
Makiki Palms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Palms
Building Overview
Makiki Palms in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1959) with a pool and covered, assigned parking.

About Makiki Palms
Makiki Palms is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1959 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key on-site features listed in MLS-derived data include a swimming pool and window air conditioning units. No other amenities are specified in the provided records.
Parking is noted as available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The property management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the current management or seller prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages or descriptions of owner-occupancy (e.g., 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupancy', '% owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no numeric or descriptive evidence, the owner_occupancy percentage is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple public remarks explicitly call the building a "walk-up," which implies no elevators. I searched the remarks for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators' and found only 'walk-up' references, so 0 elevators is supported with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe features such as the pool, lanais, in-unit washer/dryers, parking options, and location, but do not reference any surfboard storage facilities. I specifically searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and similar phrases and found no evidence that dedicated surfboard storage exists in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks only describe a 'pool' or 'swimming pool' with no indication it is salt water. Searched for phrases like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found none, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings only describe private in-unit washers and dryers and do not mention any coin-op or fee-based shared laundry facilities. I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'laundry fee', or similar, and found no evidence that any community laundry requires payment.
The remarks consistently emphasize that each featured unit has its own washer and dryer, including on the lanai, but never mention any shared or community laundry rooms on each floor. I looked for phrases like 'laundry on every floor', 'laundry room on each floor', or similar, and found none, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly say parking stall does not convey with the unit (e.g., 'a parking stall does not convey with this unit'), and other remarks describe residents renting stalls from the church, so parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
Consistent mentions across listings indicate many residents rent parking from the church across the street for about $160/month (phrases: 'rent a stall from the church across the street for approximately $160/month' and 'currently $160.00 per month').
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar terms and found none. The remarks instead describe renting stalls from a church; no waitlist referenced.
No analysis available
The public remarks describe the building and units in detail but never reference key card access, fob access, card readers, or any electronic access control for the building. I searched for terms like 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', 'electronic access', and similar phrases and found no evidence of a card/fob security system, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
Across all provided listings, security features such as a guard or manager are not mentioned, and there is no reference to any roving or scheduled security patrol service. I specifically looked for words like 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrolled', and 'patrol service' and found no evidence that such a service exists at this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', and minimum-stay language; none were found. With no evidence in the remarks, STR allowance is not stated and is assumed not indicated.
No public remarks reference a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. Because STRs are not indicated, hotel-pool participation is considered false.
No listings indicate any mandatory participation in a rental pool; with no hotel pool and no STR allowance mentioned, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', and specific years; none were found. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown from the remarks.
Searched all public remarks for 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans' and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, VA financing eligibility is assumed not stated.
I searched for phrases indicating full walls-in or comprehensive HOA insurance and found only mention of '100% hurricane insurance coverage.' That does not equate to full walls-in/HOA master policy coverage, so 'insured_fully' is set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit language about fire/life safety evaluations (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire inspection passed', 'life safety compliant') and found no references. In the absence of any explicit statement, this field remains false but with low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Descriptions of views reference tree tops, pool, and tropical landscaping, but nothing about fireworks or Friday night shows. This absence indicates the building is not being promoted as having a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.