Maile Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Maile Tower
Building Overview
Maile Tower in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1968): concrete construction with a pool and on-site resident manager.
About Maile Tower
Maile Tower is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1968 and constructed of concrete. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The property offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views. Pets are allowed; short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided records.
Parking is available and listed as covered and assigned. The MLS data does not identify a management company, and specific association fees or additional building policies were not provided. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, none mention common area electricity or building power being included in fees. The MLS checkbox data is mixed at 3/6, which is not enough to overcome the lack of confirming remarks and suggests possible copy-paste inconsistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remark explicitly says hot water is included, while several remarks only mention water and sewer. The presence of WTRHTR in 2/6 listings points away from building-supplied hot water, making hot-water inclusion unlikely for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is directly confirmed in the remarks: one listing says fees cover 'water, sewer, and trash.' The MLS data is also highly consistent at 5/6, so this feature appears well established for the building.
Water inclusion is directly stated in the remarks and is supported by every MLS listing provided (6/6). The evidence is very strong and consistent, with no sign of agent disagreement or copy-paste conflict.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and current remarks. In the provided listings, 1 listing explicitly mentions "storage unit," while historical MLS data shows storage/additional storage in 5 of 6 records overall. The repeated MLS entries suggest this is a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
I searched for 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' or similar storage amenities. The remarks mention general storage and a storage unit, but nothing specifically related to surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is consistently supported by the listing remarks and MLS amenities. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including one describing 'direct access from your unit to trash chute' and another noting 'trash chute for your convenience.' The feature appears to be a shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is confirmed across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "pool on property" and the MLS amenities show POOL/CNDAP/COMAP/HEAPOO in 6/6 listings, suggesting this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' or 'salt pool.' The remarks only say 'pool on property' and provide no indication that the pool is salt water.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported. 3 of the provided public remarks explicitly say "washer/dryer in-unit" or "washer/dryer in unit," and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in all 6 listings. The repeated wording across multiple listings looks like consistent listing data rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry,' 'coin-op,' 'quarters,' 'card operated,' or a laundry fee. None of the listings mention any community laundry system at all, only in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid shared laundry.
I searched for language like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or similar floor-by-floor community laundry references. The remarks only mention 'washer/dryer in-unit,' which does not indicate shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention "assigned parking stall" and "covered parking," while the current MLS set shows parking features in all 6/6 listings. This looks consistent across agents rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is clearly supported across the listing remarks and MLS data. At least three remarks explicitly state "assigned parking" or "one assigned parking stall," matching the current MLS pattern of 5/6 listings with ASSIGN. Confidence is very high that the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only confirm assigned/covered parking, so deeded parking is not established from the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, or any separate parking rental cost. The remarks do not mention any parking fee, so this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or parking availability constraints. Nothing in the remarks indicates a waitlist system, so it is not supported here.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card access,' 'fob access,' 'card reader,' or 'keycard entry.' The public remarks do not mention any card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for references to 'security patrol,' 'patrolled building,' or 'roving security.' None of the listings mention patrol service, so this feature is not evidenced in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 6 of 6 listings identify the building’s construction materials as CONCRE. None of the public remarks mention a different construction type or suggest a change, so this appears to be a stable building-level attribute rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU. The listings do not mention any such allowance, so STR is not evidenced from the remarks.
I looked for hotel pool terms like hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation. No public remark references a hotel pool, and since STR is not established, this remains false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool or a requirement to rent through the building. The remarks contain no such requirement, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, lease ends, or renewed through a specific year. No such information appears in the public remarks, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined.
The remarks directly state that the building is VA approved, and this is repeated more than once. The VA assumable loan mention further supports that VA financing is available for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are well supported across the building: 4 of 6 current MLS listings include OCEAN, and several remarks explicitly say 'partial ocean views' or 'panoramic views of the city and ocean.' This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy/paste issue.
Mountain exposure is supported by both MLS data and remarks, with 3 of 6 listings including MOUNTA. Multiple descriptions refer to mountain views or breezes, which suggests this is a real building-level view option available from some units.
Diamond Head views appear in 3 of 6 MLS listings, and at least one public remark explicitly names Diamond Head. That combination is strong enough to treat this as a genuine view option in the building, though not every unit has it.
City views are overwhelmingly supported: all 6 of 6 current MLS listings include CITY, and the remarks repeatedly mention 'city skyline' and 'city and ocean views.' This looks like a consistent building feature, not a copy/paste anomaly.
Coastline views are suggested by the MLS data in 2 of 6 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly use coastline/shoreline/coastal language. This is enough to flag as a possible view option, but the evidence is weaker and may reflect agent-entered MLS view labels rather than repeated description in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is explicitly supported in the remarks. The listing directly says residents can see Friday night fireworks from the lanai, which satisfies the requirement that the view be from the building/units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.