Newtown Meadows
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Newtown Meadows
Building Overview
Newtown Meadows in Aiea, built 1987; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company listed as unknown.
About Newtown Meadows
Based on MLS data, Newtown Meadows is a residential building located in the Aiea neighborhood. The building is recorded as built in 1987. Size (number of units, square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key policies for Newtown Meadows include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities or common-area features.
The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Information about parking, maintenance fees, special assessments, or other homeowner association details is not provided in the available records. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with listing agents, management, or public records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy clues such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar wording, but found none. Since the remarks do not provide a current value either, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any explicit elevator references, including counts and phrases like 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Since there is no current value provided and no remark evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 14 current MLS listings shows 'CABTV' in association_fee_includes and no public remarks mention cable being included. Given the very low prevalence and absence of any remark confirmation, this appears to be an isolated checkbox entry rather than a building-level feature.
13 of 15 current MLS listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly mention 'common area electricity', so evidence is based on consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple agents rather than explicit remark language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly points to hot water not being included. Across 16 current listings, none check HOTWAT and many list WTRHTR, which is usually a sign the unit has its own water heater rather than the HOA providing hot water. Public remarks are silent on hot-water service, so the MLS pattern appears consistent and not like a copy-paste inclusion.
Only 1 of 14 MLS listings shows 'INTSER' (internet service) in association_fee_includes and no public remarks mention internet being included. This isolated checkbox entry likely represents an erroneous or unit‑specific entry rather than a building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fees. 15 of 16 current listings check SEWER, and there is no meaningful contrary evidence in the public remarks. The consistency across listings suggests this is a reliable building feature rather than an agent copy-paste error.
Water is very likely included in the maintenance fees. 14 of 16 current listings check WATER, which is strong repeated MLS evidence even though the remarks do not spell it out. The pattern is broad enough across listings to treat this as a building-level feature.
BBQ facilities appear to be a shared building/community amenity, not just a one-off unit feature. Across the remarks, multiple listings explicitly reference "Pavilion and BBQ area," "green space and BBQs," and "Take advantage of the property's BBQ area," aligning with the current MLS data showing BBQ in all listings. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, so this feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the current public remarks mention a car wash or vehicle wash station, and only a small number of MLS checkbox entries list CRWSH (2 of 15). Given prior high-confidence assessment and no supporting remarks here, this appears to be an erroneous/unchecked amenity rather than a real facility.
The building/community clearly offers clubhouse-type shared amenities through the Newtown Recreation Center/community center. Multiple listings mention "Newtown Recreation Center," "community pavilion," and "meeting areas," showing this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a recurring amenity description. This supports keeping club_house as true, with moderate-to-strong confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 6 of 15) explicitly reference a fitness/gym or fitness center—phrases include "fitness center" and "gym" and references to pool/gym/sauna at the recreation center. Evidence is consistent across different remarks and agents, indicating a shared building amenity rather than a single-agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe private outdoor spaces: at least 9 of the provided remarks mention patios/lanai/courtyards (e.g., "private front patio", "spacious courtyard and back lanai", "living room extends to a usable and very private covered lanai", "covered back patio"). While only 4/15 listings currently have the PATDEC/COVPAT checkbox, the consistent, independent agent remarks across many listings provide strong evidence the building offers patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
About 9 of 15 listings reference the Newtown Recreation Center or similar community recreation amenities—quotes include "Newtown Recreation Center" and "community pavilion". The consistency and frequency across listings indicate a shared recreation area is available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of the 15 recent listings explicitly mention extra storage (phrases include 'additional storage located under the stairs', 'Storage under upstairs stairwell', 'good storage', and 'ample storage throughout'). MLS checkboxes show storage only on 1/15 listings, so evidence is moderate and appears to refer to unit-level/under-stair storage rather than a formal shared locker system; buyers seeking units with extra storage would find this building relevant.
No analysis available
Tennis courts are mentioned in multiple listings (about 4–5 of 15), with explicit phrases like "tennis & basketball courts" and "tennis courts" tied to the Newtown Recreation Center. The direct mentions across different listings provide moderate-to-strong evidence the building/community offers tennis facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings: well over 10 remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, often alongside the Newtown Community Association/Recreation Center amenities. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not limited to a single copied remark, so the building should be treated as offering pool access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the feed: historical MLS data shows 16/16 listings with washer/dryer in inclusions, and current remarks explicitly mention it in multiple places. Key phrases include "newer washer and dryer" and "Stack W/D," which confirms this is not just copied MLS checkbox data but appears in agent remarks as well.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 15 listings reference parking—common phrases include '2 parking', '2 parking stalls', and 'open parking stall(s)'. MLS parking_features also indicate parking for 15/15 listings and there is consistent confirmation across multiple agent remarks (likely some copy/paste, but numerous explicit mentions provide strong evidence).
Parking is strongly confirmed as assigned/reserved in this building. Multiple remarks across the provided listings explicitly say '2 assigned parking stalls,' '2 assigned stalls,' '2 dedicated side-by-side parking stalls,' and 'assigned side-by-side parking in front of unit,' with 16/16 MLS records showing ASSIGN in parking_features. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned, dedicated, or open stalls, which indicates reserved parking but not deeded ownership. I looked for explicit wording like deeded, owned stall, or parking included in deed, and found none.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, rental, or extra cost, but there were no mentions. Because the remarks do not discuss parking pricing, this cannot be determined.
The majority of listings (14/15 in MLS) and numerous remarks reference guest parking—examples: 'plenty of guest parking', 'guest parking nearby', 'lots of guest stalls'. Consistent agent remarks combined with MLS guest checkbox support including guest parking as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for stalls, and found nothing. With no evidence of a waitlist system in the public remarks, this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings supports split AC availability in the building. At least 6–7 remarks explicitly reference split/mini-split/ductless cooling, with consistent phrasing from multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste note. Current MLS data also shows ACSPL in many listings, reinforcing that units in Newtown Meadows offer split AC systems.
7 of 15 current listings have the ACWIUN inclusion checked, and at least one listing's public remarks explicitly says "window A/C units." Several other listings mention split ACs (e.g., "split AC"), so window units appear present in some units but not universally across the building.
No analysis available
13 of 14 current MLS listings list DOUWAL (double-wall) in construction materials. While none of the public remarks explicitly state 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction,' the near-universal presence of the MLS checkbox across multiple listings/agents indicates this is likely a true building-level feature rather than isolated agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
9/15 recent MLS entries list WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or similar phrasing. The majority of listings indicate wood-frame construction via MLS fields, though the absence of remarks means some risk of checkbox copy/paste; overall evidence moderately supports including the feature.
No current listing remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground constructed, and the remarks are otherwise focused on interior updates, AC, and amenities. Given the low historical confidence and the lack of any corroborating public remarks across the listings, the ABOGRO material flag appears unsupported for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like STR permitted, short-term rental allowed, TVU, vacation rental, or minimum-stay rules, but found no supporting language. Based on the absence of any STR-positive remarks, short-term rentals are treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, hotel-managed, or rental program language, and found none. Since STR is not supported here, hotel pool participation must be false.
I searched for language indicating a required rental pool, mandatory participation, or inability to opt out, but found nothing. Because there is no evidence of any STR program, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or expiry year, but found nothing in the remarks. Without a specific year mentioned, this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm VA financing eligibility, including direct language that the building is VA-approved and VA-friendly. This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple listings, so the feature is set to true.
I searched the remarks for terms indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but there were no references. Because there is no current value and no supporting text, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating FLSE passed, fire/life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection, but nothing in the public remarks suggests that status. With no current value provided, the safest interpretation is false based on absence of evidence in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 15 current MLS view_descriptions list 'MOUNTA', while zero of the supplied public remarks reference mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. The evidence is driven by consistent MLS checkbox entries across many listings (possible copy/paste), so the building is reported to offer mountain views but public remarks do not explicitly confirm them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5–6 listings explicitly reference garden/courtyard/yard features — phrases include 'spacious courtyard', 'private garden entry', 'private front courtyard', and 'fenced in courtyard at the front of the unit'. This consistent mention across multiple agent remarks indicates the building does offer garden/courtyard views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, sunset views are not mentioned at all, and current MLS view data shows 0/16 listings tagged SUNSET with 3/16 marked NONE. The remarks focus on layout, renovations, parking, and community amenities, which suggests the sunset-view signal is likely a copy/paste or data issue rather than a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.