Mokuleia Country Homes
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mokuleia Country Homes
Building Overview
Mokuleia Country Homes in North Shore, built 1987; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per MLS data.
About Mokuleia Country Homes
Mokuleia Country Homes is located in the North Shore neighborhood and was built in 1987. According to available MLS records, specific details such as building size, number of units, and construction type are not provided in the data set.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include no pets and no short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or common-area information is specified in the MLS data provided.
Parking, maintenance fees, lease restrictions, and other operating details are not included in the supplied MLS information. Buyers should verify all facts, policies, and fees with the listing agent or property manager and review official documents prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current listings lack the HOTWAT association fee checkbox and each lists WTRHTR in inclusions (strong indicator hot water is provided by individual water heaters). No public remarks mention hot-water-included or building-supplied hot water. Given the unanimous presence of WTRHTR and absence of any remarks or checked HOTWAT, there is high confidence the maintenance fee does not include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three MLS listings list patio/deck amenities and the remarks include explicit language such as “covered lanai” and references to outdoor entertaining space and BBQ areas. The feature is described across multiple listing remarks (three listings) and aligns with the MLS checkbox data, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listings mention a private, fully fenced yard (quotes include “large, fully fenced private yard” and “private landscaped and fenced yard”), and the MLS amenities checkboxes show PRIYAR on every current listing. Multiple remarks across listings consistently describe the private yard, supporting high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level storage is supported by MLS checkbox data (3/3 listings show storage in amenities; 2/3 show storage in unit features) and reinforced by listing remarks that state "generous storage throughout" and "plenty of storage." Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents and remarks explicitly describe ample storage in the unit(s), so inclusion is warranted.
The remarks clearly indicate space for surfboards and beach gear, which supports surfboard storage. While not phrased as a formal storage room, the listing explicitly calls out room for surfboards and related items.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a saltwater or saline pool and found none. Since the current building context says the building has no pool, this feature is not supported.
All three current MLS listings list 'washer/dryer' in the inclusions (3/3), however none of the public remarks mention in-unit laundry. Evidence is entirely from MLS inclusion fields (possible agent copy/paste), so inclusion is probable but not explicitly confirmed in remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, paid laundry, or laundry fee references. The public remarks do not mention any laundry system or payment requirement.
I looked for language such as laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or shared laundry facilities. The remarks focus on the private yard, beach access, and interior upgrades, but say nothing about community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
MLS shows 2 of 3 listings indicate assigned parking, and the public remarks explicitly state 'Includes one assigned parking stall' and 'one assigned parking.' The language is clear and specific across agent remarks, providing strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking stalls.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only mention one assigned parking space, which is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking fee, monthly parking cost, parking rental, or additional parking charge and found none. The public remarks do not state any separate parking fee.
MLS indicates guest parking on 2 of 3 listings and the public remarks explicitly mention 'guest and street parking,' supporting that the building provides guest/visitor parking. Multiple agent remarks reference guest parking, so evidence is reasonably strong though sourced from listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found no such mention. The listing instead indicates one assigned parking space and available street parking.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, keycard entry, or card reader language. The remarks describe a small 7-unit community and private yard, but no card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for references to security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or a patrolled building. There is no indication of patrol service in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion flag, but none of the public remarks mention window air conditioners—remarks instead reference 'updated ceiling fans' and other features. This suggests the checkbox may have been copy/pasted by agents; MLS unanimity supports existence but the lack of remarks makes the evidence weak/moderate rather than definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current MLS listings for this building list 'WOOFRA' (wood frame) in the construction materials. None of the public remarks mention construction type, so the support is limited to MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and may reflect agent entry rather than explicit description in remarks. Confidence is moderate (0.72) because the majority of current listings indicate wood frame but there is no corroborating language in the public remarks or prior verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, TVU, NUC, or similar language and found none. There is also no wording suggesting short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, Hilton/Ritz pool, or similar program references and found nothing. Since the remarks do not show STR allowance or any hotel pool program, this is false.
I looked for wording such as mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out and found none. There is no evidence of a mandatory rental-pool arrangement in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewals, or a specific expiry year and found none. The remarks do not provide any land-tenure expiration information.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as VA approved, VA financing, or VA loans accepted and found nothing. With no explicit evidence, this remains unsupported from the listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current MLS listings include MOUNTA in the view descriptions and the public remarks explicitly state 'mauka views of Mount Ka‘ala' and 'Mauka views from the bedrooms upstairs.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and clearly indicates the building offers mountain (mauka) views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings (0/3) list sunrise views and none of the public remarks mention sunrise or eastern exposure. With absent historical support and no remarks corroborating sunrise views, there is high confidence the building should not be marked as offering sunrise views.
None of the three current MLS listings list sunset views and the public remarks make no mention of sunset/evening/western exposure. Given the lack of any supporting remarks or MLS indications, there is high confidence the building does not offer documented sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit mentions of viewing Friday night fireworks from the unit or building, such as from a lanai or bedroom. The remarks mention beach proximity and mauka views, but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.