Maile Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Maile Tower
Building Overview
Maile Tower in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1968): concrete construction with a pool and on-site resident manager.
About Maile Tower
Maile Tower is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1968 and constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The property offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views. Pets are allowed; short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided records.
Parking is available and listed as covered and assigned. The MLS data does not identify a management company, and specific association fees or additional building policies were not provided. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The highest MLS floor field is 12, and the state registration also reports 12 floors. The county's max_floors of 13 is set aside because county floor counts can include nonresidential levels and no penthouse listing establishes a 13th residential floor.
The county assessor reports 24 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 24 units for this single-building registration. The stored value is supported.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 73. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, none mention common area electricity or building power being included in fees. The MLS checkbox data is mixed at 3/6, which is not enough to overcome the lack of confirming remarks and suggests possible copy-paste inconsistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remark explicitly says hot water is included, while several remarks only mention water and sewer. The presence of WTRHTR in 2/6 listings points away from building-supplied hot water, making hot-water inclusion unlikely for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is directly confirmed in the remarks: one listing says fees cover 'water, sewer, and trash.' The MLS data is also highly consistent at 5/6, so this feature appears well established for the building.
Water inclusion is directly stated in the remarks and is supported by every MLS listing provided (6/6). The evidence is very strong and consistent, with no sign of agent disagreement or copy-paste conflict.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and current remarks. In the provided listings, 1 listing explicitly mentions "storage unit," while historical MLS data shows storage/additional storage in 5 of 6 records overall. The repeated MLS entries suggest this is a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
The remarks mention an assigned parking stall, storage unit, and general storage space, but do not mention surfboard, board, or surf storage. General storage does not establish dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is consistently supported by the listing remarks and MLS amenities. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including one describing 'direct access from your unit to trash chute' and another noting 'trash chute for your convenience.' The feature appears to be a shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is confirmed across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "pool on property" and the MLS amenities show POOL/CNDAP/COMAP/HEAPOO in 6/6 listings, suggesting this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks confirm that the property has a pool. No listing describes the pool as saltwater or otherwise indicates a salt system.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported. 3 of the provided public remarks explicitly say "washer/dryer in-unit" or "washer/dryer in unit," and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in all 6 listings. The repeated wording across multiple listings looks like consistent listing data rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention coin-operated, card-operated, fee-based, or other paid community laundry. The only laundry reference is to an in-unit washer/dryer.
The remarks mention an in-unit washer/dryer but do not mention laundry facilities on each floor or floor-by-floor community laundry. No evidence supports community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention "assigned parking stall" and "covered parking," while the current MLS set shows parking features in all 6/6 listings. This looks consistent across agents rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is clearly supported across the listing remarks and MLS data. At least three remarks explicitly state "assigned parking" or "one assigned parking stall," matching the current MLS pattern of 5/6 listings with ASSIGN. Confidence is very high that the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
Listings confirm assigned or covered parking but do not identify the stall as deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed. Therefore, deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for separate parking costs and monthly parking charges. The remarks do not provide enough information to determine whether a parking fee applies.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned parking but contain no indication of a parking waitlist or constrained parking availability. No waitlist evidence was found.
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention key-card access, fob access, card readers, electronic access, or keycard entry. There is no public-remark evidence of a card-based security system.
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention security patrols, roving security, patrol service, or a patrolled building. No evidence supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 6 of 6 listings identify the building’s construction materials as CONCRE. None of the public remarks mention a different construction type or suggest a change, so this appears to be a stable building-level attribute rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental and vacation rental authorization language, including STR, NUC, and TVU. No allowance is stated, so STR is not supported by the public remarks.
The remarks contain no reference to a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because STR is not supported, hotel pool participation must also be false.
I searched for language requiring units to participate in a hotel or rental pool. No such requirement appears, and the lack of supported STR eligibility means mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language, including lease expiry, ground lease, lease ends, and renewal dates. No specific lease expiration year was found.
The building is explicitly identified as VA approved in multiple listings. The VA assumable loan reference further supports current VA financing eligibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are well supported across the building: 4 of 6 current MLS listings include OCEAN, and several remarks explicitly say 'partial ocean views' or 'panoramic views of the city and ocean.' This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy/paste issue.
Mountain exposure is supported by both MLS data and remarks, with 3 of 6 listings including MOUNTA. Multiple descriptions refer to mountain views or breezes, which suggests this is a real building-level view option available from some units.
Diamond Head views appear in 3 of 6 MLS listings, and at least one public remark explicitly names Diamond Head. That combination is strong enough to treat this as a genuine view option in the building, though not every unit has it.
City views are overwhelmingly supported: all 6 of 6 current MLS listings include CITY, and the remarks repeatedly mention 'city skyline' and 'city and ocean views.' This looks like a consistent building feature, not a copy/paste anomaly.
Coastline views are suggested by the MLS data in 2 of 6 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly use coastline/shoreline/coastal language. This is enough to flag as a possible view option, but the evidence is weaker and may reflect agent-entered MLS view labels rather than repeated description in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing explicitly states that Friday night fireworks can be viewed from the unit's lanai. This directly satisfies the requirement for a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.