Makaha Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makaha Village
Building Overview
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy statements such as '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or similar. The listing describes a single-family short sale in a 12-home village but does not state owner-occupancy percentages; without explicit numeric evidence, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit mentions like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', or numeric elevator counts. The listing describes a single-family home in a 12-home village and contains no elevator information; without explicit evidence, I cannot assign a numeric value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 listings mention common area electricity. No remarks contain phrases like 'common area electricity', 'common electric', or 'building power included'. With no historical confidence and no current textual evidence, there is insufficient support to mark this feature as included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0) mention patio, deck, lanai, covered patio, or other outdoor-space language. With no prior confidence data and no remarks to support the feature, there is insufficient evidence to include patio/deck as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0) mention private yard, fenced yard, private outdoor space, or yard access. With no prior confidence data and no remarks to support the feature, there is insufficient evidence to include private yard as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no public remarks mentioning storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage in the supplied listing text (0 listings mention it). Because this is a new feature with no historical data and no current remarks confirming it, we cannot verify that the building offers storage units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no public remarks mentioning covered parking (no phrases like 'garage', 'carport', 'covered stall', or 'sheltered parking') and no prior confidence data for this feature. Because remarks are empty and no agents mention covered parking, there is no evidence that the building offers covered parking; however, evidence is insufficient to strongly assert absence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0) mention double wall construction or phrases like 'double wall'/'double-wall'. There is no prior confidence data and the current public remarks are empty, suggesting agents did not describe or add this feature; evidence is insufficient to include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0) mention 'concrete slab', 'solid concrete foundation', or similar language. With no prior data and no current remarks referencing a slab foundation, there is insufficient evidence to mark this building as constructed on a concrete slab.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', or 'comprehensive building insurance'. There is no insurance-related language in the listing, so I mark fully insured as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and related terms. The remarks make no reference to any fire/life safety evaluation; absent any explicit statement, I mark this as false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No listings (0) mention mountain/mauka/Koolau views; public remarks are empty. Because there is no supporting language like 'mountain view', 'mauka view', or 'Koolau view', and no prior confirmation, the feature is omitted pending further evidence (owner verification, explicit remarks, or MLS checkbox data).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 listings mention a resident or on-site manager; no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager' appear in the public remarks. With no prior confidence data and no supporting agent remarks, there is insufficient evidence that the building has a resident manager, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.