Nob Hill 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nob Hill 2
Building Overview
Nob Hill 2 in Mililani-Waipio, built 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per available MLS data.
About Nob Hill 2
Nob Hill 2 is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974. Specific details on building size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies and amenities recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are prohibited. No management company is listed in the available MLS information. Other common building amenities (if any) are not detailed in the provided records.
Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all building details, policies, and any applicable fees or parking arrangements with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
5/7 current MLS listings include OTCOEX, which suggests a building-level common-area charge is included in the fee. Multiple remarks also reference maintenance coverage for common area maintenance, but none explicitly say common area electricity, so this looks like a likely MLS-coded inclusion rather than a consistently spelled-out amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark evidence that hot water is included, while the current MLS data consistently shows WTRHTR and no HOTWAT across all listings. This is strong, consistent evidence that maintenance fees do not include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings include SEWER, and the remarks directly confirm it with the phrase 'Maintenance fee covers water, sewer.' This is a strong, consistent building-level feature across multiple listings.
All current MLS listings include WATER, and the remarks explicitly confirm that the maintenance fee covers water. The evidence is consistent across listings and appears reliable rather than copy-pasted error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are 0 explicit mention of car wash facilities in the remarks across these listings. Although 2/7 MLS records now check CRWSH, the absence of any descriptive support suggests the amenity is not verified and may be a copy-paste MLS checkbox issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit mentions of an exercise room or fitness center. Remarks only say residents can use Mililani Town Association rec centers and enjoy activities like exercise and martial arts, which reads as neighborhood amenities rather than a building gym.
No analysis available
None of the listings describe a meeting or conference room, and there are 0 explicit mentions in the remarks. The current MLS checkbox appears isolated and is likely a data-entry artifact rather than a confirmed shared amenity.
Outdoor space is mentioned in several of the public remarks, with 5+ listings referencing a courtyard, porch, or lanai. Phrases like 'private fenced courtyard,' 'fenced lanai,' and 'covered lanai' support that patio/deck-style features are available for at least some units in the building. The remarks are varied across listings, suggesting this is a real feature rather than a one-off MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is confirmed by several remarks across the listings: at least 2-3 descriptions explicitly reference "Mililani Town Association pools" or the "community pool." This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox with no remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: 7/7 current listings include WASHER/DRYER in MLS inclusions, and multiple remarks explicitly mention it. Key phrases include "washer and dryer in the unit" and "Full size washer/dyer located in closet in covered lanai," which appear to be consistent rather than copy-paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 7/7 current listings include parking-related MLS features, and several remarks describe the stalls directly. Multiple agents mention 'two assigned parking stalls' or '2-side-by-side parking stalls,' which is consistent with the listing data and not just a one-off copy-paste.
Assigned parking appears to be a real building feature, not just checkbox noise. The remarks from multiple listings explicitly mention assigned stalls, matching the MLS data in most listings and suggesting consistent, verified information.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe the parking as assigned, including stalls in front of the unit, but never as deeded or owned. Based on the wording provided, there is no evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of parking fees, rental charges, or paid parking arrangements, but found nothing. The remarks only note assigned stalls and do not indicate whether parking carries a separate cost.
Guest parking is supported primarily by the MLS checkbox data: 6/7 listings include GUEST. None of the public remarks explicitly mention guest or visitor parking, so this looks like a moderately supported building feature rather than something confirmed in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, waitlist system, or similar language and found none. In the absence of any such mention, this is treated as not indicated by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is directly mentioned in 1 listing with the phrase "window ACs," and current MLS data shows the ACWIUN inclusion checked in 4 of 7 listings. While the remarks mostly look like standard copy/paste listing text, the explicit mention is strong evidence that at least some units offer window air conditioning.
There is no remark-level evidence supporting concrete construction in these listings. The MLS checkbox appears on only 2 of 7 listings, which looks more like inconsistent metadata than verified building construction.
Zero of the provided remarks mention double wall construction, even though MLS metadata checks DOUWAL on all 7 listings. This pattern strongly suggests copied MLS data rather than a verified building feature, so the feature should not be trusted from remarks alone.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, none of the public remarks reference wood frame construction. Because the evidence is absent from remarks and only appears in MLS metadata, confidence is low that this building should be labeled as wood frame.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or minimum-night rules, but found no mention. Because there is no positive evidence of STR allowance, this is treated as not allowed/unsupported from the remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as managed-by-hotel, hotel program, or branded pool participation and found none. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for language like mandatory pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or similar rental-program restrictions and found none. With no STR evidence in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, or renewal years, but found none. Since no specific lease expiration year is provided, this remains unknown.
The remarks explicitly state that Nob Hill is VA approved, which directly satisfies the feature definition. I did not rely on the separate mention of a VA assumption option; the approval statement is the decisive evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but non-zero evidence for garden views: 2 of 7 current listings are labeled GARDEN in MLS view_descriptions. The remarks mostly describe private fenced courtyards/lanai areas and no back neighbors, which suggests outdoor space but does not explicitly confirm a garden view. Because the remarks do not clearly corroborate the MLS view label, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates the building does not offer sunset views: 0 of 6 current MLS view_descriptions include 'SUNSET' while 5 of 6 explicitly show 'NONE'. None of the public remarks mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', 'evening sun', or similar phrases. Given the absence across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox now unchecked, this appears to be a correction rather than an omission.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.