Makakilo Mala 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makakilo Mala 1
Building Overview
Makakilo Mala 1 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building built in 1975. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Makakilo Mala 1
Makakilo Mala 1 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1975 and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, the building has policies that do not allow pets and do not allow short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. No specific common-area amenities are provided in the available MLS information.
Details such as parking, unit counts, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and other policies are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or property management and review official documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention storage: phrases include 'additional storage', 'secure storage built in', and 'fenced-in backyard with a storage unit'. Storage appears in MLS fields fairly often (6/10 unit_features, 2/10 building amenities) and at least 5–6 separate remarks reference storage/extra storage, giving strong, consistent evidence that the building offers storage units/lockers or built-in storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 10 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions, and at least one public remark explicitly states 'in-unit washer and dryer.' While agent checkbox data may sometimes be copy-pasted, the majority of listings indicate the feature and one remark confirms it, so the building offers some units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that the building provides parking: MLS checkbox data is populated for all 10 current listings and at least seven remark blocks explicitly mention parking stalls/assigned spaces or guest parking (quotes include “side-by-side parking located directly in front of the unit,” “two parking stalls in front of the home,” and “includes two assigned parking spaces”). Multiple agents independently note assigned stalls and guest parking, so the building-level parking feature is well supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings consistently mention assigned/side-by-side parking stalls in front of units and guest parking, but none call the stalls 'deeded', 'owned', or 'included in deed'. Based on the absence of explicit deeded language, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found no information about any parking charges, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe assigned and guest parking but do not reference a waitlist process. In absence of any mention, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 10 current MLS listings list 'WOOFRA' (wood frame) in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention wood frame or recent construction changes. The MLS checkbox consistency suggests the building is likely wood-frame, but absence of explicit remarks or owner/site verification means confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', 'owner-occupant only', and related phrases and found nothing. Therefore STRs are marked not allowed with medium confidence due to no supporting remarks.
No public remarks reference a hotel rental program or hotel-managed pool. Because there is no indication that STRs are permitted, hotel rental-pool participation is set to false.
There are no remarks indicating a mandatory hotel rental pool; absent STR allowance and no mention of required participation, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks reference any land lease or expiry year. I searched for explicit years or phrases indicating lease expiry or renewal and found nothing, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks explicitly reference a VA assumable rate, indicating VA financing is involved and the listing/unit is associated with a VA loan. This supports marking the building as VA loan approved based on available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listing remarks that the building offers ocean views: at least 8 of 10 remark blocks explicitly mention 'ocean view(s)', 'unobstructed ocean views', 'ocean vistas', or 'overlooking Aulani and Ko’olina Resorts.' Current MLS view_descriptions also list OCEAN for the majority of listings, indicating many units have ocean views rather than a single outlier. Multiple agents independently reference ocean views, so the building should be listed as offering ocean-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of ten current listings list 'RESMAN' in the amenities, suggesting the building may have an on-site/resident manager. None of the provided public remarks contain phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager', so the evidence appears to come from MLS checkbox entries (which can be copy-pasted by agents). Inclusion is warranted for buyers searching for this feature, but confidence is moderate because remarks do not corroborate the amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.