Makiki Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Plaza
Building Overview
Makiki Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1980, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed (per MLS data).
About Makiki Plaza
Makiki Plaza is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1980 and is of concrete construction. Size details such as number of units, floors, or square footage are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Based on MLS data, the building prohibits pets and does not allow short-term rentals. No specific on-site amenities (such as pool, fitness center, or common areas) are listed in the MLS information provided. Management company information is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details commonly considered by buyers—such as parking availability, maintenance fees, utility arrangements, and other rules—are not specified in the MLS data for this property. Prospective buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions; the above is based solely on MLS data analysis.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures or qualitative descriptions such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." None were found, so the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from the remarks.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or other numeric references, but found none. The remarks do confirm that the building has elevators and that elevator repairs were financed, so the feature exists but the count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports cable being included in the maintenance fee. MLS checkbox data shows CABTV on 13 of 14 listings, and one remark explicitly states the fee covers "cable tv," which aligns with the historical pattern rather than a one-off agent error.
MLS checkbox prevalence (9/13) and a remark saying the maintenance fee covers "other common area maintenance/expenses" imply common-area costs are included. The wording is implied rather than explicit about electricity, so confidence is moderate (implied evidence across MLS plus remarks).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported across the listings. MLS data shows HOTWAT on 13 of 14 listings, and one remark directly says the maintenance fee covers "Hot water," with no WTRHTR indicator to suggest otherwise.
Internet inclusion is explicitly mentioned in at least one listing remark, which is important given that MLS checkbox coverage is only moderate. The key remark says the fee covers "internet," alongside cable, hot water, water, and sewer, suggesting the amenity is real even if some agents omitted the checkbox.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a true building-level feature. MLS data shows SEWER on 12 of 14 listings, and one remark clearly states the maintenance fee covers "sewer," reinforcing the checkbox data.
Water is very consistently included in the maintenance fee. MLS checkbox data shows WATER on 13 of 14 listings, and the public remark listing fee inclusions specifically names "water," matching the historical pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is explicitly described as having a meeting room in multiple listings, including a unit that notes "recreation room, meeting room & sauna/whirlpool." Current MLS data also shows MEEROO in 6 of 14 listings, so this appears to be a real shared amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there is no clear mention of a recreation area—only a few references to a recreation room. With current MLS data showing RECARE in just 4 of 14 listings and no strong supporting remarks, this feature does not appear reliably established for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is clearly supported by the listing remarks, which repeatedly reference "sauna" and "sauna/whirlpool." Current MLS data also shows SAUNA in 7 of 14 listings, making this a well-supported building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, but the current MLS data is strong: 12 of 14 listings have the TRACHU amenity checked. Given the high rate of current checkbox confirmation and prior medium confidence, the building likely does have a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool is directly confirmed in the remarks, including phrasing like "sauna/whirlpool" and separate mentions of a "whirlpool" amenity. With 7 of 14 current MLS listings checking WHIRLP, the evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings.
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple remarks across listings explicitly say "pool," "swimming pool," and "pool on the ground level," including amenity lists that also mention whirlpool/sauna/recreation room, which suggests a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error. With 14/14 current MLS listings showing the amenity checked, confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the current listings: the MLS data shows 14/14 listings with washer/dryer in the inclusions. Public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "washer/dryer in unit," "stacking washer & dryer," and "washer/dryer were replaced new in year 2025."
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "one assigned covered parking," "one covered parking space is included," and a "ground-floor parking stall," which aligns with the high-confidence MLS pattern. This looks consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Covered parking is strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Several listings explicitly use phrases like "covered gated parking," "secured/covered parking," and "one assigned covered parking," matching the MLS data that shows this feature across all listings. Confidence is very high because the wording is consistent and appears in multiple remarks.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks support included or assigned parking, but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for references to parking fees, rental charges, or added monthly parking costs and found none. The remarks indicate parking is included/assigned, but they do not specify any separate fee.
Guest parking appears to be a real building-level amenity, though it is mentioned less often than covered parking. One remark explicitly says the building has "guest parking," and the historical MLS data supports this in most listings. This is strong enough to include as a shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. In the absence of any public mention, there is no evidence that this building uses a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 14 current listings indicate concrete construction in the MLS, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks across the sample focus on views, amenities, and renovations and do not reference a change away from concrete, so this appears to be a consistent MLS attribute rather than a copied-in error.
Four of 13 MLS listings include 'double wall' in construction materials, but the aggregated public remarks contain no references to double-wall construction. With no historical confidence and no remarks confirming a structural feature, the MLS entries appear inconsistent and there is insufficient evidence to mark the building as having double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language showing short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, and found none. The remarks also do not suggest any hotel-style rental use, so STR allowance is not evidenced.
I searched for hotel pool language such as "hotel rental pool," "Hilton pool," or similar managed rental programs and found nothing. Since the remarks do not show STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I looked for wording like "mandatory rental pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out" and found none. There is also no evidence of any hotel rental pool program, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to leasehold status, ground lease, lease expiration, or renewal dates and found nothing. Without a specific 4-digit expiry year in the remarks, this field remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. Because VA approval must be stated explicitly in public remarks, there is no evidence to mark this building as VA-approved.
The remarks repeatedly state that the building is fully insured, which strongly indicates comprehensive walls-in style coverage or equivalent building insurance. This is explicit and repeated across multiple listings, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases like FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection. None were found, so there is no evidence in the remarks that the building has passed this evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (5 of 13 per current MLS data) explicitly mention ocean views with phrases like 'stunning ocean views', 'ocean-facing floor-to-ceiling windows', and 'peekaboo ocean view.' Mentions appear across different listings/agents and are corroborated by MLS view_descriptions, so there is strong multi-listing evidence that the building offers ocean-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the listings, with 13 of 14 current MLS entries marked CITY and several remarks explicitly calling out 'city views,' 'downtown,' and 'urban' outlooks. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not just copy-paste checkbox data, so this building should be considered to offer city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are mentioned in a smaller subset of listings (3 of 13 per current MLS data) and public remarks include phrases like 'amazing sunsets.' While less frequently cited than ocean or city views, multiple listings indicate some units have sunset/western exposure, so the building should be listed as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence this building has a resident manager: 9 of 13 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity and numerous public remarks explicitly state phrases like "onsite Manager", "resident manager", and "on-site resident manager." Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents (not isolated to a single copy/paste), providing high confidence that the building offers an on-site resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.