Makakilo Gardens 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makakilo Gardens 2
Building Overview
Makakilo Gardens 2 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 1973; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Makakilo Gardens 2
Makakilo Gardens 2 is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records the property was built in 1973. Size, unit mix, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies identified in MLS records include a no-pets policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing data does not detail on-site amenities, common facilities, or building services, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Additional specifics such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, permit requirements, or association rules are not available in the supplied MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify building size, construction details, amenity availability, management contact, and policy enforcement with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') across all public remarks and found none. Because no numeric value is provided in the data and there is no explicit mention in the remarks, I cannot assign a percentage and return null with low confidence.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator language such as 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because there is no current numeric value provided and no explicit statement in the remarks, I cannot determine the number of elevators and therefore return null with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent MLS listings include the OTCOEX checkbox (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly state "common area electricity" or similar phrases, suggesting agents may be relying on MLS checkbox fields rather than remark text. Given the moderate consistency in MLS data (15/20) and previously Medium confidence, the feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) show HOTWAT in association fee includes, while 13/20 listings list WTRHTR (unit hot water heater) and one remark explicitly mentions a '47 gallon hot water heater'. There are no remarks stating 'hot water included' — evidence strongly indicates hot water is provided by in-unit heaters, not by the association.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 of 20 recent MLS listings list SEWER in the association_fee_includes field, though none of the public remarks explicitly say "sewer included." The unanimous MLS indication gives consistent implied evidence across multiple agent listings (likely copy/paste), so sewer-in-fees is included with moderately high implied confidence.
All 20 of 20 recent MLS listings show WATER in the association_fee_includes field, but public remarks lack explicit phrases like "water included" or "water in HOA fees." The unanimous MLS entries provide consistent implied evidence, so water-in-fees is included with moderately high confidence.
Multiple unit listings explicitly reference BBQ/grilling facilities — examples include 'ideal for entertaining, BBQs, outdoor dining', 'Pool & BBQ area & Playground located across the parking', and 'relax or entertain family and friends with a BBQ'. Current MLS amenity data also shows 7 of 20 listings checked BBQ, and the mentions appear across different agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste, supporting that the building offers shared BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that units include private outdoor space: at least 18 separate listing remarks explicitly reference private yards or enclosed outdoor areas (phrases include "private fenced courtyard", "private yard", "private back yard", "private, fenced lanai", "enclosed yard"). This appears in listings from multiple agents and matches prior high-confidence data and MLS amenity checks (12/20 showing PRIYAR), so include the feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for surfboard or board storage references (e.g., 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage'). The listings do not mention dedicated surfboard storage or related facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two separate listings explicitly mention a hot tub/hot tub-adjacent area—quotes include 'Pool hot tub and green gardens steps away' and 'large pool and hot tub, and large green lawn adjoining unit.' MLS amenity checkbox also shows WHIRLP in 2 of 20 current listings, so there is consistent, explicit evidence across multiple listings that the building offers a hot tub.
Strong evidence the building has a pool: MLS checkbox historically set in 19/20 listings and multiple agent remarks explicitly reference a pool (quotes: "community pool", "sparkling swimming pool", "community features a pool"). Pool mentions appear across listings from different agents and are consistent rather than isolated or contradictory, supporting high confidence that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
I reviewed all remarks for indications the pool is salt water. Remarks reference a pool, kiddie pool, and hot tub but contain no language identifying the pool as salt water.
Strong evidence that some units have in‑unit laundry: at least a dozen separate public remarks explicitly mention "in-unit laundry" or "washer and dryer" (e.g., "Additional perks include in-unit laundry", "washer and dryer in the unit!", "Laundry area with full washer and dryer located on the 2nd floor"). This aligns with historical MLS data (17/20 listings) and appears across multiple agent listings rather than a single copy/paste entry, so include the feature for the building.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'paid laundry', and 'card operated' across all remarks. Nothing in the public remarks indicates community laundry requiring payment.
I searched all public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Remarks instead reference in-unit laundry or a laundry area in units; there is no indication of community laundry on every floor.
All 20 current MLS listings indicate parking features present and numerous public remarks explicitly reference parking: phrases include "2 assigned parking stalls", "1 assigned parking stall", "private parking at front door", and "1 pkg and guest pkgs." Evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, confirming the building offers parking.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: at least a dozen current remarks explicitly state assigned or deeded stalls (examples: '2 assigned parking stalls', '1 assigned parking stall', 'deeded side-by-side parking stalls #35 & #54'). This corroborates historical MLS data where 16/20 listings included ASSIGN, and the consistency across many agents suggests the feature is building-wide rather than a single-unit anomaly.
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly reference deeded/assigned parking stalls for units (including explicit 'deeded'), indicating parking is owned with the unit.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', and similar phrases; no evidence of a separate parking fee was found in the remarks.
Multiple listings mention guest/visitor parking (phrases such as 'Visitor parking as well', 'guest parking and plenty of street parking', 'guest pkgs'), supporting prior MLS records that showed GUEST in about half of listings. Evidence indicates the complex provides guest parking, though mentions are less ubiquitous than assigned stalls and may reflect shared/limited visitor spaces.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or related language; none found, so no waitlist is indicated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases indicating card/fob access (key card, fob, electronic access) across all public remarks. There is no evidence in the remarks that the building uses a card/fob access system.
No analysis available
I searched remarks for references to security patrol or roving/patrolled services. None of the public remarks mention a security patrol service for the community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have split AC: at least three listings explicitly mention split/mini-split systems — e.g., "Stay cool year-round with a split AC unit downstairs" and several listings state "NEW SPLIT AC'S." MLS inclusion ACSPL appears in 3 of 20 listings, and multiple agents' remarks independently reference new or existing split ACs, supporting that some units offer ductless split ACs.
8 of 20 current listings include the ACWIUN inclusion (suggesting some units have window/wall AC). No public remarks explicitly state 'window AC' or 'window unit'; several listings instead mention 'split AC' or 'split AC unit downstairs.' Evidence is mixed (MLS checkbox present in multiple listings but remarks lack explicit confirmation), so included as a building-level feature with moderate confidence.
12 of 20 current MLS listings list concrete (CONCRE) as a construction material, suggesting the building is likely concrete-constructed. However, none of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', and there is no owner/manager verification, so evidence is moderate and appears driven mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than agent remarks.
14 of 20 current MLS listings indicate double-wall construction (DOUWAL), which provides reasonably strong MLS-based support that the building has double-wall construction. Public remarks contain no explicit references to 'double wall' and multiple agent remarks focus on amenities/renovations, so the conclusion is primarily based on MLS checkbox data rather than corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 20 current MLS listings list WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'wood frame' or similar language. The support comes from multiple agent-entered MLS checkboxes (suggesting some units/buildings are marked as wood-frame) but lack of explicit remarks raises the possibility of copy/paste; included with moderate confidence.
5 of 20 current MLS listings list 'ABOGRO' (above ground) in construction materials while public remarks across the same listings do not explicitly state 'above ground' construction. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste); no remarks describe a recent change or detailed above-ground construction, so inclusion is based on MLS data with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR permitted', '30-day minimum', 'TVU', and similar terms; nothing was found, so STR is not indicated in the remarks.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or references to hotel management; none were found. Because STR is not indicated in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is not supported.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'; no evidence was found and STR is not indicated, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', and specific years; none were found, so lease expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks explicitly reference VA assumable financing and state the building is VA approved in multiple listings, supporting that VA financing is accepted.
I searched the remarks for HOA/building insurance language such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', or 'fully covered insurance' and found none. With no explicit statement in the public remarks and no current value provided, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. With no current value provided and no explicit mention in the public remarks, I report false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it was not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings: at least 10 public-remark entries explicitly mention ocean/coastline/ocean views (e.g., 'stunning ocean views', 'ocean and coastline views', 'distant ocean views'). Evidence is consistent across different agents/ads and matches historical High confidence, so the building offers ocean-view units.
No public remarks mention mountain/Koolau/mauka views while many emphasize ocean/coastline. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions showing MOUNTA and no corroborating agent remarks, there is strong evidence to treat mountain views as not a building feature.
Multiple listings explicitly reference Diamond Head (examples: 'Diamond Head view', 'view of Diamond Head', 'overlooking the beautiful view of Diamond Head', 'iconic Diamond Head'), appearing in several separate ads. Given historical High confidence plus multiple current mentions, the building offers units with Diamond Head views.
There are a few listings referencing a 'city view' (one specifically: 'breathtaking city view of Diamond Head') and CITY appears in CURRENT MLS (4/20). While less common than ocean/Diamond Head mentions, evidence suggests some units afford a city-type view.
Multiple listings explicitly advertise 'coastline' and 'coastline and ocean' views (e.g., 'panoramic views of the coastline, ocean, and iconic Diamond Head'), CURRENT MLS has COASTL in 5/20 descriptions, and prior data indicated high confidence—together this strongly supports coastline views being offered by the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks contain no mentions of 'sunrise' or eastern exposure, and while a small number of MLS view_descriptions include SUNRIS (3/20), agent remarks do not corroborate. Thus there is strong evidence to treat sunrise views as not established for the building.
No public remarks in these listings explicitly state 'sunset view' or 'western exposure'. While MLS metadata previously showed some SUNSET entries (3/20), the remarks here lack supporting language, suggesting agents may have copied checkbox data; therefore sunset views are not substantiated in the current remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple listings note ocean and Diamond Head views and at least one explicitly states you can 'Watch 4rth of July Fireworks from the privacy of your bedroom,' which confirms fireworks are visible from the building/units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.