Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV
Building Overview
Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV in Mililani-Waipio — concrete construction, built 2022; no pets or short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV
Malina at Koa Ridge Ph IV is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2022 and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, the property prohibits pets and does not allow short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data provided. No additional amenity or unit-size details are included in the available records.
Buyers should verify specific information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, exact unit sizes, and management contact directly with the seller or listing agent, as these details are not specified in the MLS data referenced here.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly say owner-occupancy is required for this regulated affordable housing unit. However, I found no numeric owner-occupancy percentage such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied,' so the actual percentage remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for elevator-related language such as the number of elevators, 'elevator,' or 'multiple elevators,' and found nothing. The listing describes the unit, parking, EV charging, and community access, but does not provide any elevator information.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows OTCOEX in association_fee_includes on 2/2 listings ('common area electric' implied). Public remarks do not mention fee inclusions. Consistent MLS checkbox across multiple listings suggests the building maintenance likely includes common area electricity, but lack of agent remarks means confidence is implied rather than explicitly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/2) include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and 1 listing explicitly lists WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions. This combination strongly indicates hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and not included in HOA fees.
Internet appears to be included in the maintenance fees based on MLS data: 3 of 3 recent listings show INTSER. The public remarks do not reference internet or WiFi, so this is driven by consistent MLS association-fee data rather than remarks.
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the association fees according to MLS data, with 3 of 3 listings showing SEWER. Public remarks do not mention sewer, but the all-listing consistency makes this a strong building-level feature.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fees based on MLS data, with 3 of 3 listings showing WATER. Since the remarks are silent on utilities, the evidence comes from consistent association-fee entries across recent listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by the current MLS data, with 3 of 3 listings including washer/dryer in the inclusions. The public remarks are silent on laundry, so this appears to be an MLS data point rather than copy-paste confirmation from remarks, but the consistency across all current listings makes it high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed. All 3 current listings show parking in the MLS checkbox data, and the remarks repeatedly mention '2 parking stalls' / '2-parking unit.' This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be present based on the MLS inclusions: 3 of 3 current listings include ACWIUN. None of the public remarks explicitly mention window air conditioners, which suggests the feature is being carried by MLS data rather than marketing copy, but the consistency across all current listings supports including it.
All current listings show CONCRE in construction_materials, which strongly supports concrete construction. The public remarks do not call it out explicitly, but they consistently describe the building as newer 2022 construction, which is compatible with the MLS material data.
Current listings list DOUWAL, but the provided public remarks contain no mention of 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' With no corroborating language or owner verification and given common checkbox copy/paste, there is not enough evidence to mark double-wall construction as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Every current listing includes STEFRA in construction_materials. The remarks focus on age, affordability, and amenities rather than structure, so there is no contradiction to the MLS construction material data.
Although SLAB appears in the MLS construction_materials for current listings, the public remarks provided do not reference a concrete slab or slab foundation. Without owner/site-visit verification or explicit remark language, there is insufficient evidence to assert the building is slab-on-grade.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current listings include ABOGRO in construction_materials, but the public remarks do not mention above-ground construction or provide any corroborating detail. This looks like a weaker MLS-only signal, possibly a checkbox copied across some listings rather than explicitly verified in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for insurance language like 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or similar HOA insurance references, and found none. Nothing in the public remarks indicates the building is fully insured by the HOA.
There is weak evidence for fire sprinklers: 1 of 3 listings has the FIRSPR amenity checked, but none of the remarks mention a sprinkler system, sprinklers installed, or fire suppression. Because the remarks are otherwise focused on the same 2022-built building and do not confirm the feature, this looks more like unverified MLS data than strong building-wide evidence.
I looked for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, passed fire inspection, or life safety compliant, and found no references. The remarks do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views, and the current MLS view_descriptions are uniformly 'NONE' across all 3 listings. The public remarks also contain no language suggesting western exposure or sunset-facing units, so there is no supporting evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.