Magellan
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Magellan
Building Overview
Magellan in Makiki-Tantalus (1969) — pool, assigned parking; pets allowed. Short-term rentals not permitted.
About Magellan
Magellan is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, originally built in 1969. Specifics such as unit count, typical unit size, and construction type are not listed in the available MLS-derived data.
Key features noted in the MLS record include a swimming pool on the property and a pet-friendly policy. Short-term rentals are not allowed according to the provided information.
Parking is available and assigned to residents per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown in the records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and current policies with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some evidence the HOA fee includes common-area electricity: 2 of 4 current listings show OTCOEX. The remarks do not mention this explicitly, so this looks like mixed MLS checkbox data rather than strong text confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included. No current listing checks HOTWAT, while 2 of 4 list WTRHTR, which typically means a unit water heater is present rather than building-supplied hot water. The remarks also do not describe hot water as an included HOA service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all current listings: 4 of 4 check SEWER. There are no contrary remarks, so this is strong building-level evidence.
Water is consistently included across all current listings: 4 of 4 check WATER. The remarks do not conflict with this, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers storage units/lockers. Three of the four listings explicitly mention a 'large assigned storage space,' a 'separate storage unit downstairs,' or an 'extra storage unit downstairs,' which aligns with the MLS storage checkboxes appearing in most listings. This looks consistently supported across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building amenity based on current MLS data: 4 out of 4 listings have TRACHU marked. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, so this is stronger than a single-agent checkbox but still somewhat susceptible to copy/paste MLS data entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 public remarks mention a pool or any swimming amenity; they focus on unit features like views, storage, and in-unit laundry. Because the MLS amenity checkbox is checked in every listing but the text is silent, this appears to be unchecked copy/paste data rather than confirmed building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported: all 4 listings mention it directly, using phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'In-unit washer/dryer,' and 'WASHER & DRYER.' This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a copy-paste checkbox with no remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported by the listings: 3 of 4 remarks explicitly say the unit has covered parking, including phrases like '1 covered parking stall' and '1 assigned covered parking.' One listing mentions open parking, which appears to be a unit-specific inconsistency rather than a building-wide absence, so the building should be treated as offering covered parking.
I searched for deeded, owned, included in deed, or owned stall language. The listings only describe assigned/covered/open parking, which indicates parking is present but does not establish that it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking cost details such as monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge. No such information appears in the remarks, so no fee can be extracted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join waitlist language. The remarks do not mention any waitlist process, so there is no evidence of one in the listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears in 2 of 4 current MLS records for this building, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe the structure as concrete or reinforced concrete. Because there is no prior confidence data and no contradictory evidence, this is a moderate-confidence inclusion based on the MLS material field.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for indicators of STR permission such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, or NUC. The remarks are silent on rental legality, so STR is not supported by the public remarks.
I searched for hotel pool references like hotel rental pool, Hilton pool, or similar program language and found none. Because STR is not indicated, this feature must also be false.
I looked for mandatory pool language such as required to participate, cannot opt out, or must be in rental program. There is no evidence of any hotel pool arrangement, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or any 4-digit expiry year. The remarks contain no land tenure or lease expiration information, so the expiry year cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted, but found nothing. With no explicit evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Evidence supports ocean views in the building: 2 of 4 current listings include OCEAN in the view description, and remarks directly say 'partial ocean views' and 'Nice Ocean view.' This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly confirmed across the building: all 4 current listings include CITY in the MLS view descriptions. Public remarks also repeatedly reinforce this with phrases like 'sweeping city views,' 'nighttime city views of downtown,' and 'Honolulu view,' indicating broad, consistent usage rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is explicitly confirmed in the current remarks, with one listing stating there is an 'on-site building manager.' The repeated listing text suggests this is a standard building feature rather than a one-off agent claim, and it appears consistently across the remarks provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.