Matlock Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Matlock Hale
Building Overview
Matlock Hale in Downtown-Chinatown, built 1979; assigned parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Matlock Hale
Matlock Hale is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1979. Size (number of units or floors) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key features and policies for Matlock Hale include assigned parking availability, a no-pets policy, and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing does not identify a management company.
Buyers should verify current details such as unit count, construction type, management, fees, and parking arrangements with the listing agent or property management. This summary is based solely on MLS data available and may not reflect recent changes.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar wording, but found no references. Without explicit remarks, the owner occupancy rate cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for elevator references such as a number of elevators or phrases like 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because there is no explicit evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in maintenance for this building, based mainly on current MLS association_fee_includes data (5 of 8 listings). There are no public remarks mentioning cable, so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence rather than agent narrative.
Common area electricity is supported by current MLS data in 6 of 8 listings. No remarks explicitly mention common electric, so this is primarily a cross-listing MLS pattern rather than remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas inclusion is present in a minority of current listings (4 of 8), so confidence is moderate rather than strong. One public remark also mentions a "GAS STOVE," but that supports gas service generally more than it proves gas is included in the maintenance fee.
Hot water inclusion is inconsistent in the current MLS data: only 2 of 8 listings show HOTWAT, while 5 of 8 show WTRHTR, which often suggests individual water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. No public remarks confirm hot water inclusion, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very strongly supported: 8 of 8 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. This is consistent across the building and shows no signs of being a copy-paste anomaly.
Water is very strongly supported: 8 of 8 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The evidence is consistent across all listings, so this appears to be a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry: 2 of the public remarks explicitly mention it, and the current MLS data has washer/dryer included in all 8 listings. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at the building. At least 4 listings explicitly mention a stall or garage parking, including phrases like "assigned parking stall," "dedicated parking stall," and "tandem parking stalls." The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by the remarks. Several listings independently use language such as "assigned parking stall" and "dedicated parking stall," which is direct evidence that the building offers reserved parking. This appears consistent across multiple agents/listings rather than a single pasted description.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language. The listings only describe assigned, dedicated, or secured stalls, which suggests parking is included or assigned but not confirmed as deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for parking rental, monthly parking cost, or additional parking charge language. None was found, so there is no evidence for a parking fee.
Guest parking is weakly supported by the current MLS checkbox data, with 3 of 8 listings marked for guest parking. None of the public remarks explicitly confirm visitor or guest parking, so this looks less certain than the assigned-parking evidence and could reflect inconsistent MLS input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or joining a waiting list for stalls. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system, so this is not evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention window air conditioners, window units, or wall AC. The only support is an inconsistent MLS checkbox showing ACWIUN in 2 of 8 listings, which looks more like incomplete copy-paste than verified building information.
All 8 current listings indicate CONCRE in the MLS construction materials field, which is strong building-level evidence for concrete construction. The public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete, but there is no sign of a conflicting correction, and the MLS data is consistent across every listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental approval language such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU. Nothing in the remarks indicates STR is allowed, so it is treated as not evidenced and likely not allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program, managed by hotel, or pool participation. There were no such mentions, and since STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel pool must be false.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental program, or no opt-out terms. No such wording appears in the listings, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end year, or renewed-through dates. The remarks do not mention land tenure details, so the expiry year cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA approval or VA financing and found none. Because there is no explicit mention, this is treated as not evidenced from the listings.
The remarks directly say the condo is 'FULLY INSURED,' which is strong explicit evidence for walls-in/full building insurance coverage. This is a clear affirmative mention with high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit indication that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including FLSE-related language and fire inspection references. None appeared in the remarks, so this cannot be confirmed from the provided text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for mountain views in this building: 1 of 8 current MLS listings shows MOUNTA, but none of the provided remarks explicitly call out mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. This looks like a weak MLS-only signal rather than strong agent confirmation, so confidence is modest.
No analysis available
City views are well supported across multiple listings: at least 2 provided remarks explicitly reference 'views of the city and sunset' and 'City views,' and current MLS data shows 4 of 8 listings with CITY in the view field. This is consistent across multiple agents and looks like a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager appears to be an active building amenity in the current MLS data, with 8 out of 8 listings showing RESMAN. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, but the MLS pattern is consistent across all listings rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.