Nahoa Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nahoa Apartments
Building Overview
Nahoa Apartments in Mililani-Waipio — concrete construction; pets allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
About Nahoa Apartments
Nahoa Apartments is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Additional specifics about unit counts, floor plans, or building size are not provided in the available MLS-derived data.
Key policies and features noted in the MLS data include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing data does not provide details about on-site amenities (such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas) or the presence of any homeowner association amenities.
The MLS-derived information does not specify management company details, parking arrangements, maintenance fees, or other recurring assessments. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking, fee schedules, management, and any other important details with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy information such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar phrasing. The remarks mention one tenant-occupied unit and one long-time owner, but that is not enough to estimate a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage.
I looked for explicit elevator mentions such as "elevator," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators" and found none. The clearest evidence is the description of the property as a three-story walk-up, which strongly implies zero elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported by the MLS checkboxes, with 17 of 20 listings showing OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. Public remarks are consistent with a building-wide common-area electricity inclusion and mostly emphasize low maintenance fees and well-kept grounds, suggesting the checkbox data is reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings currently indicate hot water is included in maintenance fees, and the presence of WTRHTR in many units points the other way. Multiple remarks mention a 'new water heater' or 'recently replaced water heater,' reinforcing that hot water is unit-provided rather than a shared HOA utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is well supported by the MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings checking sewer in the association fee inclusions. The remarks are largely silent on sewer but consistently describe low-maintenance, well-managed building operations, which fits the checkbox evidence.
Water inclusion appears to be a building-level benefit, with 18 of 20 listings checking WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks do not suggest any change or exclusion, so the MLS checkbox evidence remains the best indicator and is highly consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports a recreation area/shared recreation amenities for this building/community. At least several listings explicitly mention recreation centers or recreation areas, including phrases like 'recreation areas for its residents to enjoy' and '7 Recreation Centers with pools and activities.' This appears consistent across multiple remarks rather than a single copy-paste mention, so the feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community/shared laundry is strongly supported across the listings. At least 10 separate remarks explicitly reference it with phrases like 'community laundry,' 'community laundry facility,' 'on-site laundry,' and 'laundry room, just steps away.' The MLS amenity is also present in 20/20 current listings, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at the building. Across the provided remarks, numerous listings reference 'one uncovered parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' 'dedicated parking stall,' 'one parking,' and similar phrases, confirming this is not just MLS checkbox noise.
Assigned parking is well supported by both the MLS data and the public remarks. Several listings explicitly describe 'assigned parking' or a 'deeded parking stall directly in front of the stairway,' indicating this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks reference assigned parking, and one listing explicitly says the unit includes a "deeded parking stall." That is direct evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
A listing directly gives the monthly parking charge for additional parking as "$75/month." This is clear public-remarks evidence for the parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be a consistent building-level amenity. Multiple independent listings mention guest parking in strong terms, including 'ample guest and street parking,' 'guest parking,' and 'plenty of guest stalls,' matching the high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks indicate a parking waitlist system by discussing extra parking availability and noting that there is "currently with no waitlist." That implies the building uses a waitlist process for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence that some units in Nahoa Apartments offer window AC: 6 of 20 listings include ACWIUN in MLS inclusions. Public remarks are not explicit about 'window units,' but one agent mentions 'new AC units,' and several others mention AC or cooling, suggesting the feature is present in at least some listings rather than being a copy-paste error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data across most listings (18 of 20). The public remarks do not explicitly mention the structure material, but there is no evidence suggesting a change away from concrete. This is a building-level feature buyers would reasonably search for, so it should be retained with very high confidence.
No analysis available
Hollow tile appears in 6 of 20 current MLS listings, but the public remarks never explicitly reference hollow tile construction. Because the evidence comes only from MLS checkbox data and not from remarks or site-visit style verification, this feature is included cautiously with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
SLAB is shown in only 2 of 20 current MLS records, while the public remarks across the listings do not mention a concrete slab foundation. The lack of corroboration strongly suggests this is not a dependable building-wide feature for buyers to search on, so it is treated as false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental permitted, NUC/TVU, or hotel-rental language and found nothing. With no public-remarks evidence, STR is treated as not allowed/unsupported here.
I looked for hotel rental pool references like hotel-managed rental programs, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, or similar. None were found, and since STR is not evidenced, this is false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel pool or mandatory rental program, but found none. There is also no evidence of any optional or mandatory short-term rental pool arrangement in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease language such as "lease expires 20xx," "land lease to 20xx," or renewal/extension dates, but none appeared. Because no specific expiry year is stated, this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA loans accepted," and "VA financing," but found no evidence. Based on the listings provided, there is nothing to indicate VA loan eligibility.
This is strongly supported by the remarks. One listing says "the building is 100% insured" and another says "well-managed and fully insured," which directly confirms full building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the provided remarks confirms the building has passed such an evaluation, so this remains unverified.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/greenery views are well supported across the listing remarks, with several units referencing open greenery, landscaped grounds, grassy areas, and lanai access to green space. This aligns with the MLS view data showing GARDEN in 11 of 20 listings, while only 4 list NONE. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by both MLS amenities data and remarks. 14 of 20 listings currently show RESMAN, and at least 2 listings explicitly say "resident manager" / "resident manager & security on grounds," which suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off checkbox. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and not just implied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.