
Makiki Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Plaza
Building Overview
Makiki Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1980, concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed (per MLS data).

About Makiki Plaza
Makiki Plaza is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1980 and is of concrete construction. Size details such as number of units, floors, or square footage are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Based on MLS data, the building prohibits pets and does not allow short-term rentals. No specific on-site amenities (such as pool, fitness center, or common areas) are listed in the MLS information provided. Management company information is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details commonly considered by buyers—such as parking availability, maintenance fees, utility arrangements, and other rules—are not specified in the MLS data for this property. Prospective buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions; the above is based solely on MLS data analysis.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptors (e.g., 'owner-occupied', '% owner occupied') and found none. With no current numeric value or explicit statements, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
Remarks confirm the building has elevators and that elevator repairs/loan occurred, but no explicit number (e.g., '4 elevators' or 'four elevators') is provided. I searched the remarks for explicit numeric phrases and counts and found none, so the exact number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data shows 12/13 listings with CABTV. One public remark explicitly states "Maintenance fee covers ... cable tv, internet," confirming cable is included; evidence is strong (MLS-wide checkbox presence plus at least one explicit agent remark), though agent copy/paste is possible.
MLS checkbox prevalence (9/13) and a remark saying the maintenance fee covers "other common area maintenance/expenses" imply common-area costs are included. The wording is implied rather than explicit about electricity, so confidence is moderate (implied evidence across MLS plus remarks).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes indicate HOTWAT present on 12/13 listings and remarks explicitly say "Maintenance fee covers Hot water"; another remark references a "centralized hot water system." No listings show WTRHTR, reinforcing that hot water is provided by the building and included in fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data lists SEWER on 11/13 listings and one public remark explicitly notes the maintenance fee covers "... water, sewer ...", giving strong corroborating evidence that sewer charges are included in the fees.
MLS checkboxes show WATER on 12/13 listings and at least one public remark explicitly states the maintenance fee covers "water." Combined MLS prevalence and explicit remark provide strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 13 current MLS listings list the TRACHU amenity checkbox, suggesting the building likely has a trash/garbage chute. However, none of the public remarks across listings mention a trash or garbage chute, so the evidence is implied across multiple agent entries (possible copy/paste) rather than explicitly described in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked and numerous public remarks across listings explicitly state the building has a pool (quotes include "swimming pool", "inviting pool", and "pool on the ground level"). Evidence comes from multiple agents' remarks and the consistent MLS checkbox entries, indicating a shared building amenity rather than a single-unit feature or clerical copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions and multiple public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (quotes include: "Washer/dryer and refrigerator were replaced new in year 2025", "stacking washer & dryer with built-in cabinetry", and "WASHER/DRYER IN UNIT"). One listing mentions a dryer in the hall, showing some variability, but overall the evidence from multiple agents and the MLS checkbox strongly indicates the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention assigned or included stalls (phrases: 'one assigned covered parking', 'one covered parking space is included', 'ground-floor parking stall'), and the MLS parking_features shows ASSIGN in the majority of listings (12/13). Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and supports that the building offers assigned parking.
Covered parking is repeatedly mentioned in the remarks (examples: 'covered gated parking', 'secured/covered parking', 'one covered parking space is included', 'covered entrance') and MLS data flags covered/garage types for all listings (13/13), indicating strong, building-level covered parking availability.
Multiple listings state assigned/covered parking is included (e.g., 'one assigned covered parking in a standalone space'), but none explicitly say parking is deeded or owned with the unit. Therefore parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks describe included/assigned covered parking but do not specify any separate monthly parking fee. Because no fee amount or charge is mentioned, the parking_fee is unknown.
Several agent remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking' (phrases: 'guest parking', 'guest parking and an on-site resident manager'), and MLS checkbox data includes GUEST in most listings (10/13). Together this provides strong evidence the building offers guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' and found none. In absence of mention, parking_waitlist is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows concrete construction on all 13 listings, but the combined public remarks for the building make no mention of concrete or reinforced concrete. Because this is a newly-populated MLS field with no historical confidence and no corroborating remarks across multiple agents, the evidence is weak and suggests checkbox copying rather than a confirmed building feature.
Four of 13 MLS listings include 'double wall' in construction materials, but the aggregated public remarks contain no references to double-wall construction. With no historical confidence and no remarks confirming a structural feature, the MLS entries appear inconsistent and there is insufficient evidence to mark the building as having double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on amenities, parking, and resident manager but do not discuss short-term rental allowances. Because STR allowance requires explicit mention, str_allowed is set to false with medium confidence.
There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool program in the public remarks, and since STR is not indicated as allowed, str_hotel_pool is false.
No remarks indicate mandatory participation in a rental pool, and because STR is not allowed per remarks, str_mandatory_pool is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the remarks that the property is leasehold or that a lease expiry year exists. Without a specific year mentioned, the lease expiry is unknown.
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit VA language and found none. Because VA approval must be stated explicitly in remarks, financing_va is set to false with medium confidence.
Several remarks explicitly state the building is insured/fully insured, indicating walls-in or comprehensive building insurance is in place. Based on these direct quotes in multiple listings, this is marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit statements indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection'). There are no such references in the remarks, so absent any current value or user verification, the feature is set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (5 of 13 per current MLS data) explicitly mention ocean views with phrases like 'stunning ocean views', 'ocean-facing floor-to-ceiling windows', and 'peekaboo ocean view.' Mentions appear across different listings/agents and are corroborated by MLS view_descriptions, so there is strong multi-listing evidence that the building offers ocean-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are noted in many listings (8 of 13 per current MLS data) with remarks such as 'city and ocean panoramic views' and 'sweeping city and ocean views.' The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers units with city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are mentioned in a smaller subset of listings (3 of 13 per current MLS data) and public remarks include phrases like 'amazing sunsets.' While less frequently cited than ocean or city views, multiple listings indicate some units have sunset/western exposure, so the building should be listed as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence this building has a resident manager: 9 of 13 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity and numerous public remarks explicitly state phrases like "onsite Manager", "resident manager", and "on-site resident manager." Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents (not isolated to a single copy/paste), providing high confidence that the building offers an on-site resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.