Lynwyd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lynwyd
Building Overview
Lynwyd in Liliha-Alewa, built in 1995; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS data.
About Lynwyd
Lynwyd is a residential building located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood, built in 1995. According to available MLS records, specific details on building size and construction type are not provided in the data set.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS data does not list on-site amenities, unit finishes, or common facilities.
MLS-derived records do not specify management company, parking availability, maintenance fees, or other assessments. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both available listings identify OTCOEX as included in the association fees, supporting inclusion of common-area expenses. However, neither listing explicitly says that common-area electricity or building power is included, so this appears to be MLS checkbox/code evidence rather than independently confirmed remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is marked as included in the association fees on both current listings. No remarks quote or explain the sewer inclusion, so the evidence is consistent across listings but may reflect copied MLS data.
Water is marked as included in the association fees on both current listings. Neither public remark explicitly confirms water inclusion, so confidence is moderate-to-good based on consistent MLS coding but lacks narrative verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings mention in-unit laundry, using the phrases "washer/dryer" and "washer & dryer in unit." The feature is consistently confirmed across multiple listings and is supported by both MLS inclusions and explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is supported across both listings in the current MLS data. One remark explicitly says "assigned parking stall," while the other says the unit includes one parking stall, making this strong evidence rather than an isolated checkbox.
No listings mention covered parking or provide phrases such as "garage," "carport," or "covered stall." Although 1 of 2 MLS records contains a covered-parking code, the lack of supporting remarks makes this appear uncertain and possibly an unverified checkbox.
Parking is mentioned, but the language describes an assigned/included stall rather than deeded ownership. No explicit deeded-parking evidence was found.
No analysis available
The remarks mention an included parking stall but do not specify whether any parking fee applies. The monthly parking fee is therefore unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention an assigned parking stall but provide no information about a parking waitlist. No waitlist evidence was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears in 2 of 2 current listings, making the MLS evidence consistent across the building. No remarks explicitly confirm or contradict it, so confidence is strong but below the level of direct textual confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry and stucco construction appears in 2 of 2 current listings, providing consistent building-level MLS evidence. Neither listing explicitly quotes “masonry” or “stucco” in the remarks, so confidence is strong but not definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame is reported in 1 of 2 current listings, with no supporting phrase such as “wood frame construction” in the remarks. Because the evidence is only partial and lacks agent narrative confirmation, this feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no indication that short-term rentals are allowed or prohibited. With no current value or explicit STR evidence, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
The remarks provide no evidence of hotel-pool participation. Because short-term-rental permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks do not describe any hotel rental program or mandatory participation requirement. Since short-term-rental permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not provide a lease-expiry year or any specific land-lease information. Therefore, the expiry year is unknown.
The remarks were searched for VA-related financing language, but none was found. With no current value or explicit evidence, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1 of 2 listings mentions ocean views, using the phrase 'city/ocean views.' The evidence is an explicit listing remark, so the building should be treated as offering ocean-view units.
0 of 2 public remarks mention mountain views or related terms. One listing reports NONE for views, and the available remarks provide no mountain-view confirmation.
No analysis available
1 of 2 listings explicitly mentions 'city/ocean views.' Because city views are directly described in a public remark, the building should be considered to offer city-view units.
0 of 2 listings specifically mention coastline, shoreline, or coastal views. One listing does mention 'ocean views,' but that does not explicitly establish a coastline-view feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 2 public remarks mention sunrise views or related exposure terms. The available listing evidence does not confirm that the building offers sunrise views.
0 of 2 public remarks mention sunset views or related terms. The current evidence does not establish that the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings mark RESMAN, indicating that the building is represented as having a resident manager. However, 0 of 2 remarks explicitly mention a manager, so the evidence may reflect copied MLS data rather than verified building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.