Manawa at Mehana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Manawa at Mehana
Building Overview
Manawa at Mehana in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale (built 2016); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company listed as unknown.
About Manawa at Mehana
Based on MLS data, Manawa at Mehana is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. The building was built in 2016. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the property has explicit policy restrictions: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities (such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas), so no amenity claims can be made from the provided information.
Additional operational details such as parking arrangements, HOA/maintenance fees, and the property management company are not specified (management company is listed as unknown in the MLS). Buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, fees, and management arrangements with their agent or through direct inquiry, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." Although one listing says many neighboring owners run businesses from FLEX units, this does not establish a building-wide owner-occupancy rate. The value is therefore unknown.
The remarks were searched for elevator references, including a specific count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." None were found. Because no current elevator count is provided and the remarks contain no usable evidence, the value is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
16 of 20 current listings have OTCOEX checked for association fees, which strongly supports common-area electricity being included. The public remarks are silent on this item, so there is no evidence of a change away from the MLS pattern. This looks more like consistent MLS reporting than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings indicate HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0 of 18) while 14 of 18 list WTRHTR (in-unit water heaters), strongly indicating hot water is not supplied/included by the association. Public remarks do not claim 'hot water included' and one remark notes submetering, so evidence is strong that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 20 current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, but at least one remark explicitly references a separate 'Sewer base fee $52.17.' That creates a conflict between MLS checkboxes and public remarks, suggesting the fee treatment may vary or that some MLS entries are copied without verification. Given the high historical confidence, the feature is still retained but with reduced certainty.
11 of 20 current listings indicate WATER in association_fee_includes, but a public remark referencing a 'submetering fee $10.14' suggests water may be billed through a separate metering arrangement for at least some units. The evidence is mixed: the MLS still leans toward water inclusion, while the remarks hint at a separate charge. This may reflect inconsistent agent input or a fee structure that differs by unit.
BBQ facilities are repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, including phrases like 'BBQ area' and 'BBQs' in the amenity lists. Historical data was already high confidence, and the current listings continue to reinforce that this is a real shared building/community amenity rather than a one-off MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community-center style amenities are well supported, with multiple listings using phrases like 'clubhouse,' 'community center space,' and 'Mehana Activity Center (MAC).' This appears consistent across agents and aligns with the previously high-confidence historical data.
No analysis available
Dog park access is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed, including direct phrases like 'dog park' and '2 Dog Parks.' The remarks strongly support the historical data and indicate this is a consistent community amenity.
No analysis available
At least 6 of the 18 listings explicitly mention a gym/fitness center (phrases: "gym", "fitness area", "brand new Fitness Center"). CURRENT MLS also has 6/18 listings with the EXEROO amenity checked. Mentions come from multiple agent remarks (not just a single copy/paste), supporting a high-confidence inclusion of an exercise room.
No analysis available
Meeting-room evidence is moderate rather than overwhelming, but some listings reference 'community room' or similar shared space language tied to the Mehana Activity Center/community center. This supports a building-level meeting/community room amenity with slightly lower confidence than the stronger amenities.
Evidence supports patio/deck availability in the building. At least 8 of 20 listings carry the PATDEC/COVPAT amenity flag, and several remarks independently describe outdoor living spaces, including "lanai," "private lanai," "private fenced patio," and "yard / patio area." The repeated mentions across different listings suggest this is not just a copy-paste error.
Walking/jogging path amenities are clearly supported by multiple remarks, including 'walking/jogging path,' 'scenic paths,' and a '1.2 mile walking or biking trail.' This is strong, repeated evidence across listings and appears to be a real shared community feature.
No analysis available
The MLS currently shows PRIYAR checked on 8 of 17 listings, and numerous listing remarks explicitly reference private yard/ fenced patio/lanai access (quotes include "front yard space is fenced in", "private fenced patio", and "private enclosed yard"). Evidence appears across multiple agent remarks for different units, so buyers searching for private outdoor space would find units in this building that offer it.
No analysis available
At least 8–10 of the aggregated listings explicitly mention shared recreation amenities (phrases include "recreation areas", "recreation room", "Mehana Activity Center (MAC)"). This aligns with the MLS checkbox (10/17), and the evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks rather than appearing isolated or erroneous.
Recreation space is supported by several listings, including direct mentions of 'recreation room' and broader wording like 'recreation areas' and 'party room.' The evidence suggests a genuine shared amenity, even if the wording varies by agent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention unit-level storage: phrases include "storage built-in's", "extra-large storage space", and "two thoughtful built-in areas for practical storage." MLS checkbox data also indicates storage appears in some records (3/17 amenities; 6/17 unit_features). Evidence is repeated across multiple agent remarks and aligns with MLS entries, so the building offers storage for at least some units.
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence supporting tennis courts, and the current MLS signal is very weak at 2/20 listings. Because agents in this data often copy/paste amenities, the absence of any tennis references makes this feature unlikely for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms the building/community has a pool. Multiple agents describe it in public remarks using consistent language such as "pool," "community pool," "resort-style amenities," and "Mehana Activity Center (MAC) with pool access," which suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The feature appears in numerous listings across different descriptions, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings confirms in-unit laundry for this building. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it in remarks with phrases like "in-unit laundry," "upstairs laundry area," and "huge stackable Washer & Dryer," matching the MLS inclusions trend. This appears to be consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. All 20 current listings indicate some form of parking, and multiple agents explicitly mention assigned stalls, covered parking, garages, and guest parking. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off listing detail.
MLS data shows 9 of 18 listings marked ASSIGN, and several public remarks explicitly mention assigned or reserved stalls (e.g., "two assigned parking stalls right outside your front door," "Two Reserved parking spaces directly in front of Townhome"). Evidence from multiple listings and agents supports that assigned parking is offered in the building.
Both historical data (high confidence) and current MLS entries (9/18 with covered/garage codes) align with many remarks citing covered parking: "1 spacious covered parking," "3 car garage," "two separate garage bays with 3 covered parking spaces," and "2-car garage." Multiple agents consistently mention covered/enclosed garage spaces, indicating strong evidence the building offers covered parking.
Several listings describe parking stalls and garages, including “2 assigned parking stalls,” “two reserved parking spaces,” and garage parking. However, no listing explicitly identifies any parking as deeded or separately owned.
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned, reserved, garage, covered, open, and street parking. No separate recurring or monthly fee for parking was found.
No analysis available
Very little evidence that the building has secured-entry parking: no remarks across the provided listings mention "gated," "secured parking," or "card access," and only 1 of 17 MLS records currently flags SECENT. This appears to be an outlier MLS checkbox rather than a building-wide secured parking feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks reference multiple parking types and guest parking but do not describe a building or community parking waitlist. No evidence of a waitlist system was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that this building offers split/ductless A/C. Roughly 15+ listings mention it directly, with multiple agents using phrases such as "split A/C units," "split AC system," and "in every room," which suggests this is a real and commonly present building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The current remarks align with the historical MLS pattern of ACSPL being checked in most listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by MLS data: 17 of 20 current listings check DOUWAL, with prior data also showing strong support (14/16). None of the remarks contradict this, and the consistency across many listings suggests this is a stable building characteristic rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention steel frame construction, and the current MLS checkbox appears in only 3 of 20 listings. Because agents often copy/paste construction fields without verification, there is not enough evidence to include steel frame as a building feature.
Mixed evidence for concrete slab foundation: 9/17 current listings include SLAB in construction materials, but public remarks do not reference a concrete slab or foundation work and other listings do not list it. This provides moderate (implied) support that some units/building entries reference a slab foundation, though the signal is inconsistent across agents.
No analysis available
8 of 18 current MLS records list 'WOOFRA' (wood frame) in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or similar phrasing, so the evidence is primarily from the MLS checkbox across multiple listings and is moderately strong but not directly corroborated in agent remarks (possible checkbox copy‑paste).
Limited and inconsistent evidence for above-ground construction: only 3/17 current listings list ABOGRO and none of the public remarks mention above-ground materials or a recent change. Given the sparse checking and lack of corroborating remarks, this feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some listings mention rental demand, investor-friendly ownership, a tenant lease through March 2027, or possible rental use of flex space, but these do not establish short-term rental permission. No STR-specific authorization or qualifying language was found.
The listings describe community amenities such as a pool, gym, clubhouse, and recreation center, but not a hotel rental pool. Because STR permission is not established, this feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
No mandatory rental-pool language was found in the remarks. The absence of STR authorization also requires this feature to be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold language, including lease expiry, land lease, ground lease, lease ends, and extensions or renewals. None of the listings provides a specific expiration year.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA assumable financing across multiple listings. This is strong, consistent evidence that VA financing is supported.
The remarks were searched for HOA insurance language including "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." No relevant insurance statements or explicit denials were found, so this remains false with low-to-medium confidence.
No listing remarks in the provided set mention 'sprinkler,' 'sprinkler system,' or 'fire suppression.' With only 5 of 20 current MLS listings checked for FIRSPR and no corroborating narrative evidence, this feature appears unverified and likely entered inconsistently by agents.
The remarks were searched for statements such as "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," or "passed fire inspection." No such statements or explicit denials were found, so this remains false with low-to-medium confidence based on the absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are consistently referenced across multiple current listings, not just a single agent remark. At least 4-5 listings explicitly mention sunset/golden hour/evening sky views, which aligns with the current MLS view data showing 6/20 listings tagged SUNSET and prior high-confidence evidence. This looks like a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.