Naniwa Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Naniwa Gardens
Building Overview
Naniwa Gardens in Hawaii Kai (built 1974) — no pets and no short-term rentals permitted, per MLS data.
About Naniwa Gardens
Based on MLS data, Naniwa Gardens is a condominium property located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1974. Size (number of units or square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or on-site facility information is provided in the available records.
Parking, maintenance fees, homeowner association details and other policies are not included in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building specifications, rules, fees and management details with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions; this summary is based solely on the MLS information available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy references such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar wording. The remarks do not mention owner occupancy at all, so the percentage remains unknown from this evidence.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators." The listings only confirm that the building has an elevator, including secured access and direct-to-door service, but they do not state how many elevators there are.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is supported by the MLS data in all 17 listings (17/17 with CABTV). None of the remarks explicitly mention cable, but the uniform checkbox pattern across many listings is very strong evidence that cable is included in the maintenance fee.
Common-area electricity is indicated in 15 of 17 listings via OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly mention building power or common electric, but the high MLS consistency makes this a strong building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is shown as included in all 17 listings (17/17 with HOTWAT). The public remarks are silent on the topic, but the checkbox data is unanimous and therefore highly reliable for this building.
Internet service appears in 7 of 17 listings via INTSER. Because the remarks do not mention internet and the checkbox is not consistent across all listings, this is only moderate-confidence evidence that some or all maintenance fees may include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water inclusion is supported by 16 of 17 listings, making it a very strong building-level feature. The remarks do not explicitly mention water fees, but the MLS pattern is highly consistent and likely reliable.
BBQ/grilling amenities are consistently confirmed by both MLS data and public remarks. Many listings reference a "BBQ area" or "Barbecue Area," so this appears to be a true shared building amenity rather than agent copy. The evidence is strong and repeated across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are well supported. Several remarks explicitly reference a "car wash area" or "car wash," aligning with the strong current MLS pattern. This looks like a real building amenity rather than an MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Exercise/fitness facilities are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks independently describe a "fitness room," "exercise room," "gym," and "fitness center," matching the unanimous current MLS amenities data. This does not look like a one-off copy-paste issue because the wording appears in many separate remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across many listings confirms patio/deck-style outdoor space in Naniwa Gardens. At least 12+ remarks explicitly mention a "lanai," "balcony," or "large private lanai," suggesting this is a common building feature rather than a one-off unit amenity. The pattern is consistent across multiple agents and not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-room evidence is moderate but credible. Most current MLS records include RECROO, and at least one remark describes an "activity room complete with full kitchen & tv," which supports the presence of a shared recreation space. The remarks are less frequent than for pool or BBQ, but the feature is still supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently and repeatedly confirmed across the building remarks and MLS data. At least 10+ listings mention storage in some form, including specific locker/unit references and basement storage, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise. The evidence is strong across multiple agents and listing types.
This feature is directly confirmed in the remarks with repeated references to "bike & surfboard storage." That is clear evidence the building offers surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the MLS record, with every current listing showing TRACHU. The public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the unanimous amenity data is sufficient to support inclusion. There is no evidence suggesting the feature was removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly mention "swimming pool," "pool," and related amenity wording, and the current MLS data shows 17/17 listings with pool-related amenities checked. This appears to be a building-level shared amenity, consistently described across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for language such as "saltwater pool," "salt water pool," or similar wording. While the building clearly has a pool, the remarks never specify that it is salt water, so this feature remains unconfirmed.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building. The current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 17 of 17 listings, and several remarks explicitly mention "new washer and dryer" or "full size washer/dryer." The evidence is highly consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical high-confidence record.
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating paid community laundry, including coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks do not reference any community laundry payment system, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
I looked for explicit statements such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar wording. The public remarks do not mention community laundry locations at all, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings, with many remarks describing specific stall numbers and fixed allocations. Phrases like 'parking stalls are 68, 170, & 171,' '2 covered, side-by-side parking stalls,' and '2 parking (side by side)' show this is not a copied checkbox artifact but a consistent building-level feature.
Covered parking is confirmed in many of the remarks, with numerous listings stating '2 covered parking stalls' or 'covered, side-by-side parking stalls.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and includes both general and specific stall descriptions, making this a very strong building feature.
I searched for deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found no explicit wording. The listings consistently mention included stalls, which suggests assigned parking, but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking fees, parking rental charges, or additional cost language and found none. The remarks describe included stalls and guest parking, but no separate parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly supported by multiple listings, with remarks calling out 'ample guest parking' and 'lots of guest parking.' This is repeated across different descriptions, suggesting a real shared building amenity rather than a copied MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found nothing. Multiple remarks describe available parking stalls, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card/fob access language like key card entry, fob access, or electronic card readers. The remarks only say the building is "well-secured" or has a "secure elevator," which is not enough to confirm card-based security.
No analysis available
I searched for any public remark indicating patrol service or roving security. The listings mention security and on-site management, but there is no explicit evidence of security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported. At least 8+ listings explicitly mention "split AC," "split A/C," or "split air conditioning," including specific references to "two split A/C systems" and a unit with split AC in the living area. The repeated, consistent descriptions across multiple remarks make this a high-confidence building feature rather than a checkbox copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
The MLS data is unanimous: 16 of 16 listings mark the building as concrete construction. None of the public remarks mention a different material or any correction, so this appears to be a stable building-level attribute rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS records still show ABOGRO in 6 of 17 listings, which is enough to keep the feature active given the prior high-confidence status. The remarks are mostly silent on construction type, so the evidence is coming from the MLS pattern rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No listing remarks describe brick exterior or brick construction. With only 1 of 17 MLS records carrying BRICK and no corroborating language in the remarks, this appears to be a likely copy-paste or checkbox anomaly rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and 30-day minimum restrictions and found no evidence. Without explicit public-remark support, STR allowance cannot be confirmed here.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation and found none. There is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for language indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program and found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel pool or STR allowance, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, or renewal dates and found nothing. The public remarks do not provide a lease expiry year.
I searched the listings for any reference to VA eligibility or VA loan approval and found none. Because there is no explicit mention, this remains unconfirmed from the public remarks.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or fully covered insurance. There were no matches, so the building's insurance status is not confirmed by these listings.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or life safety compliant. Nothing in the public remarks supports that status, so it cannot be confirmed from these listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings, with dozens of remarks explicitly saying 'ocean views,' 'breathtaking ocean views,' or 'panoramic ocean and marina views.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, not just copy-paste checkboxes.
Mountain views are supported by a meaningful subset of the listings, though not as consistently as ocean or marina views. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly reference mountains, suggesting some units in the building do offer this view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/landscaped views appear to be an actual building feature for some units at Naniwa Gardens. Across the remarks, several listings mention garden-adjacent language such as "lush tropical garden" and "beautiful zen garden," alongside other view descriptions. The MLS view data is consistent with this, with 7 of 17 listings showing GARDEN and no listings marked NONE.
No analysis available
Marina views are very strongly supported across the listings, with many explicit references to 'marina views,' 'Hawaii Kai Marina,' and 'ocean and marina views.' The repeated mentions across multiple listings and agents indicate this is a genuine building feature for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit wording that units can view Friday night fireworks from the building, lanai, or windows. The remarks mention ocean, marina, and mountain views, but nothing about fireworks views, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "on site manager" or "on-site manager," alongside other building security/management references, and the current MLS data shows RESMAN checked across all listings. This looks consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.