Lusitana Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lusitana Gardens
Building Overview
Lusitana Gardens in Downtown-Chinatown, built 1975, concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Lusitana Gardens
Based on MLS data, Lusitana Gardens is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1975. The building is of concrete construction. Specific unit counts, floor plans, and square footage were not provided in the available records.
According to available records, the building has policies that do not allow pets and do not permit short-term rentals. The listing data does not include details on common-area amenities, on-site services, or building staff. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional information such as parking availability, maintenance fees, utility arrangements, and other building rules were not provided in the MLS extract. Buyers and agents should verify these items and obtain current documentation directly from the seller or property management. This summary is based solely on the MLS data available and should be independently confirmed.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any owner-occupancy statistic or qualitative description like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied,' but none was provided. The remarks focus on unit features, location, and financing/maintenance details rather than resident composition.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, including explicit counts like '4 elevators' or general phrases such as 'multiple elevators,' but found none. The remarks describe the building as secured/gated and pet friendly, but do not say anything about vertical circulation or elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong and consistent: 4 of 5 MLS listings include ELECTR, and several remarks state the fee includes electricity. This looks like a building-level inclusion rather than a copied one-off checkbox.
No analysis available
Hot water is supported by both MLS data and remarks: 3 of 5 listings have HOTWAT, and multiple remarks state the maintenance fee includes hot water. One listing notes WTRHTR in inclusions, but the explicit fee language across listings is stronger evidence for inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is well supported by the MLS and remarks. Four of five listings include SEWER, and public remarks explicitly say the fee includes water/sewer, indicating this is a real building-level benefit.
Water is the strongest-supported feature here: all 5 MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. Several remarks also explicitly say the maintenance fee includes water, so this is highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is indicated in the current MLS amenities for 4 of 5 listings, but the public remarks are silent on any car wash or vehicle wash station. The evidence looks like a repeated MLS checkbox rather than a feature independently described by agents, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention outdoor lanai space, including phrases like "spacious lanai," "covered lanai," and "private lanai." This is strong, repeated evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. The remarks come from several listings and appear consistent rather than copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by the public remarks: one listing explicitly says "Washer/dryer". Current MLS data also shows washer/dryer in inclusions for all 5/5 listings, so this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error. Buyers searching for units with laundry would reasonably want to include this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the current remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly say the unit comes with an 'assigned' stall, and one adds that it is 'covered' and in a 'secure, gated garage.' This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is clearly present in the building, with multiple listings saying '1 covered parking stall' or 'covered, assigned parking stall.' One remark specifically mentions a 'secure, gated garage,' reinforcing that the building offers covered parking. The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents.
The listings confirm assigned parking and coverage details, but there is no explicit indication that the stall is deeded/owned with the unit. Because deeded parking is not stated, this is treated as not confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking charge language such as a monthly fee, rental rate, or separate parking payment. None was mentioned in the public remarks, so the fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or parking scarcity process, but found none. With no evidence in the remarks, this is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the listings. One remark explicitly mentions an 'AC window unit,' and the current MLS inclusions show ACWIUN on 5 of 5 listings, which suggests this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Concrete construction appears to be a consistent building feature: 5 of 5 current listings carry the CONCRE code. None of the public remarks mention a different construction type, so the MLS data is the strongest evidence available here.
No analysis available
Hollow tile appears in only 2 of 5 current MLS records, and none of the remarks explicitly describe the building as hollow tile or mention a construction change. Because the evidence is limited and could reflect inconsistent MLS checkbox usage, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR-specific terms such as legal short-term rental, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-stay language, but none appeared. Since there is no public evidence that STR is allowed, this is set to false by default.
I searched for hotel pool references such as a rental program, hotel management, or branded pool participation, and found none. Because there is no evidence of STR allowance, hotel pool participation is also false.
I looked for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, but there were no such remarks. With no evidence of an STR framework at all, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold/ground lease language such as an expiry year, renewal, or lease-end date, but nothing was mentioned in the remarks. Without a specific year, this remains unknown.
Public remarks directly confirm that VA financing is available for the building. Multiple listings repeat the VA-approved status, so this is high-confidence.
I searched for wording such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' and did not find it. The only insurance-related note is that the maintenance fee includes hurricane insurance, which does not confirm full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for any statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar inspection language, but there were no such references. The remarks mention maintenance items and insurance coverage, but nothing about fire/life safety compliance.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear in some MLS records (2 of 5 listings), but none of the remarks explicitly mention mountain, Koolau, or mauka views. Because buyers search by building-level view availability, this is likely present in at least some units, but confidence is only moderate due to limited supporting remarks and one NONE entry.
No analysis available
City views are supported by both MLS data and multiple remarks. One listing explicitly says the lanai looks 'out toward the city,' and several others emphasize proximity to Downtown Honolulu, indicating an urban/city-facing setting across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.