Naniwa Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Naniwa Gardens
Building Overview
Naniwa Gardens in Hawaii Kai (built 1974) — no pets and no short-term rentals permitted, per MLS data.
About Naniwa Gardens
Based on MLS data, Naniwa Gardens is a condominium property located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1974. Size (number of units or square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or on-site facility information is provided in the available records.
Parking, maintenance fees, homeowner association details and other policies are not included in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building specifications, rules, fees and management details with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions; this summary is based solely on the MLS information available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any percentage or descriptive owner-occupancy language, such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied," but none appeared in the listings. The remarks describe privacy, security, and unit layout, but not how many units are owner-occupied, so this remains unknown.
I searched for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or another numeric statement, but none was provided in the remarks. The repeated plural references suggest more than one elevator, but the listings do not give a precise number, so the value is kept non-numeric.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is supported by the MLS checkbox data in all 16 listings. No public remarks explicitly mention cable, but the consistency across every listing makes this a very strong building-level feature and not likely a copy/paste error.
Common area electricity is indicated in 14 of 16 listings via OTCOEX. While the remarks do not explicitly mention hallways/elevators power, the repeated MLS data across multiple listings suggests this is a real included maintenance item rather than an isolated checkbox mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is shown as included in all 16 listings, which is very strong building-level evidence. One listing also contains WTRHTR, but that is not enough to outweigh the unanimous HOTWAT indicator across the current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water inclusion appears in 15 of 16 listings, making this a strong and likely accurate building-level feature. The remarks are silent on water fees, but the MLS data is highly consistent and suggests this is standard for the building.
BBQ is consistently supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. All 16/16 listings show BBQ in amenities, and multiple descriptions explicitly mention 'BBQ area' or 'barbecue area,' indicating a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities appear to be a real building amenity. The MLS data is strong at 15/16, and multiple remarks independently mention a 'car wash area' or 'car wash,' confirming the amenity across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported: all 16/16 current listings include EXEROO, and several remarks directly name an 'exercise room,' 'fitness center,' or 'gym.' The repeated wording across different listings suggests this is a true building amenity, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention outdoor living space, especially a "large private lanai," "large lanai," "balcony," and "wide tiled lanai." The evidence appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy/paste, so patio/deck amenities should be considered present for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The recreation room evidence is moderate but credible: 12/16 listings include RECROO, and at least one public remark describes an 'activity room complete with full kitchen & tv.' The consistency is not as strong as the other amenities, but the remarks support that a shared recreation-style room exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently confirmed across the listing remarks and MLS fields. At least 10+ listings mention some form of storage, including specific locker/unit references and basement/secured storage. The evidence is strong and repeated by multiple agents, so this is not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
This feature is directly confirmed in the remarks with repeated mentions of "bike & surfboard storage." That is clear evidence the building offers surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by unanimous current MLS data: 16/16 listings include TRACHU. Although the remarks do not call it out explicitly, the all-listings pattern makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly supported by both MLS amenities data and the public remarks. Multiple listings mention it explicitly, including phrases like "pool," "swimming pool," and "sparkling swimming pool," and it appears consistently across recent remarks from different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This is a shared building amenity that buyers searching for pool access would expect to find here.
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating a saltwater pool, such as "salt water pool" or "saline pool." The building has a pool mentioned multiple times, but no remarks specify that it is saltwater.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported and appears consistent across the building. Current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 16 of 16 listings, and several public remarks explicitly say "new washer and dryer," "full size washer/dryer," or similar. This looks like a reliable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or other paid laundry wording. The remarks do not mention community laundry at all, so this feature cannot be confirmed from the public text.
I searched for public remarks describing laundry facilities on every floor, including phrases like "laundry on each floor" or "floor-by-floor laundry." Nothing in the provided remarks mentions community laundry locations, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
The evidence is very strong across many listings: most remarks describe exact stall assignments, such as 'parking stalls are 68, 170, & 171' and 'Parking Stalls 167/168.' Several also say 'side-by-side' and note the stalls are included with the unit, which is consistent with assigned parking. This appears to be repeatedly confirmed by multiple agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Coverage is confirmed in many listings, with repeated phrases like '2 covered parking stalls,' '2 covered, side-by-side parking stalls,' and '2 are covered and one is open.' This is explicit, consistent, and appears across multiple listings from different remarks. The building clearly offers covered parking for at least some units.
I searched for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed, and did not find it. The listings only describe included covered/open stalls, which indicates parking exists but does not establish that it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, parking rental, or additional monthly parking cost language and found none. The remarks describe included stalls and guest parking, but no separate parking charge.
Guest parking is directly confirmed in several remarks, including 'ample guest parking' and 'lots of guest parking.' The repetition across listings makes this a strong building-level feature rather than a one-off unit note. This evidence is clear and consistent, so it should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found nothing. The building appears to offer assigned/included stalls in the listings, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system in the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card, fob, keycard, or electronic entry references. The remarks discuss security in general terms and a secure elevator, but they do not confirm a card-access security system.
No analysis available
I searched for public remarks about security patrol, patrolling staff, or roving security. The text only supports that the building is secured and has on-site management/security, not that it has patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS data is unanimous: 16 of 16 listings mark the building as concrete construction. None of the public remarks mention a different material or any correction, so this appears to be a stable building-level attribute rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 5 of 16 listings currently carry the ABOGRO code, and the remarks across many listings are silent about above-ground construction. The pattern looks weak and possibly copied from MLS inputs rather than confirmed by multiple agents or site visits.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum restrictions, and found none. With no explicit allowance mentioned, the remarks do not support STR being permitted.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as managed by hotel, hotel program, or branded pool participation and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool language such as required rental program, must participate, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of STR permission or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end year, or renewal/extension dates, but nothing was mentioned. Because the remarks do not reference land tenure at all, the expiry year remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for any reference to VA eligibility or VA loan approval and found none. Since there is no current value and no explicit evidence, this is treated as not indicated in the remarks.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, fully covered, or walls-in coverage, and there were no matches. Without an explicit statement, there is no evidence to support that the building is fully insured from the public remarks alone.
No analysis available
I looked for any public-remarks language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification, but found nothing. Because there is no explicit mention either way, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced in the current remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings, with dozens of remarks explicitly saying 'ocean views,' 'breathtaking ocean views,' or 'panoramic ocean and marina views.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, not just copy-paste checkboxes.
Mountain views are supported by a meaningful subset of the listings, though not as consistently as ocean or marina views. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly reference mountains, suggesting some units in the building do offer this view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are very strongly supported across the listings, with many explicit references to 'marina views,' 'Hawaii Kai Marina,' and 'ocean and marina views.' The repeated mentions across multiple listings and agents indicate this is a genuine building feature for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that units can view Friday night fireworks from the building, lanai, or windows. The remarks mention ocean, marina, mountain, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks visibility from the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported. Current MLS data has RESMAN checked in 16/16 listings, and several remarks explicitly say "on site manager" or "on-site manager & security," which aligns with the checkbox data. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.