Mililani Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mililani Terrace
Building Overview
Mililani Terrace in Mililani-Waipio, built 1986, concrete construction; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Mililani Terrace
According to available records, Mililani Terrace is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1986. The building is noted as concrete construction. Specific unit counts, floor plans, and building size are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies and features identified in MLS records include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing does not specify on-site amenities such as pool, recreation areas, or common facilities; buyers should confirm the presence or absence of any amenities directly with the seller or managing entity.
Management company and details about parking, maintenance fees, association rules, and other operational matters are not included in the available MLS information. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers are advised to verify all building details, policies, fees, and amenities with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for ownership concentration indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' 'highly owner occupied,' or other owner-occupancy percentages, but found none. With no explicit percentage or descriptor in the remarks, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' and 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Because there is no current value provided and no remark evidence, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports common-area electricity being included: 15 of 20 current listings show OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. Remarks are mostly generic and do not dispute this, so the MLS checkbox data appears reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current MLS evidence: 0 of 20 listings show HOTWAT, while many list WTRHTR. Several remarks mention water heaters or upgrades, which is consistent with units having their own heaters rather than the association providing hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported, with 19 of 20 listings checked for SEWER. The remarks do not contradict this and appear consistent across many agents, suggesting the MLS data is reliable.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data: 19 of 20 listings show WATER in the fee inclusions. The public remarks do not contradict it, and the consistency across listings suggests this is a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 20 current listings have the WAJOPA amenity checked, and at least two remarks explicitly state 'walking paths' or 'pedestrian pathways' (e.g., 'walking paths and a playground' and 'peaceful setting above pedestrian pathways'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and are supported by the Mililani Town Association recreational amenities, giving moderate confidence that the building/complex offers walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks across the listings explicitly note access to Mililani Town Association recreation centers with "pools" or "swimming pools," and 9 of 20 current MLS records have pool-related amenity checkboxes. Key phrases include "swimming pools," "community pools," and "access to...pools," appearing in many independent remarks rather than a single copy-paste source, supporting that the building/community offers pool access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence confirms in-unit laundry across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, with at least several different wordings from different remarks rather than a single copied phrase, and the current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in all 20/20 listings. This is high-confidence building-level feature evidence and should be retained.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple remarks mention "two parking stalls," "one parking space," "assigned parking stall," "guest parking," and "large parking stall," showing this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off note. The evidence is broad across many listings and appears consistent, not copy-paste noise.
Assigned parking is well supported for Mililani Terrace. Several listings explicitly say "2 assigned parking stalls," "one assigned parking stall," and similar wording, while the MLS features show assigned parking in most listings. This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple remarks and is consistent with the historical data.
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating deeded, owned, or included parking ownership. The listings consistently describe parking as assigned or dedicated, which supports parking availability but not deeded ownership, so this is best treated as not deeded based on the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking fee, monthly parking rent, additional parking cost, or stall rental. The remarks only discuss assigned stalls and guest parking, with no evidence of any parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as join a waitlist, waiting list, or limited parking allocation. The listings instead emphasize assigned stalls and guest parking, with no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly present in the building, with multiple current remarks confirming it across different listings. At least 3 separate listings explicitly mention window-style units, including phrases like "window ACs in all rooms," "2 window air conditioners," and "Window AC in the bedroom & Living room." This appears to be consistent agent reporting rather than a one-off mention.
14 of 20 current MLS listings include 'CONCRE' in construction materials, indicating concrete construction is commonly reported for this building. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or describe concrete/reinforced concrete construction, so the conclusion relies on MLS checkbox data (moderate confidence) and could reflect agent checkbox usage.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 18 out of 20 listings marked DOUWAL. No public remarks contradict it, and the widespread consistency across listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of 20 current MLS listings include 'SLAB' (concrete slab) in construction materials. Public remarks do not mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation', so the feature is included because some MLS entries indicate it, but supporting evidence is indirect and not explicitly confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Across the provided public remarks, there are 0 listings that explicitly mention wood frame construction. The current MLS checkbox appears only in 8/20 listings and is not supported by agent remarks, which suggests this is likely copy-paste noise rather than a confirmed building feature.
There are no public remark references to above-ground construction across the listings provided. Because only 1 of 20 MLS records includes the checkbox and the feature is not described by agents, this appears unsupported and is omitted as a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowance indicators, including STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay rules. Nothing in the public remarks supports STRs being allowed, so this is treated as not allowed based on the available evidence.
I checked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, pool management, or branded rental operations. None were found, and because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel pool participation is also false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording such as required rental participation, must rent, or cannot opt out. No such language appears in the remarks, so there is no evidence of a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit lease-end language such as a 4-digit expiry year, renewal date, or ground lease end year. The remarks confirm leasehold status, but they do not provide a specific expiration year, so the value remains unknown.
Public remarks directly confirm VA approval for this building. The signal is repeated in more than one listing, so VA financing is accepted with very high confidence.
I searched for HOA insurance wording like 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' 'comprehensive building insurance,' and similar phrases, but found no matches. Since the remarks do not address insurance coverage, this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
I looked for FLSE-related language such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' and 'passed fire inspection,' but found nothing. With no current value and no explicit remarks evidence, I cannot verify that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-view units are supported by 9/20 current MLS listings, with remarks repeatedly describing “garden view,” “courtyard,” “green belt,” and “lush, garden-like environment.” The evidence comes from multiple listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste phrase, so this looks like a genuine feature available in some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mention sunset views while 9/20 explicitly list NONE. Public remarks consistently describe garden/treetop/greenbelt views and breezes ('treetop views', 'backs up against Nature and Forest', 'garden view', 'no back neighbor') with no agent language indicating western or evening/sunset exposure. Evidence across multiple listings shows absence of sunset-view claims rather than copy-paste affirmation, so the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported with high confidence based on the MLS amenities data: 18 of 20 listings mark RESMAN. The public remarks do not explicitly mention an on-site, live-in, or building manager, but there is no contrary evidence suggesting the feature was removed. This looks more like consistent MLS data than a copy-paste issue, given the very strong checkbox frequency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.