Makiki Colony
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Colony
Building Overview
Makiki Colony in Makiki-Tantalus — built 1970, concrete construction; assigned covered parking.
About Makiki Colony
Based on MLS data, Makiki Colony is a condominium building located in the Makiki‑Tantalus neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1970 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
Key features noted in the MLS include window air conditioning and covered, assigned parking. The property's policies, as recorded, indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed.
Additional details in the MLS show the management company as unknown. Buyers should verify all building information, rules, and any fees with the seller, HOA, or management, as this summary is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and descriptions such as majority or highly owner occupied, but none were found. No owner-occupancy value can be determined from the available remarks.
The remarks were searched for elevator counts and references to multiple elevators, but none were found. The building context does not provide enough information to determine the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of nine listings identify OTCOEX in the association-fee inclusions, which is strong building-level MLS evidence for included common expenses. None of the public remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity, so the evidence may reflect standardized or copy-pasted MLS data rather than independently described details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of nine listings state SEWER is included in the association fees. The public remarks contain no sewer-related language, but the repeated MLS designation across nearly all listings supports treating sewer inclusion as a building feature.
Eight of nine listings identify WATER as included in the association fees. No remarks independently confirm this detail, and the repeated checkbox may be copied across listings, but the 8-of-9 consistency supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 9 listings mention a trash chute in the public remarks, while 6 of 9 MLS records include the TRACHU amenity. The checkbox consistency suggests the building may offer this feature, but the lack of remarks leaves some possibility of copied or unverified MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 of 9 current listings include COMLAU in the MLS amenities, indicating the building is represented as having community laundry. No public remarks mention laundry facilities or use phrases such as “laundry room” or “shared laundry,” so the evidence is consistent but not independently confirmed across listing descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 listings explicitly mention assigned or dedicated parking, with phrases such as "assigned covered parking stall," "dedicated covered parking," and "1 assigned covered parking stall." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and strongly corroborates the current MLS data showing assigned parking on 8 of 9 listings.
At least 6 listings explicitly mention covered parking or a garage, including "assigned covered parking stall," "dedicated covered parking," and "covered parking stall." These repeated descriptions across multiple listings, together with covered-parking MLS codes on 7 of 9 listings, provide strong building-level evidence.
The listings consistently describe the parking as assigned rather than deeded or owned. Because deeded parking is not explicitly confirmed, this is treated as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned or covered parking but provide no parking fee information. There is insufficient evidence of a separate monthly parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe the unit as having an assigned parking stall and do not reference a waitlist. No evidence of a building parking waitlist was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 listings report concrete construction materials (CONCRE). No remarks explicitly mention concrete, but the unanimous MLS data across multiple listings strongly supports this building-level feature rather than an isolated agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 9 listings identifies masonry/stucco construction, with no supporting remarks such as 'masonry' or 'stucco.' Because the other 8 listings report concrete and there is no narrative confirmation, this feature is omitted as unsupported and likely copy-paste or checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss the property as a residence and potential long-term rental investment but do not state that short-term rentals are permitted. Under the absence-of-evidence rule, STR is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
The listings contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel management, or branded rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this prerequisite feature must also be false.
No remarks indicate that units must participate in a hotel rental pool or rental program. Since STR is not established as allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings indicate fee-simple ownership rather than leasehold ownership. No specific lease expiration year or renewal date appears in the remarks, so there is no applicable expiry year to extract.
The remarks were reviewed for explicit VA financing language, but none was found. This feature is therefore treated as false with medium-low confidence based on the absence of evidence.
The remarks include a statement about 100% hurricane coverage, but this does not explicitly confirm full HOA insurance or walls-in coverage. No direct qualifying insurance language was found, so fully insured cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language, but none appeared. The remarks mention a secured building and 100% hurricane coverage, which do not establish FLSE passage.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are supported by 8 of 9 current MLS listings. The remarks include the specific phrase 'see the City lights at night,' providing direct confirmation beyond checkbox data.
Coastline views have no supporting public-remark evidence across the nine listings. The feature appears in only one MLS record and is contradicted by a NONE entry, suggesting an isolated or potentially copied checkbox rather than a reliably supported building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of nine listings identify RESMAN in the MLS amenities, but 0 of the 10 provided public remarks mention a resident manager or building manager on property. Because the evidence comes only from potentially copied MLS checkbox data and lacks corroborating remarks, confidence is moderate rather than strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.