Mokuleia Beach Colony
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mokuleia Beach Colony
Building Overview
Mokuleia Beach Colony in North Shore — built 1966; no pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Mokuleia Beach Colony
Mokuleia Beach Colony is a residential building located on the North Shore, originally built in 1966. According to available MLS records, specific details regarding the number of units, building size, and construction type are not specified in the provided data.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or common-area information is available in the provided records.
Buyers and agents should verify all building details, including unit counts, construction type, parking arrangements, HOA fees, and management, with the seller, listing agent, or official condominium documents. This summary is based solely on the available MLS data and does not include information beyond those records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks note a mix of full-time residents and second homeowners for the 26-unit property, but do not provide a percent owner-occupancy. Per rules, without an explicit percentage I cannot assign a numeric value, so owner_occupancy is unknown.
I searched all remarks for explicit elevator counts or references (e.g., '4 elevators', 'elevator'), but found no mention. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no prior value to preserve, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show 10 of 13 listings include common area electricity (OTCOEX). Remarks do not explicitly discuss changes or corrections, and the checkbox is present across many listings from different agents, indicating building maintenance fees likely include common-area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 13 MLS listings shows HOTWAT in fees, whereas 9 of 13 list unit water heaters (WTRHTR), and none of the public remarks claim hot water is provided by the building. This strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows 12 of 13 listings list sewer as included in association fees (SEWER). Remarks do not contradict this and the checkbox is consistently present across multiple listings, indicating sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
MLS checkboxes indicate water is included in association fees in 12 of 13 listings. The consistency across agent listings and absence of contradictory remarks support that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and related terms and found no references; the listings mention beach access and rinse-off outdoor showers but not dedicated surfboard storage.
All current listings (MLS TENCOU checked on 13/13) include remarks referencing tennis facilities with phrases like 'tennis court', 'tennis courts', and 'tennis & pickle ball courts'. The repeated, explicit mentions across multiple listings and agents provide strong, independent confirmation that the building offers tennis court amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked, and numerous public-remarks blocks explicitly reference a community pool (examples: 'heated swimming pool', 'salt-water pool', 'private pool', 'swimming pool'). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks, indicating the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
I found a clear mention of a 'salt-water pool' in the public remarks, so the pool is identified as salt water.
No analysis available
Although 8 of 13 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked, none of the public remarks mention a shared or coin laundry, while many listings explicitly state in-unit laundry: quotes include "in-unit washer/dryer", "Washer/Dryer installed" and "Miele washer/dryer installed." Multiple agents independently reference in-unit machines, suggesting the COMLAU checkbox is incorrect rather than the building having community laundry.
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', 'quarters', or 'coin-op' and found none. The remarks emphasize in-unit laundry instead.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. None were found; listings repeatedly mention in-unit washers/dryers rather than community laundry.
No analysis available
11 of 13 current MLS listings list parking_features=ASSIGN, indicating assigned parking is likely offered. Public remarks mention parking locations (e.g., "Parking is conveniently located just outside your back entrance", "parking area") and ample guest parking but do not explicitly say 'assigned', 'deeded', or 'designated stall'. Evidence is strong in MLS checkbox data across multiple listings, but absence of explicit wording in remarks suggests possible agent copy/paste; confidence reflects likely but unconfirmed status.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language such as 'deeded parking' or 'parking included in deed' but found none. Descriptions imply common/adjacent parking rather than owned stalls, so parking_deeded is set to false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', etc. There is no information about any paid parking, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist'. The listings instead describe on-site and guest parking without any waitlist language, so parking_waitlist is set to false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'key card access', 'fob access', and 'card reader' and found none. The community is gated ('electric gates') but there's no explicit mention of card/fob security systems.
No analysis available
I looked for 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service', and similar phrases; the public remarks do not reference any security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention concrete or reinforced concrete construction. MLS checkbox counts show only 5 of 13 listings with CONCRE while 9 of 13 list masonry/stucco, suggesting agents more often selected MASSTU. The uniform lack of concrete descriptions across multiple agent remarks implies the CONCRE flags are likely copy-paste mistakes; therefore concrete construction is unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nine of 13 MLS listings list masonry/stucco (MASSTU). While the public remarks do not explicitly say 'masonry' or 'stucco', they also do not mention concrete or wood-frame construction and repeatedly describe the units as Hawaiian-style bungalows on landscaped grounds. The majority MLS selection for MASSTU across multiple listings provides moderate support that masonry/stucco is the building material.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 13 MLS listings show wood-frame checked, and none of the public remarks describe wood frame construction. The strong preponderance of MASSTU checks (9/13) and no agent remarks supporting wood-frame suggests the WOOFRA flags are likely incorrect; wood-frame construction is unlikely for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR wording and minimum-stay rules; none were present. Many phrases describe a 'vacation retreat' or 'second home' but these are not explicit permissions for STR, so short-term rental allowance is set to false with moderate confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel brand management; none found. Because str_allowed is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
Searched listings for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar wording. None found. Given STR is not indicated, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or specific years (e.g., 2050). No leasehold/expiration year or renewal details were present, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Listing remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved. This directly indicates VA financing is accepted for the property.
There is no explicit language indicating HOA walls-in or full building insurance in the remarks. With no explicit statement and no prior data, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks do not state that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification. In the absence of any mention and with no prior value, I report false with medium confidence (absence of statement is common when not applicable).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of 13 current MLS listings list GARDEN in view_descriptions, and public remarks across multiple listings repeatedly state "garden views", "beautifully landscaped grounds", "manicured landscaped grounds" and "great lawn". Evidence is consistent across different listings/agents (not limited to a single entry), so the building should be listed as offering garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from', or 'see fireworks from lanai'. The public remarks do not mention fireworks views; they mention ocean views, beach access, and polo matches but not fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 13 recent MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox. However, none of the public remarks across listings mention a "resident manager", "on-site manager", or "live-in manager," suggesting agents may be using the amenity checkbox without elaboration. Given the consistent MLS checkbox across multiple listings but no explicit remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence (implied rather than directly described).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.