Moiliili Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Moiliili Gardens
Building Overview
Moiliili Gardens in McCully-Moiliili (1965) — concrete construction with a resident manager; assigned and guest parking available.
About Moiliili Gardens
Moiliili Gardens is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1965 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit counts were not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building lists a resident manager as an on-site amenity. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the available MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records.
Parking is available with assigned stalls and guest parking noted in the MLS. Buyers should verify parking assignments, fees, and any other association policies directly, as this summary is based on MLS data and may be incomplete or subject to change.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." None of the remarks provide any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative statement. Since there is no evidence to support a number, the value remains unknown.
I searched for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "two elevators," or "multiple elevators." The remarks only mention a keyed/security-keyed elevator, so the safest interpretation is a single elevator, but there is no explicit count stated. Confidence is moderate because the elevator is clearly referenced, but the exact number is not directly given.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0/7) and 2 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) with remarks noting a new water heater in-unit. This indicates hot water is provided by unit water heaters rather than included in the maintenance fee; evidence is consistent across multiple listings and supports setting fee_inc_hot_water to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The majority of listings (6/7) have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes and one remark explicitly says "Maintenance fee includes common area expenses, parking, and sewer, there are no other monthly fees." Multiple agents independently listing sewer in the HOA suggests building-level sewer is included in maintenance.
Six of seven current MLS records list WATER included in association_fee_includes, indicating water is likely included in the maintenance fee. However, no public remarks explicitly state "water included" and some listings mention in-unit water heaters, so the evidence is implied from agent-checked MLS fields rather than explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of 7 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer located in the unit or on the unit lanai (quotes: "Washier and Dryer in the unit", "BOSCH WASHER & DRYER in the unit!", "washer and dryer in unit", "New full size washer & dryer on the lanai"). Current MLS checkbox/inclusion data also lists WASHER/DRYER in 6 of 7 listings, so evidence across listings and MLS strongly supports that some units have in-unit laundry.
MLS amenities checkboxes indicate community/shared laundry in 5 of 7 listings, but public remarks do not mention a laundry room, coin laundry, or shared facilities (agents instead reference in-unit machines or lanai hookups). This pattern suggests the COMLAU checkbox may have been applied by agents (possible copy/paste); there is moderate MLS support but no corroborating remark details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 listings reference parking: phrases include 'one parking stall included', '3 guest stalls', 'three visitor parking stalls', and '1 covered parking spot'. MLS parking_features checkboxes are populated for every listing, and multiple agents explicitly note guest/covered stalls, indicating strong, consistent evidence across listings rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
All 7 listings include assigned parking in MLS fields and multiple remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking' or 'assigned parking stall'. The consistency across all listings and MLS data provides strong evidence that assigned/reserved parking exists at the building.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks only support assigned, covered, or included parking stalls, which is not enough to call them deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for parking rental charges, monthly parking fees, or additional parking costs and found none. One listing says the maintenance fee includes parking and there are no other monthly fees, which suggests no separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or similar language and found nothing. The listings describe assigned parking, visitor stalls, and possible rental stalls, but not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows 6/7 listings checked CONCRE, but none of the public remarks (7 listings) mention 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or similar. The evidence for concrete construction is weak and appears to be checkbox copying by agents rather than explicit confirmation in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows 2/7 listings checked ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks (7 listings) reference 'above ground' construction or materials. With no explicit mentions in remarks and no user verification, the evidence for above-ground construction is insufficient and likely a checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indicators like "short-term rental allowed," "STR permitted," "NUC," "TVU," or vacation-rental language and found none. With no explicit allowance language, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language or a managed hotel program and found none. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. There is also no evidence of a hotel rental program in the remarks, so mandatory pool participation is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold/ground lease language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," or a renewal date, but nothing appeared. Because no specific lease expiry year is stated, this remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no such wording in any listing, there is no evidence the building is VA loan approved.
I searched for phrases like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA insurance language. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage for the building at all. With no explicit evidence, this is marked false at low confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," or similar fire/life safety approval statements. None of the remarks mention any fire/life safety evaluation status, so there is no evidence to mark this as passed. Because there is no explicit confirmation, this remains false with low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS records include the RESMAN amenity and 2 of the 7 public remarks explicitly state 'On-site resident manager' (e.g., 'On-site resident manager and very low maintenance fee.' and 'On-site resident manager & assigned parking stall too!'). While not every remark mentions it (possible agent copy/paste), the strong majority of MLS checkbox data plus explicit remarks across listings indicate the building offers a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.