Makakilo Gardens 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makakilo Gardens 3
Building Overview
Makakilo Gardens 3 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; concrete condominium built in 1974. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Makakilo Gardens 3
Makakilo Gardens 3 is a condominium building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction.
Based on MLS data, property rules for the building indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available data. No additional amenities or unit-level details are provided in the MLS extract supplied.
MLS-derived information for parking, monthly maintenance fees, unit sizes, and on-site amenities was not provided in the data set. Buyers and agents should verify parking, fees, rules, and management details with the listing agent or governing association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentage references or phrases like "majority owner occupied," but found none. The remarks do not provide any basis to estimate the owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or numeric counts, but found none. Because this is a townhome-style community and the remarks do not mention elevators, the feature remains unknown from the provided text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 13 current listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (agents consistently checked 'common electric'). No public-remarks explicitly mention common-area electric being included, so the evidence is consistent across multiple listings but appears to be agent-entered rather than described in text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the current listings that maintenance fees include hot water. The strongest signal is that 0/14 listings list HOTWAT, while 8/14 explicitly include WTRHTR, which is consistent with individual water heaters rather than a building-paid hot water utility. Public remarks are silent on this utility, so the MLS pattern appears deliberate rather than copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included in the maintenance fee across all current listings (14/14). The public remarks do not discuss utilities, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the MLS data is unanimous, which is strong building-level confirmation.
Water is consistently included in the maintenance fee across all current listings (14/14). Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention water, the MLS data is uniform across the building, indicating this is a stable shared expense.
BBQ/grilling is supported by both MLS amenities and listing text, but only moderately. 2 listings explicitly mention barbecuing/barbecues, while the rest do not, so this may be a mix of true amenity data and agent copy/paste. I would keep it as present, but with moderate confidence rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 6–8 of ~13 units) reference community amenities such as 'pool, playground, and recreation area' or 'community amenities include a swimming pool and playground.' Only 2/13 MLS records currently have the CLUHOU checkbox checked, and agents sometimes copy/paste amenity text; however the repeated mentions of a 'recreation area' and community amenities across different remarks suggest the building offers shared clubhouse/recreation facilities (implied rather than explicitly labeled 'clubhouse').
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence across many listings shows outdoor patio/lanai space is available. At least 9+ remarks reference a lanai, patio, courtyard, or outdoor entertaining area, suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly. The wording is consistent across multiple agents and units, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that some units in the building offer private yard or yard-like outdoor space. At least 6+ listings mention fenced yards, courtyards, yard space, or enclosed/gated outdoor areas, and the descriptions come from different remarks rather than a single repeated template. This supports including private_yard as an available feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in several remarks across the listings, but mostly as unit storage or closets rather than explicit building lockers. Public remarks include phrases like "multiple storage closets," "lots of storage," "ample storage throughout," and "private fenced courtyard with storage," which suggests storage is available in some units. Because the MLS also shows 2/14 listings with storage in unit features, this is a moderate-confidence inclusion rather than a confirmed building-level locker amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Across the provided remarks, at least 8 listings explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, including phrases like 'community amenities like a pool,' 'there's a pool on the property,' and 'pool and playground in complex.' The MLS checkbox is also consistently checked in all current listings, so this appears to be a reliable building-level amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the listing set: 13 of 14 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions, and the remarks also confirm it with phrases like 'new washer and dryer.' The evidence is consistent and appears to be repeated by multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the listings: most remarks explicitly mention parking stalls, dedicated spaces, guest parking, or garage/stall availability. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building-level feature rather than a copied checkbox.
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly present in the building and is mentioned in multiple independent remarks. The repeated wording about assigned, dedicated, and dedicated guest parking aligns with the MLS checkbox data and supports this as a genuine building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned, or parking included in deed language and found none. The listings describe assigned or dedicated stalls, which is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of parking cost, monthly charge, or rental fee. The listings only describe parking availability and stall counts, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
9 of 13 MLS records list guest parking and multiple remarks reference guest/visitor parking or ample street parking (quotes: “guest parking available,” “additional dedicated guest parking”). Evidence is present across listings though slightly less ubiquitous than assigned parking, so confidence is moderate-high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and similar terms. Nothing in the remarks suggests a waitlist process for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox ACSPL appears in 4/13 listings. Public remarks explicitly state 'split ACs', 'split a/c upstairs and downstairs', and 'A/C window unit' across several listings (at least three distinct remarks). The evidence indicates some units in the building have split/ductless systems, but mentions are not yet widespread across all agent listings so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly describe concrete construction. The MLS checkbox appears only in 3/14 current listings, which is not enough to overcome the lack of supporting public remarks and could reflect copy-paste data rather than verified construction.
No listing remarks mention double wall construction. The MLS checkbox rate is relatively high at 10/14, but the complete absence of descriptive confirmation suggests the data may be copied rather than verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the public remarks indicate a concrete slab foundation. With only 4/14 MLS listings marked SLAB and no descriptive support, this feature remains unconfirmed from the provided remarks.
No analysis available
None of the remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction. The MLS data is mixed at 8/14, but without supporting remarks this looks more like unchecked listing metadata than confirmed building construction details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for affirmative STR language such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, or NUC. The remarks do not show any indication that short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I searched for hotel pool, rental pool, hotel-managed, Hilton, Ritz, or Trump-style program references. None appear in the remarks, and there is no basis to mark this feature true.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, must participate, or cannot opt out. There is no evidence of any required rental-pool arrangement in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold expiring, or a 4-digit expiry year. The remarks confirm leasehold ownership structure, but they do not provide a specific lease expiry date.
This is strongly supported by multiple listings. The remarks directly state the building is VA-approved and mention assumable VA financing for eligible buyers.
I searched for remarks indicating full HOA insurance or walls-in coverage, but found no direct statements. A note about a special assessment for a property insurance increase suggests insurance costs are discussed, but it does not confirm the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety compliance phrases including FLSE pass, fire safety certification, and passed fire inspection language, but there were no explicit mentions. The remarks do not provide enough evidence to confirm the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, appearing in well over half of the listing blocks. Phrases like 'sweeping ocean views,' 'ocean views from your lanai,' and 'Spectacular Ocean/Diamond Head views' show this is a real building-level feature rather than a copied MLS checkbox.
Mountain views are directly mentioned in several listing remarks, including 'from the mountains to the ocean' and 'ocean and mountain views.' The evidence is consistent with the historical MLS pattern and appears across multiple listings.
Diamond Head views are one of the most consistently described features in the remarks. Multiple listings call out 'Diamond Head' directly, often alongside ocean and city views, which strongly supports this building-level feature.
City views are clearly supported by several listings, including explicit references to 'city views' and 'sparkling city lights.' The repeated phrasing across different remarks suggests this is not a one-off agent description.
Coastline views are directly supported by the phrase 'unobstructed coastline' in the remarks, with additional listings describing broad ocean-facing views that align with a coastline perspective. This appears to be a genuine feature available in some units rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are less common than the other view types but are explicitly mentioned in at least one listing, with the phrase 'Watch the sunrise in the mornings.' Because the current MLS data also shows sunrise in a few listings, this is credible as a building feature available in some units.
Sunset views are directly mentioned once ('sunset dinners on your generous front lanai') and implied by multiple ocean/west-facing remarks; MLS also lists SUNSET in 4/13 listings. Evidence is moderate but sufficient to indicate that some units offer sunset/west exposure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, live-in manager, or on-site building manager. The only signal is the MLS amenity checkbox appearing in 7 of 14 listings, which is not strong enough on its own and may reflect copy-paste behavior rather than verified building staffing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.