Nanihala
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nanihala
Building Overview
Nanihala in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1967; pets allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
About Nanihala
Nanihala is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, built in 1967. According to available records, specific details on building size and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key policies include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. Other amenity information is not listed in the available MLS records.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, and the management company are not specified in the MLS data (management company listed as Unknown). Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages like "80% owner occupied" and qualitative phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." Nothing in the remarks addresses owner occupancy, so the percentage cannot be determined from these listings.
I found multiple public remarks confirming that the building has an elevator. However, the remarks never state how many elevators there are, so I cannot determine the numeric count from the listing text alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is present in the MLS checkbox data rather than the remarks: 6 of 7 current listings include OTCOEX. No public remark explicitly says "common area electricity," so this looks like a likely MLS-coded inclusion supported by most listings, but not directly confirmed in narrative text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS support for hot water being included, and two listings instead show WTRHTR. The public remarks also point away from building-supplied hot water by describing an in-unit tankless water heater, so this is a strong correction to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across all listings: 7 of 7 current MLS records include sewer, and the public remarks directly confirm it. The wording appears consistent rather than copy-pasted error, making this a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is confirmed by every current MLS listing and by the remarks themselves. With 7 of 7 listings aligned and explicit narrative confirmation, this is a very strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the current listings: 7/7 MLS records have the pool amenity checked, and several remarks mention it directly, including "swimming pool" and "overlooking the inviting pool." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, with no sign this is just copied checkbox data without a real amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. All 7 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked, and multiple remarks explicitly mention "community laundry" or a "secured community laundry facility" with well-kept equipment. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real shared building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. The remarks mention it several times, including "one assigned parking," "your assigned parking stall," and "1 assigned parking," matching the high-confidence MLS pattern. This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Covered parking is explicitly mentioned in the remarks, including "your own dedicated, covered parking stall" and "covered parking stall." The evidence appears in multiple listing descriptions, suggesting this is a real building-level amenity rather than an accidental checkbox. Buyers searching for covered parking would reasonably consider this building.
The listings consistently reference assigned or dedicated parking, which confirms parking exists with the unit. However, there is no explicit statement that the stall is deeded or owned, so this cannot be verified as deeded parking from remarks alone.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge, parking rental fee, or added parking cost, but none were mentioned. The remarks only say the unit has assigned/dedicated parking, not whether there is a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list process and found none. The remarks describe assigned parking stalls, but do not indicate any parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This appears to be a concrete building based on MLS records: 6 of 7 current listings mark CONCRE in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, so the support comes from the repeated MLS construction field rather than agent narrative.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not supported by the public remarks, and only 2 of 7 current MLS records carry the ABOGRO code. The evidence is weak and inconsistent, suggesting this is likely not a dependable building-level feature in the MLS data.
Only 1 of 6 current MLS records includes 'BRICK', yet none of the six public remarks reference 'brick', 'brick exterior', or 'brick-and-mortar' construction. With no supporting remarks or user verification, this single checkbox appears unreliable and does not provide strong evidence of brick construction for the building.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental language such as STR allowed, vacation rental, TVU, or NUC, and found nothing. There is also no remark suggesting 30-day minimums or other rental-policy details, so STR allowance is not supported by the public remarks.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded pool participation and found no references. Because short-term rentals are not shown as allowed in the remarks, hotel-pool participation must be marked false.
I looked for any indication that units must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, but found none. There is no public-remarks evidence of a mandatory hotel or rental pool program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and specific expiry years, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
Multiple listings directly say the building/unit is VA approved, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted. This is a clear public-remarks confirmation with no contrary language found.
I looked for insurance-related wording that would indicate the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all, so there is no public-listing evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed or fire safety certified and found nothing. With no current verified value provided and no remark evidence, this is treated as not indicated in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City-view evidence is moderate: 5 of 7 current MLS listings mark CITY in the view description. The remarks reinforce a central urban setting with references to 'Downtown Honolulu,' 'Town,' and 'Enjoy the City Life,' but only a few descriptions are explicit enough to confirm the view directly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly state the building has a resident manager, including the phrases "resident manager" and "on-site resident manager." This is consistent with the current MLS data showing RESMAN in amenities and appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.