Mililani Point
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mililani Point
Building Overview
Mililani Point (neighborhood not specified) — built 1989; concrete/wood construction, on-site pool, window air conditioning.
About Mililani Point
Mililani Point is a residential building listed as built in 1989. According to available records, the structure includes both concrete and wood frame construction. Specific unit counts or exact neighborhood details were not provided in the MLS data.
Key on-site features noted in MLS materials include a pool and window air conditioning in units. No other common-area amenities or interior features were listed in the provided data.
Parking provisions shown in the MLS data include covered parking and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the available records. The management company is listed as unknown. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including exact neighborhood, management, maintenance fees and any additional rules, with the listing agent or condominium association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is unanimous across current listings (3/3 with OTCOEX), and none of the remarks suggest otherwise, so this looks like a reliable building-level inclusion rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included. The current MLS data is consistent across all listings: HOTWAT is absent, and WTRHTR appears in all 3/3 records, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not provided by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fee. This is supported by unanimous MLS inclusion across current listings (3/3), and the public remarks contain no contradictory information.
Water is included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is consistent across all current listings (3/3), and there is no public-remark evidence suggesting otherwise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park/pet area is supported by the current MLS amenities data: 2 of 3 listings include DGPRK, which is a specific code for a dog park or pet exercise area. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a dog park, but there is also no contradictory evidence, so this remains a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 2 current listings has the RECARE amenity checked, but the public remarks do not state the building has a shared recreation area. Remarks reference nearby community rec centers: "Rec 1 being the closest of seven rec centers" and "near Mililani’s community recreation centers," which indicates community amenities rather than an on-site rec area. Evidence is weak and inconsistent across listings, suggesting the RECARE checkbox may be an agent copy/paste rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some MLS entries indicate storage (1/2 with STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities; 1/2 with STORAG in unit_features) and the listing remarks explicitly state "ample storage and parking for residents and guests." Evidence is consistent across agent-entered MLS data and the public remarks, so the building is reported to offer storage/lockers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is supported by the current MLS amenity codes, which show pool-related entries in all 3/3 current listings. The remarks themselves do not mention a pool, so this appears to come from MLS amenity data rather than agent description, but the consistency across listings makes it strong evidence for a building-level shared pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. Current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 3/3 listings, and one remark explicitly states "stacked and full sized washer/dryer in the hallway closet." This looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise, with multiple listing versions carrying the same feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings mention parking stalls (2 parking stalls; 'two covered parking stalls'), and MLS parking_features are populated (no 'NONE'). Evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, confirming the building provides parking.
Assigned parking appears to be present at the building, supported by MLS parking_features showing ASSIGN in 2 of 3 listings. The public remarks do not say 'assigned' outright, but they consistently reference specific stalls rather than generic parking, which is consistent with reserved/assigned spaces. Evidence is moderate and partly inferential, not a clear agent-verified statement.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. All three listings reflect covered parking in MLS data, and the remarks explicitly mention 'two covered parking stalls' plus '1 covered and 1 open.' This is consistent across listings and appears reliable rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. MLS parking_features include GUEST in all 3 listings, and one description explicitly states 'parking for residents and guests.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and suggests a real building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be present based on MLS inclusions: 2 of 3 listings include ACWIUN, the code for window air conditioning units. The public remarks do not explicitly mention AC, so this is driven by the MLS feature data rather than agent narrative. There is no evidence of a recent change or correction, so the feature should be kept as true.
Concrete construction is supported by current MLS data and prior high-confidence history. Although the remarks do not explicitly say "concrete," there is no evidence of a change or correction. The building-level material coding appears consistent across the listings reviewed.
Weak/new evidence only: 1 of 2 current MLS listings include DOUWAL but none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction. With no historical support and no remarks describing such construction, this is likely an MLS checkbox error and not a verified building feature.
No analysis available
Limited/weak evidence: 1 of 2 current MLS listings include MASSTU but there are no remarks mentioning 'masonry' or 'stucco' and no prior confirmation. Given absence in remarks and lack of historical support, it's likely the single MLS checkbox is a copy-paste error and the building should not be listed as masonry/stucco.
No analysis available
Weak/new evidence only: 1 of 2 current MLS listings list SLAB, but no remarks mention a concrete slab foundation and there is no historical confirmation. The single MLS checkbox is likely erroneous, so slab foundation is not verified for the building.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is strongly supported by current MLS data, which shows WOOFRA in all 3 listings. The remarks are silent on structure, suggesting no reason to override the MLS material coding. This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent entry.
Above-ground construction is supported by the current MLS material codes, which include ABOGRO in all 3 listings. Public remarks do not explicitly confirm it, but they also provide no contrary evidence. The repeated MLS coding suggests this is a stable building-level characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two current MLS listings for the building lists a 'CITY' view while the other shows 'NONE'. The provided public remarks do not mention city or downtown views and there is no prior confidence history, so the evidence is mixed and may reflect agent checkbox variation or that only some units have city views. Confidence is moderate (0.75) since at least one listing explicitly states CITY.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 3 listings reviewed, there are no mentions of sunset views in the public remarks. The current MLS view data also shows no SUNSET entries and two listings with NONE, which suggests the building should not be marketed for sunset views. The evidence appears to be absent rather than copy-pasted support for the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.