Nalanui Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nalanui Apartments
Building Overview
Nalanui Apartments in Liliha-Alewa — concrete building (1964); pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Nalanui Apartments
Based on MLS data, Nalanui Apartments is located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood and was built in 1964. The building is listed as concrete construction. Specific unit count, floor plans, and square footage are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing indicates the management company is unknown in MLS data. No additional amenities or building features are specified in the provided information.
Parking, maintenance fees, association fees, and other policies are not included in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or condominium management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit numeric owner-occupancy statements or terms like 'majority owner occupied' but found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no evidence in the remarks, I do not guess a percentage and return null with low confidence.
Multiple remarks call the property a 'walk up' and explicitly state '4-Story Walk Up', which strongly indicates there are no elevators. I therefore set elevators to 0 with high confidence. I looked for explicit phrases like '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators' but found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 7 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in the association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or 'building power included', so evidence is based on multiple MLS checkbox entries across agents and appears implied rather than explicitly described in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings show HOTWAT included (0/7) while 5 of 7 list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions; a remark explicitly notes a 'New Water Heater'. This indicates units rely on individual water heaters and hot water is not included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 7 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA'. The feature is inferred from consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings rather than explicit agent remarks.
5 of 7 current MLS listings list WATER as included in association fees, but public remarks do not mention 'water included' or 'water in HOA'. The inclusion is inferred from MLS checkbox consistency across several listings rather than direct confirmation in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not reference any surfboard or board storage facilities. Because there is no mention, the feature is assumed absent with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The provided building context states there is no pool, and the public remarks do not reference any pool or saltwater pool. Given no pool exists, a salt pool is not present.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry: 5/7 current MLS listings have the COMLAU checkbox checked, and at least four separate public remarks explicitly state 'community/coin laundry on each floor' or 'laundry facilities on each floor' (e.g., 'Coin Laundry located on Every Floor of this 4-Story Walk Up'). Multiple agents mention the same feature, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of community laundry.
Remarks explicitly state "coin laundry" on each floor, indicating the community laundry requires payment (coin-op). This is strong evidence the laundry is paid.
Multiple listing remarks explicitly mention laundry on every floor (e.g., "community laundry on each floor", "laundry facilities on each floor", "Coin Laundry located on Every Floor"). This provides very strong evidence the building has community laundry on each floor.
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings indicate assigned parking and multiple agent remarks explicitly state phrases like 'one assigned parking stall', '1 assigned covered parking', and 'WITH 1 Assigned Parking Stall'. The evidence is consistent across several listings and matches the MLS checkbox (strong, corroborating evidence rather than a lone copy/paste).
No analysis available
Listings describe assigned/covered parking stalls for units but do not state parking is deeded. Because 'deeded' is not mentioned and only 'assigned' is used, I conclude parking is not indicated as deeded in the remarks.
No analysis available
The public remarks describe assigned parking but provide no information about a monthly parking fee or rental cost. I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and similar phrases and found none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the listings of a parking waitlist system. The remarks only reference assigned/covered parking stalls without waitlist language.
No analysis available
Listing remarks do not mention any card/fob/electronic access system. In the absence of any mention, the feature is assumed not present with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks do not indicate the building has a security patrol service. With no explicit mention, this feature is assumed not present with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have window AC comes from MLS inclusions (4/7 listings list ACWIUN) and a public remark explicitly stating 'Window A/C unit, ceiling fans, and coin laundry on each floor.' While only one remark phrases it directly, multiple listings checking the ACWIUN box across different agents supports that window units are present in the building rather than a single listing error.
Six of seven current MLS listings for this building list 'CONCRE' in construction materials, which strongly suggests a concrete building. None of the provided public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete' (no phrases like 'concrete construction' appear), so the evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings rather than descriptive agent remarks. Given the consistent majority of listings reporting concrete, the feature is included with moderate-high confidence (0.80) while noting the lack of explicit mention in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings suggest potential for renting but do not explicitly permit short-term or vacation rentals. Because STR-specific language is absent, STR allowance cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
There is no evidence of hotel rental pool participation in the public remarks. Since STR is not indicated as allowed, a hotel pool program would not apply.
The remarks contain no indication of a mandatory rental-pool participation. Because STR allowance is not shown, mandatory pool participation is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not indicate the building is leasehold nor provide any lease expiry year. Searched for explicit four-digit expiry years and renewal language but found nothing.
There is no evidence in the remarks that the building is VA-approved. I searched the listings for explicit mentions of VA loan acceptance and found none.
I searched the remarks for 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and similar phrases; none were found. With no current value and no remarks mentioning comprehensive HOA/building insurance, I report false with medium/low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. Because there is no current data and no mentions in the remarks, I report false with medium/low confidence per rules (absence of mention = likely not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/7) mention sunset views and three listings explicitly state View: NONE. Public remarks do not reference sunset, western exposure, or evening views (one unit only notes it faces the "cooler, breezy side of the building"). Given the lack of any remarks and the MLS checkbox data showing no SUNSET entries, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention fireworks or views of fireworks from units or the building. I searched the remarks for explicit language about watching/seeing fireworks from the unit but found none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.