Makiki Holiday
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Holiday
Building Overview
Makiki Holiday in Makiki-Tantalus — 1971 concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals not allowed (based on MLS data).
About Makiki Holiday
Makiki Holiday is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1971 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Key building characteristics recorded in the MLS include its construction type and policies: pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, special assessments, and on-site amenities — are not specified in the MLS data provided. Based on MLS data analysis, prospective buyers should verify parking, fee, and management details with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 listings indicate electricity is included in the maintenance fee; remarks explicitly state "maintenance fee covers all utilities including Electricity" or similar in each listing. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents/listings, though some phrasing is repeated which may indicate copy/paste; still, the explicit repeated mention provides strong support.
Gas is explicitly listed as included in the maintenance fee in all 4 listings, with phrases like "gas" or "Gas" appearing alongside other utilities. The consistent language across listings supports a high-confidence inclusion.
All 4 listings explicitly state hot water is included in the maintenance fee (phrases like "Hot Water" and "water hot"), and the MLS association_fee_includes field contains HOTWAT for every listing. The consistent, repeated mentions across listings yield strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed as included in the maintenance fee in all 4 listings, with remarks stating "sewer" or "Sewer" among the utilities covered. Multiple listings use the same language, providing strong supporting evidence.
Water is explicitly included in the maintenance fee in all 4 listings, with remarks stating "water" among the utilities covered. The consistent, repeated references across multiple listings provide strong confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings list pool amenities (POOL/CNDAP/COMAP/HEAPOO). Public remarks across listings mention 'pool deck resurfaced', 'pool deck repair', and 'walkways and pool deck resurfaced', which—combined with unanimous MLS checkbox data—strongly indicates the building has a swimming pool. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and appears corroborated by the remarks rather than being a lone copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings have the COMLAU (community/shared laundry) amenity checked in the MLS, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry facilities; one remark instead specifies 'your own in-unit laundry' for the penthouse. Evidence is mixed: strong checkbox consistency across agents suggests the building likely has shared laundry, but the lack of explicit remarks (and at least one unit with in-unit laundry) means confirmation is moderate rather than high and may reflect agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings include parking checkbox values (no listings show 'NONE'), and public remarks reference parking in several unit descriptions (e.g., '1 assigned parking', '1 parking unit'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers parking.
Three of four MLS parking feature entries include 'ASSIGN', and at least one public remark explicitly says '1 assigned parking' while another notes '1 parking unit'. Multiple listings and MLS checkboxes indicate assigned/reserved parking is available in the building.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language such as 'deeded parking' or 'parking included in deed' and found none. While listings reference 'assigned' or '1 parking', that does not confirm deeded ownership, so deeded parking is not indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking rental', or 'additional parking cost' and found no information. Parking fee amount is therefore unknown from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating a waitlist system for parking and found none. Absence of any mention suggests no waitlist is indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current listings (4/4) have the construction_materials field set to 'CONCRE'. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete', 'concrete building', or 'reinforced concrete' — they discuss repainting, pool deck repairs, plumbing, and solar systems. The feature is likely present given unanimous MLS checkbox but lacks explicit mention in agent remarks, so confidence is moderate (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements about short-term rental permissibility (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental permitted', 'NUC') and found none in the remarks. Therefore there is no evidence STRs are allowed.
Because the remarks contain no indication STRs are allowed, hotel rental-pool participation cannot apply. No language referencing a hotel rental program or hotel management was found.
No remarks mention a hotel rental pool, let alone mandatory participation. Given STRs are not indicated in the remarks, mandatory pool participation does not apply.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit leasehold/land-lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'renewed through 2075') and found no references. Without any year mentioned, the lease expiry is unknown.
I searched the remarks for terms indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. With no explicit statement, VA approval is assumed not indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 4 current MLS view_descriptions contain 'MOUNTA' indicating mountain views, but none of the public remarks mention mountains (no 'mauka', 'Koolau', or 'mountain view' text). Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across listings and not corroborated in agent remarks, so the feature is included with moderate confidence (0.72).
No analysis available
2 of 4 current MLS view_descriptions list 'CITY', and a public remark explicitly says 'open view of City!'. Multiple MLS entries plus an explicit agent remark confirm the building offers city views, so this is included with high confidence (0.90).
No analysis available
No current MLS view_descriptions (0 of 4) list 'GARDEN', one listing shows 'NONE', and none of the public remarks reference garden/courtyard/landscaped views. With no supporting remarks and MLS unchecked, the building is marked as not offering garden views (confidence 0.90).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.