Makakilo Mala 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makakilo Mala 1
Building Overview
Makakilo Mala 1 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete building built in 1975. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Makakilo Mala 1
Makakilo Mala 1 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1975 and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, the building has policies that do not allow pets and do not allow short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. No specific common-area amenities are provided in the available MLS information.
Details such as parking, unit counts, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and other policies are not included in the provided MLS data. Buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or property management and review official documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level pattern: 11 of 13 listings include OTCOEX, which strongly indicates maintenance fees cover common area electricity. The public remarks do not address fee inclusions, so this appears to be consistent MLS data rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported at the building level: 0 of 13 listings include HOTWAT, while many list WTRHTR instead. That pattern is consistent across listings and points to unit-level water heaters rather than HOA-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level MLS data strongly supports sewer being included: 11 of 13 listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes. No public remarks contradict this, and the repeated pattern suggests this is a genuine shared-cost feature rather than a listing error.
Water inclusion is strongly supported at the building level: 11 of 13 listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks are silent on the topic, but the consistent MLS pattern across multiple listings makes this highly reliable.
Across the provided remarks, there is no evidence of BBQ or grilling facilities. Several listings mention pools, recreation areas, parks, guest parking, and green space, but nothing about BBQ amenities. With no corroborating text and only partial MLS checkbox support, this feature should be treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station. The MLS amenity checkbox appears in only 2 of 12 listings, which is too sparse to validate a building-level amenity and is consistent with agent-entered checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe patio/deck-style outdoor spaces, including private lanais, a large open deck, covered front lanai, fenced back patio, porch, and balcony. These references appear across numerous remarks and multiple agents, not just a single copy-paste description, so confidence is very high that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
There is no textual evidence of a jogging or walking path in the remarks provided. Agents repeatedly mention pools, recreation areas, parks, and green spaces, but never a dedicated path or trail. Based on the absence of supporting remarks, this feature should be treated as not verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area evidence is strong and repeated across multiple listings, not just one agent remark. At least 2 listings explicitly say 'recreation area(s),' with one describing it as a shared complex amenity alongside a basketball court, playground, and pool. This is consistent with a real building/community amenity rather than copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly present for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention storage-related features across different agents, including "secure storage built in," "a storage unit," "additional outdoor storage space," and general "plenty of storage." This is consistent with the historical MLS pattern and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by both the historical MLS amenities and the current public remarks. At least 6 listings explicitly mention a pool, often in shared community terms such as 'community pool,' 'large pool,' 'association pool,' and 'wonderful pool,' indicating this is a building/community amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by both MLS inclusions and public remarks. Across the listings provided, 1 remark explicitly mentions "in-unit washer and dryer," while the MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 9 of 13 listings, suggesting this is a real building feature and not just a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: current MLS data shows 12/13 listings with parking-related features and none showing NONE. Multiple remarks across different listings explicitly describe parking stalls, side-by-side parking, and parking right in front of the unit, indicating this is not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported by both MLS checkbox data and listing remarks. At least one listing explicitly says 'two assigned parking spaces,' and several others describe fixed stalls in front of the unit, which matches the assigned-parking pattern seen in the MLS data.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned or front-of-unit parking, not deeded or owned stalls. Because deeded ownership is not explicitly stated, this should not be treated as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, parking rent, additional parking charge, and similar wording. No public remark indicates any separate monthly parking cost.
Guest parking appears to be an actual building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The MLS data shows it in 4/13 listings, and one remark directly confirms it with 'Guest parking is generous,' which is enough to support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a parking queue. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in the MLS inclusions field across 8 of 13 listings, which is a moderate signal that some units in the building have it. None of the public remarks explicitly say “window AC” or “window unit,” so the support comes from MLS checkbox data rather than agent commentary. Because the same pattern repeats across multiple listings, it looks more like a building feature than a one-off entry, but confidence is still moderate.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is not supported by the public remarks. With only 4 of 13 current MLS listings checked and no agent remarks describing double walls, the evidence is too sparse to treat it as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be the prevailing MLS material for this building, with 10 of 13 listings coded WOOFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, but the MLS pattern is consistent enough to treat as present for the building.
Above-ground construction remains unsupported by the public remarks. It appears only sporadically in current MLS data (4 of 13 listings), which is consistent with checkbox noise rather than a real building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related language such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules. There is no public-remarks evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building, so the safest read is false.
I looked for any hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program references and found none. Since there is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, hotel-pool participation should be false.
I searched for language indicating a required rental pool or mandatory participation, such as cannot opt out or must be in the rental program. No such evidence appears in the remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like ground lease, leasehold, lease expires, renewed through, and similar language. Nothing in the public remarks indicates any lease expiry date.
The remarks directly mention VA financing via an assumable VA loan rate. This is strong public evidence that VA loan financing is relevant for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported and appear across multiple listings and agents. At least 11 of 13 MLS records include OCEAN in the view descriptions, and several remarks explicitly say "ocean views," "unobstructed ocean views," or "ocean vistas." This is consistent, repeated evidence rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
There is no remark-level evidence for mountain views in the listings reviewed. Although 3 of 13 MLS records show MOUNTA in the view descriptions, the absence of any matching public remarks suggests this is not a dependable building-level feature and may reflect agent checkbox noise.
No analysis available
City views are not supported by the public remarks. Only 2 of 13 MLS entries show CITY in the view descriptions, and none of the remarks mention city-facing vistas, so this does not appear to be a reliable feature for the building.
Coastline views are not clearly supported by the listing remarks. Several listings mention ocean views and proximity to beaches or resorts, but none explicitly describe coastline/shoreline/coastal views. With only partial MLS support and no matching remarks, this feature is not reliable as a building-wide attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide clear support for sunset views, though less frequently than ocean views. One listing explicitly mentions 'breathtaking cotton candy sunsets,' and another notes 'ocean views to the west,' which aligns with sunset-facing exposure. Evidence appears genuine across multiple listings, not just a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated by MLS amenities in 8 of 13 listings, with prior data also showing 7 of 12. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, so the evidence comes from repeated MLS entries and may reflect copy/paste behavior, but the consistency across listings makes the feature likely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.