Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV
Building Overview
Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV in Mililani-Waipio — concrete construction, built 2022; no pets or short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV
Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2022 and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, the property prohibits pets and does not allow short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data provided. No additional amenity or unit-size details are included in the available records.
Buyers should verify specific information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, exact unit sizes, and management contact directly with the seller or listing agent, as these details are not specified in the MLS data referenced here.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly say 'Owner-occupancy is required.' No numeric percentage is provided, so instead of inventing a percent, the field records the explicit requirement. If a numeric owner-occupancy percentage is needed, additional data is required since the remarks do not provide a percent value.
I searched the public remarks for any mention of elevator count (phrases like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found no references. Because there is no prior value and no explicit statement in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and not inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows OTCOEX in association_fee_includes on 2/2 listings ('common area electric' implied). Public remarks do not mention fee inclusions. Consistent MLS checkbox across multiple listings suggests the building maintenance likely includes common area electricity, but lack of agent remarks means confidence is implied rather than explicitly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/2) include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and 1 listing explicitly lists WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions. This combination strongly indicates hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and not included in HOA fees.
MLS data shows INTSER in association_fee_includes on 2/2 listings ('internet included'). Public remarks do not reference this, so the evidence is based on consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
MLS data shows SEWER in association_fee_includes on 2/2 listings ('sewer included'). The public remarks do not mention sewer, so the conclusion is driven by consistent MLS entries across listings rather than explicit remarks.
MLS data shows WATER in association_fee_includes on 2/2 listings ('water included'). Public remarks do not mention water fees, so the finding is based on consistent MLS checkbox usage across listings rather than explicit agent statements.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2 of 2) include 'washer/dryer' in the inclusions, but the provided public remarks do not mention in-unit laundry. This is moderate evidence that some units have in-unit washers/dryers (likely included), though no remarks explicitly describe or confirm installation details and it could be a copy/paste from agents; confidence set to moderate (0.78).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current listings (2 of 2) indicate parking in the MLS checkboxes, and the public remarks for this unit explicitly state '2-parking unit' and 'two parking stalls' and note EV charging stations. Evidence is consistent across MLS data and agent remarks, so the building has parking (high confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current MLS listings (2 of 2) include the ACWIUN inclusion indicating window air conditioning units, but no public remarks mention window AC. Evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data and may reflect agent copy/paste, so the feature is included for buyers with moderate confidence (0.75).
MLS construction_materials show CONCRE in 2/2 current listings, but none of the public remarks (1 provided) mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or similar wording. With no prior verification or explicit remark and agents often copying MLS checkboxes, there is insufficient evidence to assert concrete construction across the building.
Current listings list DOUWAL, but the provided public remarks contain no mention of 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' With no corroborating language or owner verification and given common checkbox copy/paste, there is not enough evidence to mark double-wall construction as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although construction_materials include STEFRA in 2/2 listings, the public remarks make no reference to steel frame construction. No supplemental remarks or owner/site-visit verification support this, so there is insufficient evidence to include steel-frame construction for the building.
Although SLAB appears in the MLS construction_materials for current listings, the public remarks provided do not reference a concrete slab or slab foundation. Without owner/site-visit verification or explicit remark language, there is insufficient evidence to assert the building is slab-on-grade.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit insurance language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance') and found no references. With no prior data and no explicit statement, this is set to false with medium confidence as absence usually indicates it wasn't mentioned.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language about passing a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certifications and found none. In the absence of any mention and no existing data, the conservative default is false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it was not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/2) mention sunset views; current MLS view_descriptions are 'NONE' for both listings and the provided public remarks do not include 'sunset', 'western exposure', or similar. With no historical evidence and both current listings indicating no view, we conclude the building does not offer sunset views and treat this as a correction of a probable prior mis-check.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.