
Mokuleia Surf
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mokuleia Surf
Building Overview
Mokuleia Surf in North Shore — concrete construction from 1975; pets and short-term rentals not allowed (based on MLS data).

About Mokuleia Surf
Mokuleia Surf is a condominium building located on the North Shore. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit counts and building size are not provided in the MLS data supplied.
Based on MLS data, detailed amenity listings for Mokuleia Surf are not available. The information provided does not specify on-site facilities, common area features, or unit-level interior details. Prospective buyers should request a full amenities list and property disclosure from the listing agent or management.
According to the MLS-derived data, pets are not allowed at Mokuleia Surf and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Buyers should verify pet, rental and management policies, as well as any applicable fees or parking arrangements, with the seller or managing entity before proceeding.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks do not disclose the percentage of owner-occupied units. I searched for explicit statements of owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrases and found none. Without explicit numeric evidence, owner occupancy is unknown and not inferred.
No public remarks mention the number of elevators. I searched the remarks for explicit phrases like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', and 'multiple elevators' and found no references. Because there is no numeric evidence, the number of elevators is unknown and not inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 3 current MLS listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, but none of the public remarks mention common electric or building power being included. This is a weak signal across agents and could be an MLS checkbox error, so include cautiously.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 current MLS listings indicate 'SEWER' is included in association/maintenance fees. Public remarks for the provided listing do not mention utilities, but the consistent checkbox across multiple listings suggests sewer is included building‑wide (though no owner/site verification is available).
2 of 3 current MLS listings list 'WATER' as included in association fees, but the provided public remarks do not reference water being paid by HOA and no owner verification exists. This suggests a moderate likelihood that water is included, but it may reflect agent checkboxing rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity, suggesting the building likely has shared laundry facilities. However, the provided public remarks make no mention of a laundry room or coin laundry and could indicate copy/paste of checkbox amenities. Given the mixed signal (MLS checks but no remarks), confidence is moderate that community/shared laundry exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 current MLS listings have the ASSIGN parking checkbox checked, and one listing's public remarks explicitly state 'the unit includes two designated parking spaces.' Evidence is consistent across multiple MLS entries and includes a direct phrase indicating assigned/reserved stalls, so the building is reported as offering assigned parking.
No analysis available
Remarks clearly indicate two designated/assigned parking spaces are included with the unit, but there is no explicit language that the parking is deeded/owned. Without explicit 'deeded' wording, treated as not deeded.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' etc.; no information provided about any parking fees, so monthly cost is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' and found none. Remarks indicate assigned spaces for this unit, with no reference to a building waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current MLS listings for the building have the construction_materials checkbox set to CONCRE, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete', 'concrete building', or 'reinforced concrete'. Evidence is therefore consistent across agents' MLS data but not corroborated by listing text, so inclusion is implied (confidence moderate) and should be verified with owner/manager or property records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for explicit indicators of STR policy (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental allowed', '30-day minimum' etc.) and found none. In absence of any mention, defaulted to false with medium confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel brand management references and found none. Because STRs are not mentioned, hotel pool participation is marked false.
Looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or conversely 'optional' and found no references. With no STR program mentioned, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and specific years; nothing found. Lease expiry year is unknown from the provided remarks.
Searched remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No evidence to mark the building VA-approved.
There is no statement in the remarks that the HOA or building is fully insured or provides walls-in coverage. I looked for explicit insurance phrases and found none. With no explicit mention and no prior data, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. I searched for terms such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', and related phrases and found no matches. In the absence of any mention and with no prior data, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it is not documented publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (3 listings' remarks combined) explicitly state mountain views: quotes include 'beautiful mountain views', 'scenic views of Mount Ka'ala', and 'Beautiful Mountain views from your living room.' Evidence is consistent across listings and strong enough to include view_mountain=true for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.