Mokuleia Beach Colony
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mokuleia Beach Colony
Building Overview
Mokuleia Beach Colony in North Shore — built 1966; no pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Mokuleia Beach Colony
Mokuleia Beach Colony is a residential building located on the North Shore, originally built in 1966. According to available MLS records, specific details regarding the number of units, building size, and construction type are not specified in the provided data.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or common-area information is available in the provided records.
Buyers and agents should verify all building details, including unit counts, construction type, parking arrangements, HOA fees, and management, with the seller, listing agent, or official condominium documents. This summary is based solely on the available MLS data and does not include information beyond those records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings show all 13 floor-field entries on floor 1, while the county assessor and state registration both report one floor.
The county assessor reports 52 reconciled residential units, and the state registration reports 52 total units for this single-building registration. The state's separate residential_units figure of 45 is set aside because total_units is authoritative for the registration.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 69. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for an elevator count, such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," as well as general elevator references. None were found, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity is included in 12 of 15 current MLS listings through the OTCOEX designation. Public remarks do not discuss utility inclusions, but the repeated MLS pattern across listings strongly supports this building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not included according to the current MLS data: 0 of 15 listings include HOTWAT, while 12 of 15 identify unit water heaters. One listing specifically states there is a "tankless on-demand water heater," and no remarks state that hot water is included in the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, appearing in 14 of 15 current listings. The same feature was previously supported by 13 of 14 listings, with no public remarks contradicting it.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, appearing in 14 of 15 current listings. The prior dataset showed the same pattern at 13 of 14 listings, and none of the public remarks indicate that owners pay water separately.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 current public remarks explicitly mention walking paths, using phrases such as "walking paths," "scenic walking paths," and "walking path throughout the complex." The repeated references across listings, together with the 8/15 MLS checkbox rate and prior high-confidence evidence, support including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss surfing, ocean access, beach activities, outdoor showers, and in-unit storage, but do not identify a dedicated surfboard-storage facility. No qualifying storage language was found.
At least 10 current public remarks explicitly mention tennis facilities, including "tennis court," "tennis courts," and "community amenities including a pool, tennis court and pickleball court." The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and the 14/15 MLS amenity rate provide strong, consistent evidence that the building has tennis courts.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly validated across the listings: at least 13 of the provided remarks explicitly mention a community pool or swimming pool, often with specific details such as heated or salt-water. The repeated confirmations from multiple listings and the 15/15 current MLS amenity records indicate this is a genuine building-level amenity rather than a copied checkbox error.
No analysis available
The salt-water pool is directly confirmed in the public remarks. Other listings consistently mention the community pool, reinforcing that this is the building's pool amenity.
No analysis available
At least 1 current listing explicitly mentions "community laundry (if preferred)," directly confirming shared laundry facilities in the building. The feature is further supported by COMLAU appearing in 10 of 15 MLS listings and the previously high-confidence determination, although most other remarks emphasize in-unit washers and dryers rather than the shared facility.
The listings confirm that community laundry may be available, but do not establish that it requires payment. I searched for coin-op, card-operated, fee, and related payment language and found none.
The remarks mention community laundry in one listing, but do not indicate that facilities are available on every floor. No explicit every-floor laundry wording was found.
Parking is strongly confirmed by MLS data, with 15 of 15 listings showing one or more parking features and zero listings showing NONE. Remarks specifically state that parking is "conveniently located just outside your back entrance" and refer to the community's "parking area," providing confirmation beyond checkbox data.
Assigned parking is supported by 13 of 15 current MLS listings and the feature has previously been assessed with high confidence. Public remarks do not explicitly describe assigned or reserved stalls, so the conclusion relies primarily on strong, repeated MLS data that may include some copied checkbox entries.
No analysis available
The listings reference parking location and guest parking but provide no evidence that a parking stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Because no deeded-parking language appears, this is assessed as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly charges, additional parking costs, and parking rental language. None of the remarks mention a parking fee.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in at least two listings, including "ample guest parking" and "Guest parking for when friends come to call." This is reinforced by 11 of 15 current MLS listings marking GUEST, making the building-level feature strongly supported across multiple sources.
Secured entry is supported by both MLS data and the public remarks. While only 3 of 14 listings have SECENT checked, multiple listings describe the property as 'gated,' 'private gated community,' and even 'secured by electric gates,' which strongly indicates secured access. The wording is consistent across several agents and not isolated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking waitlist and waiting-list references. No such system or limitation was described.
No analysis available
The community is described as gated and secure, but those statements do not establish a card- or fob-based access system. I found no explicit card access terminology.
No analysis available
Several listings describe the community as private, gated, or secure, but none indicate staffed or roving security patrols. Gated access alone is insufficient evidence of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly supported by the public remarks across multiple listings. At least 4 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "features split AC," "brand new split AC system," and "a split AC unit," so this is not just a checkbox artifact. The MLS inclusions data (6/14) aligns with those remarks, indicating the building offers split AC in some units.
No analysis available
No public remarks mention concrete or reinforced concrete construction. MLS checkbox counts show only 5 of 13 listings with CONCRE while 9 of 13 list masonry/stucco, suggesting agents more often selected MASSTU. The uniform lack of concrete descriptions across multiple agent remarks implies the CONCRE flags are likely copy-paste mistakes; therefore concrete construction is unlikely.
No analysis available
Only one listing reports hollow-tile construction, with no corroborating remarks or repeated evidence across agents. This appears more likely to be an isolated MLS checkbox than a validated building-wide feature.
Ten of 15 listings identify masonry/stucco construction, providing moderate-to-strong repeated MLS support. None of the remarks explicitly quote masonry or stucco, so confidence is below the level of direct textual confirmation, but the prevalence across listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
Seven of 15 listings report slab construction, but the remarks contain no references to a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. Because the checkbox is inconsistent and unsupported by descriptive evidence, this feature is not validated.
No analysis available
Four of 15 current listings identify wood-frame construction, while the prior assessment was high confidence despite limited checkbox prevalence. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention wood-frame construction, but the current data does not convincingly contradict the established building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly permit 30-day rentals, which establishes that short-term or vacation rentals are allowed under the association rules. This is explicit and current evidence.
Although rentals are allowed, the listings describe the property as a residential community and do not mention participation in a hotel rental pool. Therefore, hotel-pool participation is assessed as false.
I searched for language requiring all units to participate in a hotel or rental program and found none. Since no hotel pool is identified and no mandatory participation is described, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language, lease expiration, ground lease terms, and renewal dates. No specific lease-expiry year was found, so the value remains unknown.
Multiple listings directly confirm VA financing support. The explicit VA approval and VA assumption language provide very strong evidence that the building is VA approved.
The remarks were searched for HOA insurance terms including fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No explicit insurance information was provided, so full insurance coverage is not confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, was FLSE-passed, fire-safety certified, life-safety compliant, or passed a fire inspection. No such language was found; this does not establish that the building failed an evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate MLS support for mountain views, but the public remarks provided do not clearly confirm them with phrases like 'mountain view' or 'Koolau view.' Since 5 of 14 current listings include MOUNTA in the view field and none show NONE, this likely reflects a real building-level view offering rather than a copy-paste anomaly, though the evidence is weaker than for garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are strongly supported across the current listings: 12/15 MLS records identify GARDEN, while 0/15 identify NONE. Remarks from multiple listings describe "beautiful garden views," "serene tropical landscaping," "lush and green beautifully landscaped grounds," and views overlooking the community grounds, indicating this is a legitimate building feature rather than isolated copy-paste data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views have moderate support from the MLS and remarks. At least two listings mention 'morning sun,' which aligns with sunrise/eastern exposure, though the wording is not as explicit as 'sunrise view.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe sunsets, ocean views, garden views, and nearby activities, but do not mention fireworks visible from a unit or building. References to nearby attractions do not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The resident manager feature is indicated by the RESMAN amenity checkbox in 14 of 15 current listings, which is consistent across multiple listings. No public remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager, so the evidence is strong but may partly reflect repeated MLS checkbox usage rather than independently verified remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.