Marina Palms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Marina Palms
Building Overview
Marina Palms in Hawaii Kai — built 1966, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Marina Palms
Based on MLS data, Marina Palms is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1966 and is of concrete construction. Size, unit mix, and number of stories are not specified in the provided MLS information.
Key policy details noted in the MLS data include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No specific amenities (such as pool, gym, or common areas) are indicated in the supplied data.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — including parking provisions, maintenance or HOA fees, utilities, financing considerations, and any recent assessments or renovations — are not provided in the MLS extract. Buyers and their agents should verify all building information, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in the maintenance fees for at least some units in this building, with 6 of 9 listings showing CABTV. There are no remark-level confirmations, so this looks like a listing-level HOA inclusion that may be copied across agent entries, but the majority of current data still supports it.
Common area electricity is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with 8 of 9 listings checking OTCOEX. While public remarks do not discuss utility inclusions, the near-unanimous checkbox pattern makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very unlikely to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data strongly points the other way: only 1 of 9 listings shows HOTWAT, while 8 of 9 show WTRHTR, which usually means unit water heaters rather than shared hot water service.
Internet appears to be included in some listings for this building, with 5 of 9 current records showing INTSER. Because public remarks do not mention internet service, this likely reflects a building-level HOA inclusion that is not consistently described in marketing remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fees. All 9 of 9 current listings show WATER in the association fee inclusions, which is the strongest possible MLS pattern short of explicit remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/jacuzzi appears to be a real shared building amenity. 6 of 9 current listings have WHIRLP checked in amenities, and remarks explicitly describe a "marina front pool and hot tub" and "pool and jacuzzi". The repeated mentions across multiple listings support inclusion rather than a one-off MLS copy-paste error.
The building clearly has a shared swimming pool. At least 4 of the provided remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'marina front pool,' 'pool and hot tub,' and 'pool & jacuzzi.' With 9/9 current MLS listings showing the pool amenity, the evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry appears to be a consistent building feature based on MLS inclusions: 9/9 listings show washer/dryer included. None of the public remarks explicitly contradict this, and there is no sign this is a one-off copy/paste error. Buyers searching for in-unit laundry should consider this building a match.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the listings, with all 9 current MLS records showing parking features and none indicating no parking. Multiple remarks explicitly mention '2 parking stalls' and 'two open parking stalls,' so this does not look like a copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking appears to be available in a majority of the current MLS listings, with 6 of 9 showing ASSIGN. Public remarks support this indirectly by describing stalls as 'closest to the unit' and 'right outside the entrance,' suggesting designated parking rather than random open parking.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned, or included parking language and did not find any. The remarks only confirm that the unit comes with two stalls, which is not enough to conclude the stalls are deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a separate parking cost, monthly parking charge, or rented stall fee. The remarks only discuss the number and location of stalls, so no parking fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking shortage, or needing to join a queue for parking. Nothing in the remarks suggests a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, there is no direct public remark supporting above-ground construction; the only signal is a small minority of MLS records (3/9) with ABOGRO checked. This looks more like inconsistent agent data entry than a confirmed building feature, since the remarks focus on layout, marina access, views, and amenities rather than construction type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR language such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental permission and found none. With no positive evidence in the remarks, STR allowance is not established.
I searched for hotel pool participation indicators like hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool language. None were mentioned, so there is no evidence this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I looked for any indication that owners must participate in a rental pool or hotel program. The remarks contain no such language, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease, leasehold, or lease-expiration language such as an expiry year or renewal date. The remarks do not provide a lease expiration year, and the explicit "fee simple" wording suggests this is not a leasehold listing.
I searched the public remarks for any statement that the building is VA approved or accepts VA financing, but found none. Since there is no current value and no explicit evidence, this is treated as not established from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 9 current listings includes CITY in the view description, while the remarks across these listings focus almost entirely on marina/front-water features. There are no clear city-view phrases like 'city view' or 'downtown view,' so this looks like a limited MLS-only signal rather than repeated confirmation from multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are consistently confirmed across the listing remarks, with many explicit references to 'marina front,' 'marina vista,' 'water view,' and living 'by the water.' This is reinforced by current MLS data showing MARCAN in all 9/9 listings, so the evidence is strong and appears to be broadly consistent rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.