Makiki Park Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Park Place
Building Overview
Makiki Park Place in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1978) — concrete construction with pool, BBQ area and central air conditioning.
About Makiki Park Place
Based on MLS data, Makiki Park Place is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1978 and is concrete construction. According to available records, the property offers central air conditioning.
Key amenities reported in the MLS include a pool, a BBQ area and a resident manager. The building permits pets and does not allow short-term rentals, per the MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The MLS data does not specify management company details or recurring fees; management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all details, including rules, fees, and current amenity status, with their agent or the managing entity, as this summary is based on MLS data only.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for a stated owner-occupancy percentage or any qualitative description of the ownership mix, but found none. The listings discuss amenities, parking, and maintenance fees, not the resident ownership profile.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator count or references to multiple elevators, but none were provided. Since elevator details are rarely included in listing remarks, there is not enough evidence to assign a number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong consensus across the listings: 6/6 MLS records include CABTV, and the remarks repeatedly say fees cover "basic cable" or "cable." This looks like a stable building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
The MLS data is mixed but still leans positive, with 4/6 listings tagged OTCOEX. None of the public remarks specifically mention common-area electricity, so this appears to be based more on MLS coding than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
This is strongly supported both by the MLS and the remarks. Multiple listings say the fee covers electricity, and the inclusion appears consistent across all 6 MLS records.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly mention hot water being covered, and the MLS includes HOTWAT in 4/6 records. The absence of WTRHTR supports treating this as building-supplied hot water rather than unit-owned heaters.
Internet inclusion is very consistent here: 6/6 MLS records show INTSER, and the remarks repeatedly mention internet as included. This looks like a reliable building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across the building records, with 6/6 MLS listings showing SEWER and the remarks confirming it in several places. There is no meaningful sign of conflict or copy-paste error.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS and remarks. All 6 listings show WATER, and several descriptions directly say water is covered in the fee.
BBQ/grilling facilities are clearly supported by the remarks: several listings say "BBQ area" or "building amenities like a BBQ area." The MLS data is also unanimous at 6/6 listings, so this looks like a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of the 5 public remarks explicitly mention a patio/deck amenity, including phrases like "patio/deck" and "deck/recreation area." The repeated mention across different listings supports that this is a shared building amenity, not just a unit-specific feature, even though the MLS checkbox is inconsistently used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation space is mentioned directly in multiple remarks, including "recreation spaces" and "deck/recreation area." Combined with 6/6 MLS listings checking RECARE, the evidence is strong that this building offers a shared recreation area/amenity deck.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage units/lockers are strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 4 of the provided listings explicitly mention storage, including phrases like "plus storage," "storage galore," and "Individual Storage locker on the same floor." This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark explicitly says "trash chute," but the MLS amenities are unanimous at 6/6 for TRACHU. Because the checkbox data is fully consistent across listings and there is no evidence suggesting a correction, this is likely a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a shared swimming pool. Multiple listings mention it across different remarks, and the MLS data is unanimous (6/6) for pool-related amenities, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
There is direct evidence that the building has a heated pool. At least two remarks say so, including the explicit phrase "heated swimming pool" and "The POOL is even HEATED Now!" While the MLS heated-pool checkbox appears in only 1/6 listings, the wording is specific enough to treat this as a real building feature.
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by both the MLS inclusions and public remarks. The current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 6 out of 6 listings, and one remark explicitly notes a "side-by-side washer and dryer." This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention "2 parking stalls," "2 assigned parking stalls," "secured parking garage," and "TWO parking stalls are secured and COVERED," which strongly supports building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. At least one remark explicitly states "2 assigned parking stalls," and the MLS checkbox data shows assigned parking in all 6 listings, suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking is well documented in the remarks and MLS data. Listings mention "2 covered parking stalls," "secured parking garage," and "TWO parking stalls are secured and COVERED," making this a high-confidence building feature.
I looked for explicit wording such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The remarks only indicate assigned/secured parking stalls, so there is no clear evidence that the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks describe parking stalls as assigned or secured, but do not mention any separate monthly parking charge.
Guest parking is not supported by the public remarks. Although 4/6 current MLS listings have the GUEST flag, none of the remarks mention guest or visitor parking, so this looks like inconsistent MLS checkbox data rather than verified building information.
Secured entry is strongly supported. Several listings describe the building as "secured," with direct wording like "secured entry" and "secured parking garage," and the MLS data shows secured-entry features in 5 of 6 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or instructions to join a parking list. None of the public remarks mention a waitlist process for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC appears to be a real building feature, not just a copied MLS checkbox. Five remarks explicitly reference it, with multiple agents repeating utility coverage for "central AC" and "central air conditioning throughout." The MLS pattern is also consistent (4/6 unit_features and 6/6 inclusions), reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be confirmed by the current MLS data across all 6/6 listings. The public remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but they also do not present any conflicting evidence, and the repeated building-level listing pattern suggests the MLS checkbox is consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR permitted, legal vacation rentals, NUC, or TVU. The remarks do not mention any short-term rental allowance, so this remains false by absence of evidence.
I looked for references to hotel pool, hotel rental program, Hilton/Ritz/Trump pool, or similar managed rental arrangements. There is no public remark evidence that this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for phrases indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or mandatory rental pool membership. Since the remarks do not mention any STR or hotel pool program, there is no basis to mark this as mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, lease extends to, or any 4-digit expiration year. Nothing in the public remarks indicates that this is a leasehold building or gives a lease expiration date.
I looked for explicit language such as 'VA approved' or 'VA financing accepted' across the listings and found none. Based on the absence of any such mention in the public remarks, this is left as false with low-to-moderate confidence.
I searched for any wording indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all. Without explicit language, this feature remains unknown.
Fire sprinklers are confirmed by multiple recent remarks, with at least 3 listings explicitly stating 'fire sprinklers' or 'FIRE SPRINKLERS!'. The mentions are consistent across different agents and appear to be direct building/unit feature descriptions rather than copy-paste noise.
I looked for phrases such as FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks only confirm fire sprinklers, which is not the same as a stated FLSE pass, so this cannot be marked true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. The current MLS data shows only 1/6 listings with a mountain-related view description, while the public remarks consistently point to city/ocean/Diamond Head views instead. This looks weak and possibly copy-pasted rather than verified on site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Current MLS data shows only 1/6 listings with a garden-related view description, but the remarks consistently emphasize other view types instead. This weak support suggests the checkbox may be an agent error rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by multiple listings, with at least 3 remarks explicitly describing an on-site resident manager/property manager. The evidence is consistent across listings and strongly indicates this is a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.