Matlock Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Matlock Hale
Building Overview
Matlock Hale in Downtown-Chinatown, built 1979; assigned parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Matlock Hale
Matlock Hale is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1979. Size (number of units or floors) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key features and policies for Matlock Hale include assigned parking availability, a no-pets policy, and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing does not identify a management company.
Buyers should verify current details such as unit count, construction type, management, fees, and parking arrangements with the listing agent or property management. This summary is based solely on MLS data available and may not reflect recent changes.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar language, but found no references. With no explicit mention in the remarks, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for an explicit elevator count or phrases like 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because there is no direct evidence in the remarks, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in maintenance for this building, based mainly on current MLS association_fee_includes data (5 of 8 listings). There are no public remarks mentioning cable, so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence rather than agent narrative.
Common area electricity is supported by current MLS data in 6 of 8 listings. No remarks explicitly mention common electric, so this is primarily a cross-listing MLS pattern rather than remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas inclusion is present in a minority of current listings (4 of 8), so confidence is moderate rather than strong. One public remark also mentions a "GAS STOVE," but that supports gas service generally more than it proves gas is included in the maintenance fee.
Hot water inclusion is inconsistent in the current MLS data: only 2 of 8 listings show HOTWAT, while 5 of 8 show WTRHTR, which often suggests individual water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. No public remarks confirm hot water inclusion, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very strongly supported: 8 of 8 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. This is consistent across the building and shows no signs of being a copy-paste anomaly.
Water is very strongly supported: 8 of 8 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The evidence is consistent across all listings, so this appears to be a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry: 2 of the public remarks explicitly mention it, and the current MLS data has washer/dryer included in all 8 listings. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at the building. At least 4 listings explicitly mention a stall or garage parking, including phrases like "assigned parking stall," "dedicated parking stall," and "tandem parking stalls." The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by the remarks. Several listings independently use language such as "assigned parking stall" and "dedicated parking stall," which is direct evidence that the building offers reserved parking. This appears consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than a single pasted description.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded or owned parking language. The listings describe assigned, dedicated, secured, and tandem stalls, which indicates parking access but does not confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark describing a separate monthly parking cost or parking rental. None was found, so there is no evidence of a parking fee.
Guest parking is weakly supported by the current MLS checkbox data, with 3 of 8 listings marked for guest parking. None of the public remarks explicitly confirm visitor or guest parking, so this looks less certain than the assigned-parking evidence and could reflect inconsistent MLS input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or waiting for a stall. The remarks do not mention any such system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention window air conditioners, window units, or wall AC. The only support is an inconsistent MLS checkbox showing ACWIUN in 2 of 8 listings, which looks more like incomplete copy-paste than verified building information.
All 8 current listings indicate CONCRE in the MLS construction materials field, which is strong building-level evidence for concrete construction. The public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete, but there is no sign of a conflicting correction, and the MLS data is consistent across every listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU. Nothing in the listings indicates STR is permitted, so there is no support for allowing it.
I searched for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or hotel-managed operations. There were no such mentions, and without STR evidence this cannot be true.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out. The remarks do not show any rental-pool requirement, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end year, renewed-through dates, or lease extension terms. The remarks do not mention land tenure details, so there is no year to extract.
I searched the remarks for explicit references like "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public remark support, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
The public remarks directly and unambiguously state that the condo is fully insured, which is strong evidence for walls-in/full building insurance coverage. This is explicit enough to set the feature to true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to fire/life safety evaluation passing, FLSE wording, and fire safety certification language, but found nothing in the remarks. Without a direct mention, I cannot confirm that the building passed this evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for mountain views in this building: 1 of 8 current MLS listings shows MOUNTA, but none of the provided remarks explicitly call out mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. This looks like a weak MLS-only signal rather than strong agent confirmation, so confidence is modest.
No analysis available
City views are well supported across multiple listings: at least 2 provided remarks explicitly reference 'views of the city and sunset' and 'City views,' and current MLS data shows 4 of 8 listings with CITY in the view field. This is consistent across multiple agents and looks like a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager appears to be an active building amenity in the current MLS data, with 8 out of 8 listings showing RESMAN. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, but the MLS pattern is consistent across all listings rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.