Manai Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Manai Hale
Building Overview
Manai Hale in Kaneohe — built 1974, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Manai Hale
Manai Hale is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1974 and is constructed of concrete. Specific details about the number of units or total building size are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies recorded for the property include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS fields. No additional amenities, common areas, or unit-level features are specified in the provided data.
Information on parking, maintenance fees, homeowner association details, or other charges is not included in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County records and the state registration both report 3 floors. Listings also reach floor 3, with floor fields agreeing with unit-number-derived floors.
The county's reconciled residential count, residential CPR/dwell sum, and the state's residential_units value all report 47. The 52-unit CPR/registration totals are set aside because they do not match the reconciled residential count.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1332. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator counts and related wording, but none was found. One listing describes the property as a 'walk-up building,' which may suggest no elevator, but this does not provide an explicit numeric value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Two of six listings list CABTV in the association-fee inclusions, but none of the remarks explicitly state that cable TV is included. The limited checkbox coverage and lack of remark confirmation suggest moderate-to-low confidence and possible inconsistent agent data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six listings identify GAS as included in association fees, providing strong building-level MLS support. Remarks mention a gas range or new gas range, but do not independently verify fee inclusion, so the conclusion relies primarily on consistent checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed in the association-fee inclusions for all six listings. No remarks directly discuss sewer, but the unanimous and consistent MLS data strongly supports that sewer is included.
Five of six listings identify water as included in the association fees. The remarks contain no direct water-fee statement, so confidence is based on strong but not unanimous MLS checkbox agreement.
BBQ is checked in 5 of 6 current MLS listings, indicating the building likely offers grilling facilities. However, 0 of 6 public remarks mention a BBQ or grill, so the evidence appears checkbox-based rather than independently confirmed by multiple agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building pool is explicitly mentioned in 4 of 6 listings, with multiple remarks describing it as a shared or community amenity. The consistent references across multiple listings and the 6/6 MLS pool indicators provide strong evidence that the building has a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported across the listing set: 2 listings explicitly mention an on-site laundry room or shared on-site laundry facilities, while COMLAU appears in all 6 of 6 current MLS records. The repeated, specific remarks across multiple listings corroborate the MLS amenity rather than suggesting unsupported copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported by current MLS data, with 6/6 listings showing a parking feature and none marked NONE. One of the six remarks explicitly states, "Condo included two parking stalls," confirming that parking is available at the building.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings: 6/6 current MLS records show ASSIGN. A listing explicitly says, "Condo included two parking stalls - one separately deeded," providing direct confirmation of assigned/deeded parking rather than relying solely on checkbox data.
No analysis available
At least one parking stall is explicitly described as separately deeded. This is direct evidence that deeded parking exists for the listed unit/building.
No analysis available
The remarks describe two parking stalls, including one separately deeded stall, but do not state that a recurring parking fee applies. No parking fee amount or rental charge was found.
Guest parking is identified in 3 of 6 current listings, including one explicit statement that "Guest parking is available." The evidence is sufficient to include the feature, though it is not mentioned across all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss available parking stalls but do not describe a waitlist system. There is no evidence that residents must wait for or join a list to obtain parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears in 5 of 6 listings through the MLS construction-material field. None of the six public remarks explicitly mentions concrete construction, so the evidence is based primarily on consistent checkbox data rather than independent agent descriptions.
Double-wall construction appears in only 2 of 6 listings, with no remarks quoting double-wall construction or describing two walls. Because the evidence is sparse and unsupported across the listings, the feature is omitted as likely unverified MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe the property as suitable for first-time buyers or investors, but that wording does not establish short-term-rental permission. No explicit STR authorization or prohibition was found, so this is treated as false based on the available remarks.
References to the pool describe a residential amenity, including a community or building pool. No hotel rental program, hotel management, or rental-pool participation is mentioned, and the STR prerequisite is not met.
The remarks contain no evidence of a hotel rental pool or mandatory participation requirement. Because STR is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is also false by prerequisite.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fee-simple ownership indicates that the property is not described as leasehold. No ground lease, leasehold expiration, or renewal year was mentioned, so no expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks were searched for VA approval and VA financing language, but none was found. The available insurance reference does not establish VA eligibility.
The phrase '100% insured' directly supports full building insurance coverage. This is clear, strong public-remark evidence that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no evidence that the building passed an FLSE or equivalent fire/life safety inspection. Because the feature is not mentioned, it is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence rather than confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listings mention sunset views or related western-exposure language. Several listings describe Ko'olau mountain views, but this is distinct from sunset viewing, and the repeated NONE entries indicate the feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 6 listing remarks mention a resident manager or equivalent on-site management. RESMAN appears in only 2 of 6 listings without supporting details, which is weak and potentially copy-pasted MLS evidence rather than confirmation of a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.