Makakilo Mala 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makakilo Mala 1
Building Overview
Makakilo Mala 1 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building built in 1975. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Makakilo Mala 1
Makakilo Mala 1 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1975 and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, the building has policies that do not allow pets and do not allow short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. No specific common-area amenities are provided in the available MLS information.
Details such as parking, unit counts, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and other policies are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or property management and review official documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level pattern: 11 of 13 listings include OTCOEX, which strongly indicates maintenance fees cover common area electricity. The public remarks do not address fee inclusions, so this appears to be consistent MLS data rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the available evidence: 0 of 14 listings include HOTWAT in association fees, while many list WTRHTR instead. The remarks across multiple listings are silent on hot-water inclusion and instead focus on AC, views, pools, and parking, which is consistent with a building that does not provide hot water as an HOA-covered utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported at the building level, with 12 of 14 listings showing SEWER in association fees. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, but there is no evidence of contradiction, and the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
Water inclusion is strongly supported across the listings, with 12 of 14 marking WATER in association fees. The public remarks are largely silent on utilities, but the repeated MLS checkbox pattern across multiple agents indicates this is a building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Across the provided remarks, there is no explicit mention of BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling areas in any of the listings. While 6 of 14 MLS entries currently have BBQ checked in amenities, the lack of supporting language across multiple agents strongly suggests the checkbox is unreliable here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station. The MLS amenity checkbox appears in only 2 of 12 listings, which is too sparse to validate a building-level amenity and is consistent with agent-entered checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe patio/deck-style outdoor spaces, including private lanais, a large open deck, covered front lanai, fenced back patio, porch, and balcony. These references appear across numerous remarks and multiple agents, not just a single copy-paste description, so confidence is very high that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
There is no textual evidence of a jogging or walking path in the remarks provided. Agents repeatedly mention pools, recreation areas, parks, and green spaces, but never a dedicated path or trail. Based on the absence of supporting remarks, this feature should be treated as not verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area evidence is strong and repeated across multiple listings, not just one agent remark. At least 2 listings explicitly say 'recreation area(s),' with one describing it as a shared complex amenity alongside a basketball court, playground, and pool. This is consistent with a real building/community amenity rather than copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly available in this building. Multiple current listings mention it directly in different forms—"storage," "secure storage built in," "with a storage unit," and "additional outdoor storage space"—which strongly supports that buyers can expect storage-related features here. The repeated mentions across listings suggest this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by both the historical MLS amenities and the current remarks. At least 6 listings explicitly mention a pool, including phrases like "community pool," "large pool," "association pool," and "wonderful pool," across multiple agents and listings. The repeated mentions suggest this is a real shared building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by both MLS inclusions and public remarks. Historical MLS data shows 10 of 14 listings including washer/dryer, and one current remark explicitly says "an in-unit washer and dryer." The repeated presence in MLS and direct remark confirmation make this a strong building-level feature, though it is not mentioned in every listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows 13/14 listings with parking-related features and none with NONE, and multiple remarks independently describe parking availability. Evidence appears consistent across several listings rather than a single copy-paste note.
Assigned parking is supported by both checkbox data and listing remarks. At least one listing explicitly states 'two assigned parking spaces,' and another says 'side-by-side parking sits right in front of the unit,' which is consistent with reserved/assigned spaces. Overall evidence is strong enough to include.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language and found only assigned, front-of-unit, or guest parking references. That supports parking being assigned rather than deeded, but there is no direct statement that the stalls are deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee wording such as monthly parking charge, parking rent, or additional cost. The remarks only discuss parking availability and assignment, not any separate fee.
Guest parking appears to be an actual building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The MLS data shows it in 4/13 listings, and one remark directly confirms it with 'Guest parking is generous,' which is enough to support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a queue, or delayed parking availability. The remarks do not indicate any waitlist system, only the presence of assigned and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the 14 listings explicitly mentions "Split AC," and the current MLS inclusions also show ACSPL on 1 listing. The rest of the remarks do not consistently mention A/C type, so this looks like a feature present in some units rather than a universally described building-wide standard.
Window AC appears in the MLS inclusions field across 8 of 13 listings, which is a moderate signal that some units in the building have it. None of the public remarks explicitly say “window AC” or “window unit,” so the support comes from MLS checkbox data rather than agent commentary. Because the same pattern repeats across multiple listings, it looks more like a building feature than a one-off entry, but confidence is still moderate.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is not strongly supported by the public remarks, but 5 of 14 current MLS listings are coded DOUWAL. Because the remarks are silent and the MLS checkbox appears in only part of the dataset, this looks like partial or possibly inconsistent agent reporting rather than firm confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be the prevailing MLS material for this building, with 11 of 14 current listings coded WOOFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly mention the construction type, so this is supported mainly by the MLS pattern rather than agent descriptions.
Above-ground construction remains unsupported by the public remarks. It appears only sporadically in current MLS data (4 of 13 listings), which is consistent with checkbox noise rather than a real building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related language such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, or minimum-stay rules. There is no public-remarks evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building, so the safest read is false by absence of support.
I looked for hotel rental pool references and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STRs are allowed, this must be false.
I searched for any indication that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such language, and with no STR evidence this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, leasehold expiring, renewed through, and similar terms. Nothing indicates the land tenure or any lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
This is strong public evidence that VA financing is relevant to the building/unit listings. The mention of an assumable VA rate directly supports VA loan approval or at least VA-financed ownership in the market context.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, roughly 10+ listings explicitly mention ocean views or similar wording such as 'ocean vistas,' 'ocean views to the west,' and 'unobstructed ocean views.' This is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing OCEAN in most view descriptions.
There is no remark-level evidence for mountain views in the listings reviewed. Although 3 of 13 MLS records show MOUNTA in the view descriptions, the absence of any matching public remarks suggests this is not a dependable building-level feature and may reflect agent checkbox noise.
No analysis available
City views are not supported by the public remarks. Only 2 of 13 MLS entries show CITY in the view descriptions, and none of the remarks mention city-facing vistas, so this does not appear to be a reliable feature for the building.
Coastline views are not clearly supported by the listing remarks. Several listings mention ocean views and proximity to beaches or resorts, but none explicitly describe coastline/shoreline/coastal views. With only partial MLS support and no matching remarks, this feature is not reliable as a building-wide attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide clear support for sunset views, though less frequently than ocean views. One listing explicitly mentions 'breathtaking cotton candy sunsets,' and another notes 'ocean views to the west,' which aligns with sunset-facing exposure. Evidence appears genuine across multiple listings, not just a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated by MLS amenities in 8 of 13 listings, with prior data also showing 7 of 12. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, so the evidence comes from repeated MLS entries and may reflect copy/paste behavior, but the consistency across listings makes the feature likely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.