Makiki Park Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Park Place
Building Overview
Makiki Park Place in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1978) — concrete construction with pool, BBQ area and central air conditioning.
About Makiki Park Place
Based on MLS data, Makiki Park Place is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1978 and is concrete construction. According to available records, the property offers central air conditioning.
Key amenities reported in the MLS include a pool, a BBQ area and a resident manager. The building permits pets and does not allow short-term rentals, per the MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The MLS data does not specify management company details or recurring fees; management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all details, including rules, fees, and current amenity status, with their agent or the managing entity, as this summary is based on MLS data only.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for an owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative descriptions such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The listings do not provide any ownership-mix information. Because there is no explicit remark-based evidence, the percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or references to multiple elevators (e.g., "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators"). None of the listings mention elevators at all. Since there is no evidence in the remarks, the feature remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong consensus across the listings: 6/6 MLS records include CABTV, and the remarks repeatedly say fees cover "basic cable" or "cable." This looks like a stable building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
The MLS data is mixed but still leans positive, with 4/6 listings tagged OTCOEX. None of the public remarks specifically mention common-area electricity, so this appears to be based more on MLS coding than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
This is strongly supported both by the MLS and the remarks. Multiple listings say the fee covers electricity, and the inclusion appears consistent across all 6 MLS records.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention hot water being covered, and the MLS includes HOTWAT in 4/6 records. The absence of WTRHTR supports treating this as building-supplied hot water rather than unit-owned heaters.
Internet inclusion is very consistent here: 6/6 MLS records show INTSER, and the remarks repeatedly mention internet as included. This looks like a reliable building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across the building records, with 6/6 MLS listings showing SEWER and the remarks confirming it in several places. There is no meaningful sign of conflict or copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS and remarks. All 6 listings show WATER, and several descriptions directly say water is covered in the fee.
BBQ/grilling facilities are clearly supported by the remarks: several listings say "BBQ area" or "building amenities like a BBQ area." The MLS data is also unanimous at 6/6 listings, so this looks like a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of the 5 public remarks explicitly mention a patio/deck amenity, including phrases like "patio/deck" and "deck/recreation area." The repeated mention across different listings supports that this is a shared building amenity, not just a unit-specific feature, even though the MLS checkbox is inconsistently used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation space is mentioned directly in multiple remarks, including "recreation spaces" and "deck/recreation area." Combined with 6/6 MLS listings checking RECARE, the evidence is strong that this building offers a shared recreation area/amenity deck.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage units/lockers are strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 4 of the provided listings explicitly mention storage, including phrases like "plus storage," "storage galore," and "Individual Storage locker on the same floor." This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark explicitly says "trash chute," but the MLS amenities are unanimous at 6/6 for TRACHU. Because the checkbox data is fully consistent across listings and there is no evidence suggesting a correction, this is likely a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a shared swimming pool. Multiple listings mention it across different remarks, and the MLS data is unanimous (6/6) for pool-related amenities, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
There is direct evidence that the building has a heated pool. At least two remarks say so, including the explicit phrase "heated swimming pool" and "The POOL is even HEATED Now!" While the MLS heated-pool checkbox appears in only 1/6 listings, the wording is specific enough to treat this as a real building feature.
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by both the MLS inclusions and public remarks. The current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 6 out of 6 listings, and one remark explicitly notes a "side-by-side washer and dryer." This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention "2 parking stalls," "2 assigned parking stalls," "secured parking garage," and "TWO parking stalls are secured and COVERED," which strongly supports building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. At least one remark explicitly states "2 assigned parking stalls," and the MLS checkbox data shows assigned parking in all 6 listings, suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking is well documented in the remarks and MLS data. Listings mention "2 covered parking stalls," "secured parking garage," and "TWO parking stalls are secured and COVERED," making this a high-confidence building feature.
I searched for explicit wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings describe assigned, secured, and covered stalls, which indicates parking access but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a separate parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks only say the unit has assigned or secured stalls, with no indication of a monthly parking charge.
Guest parking is not supported by the public remarks. Although 4/6 current MLS listings have the GUEST flag, none of the remarks mention guest or visitor parking, so this looks like inconsistent MLS checkbox data rather than verified building information.
Secured entry is strongly supported. Several listings describe the building as "secured," with direct wording like "secured entry" and "secured parking garage," and the MLS data shows secured-entry features in 5 of 6 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking queue. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC appears to be a real building feature, not just a copied MLS checkbox. Five remarks explicitly reference it, with multiple agents repeating utility coverage for "central AC" and "central air conditioning throughout." The MLS pattern is also consistent (4/6 unit_features and 6/6 inclusions), reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be confirmed by the current MLS data across all 6/6 listings. The public remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but they also do not present any conflicting evidence, and the repeated building-level listing pattern suggests the MLS checkbox is consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for evidence of STR permissions such as "legal short-term rental," "NUC," "TVU," or vacation rental language, and found none. There is also no mention of hotel-style rental use or 30-day minimum language in the remarks.
I searched for references to hotel rental pools or managed hotel programs such as Hilton, Ritz, or Trump pool arrangements. No such program is mentioned in the public remarks, so there is no evidence this building participates in a hotel pool.
I looked for phrases indicating required participation, such as "mandatory pool," "must be in rental program," or "cannot opt out." The remarks contain no such language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to leasehold status, ground lease, lease expiry, or a 4-digit lease end year such as "expires 2050" or "extended to 2075." Nothing in the remarks indicates a leasehold tenure or a specific expiration date.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted," and found none. Based on the available public remarks, there is no evidence this building is VA approved.
I searched for wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks discuss utilities, parking, and amenities, but do not mention HOA insurance coverage. There is no evidence here that the building is fully insured.
Fire sprinklers are confirmed by multiple recent remarks, with at least 3 listings explicitly stating 'fire sprinklers' or 'FIRE SPRINKLERS!'. The mentions are consistent across different agents and appear to be direct building/unit feature descriptions rather than copy-paste noise.
I looked for language such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety compliant, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks only mention in-unit/building fire sprinklers, which is not the same as a passed fire/life safety evaluation. With no explicit pass statement, this is best marked false based on the available remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. The current MLS data shows only 1/6 listings with a mountain-related view description, while the public remarks consistently point to city/ocean/Diamond Head views instead. This looks weak and possibly copy-pasted rather than verified on site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Current MLS data shows only 1/6 listings with a garden-related view description, but the remarks consistently emphasize other view types instead. This weak support suggests the checkbox may be an agent error rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by multiple listings, with at least 3 remarks explicitly describing an on-site resident manager/property manager. The evidence is consistent across listings and strongly indicates this is a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.