paste noise. Current MLS data also shows the amenity checked in a subset of listings, reinforcing it.
I looked for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and did not find any. One listing mentions ceiling fire sprinklers for safety, but that does not confirm the building passed the required evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is limited but not absent: 2 of 20 listings have GARDEN in the MLS view field, while most others show NONE. The remarks more often describe landscaped surroundings, private yards, and garden/courtyard areas than explicit view language, so this looks like a partial building-level feature rather than a consistently advertised amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 listings explicitly mentions SUNSET in the MLS view field, while 15 list NONE. None of the public remarks reference sunset, evening sun, western exposure, or similar phrasing, so the evidence is limited and may reflect a single unit rather than a broadly advertised building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for wording that would show a view of Friday night fireworks from the building, such as seeing fireworks from a lanai or unit. The remarks mention parks, pools, beaches, and nearby activities, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.