Makaha Oceanview Estates
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makaha Oceanview Estates
Building Overview
Makaha Oceanview Estates in Waianae Coast — 1974 building offering ocean and mountain views.
About Makaha Oceanview Estates
Makaha Oceanview Estates is a residential building located on the Waianae Coast, built in 1974. According to available records, the structure is constructed of concrete and wood frame.
Key features include ocean, mountain, and sunset views. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the MLS-derived data. Parking is available with assigned stalls and additional guest parking.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details including management, maintenance fees, specific unit rules, and parking assignments with the listing agent or condo association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive phrases, but none were included in the remarks. Without a stated percentage or qualifying description, the owner-occupancy level is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to elevators, but none were mentioned. Because there is no current numeric value provided and no remark-based evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to include common-area electricity in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 7 of 11 listings, which is a strong multi-listing signal and consistent with the community-style amenities described in the remarks. There are no remarks suggesting owners pay separately for building power.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as an included maintenance-fee item. The MLS data has no HOTWAT entries (0 of 11) and multiple listings instead note individual water heaters or solar water heating, including phrases like "newer water heater" and "solar hot water." That pattern strongly points to separately supplied hot water rather than a building-paid utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fees. Current MLS data shows SEWER in 6 of 11 listings, and none of the remarks indicate owners pay sewer separately. The evidence is consistent enough to treat this as a building-level included expense.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fees. Current MLS data shows WATER in 6 of 11 listings, and the public remarks do not suggest any separate water billing. The repeated inclusion across listings supports this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the provided listings explicitly says the community includes a "walking and jogging path." The MLS data also shows the amenity checked in 2/11 listings, which is consistent with a shared building/community feature. Evidence is limited but direct and aligns with the historical amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that some units in this building have in-unit laundry: at least 4 public remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry ('plumbed for in-unit laundry', 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'dual washer/dryer'), and current MLS inclusion data shows 7 of 9 listings list WASHER/DRYER. Historical confidence was high and current remarks consistently confirm the feature across multiple units and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'two assigned parking stalls,' '2-car garage,' 'enclosed 2-car garage,' and 'garage,' making this a very strong building-level feature rather than a one-off unit amenity.
Assigned parking is well supported by both the MLS checkboxes and the public remarks. At least three listings explicitly say 'two assigned parking stalls' or similar wording, which strongly confirms reserved/assigned parking for the building.
Multiple unit remarks explicitly reference covered parking: at least five listings mention a garage or enclosed 2-car garage (quotes include "2-car finished garage", "spacious 2-car garage", and "424 sf enclosed 2-car garage"). CURRENT MLS parking_features also show covered/garage for 4 of 9 listings. Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, indicating the building offers covered parking (garages/carports/covered stalls) for some units.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language and only found assigned stalls. Assigned parking indicates allocated use, not ownership, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any monthly parking cost or rental language and found none. The listings mention assigned and guest parking, but no separate parking fee is disclosed.
Guest parking is clearly advertised in the remarks and reinforced by the MLS data. Several listings mention guest parking nearby or visitor stalls, suggesting this is a shared building amenity and not just isolated to one unit.
Evidence for secured-entry parking is weaker than the other parking features, but there is some support. Three listings have SECENT checked in MLS, and the remarks repeatedly describe the building as a 'gated community' or 'gated private community,' implying controlled access even though the remarks do not explicitly say 'secured parking' or 'gated parking'.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or parking queue system and found nothing. The remarks only discuss assigned parking stalls and nearby guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS record. Current data shows 10 of 11 listings with DOUWAL, and historical entries were consistently aligned. The remarks do not address construction, suggesting the checkbox data is the main evidence source here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be a stable building feature. Current MLS data shows 10 of 11 listings with WOOFRA, and historical entries were also consistently marked that way. Public remarks do not discuss construction type, which looks like copy-paste omission rather than a contradiction.
Above-ground construction has weak and inconsistent support. Only 3 of 11 current listings mark ABOGRO, and none of the remarks mention above-ground materials or construction. This looks more like sporadic MLS checkbox usage than a clearly documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental permission terms such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental language, and found none. With no supporting evidence in the public remarks, short-term rentals are treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel-managed rental program references and found none. Because the remarks do not support STR allowance, hotel pool participation is also false.
I searched for any indication that owners must participate in a rental pool and found nothing. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, and renewal language, but found nothing. The remarks point to fee simple ownership, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. There is no evidence in the listings that VA financing is supported.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance coverage language such as fully insured or walls-in coverage, but there were no references. The listing text does not provide evidence that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance wording, but found nothing. In the absence of any explicit mention, this is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across several listings and agents, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 5 remarks reference ocean views directly with phrases like "stunning ocean," "peek-a-boo ocean view," and "gorgeous Pacific ocean," making this a clear building-level feature for buyers searching ocean-view units.
Mountain views are consistently described across multiple listings and appear to be a real, recurring feature of the building or development. Roughly 5 remarks mention them directly, often paired with ocean views, which suggests this is not copy-paste noise but a genuine building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-style views are supported by several remarks, but the evidence is less direct than for ocean or mountain views. About 3 listings reference landscaping or garden-like surroundings, so this appears to be an available view aspect, though likely not as prominently marketed as the other views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. At least 2-3 listings explicitly mention sunsets or sunset views, and the feature appears consistent enough to treat as a real building-level selling point.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.